<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Michael Scheuer Represent the CIA? [Updated]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25026/does-michael-scheuer-represent-the-cia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25026/does-michael-scheuer-represent-the-cia/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 07:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Scheuer&#8217;s Nuclear Nut Meltdown : NO QUARTER</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25026/does-michael-scheuer-represent-the-cia/#comment-1223728</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Scheuer&#8217;s Nuclear Nut Meltdown : NO QUARTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25026#comment-1223728</guid>
		<description>[...] My disdain for this man is already on the record (see here). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My disdain for this man is already on the record (see here). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25026/does-michael-scheuer-represent-the-cia/#comment-1212660</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 02:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25026#comment-1212660</guid>
		<description>TeakwoodKite:

In his book, Marching Toward Hell, Scheuer states that Bill Clinton had more than half a dozen chances to capture or kill Bin Laden based on solid intelligence.  However, he passed them up, and then after 9/11 lied on national television (again, remember his &quot;sexual relations&quot; lie?) saying that he took every chance to take him out.  If you ask me, I believe Scheuer&#039;s account and don&#039;t believe Clinton&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TeakwoodKite:</p>
<p>In his book, Marching Toward Hell, Scheuer states that Bill Clinton had more than half a dozen chances to capture or kill Bin Laden based on solid intelligence.  However, he passed them up, and then after 9/11 lied on national television (again, remember his &#8220;sexual relations&#8221; lie?) saying that he took every chance to take him out.  If you ask me, I believe Scheuer&#8217;s account and don&#8217;t believe Clinton&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferd Berfle</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25026/does-michael-scheuer-represent-the-cia/#comment-1209439</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferd Berfle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 21:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25026#comment-1209439</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;As far as I am concerned the only difference between the Obama and the Bush administration is one has a smile while the other one smirked.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That One has a better tan, too. In either instance, the differences are merely superficial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>As far as I am concerned the only difference between the Obama and the Bush administration is one has a smile while the other one smirked.</p></blockquote>
<p>That One has a better tan, too. In either instance, the differences are merely superficial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeakwoodKite</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25026/does-michael-scheuer-represent-the-cia/#comment-1209203</link>
		<dc:creator>TeakwoodKite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25026#comment-1209203</guid>
		<description>LJ, perhaps Michael Scheuer can shed light on why he was the &quot;blacked out&quot; person when he went &quot;public&quot;.

I saw him on TV with the voice alteration and the silouette. Who is he calling &quot;black&quot;?

Michael Scheuer you are not the real slim shady, you did not get OBL. How do you blame for that? It was your gig to find him...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LJ, perhaps Michael Scheuer can shed light on why he was the &#8220;blacked out&#8221; person when he went &#8220;public&#8221;.</p>
<p>I saw him on TV with the voice alteration and the silouette. Who is he calling &#8220;black&#8221;?</p>
<p>Michael Scheuer you are not the real slim shady, you did not get OBL. How do you blame for that? It was your gig to find him&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: politicalidentitycrisis</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25026/does-michael-scheuer-represent-the-cia/#comment-1209173</link>
		<dc:creator>politicalidentitycrisis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 14:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25026#comment-1209173</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not new here, but it seems when people want to attack anyone who tells a truth about Obama, the race card gets thrown out there again.  It is sickening.  Truly.  And even the biggest criers of racism do it and don&#039;t realize that that in itself is racist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not new here, but it seems when people want to attack anyone who tells a truth about Obama, the race card gets thrown out there again.  It is sickening.  Truly.  And even the biggest criers of racism do it and don&#8217;t realize that that in itself is racist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Nunya</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25026/does-michael-scheuer-represent-the-cia/#comment-1209149</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Nunya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25026#comment-1209149</guid>
		<description>LARRY, BE HONEST!

Ok,good post.  BUT lets be honest about what Scheuer said in the quote you used to conclude your point.

What he said is that our policies in the middle east are crazy, but if we insist on continuing down this path, we should do everything possible to win.

That opinion may not be correct, but lets at least be honest and argue about what he ACTUALLY SAID.

He said: 

&quot;Again, this sort of bloody-minded is &lt;strong&gt;neither admirable nor desirable,&lt;/strong&gt; but it will remain America’s only option so long &lt;strong&gt;as she stands by her failed policies toward the Muslim world.&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;

And you immediately say &quot;according to what he has written, &lt;strong&gt;sees no problem with the slaughter of women and children&lt;/strong&gt; simply because they are muslims.&quot;

Huh?  

Thats exactly the opposite of what the guy just said!

It is arguable whether or not you need to know Arabic to see the flaws in pussyfooting around Afhanistan with no endgame in sight.  But shouldn&#039;t you first master basic English comprehension before turning your guns on those who aren&#039;t bilingual?

