RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Inflation, Deflation, or Stagflation?

I am an eternal optimist and, as such, I never want to see people’s spirits waver. I encourage people not to allow the current economy to “deflate” their hopes for better days. By the same token, I am a pragmatist and caution people not to view the recent bounce in our equity markets as reason for an overly “inflated” sense of optimism. In this same spirit, though, we need sufficient optimism along with practical analysis to avoid the perils of “stagflation.” Let me expound.

The debate between analysts touting prospects for inflation versus deflation is ongoing. Those concerned with deflation highlight increasing levels of unemployment pressuring wages, falling asset valuations, and slack consumer demand. Those concerned with inflation point toward the unprecedented levels of liquidity injected into our system via all of the government programs. The inflation hawks maintain the economy merely needs a small spark and inflation will spread in an uncontrollable arson-like fashion.

I actually believe there is a very real chance we get developments from both camps leading to the scourge known as stagflation. How may this play out?

Many respected analysts are promoting the concept of a new “normal” economy. This scenario entails an economy operating with enormous government deficits, an elevated level of unemployment, and little to no shadow banking system (securitization of loans and other assets).

In this new “normal” economy, GDP may only eke out small positive growth given these heightened pressures. Pimco’s Mohamed El-Erian writes of A New Normal:

This reflects a growing realization that some of the recent abrupt changes to markets, households, institutions, and government policies are unlikely to be reversed in the next few years. Global growth will be subdued for a while and unemployment high; a heavy hand of government will be evident in several sectors; the core of the global system will be less cohesive and, with the magnet of the Anglo-Saxon model in retreat, finance will no longer be accorded a preeminent role in post-industrial economies. Moreover, the balance of risk will tilt over time toward higher sovereign risk, growing inflationary expectations and stagflation.

Even as we come out of this recession, our economy will run increased risks of slipping into another recession given the lack of cushion provided by a strong consumer, the burdens of heavy government debts, and inability to easily access credit.

El-Erian adds:

For the next 3–5 years, we expect a world of muted growth, in the context of a continuing shift away from the G-3 and toward the systemically important emerging economies, led by China. It is a world where the public sector overstays as a provider of goods that belong in the private sector. (As one of our speakers put it, we have transitioned from a world where the private sector provided public goods to one where the public sector provides private goods.) It is also a world in which central banks and treasuries will find it difficult to undo smoothly some of the recent emergency steps. This is particularly consequential in countries, such as the U.K. and U.S., where many short-term policy imperatives materially conflict with medium-term ones.

As our global economy transitions to this new “normal,” I believe the likelihood of stagflation is quite high. For those who recall the perils of our economy in the early 1980s, stagflation is not a pretty picture. How does one manage investments and personal finances in an environment of stagflation?

Let’s deal with the component parts. Given sluggish growth, limited credit, and lessened opportunities, it is of paramount importance to cut expenses and minimize debt as much as possible. Servicing debt will be an ongoing challenge and increasingly problematic. Be proactive at this point in time in adjusting your finances to this reality.

Where will the inflation come from and how does one address it? In my opinion, the inflation “train” will arrive sooner than we think. Some of the savviest investors, including Financial Pacific Advisors’ Bob Rodriguez and noted Black Swan author Nassim Nicholas Taleb, are already positioning themselves for it. (The WSJ reports, Black Swan Fund Makes a Big Bet on Inflation).

How can people protect themselves from the inflation monster? Increase exposure to the following:

– precious metals and commodities

– critical infrastructure (power plants, agriculture, water, transportation)

– necessary life items (drugs, medicines, food)

– stronger and more fiscally prudent foreign markets

Decrease exposure if not get outright short

– longer maturity (5yr and and longer) Treasury bonds

This stagflation story will have many chapters and I will be writing extensively on it. Please share your thoughts, opinions, and recollections of the early 80s economy so we can all move forward most effectively in navigating the economic landscape.

LD

  • Tricia Spiegel

    Informative, useful post! Thanks Larry.

  • AM

    Larry,
    May I have your site address please?

    • http://www.senseoncents.com Larry Doyle

      AM,

      Our friends here at NQ and I have coordinated so you can easily go back and forth between our sites as we each have links for the respective sites on our home page. Look in the upper right hand part of the NQ home page and click on the Sense on Cents icon. The same can be done from SoC to come back to NQ.

      Sense on Cents can also be accessed at http://www.senseoncents.com

      • AM

        Thank you, Larry.

    • AM

      Never mind. I found it.

  • whoisjohngalt

    I do not see how inflation can occur when there is:

    1. reduced employment (GM, housing)
    2. higher default rates (due to increasing unemployment)> more forclosed homes > banks going under
    3. an unwillingness of banks (the ones that are left)to make risky loans
    4. more bankruptcies