Although Scheuer&#039;s comments indeed seem strange and racially tinged, he does seem to be making a point (out of frustration).  The point is one that all honest observers of this election can see clearly.  Obama is naive and inexperienced and the only thing that has shielded him from serious criticism (so far)is his race.  Scheuer seems to think that some are following a naive Wilsonian just because he is new and exciting because of....his pigment.  You did see CNN on inauguration day right?  It was ALL ABOUT RACE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LARRY, BE HONEST!</p>
<p>Ok,good post.  BUT lets be honest about what Scheuer said in the quote you used to conclude your point.</p>
<p>What he said is that our policies in the middle east are crazy, but if we insist on continuing down this path, we should do everything possible to win.</p>
<p>That opinion may not be correct, but lets at least be honest and argue about what he ACTUALLY SAID.</p>
<p>He said: </p>
<p>&#8220;Again, this sort of bloody-minded is <strong>neither admirable nor desirable,</strong> but it will remain America’s only option so long <strong>as she stands by her failed policies toward the Muslim world.</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p>And you immediately say &#8220;according to what he has written, <strong>sees no problem with the slaughter of women and children</strong> simply because they are muslims.&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  </p>
<p>Thats exactly the opposite of what the guy just said!</p>
<p>It is arguable whether or not you need to know Arabic to see the flaws in pussyfooting around Afhanistan with no endgame in sight.  But shouldn&#8217;t you first master basic English comprehension before turning your guns on those who aren&#8217;t bilingual?</p>
<p>Although Scheuer&#8217;s comments indeed seem strange and racially tinged, he does seem to be making a point (out of frustration).  The point is one that all honest observers of this election can see clearly.  Obama is naive and inexperienced and the only thing that has shielded him from serious criticism (so far)is his race.  Scheuer seems to think that some are following a naive Wilsonian just because he is new and exciting because of&#8230;.his pigment.  You did see CNN on inauguration day right?  It was ALL ABOUT RACE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda C</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25026/does-michael-scheuer-represent-the-cia/#comment-1209136</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 12:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25026#comment-1209136</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s so great about the infrastructure in some of these countries that we need to attack it with Sherman like tactics?  Most of these countries don&#039;t have an infrastructure. Let&#039;s take out the infrastructure that doesn&#039;t exist in the ungoverned territories of Pakistan and Afghanistan.  Of course there is the minor issue that these places are &quot;ungoverned&quot; because they have no infrastructure in the first place. The lack of infrastructure actually helps organizations like the Taliban and Al Qeda where they can rule in the vacuum.  Only mechanized armies and organizations require infrastructure to maneuver, organic ones do not. 

Fascist Woodrow Wilson?  Do we have to go back that far in our history?  What about the fascist administration that just left?   As far as I am concerned the only difference between the Obama and the Bush administration is one has a smile while the other one smirked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s so great about the infrastructure in some of these countries that we need to attack it with Sherman like tactics?  Most of these countries don&#8217;t have an infrastructure. Let&#8217;s take out the infrastructure that doesn&#8217;t exist in the ungoverned territories of Pakistan and Afghanistan.  Of course there is the minor issue that these places are &#8220;ungoverned&#8221; because they have no infrastructure in the first place. The lack of infrastructure actually helps organizations like the Taliban and Al Qeda where they can rule in the vacuum.  Only mechanized armies and organizations require infrastructure to maneuver, organic ones do not. </p>
<p>Fascist Woodrow Wilson?  Do we have to go back that far in our history?  What about the fascist administration that just left?   As far as I am concerned the only difference between the Obama and the Bush administration is one has a smile while the other one smirked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Guglielmino</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25026/does-michael-scheuer-represent-the-cia/#comment-1209135</link>
		<dc:creator>James Guglielmino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 12:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25026#comment-1209135</guid>
		<description>Exactly the kind of mini-minded reaction that any sentient person would expect from this cretin. Well done, Mr. Schuer. You have proved the thesis presented. You are a disgrace to our nation and an inherently evil man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly the kind of mini-minded reaction that any sentient person would expect from this cretin. Well done, Mr. Schuer. You have proved the thesis presented. You are a disgrace to our nation and an inherently evil man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catherine</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25026/does-michael-scheuer-represent-the-cia/#comment-1209129</link>
		<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 10:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25026#comment-1209129</guid>
		<description>WTF are you talking about?!?! Are you new here or something? I&#039;ve never defended 0bama. However, I agree that continuing mentioning his color in a one paragraph response shows the same preoccupation with his race as his 0bots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF are you talking about?!?! Are you new here or something? I&#8217;ve never defended 0bama. However, I agree that continuing mentioning his color in a one paragraph response shows the same preoccupation with his race as his 0bots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25026/does-michael-scheuer-represent-the-cia/#comment-1209097</link>
		<dc:creator>mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 04:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25026#comment-1209097</guid>
		<description>Jethro Bodine

Loved your comment!!!!!Class, Wit....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jethro Bodine</p>
<p>Loved your comment!!!!!Class, Wit&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25026/does-michael-scheuer-represent-the-cia/#comment-1209095</link>
		<dc:creator>mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 04:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25026#comment-1209095</guid>
		<description>Sheuer

I knew I heard your soprano voice in the Cheney Harem....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheuer</p>
<p>I knew I heard your soprano voice in the Cheney Harem&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25026/does-michael-scheuer-represent-the-cia/#comment-1209091</link>
		<dc:creator>mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 04:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25026#comment-1209091</guid>
		<description>Larry, thanks for this post! And for saving me a few bucks. 

I had read about Mike Scheuer in a Canadian magazine and was going to buy his book &quot;Imperial Hubris--Losing the War on Terror&quot;(?) Not now!  I&#039;ve read more on this monkey and believe that Scheuer is just a pompous, self-important poseur who falsifies his background information and based on his expertise (not counterinsurgency!) he could not possibly write a book that would belong to a category other than &quot;Fiction&quot;--and I&#039;d rather read a good Sherlock Holmes story.  His bravado approach and macho views of &quot;demolishing&quot; the muslims--Love them or Kill them--does not appeal to any rational person who wants to understand intelligence work and how enemies are classified. Glad to have saved a few bucks and not needing to read his drivel. Thanks, Larry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry, thanks for this post! And for saving me a few bucks. </p>
<p>I had read about Mike Scheuer in a Canadian magazine and was going to buy his book &#8220;Imperial Hubris&#8211;Losing the War on Terror&#8221;(?) Not now!  I&#8217;ve read more on this monkey and believe that Scheuer is just a pompous, self-important poseur who falsifies his background information and based on his expertise (not counterinsurgency!) he could not possibly write a book that would belong to a category other than &#8220;Fiction&#8221;&#8211;and I&#8217;d rather read a good Sherlock Holmes story.  His bravado approach and macho views of &#8220;demolishing&#8221; the muslims&#8211;Love them or Kill them&#8211;does not appeal to any rational person who wants to understand intelligence work and how enemies are classified. Glad to have saved a few bucks and not needing to read his drivel. Thanks, Larry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Politicalidentitycrisis</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25026/does-michael-scheuer-represent-the-cia/#comment-1209083</link>
		<dc:creator>Politicalidentitycrisis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 04:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25026#comment-1209083</guid>
		<description>Hello, Obama is black and that&#039;s why we had to have him.  The only reason he is President and Hillary is not.  The only reason.  A very smart woman, Geraldine Ferraro once said, if he was a white guy with so little experience and qualifications he would have never gotten so far (or words to that effect).  I did at the time and still do agree with that statement.  To me, electing a person to a high office he is not prepared to serve in is the most racist thing I have seen in my entire life.  And any here at No Quarter who will defend this boob just because he is black are racist, too!

I don&#039;t care what skin color the boob has!  He is an utter, incompetent, arrogant fool!  An embarrassment to our entire country!  No one should make out that he is doing well and preface it with, he is black.  He is black, but it makes him no better than anyone else.  He would still be the worst President in the history of this country if he were this moronic and white, asian, female, or purple with blue polka dots. 

Quit trying to save him by playing the race card.  It is unattractive when he does it and it is unattractive when people here throw the race card for him!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Obama is black and that&#8217;s why we had to have him.  The only reason he is President and Hillary is not.  The only reason.  A very smart woman, Geraldine Ferraro once said, if he was a white guy with so little experience and qualifications he would have never gotten so far (or words to that effect).  I did at the time and still do agree with that statement.  To me, electing a person to a high office he is not prepared to serve in is the most racist thing I have seen in my entire life.  And any here at No Quarter who will defend this boob just because he is black are racist, too!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care what skin color the boob has!  He is an utter, incompetent, arrogant fool!  An embarrassment to our entire country!  No one should make out that he is doing well and preface it with, he is black.  He is black, but it makes him no better than anyone else.  He would still be the worst President in the history of this country if he were this moronic and white, asian, female, or purple with blue polka dots. </p>
<p>Quit trying to save him by playing the race card.  It is unattractive when he does it and it is unattractive when people here throw the race card for him!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donjo</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25026/does-michael-scheuer-represent-the-cia/#comment-1209060</link>
		<dc:creator>donjo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 02:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25026#comment-1209060</guid>
		<description>Correction: it was the prosecution of the East African embassy bombers.

The video, at this point, that cuts to the crux of the matter is about the 8th one down and labelled:

bbc: al queda does not exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction: it was the prosecution of the East African embassy bombers.</p>
<p>The video, at this point, that cuts to the crux of the matter is about the 8th one down and labelled:</p>
<p>bbc: al queda does not exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donjo</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25026/does-michael-scheuer-represent-the-cia/#comment-1209056</link>
		<dc:creator>donjo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 02:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25026#comment-1209056</guid>
		<description>Concerning Al Queda;  According to this BBC report, it doesn&#039;t exist and was a creation of the U.S. govt. in order to prosecute the bombers of the twin towers. They needed a conveneint entity to link the bombers too, so they invented Al Queda.

Here&#039;s a link to parts 1 through 6 of their series;
http://budurl.com/pmah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerning Al Queda;  According to this BBC report, it doesn&#8217;t exist and was a creation of the U.S. govt. in order to prosecute the bombers of the twin towers. They needed a conveneint entity to link the bombers too, so they invented Al Queda.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a link to parts 1 through 6 of their series;<br />
<a href="http://budurl.com/pmah" rel="nofollow">http://budurl.com/pmah</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

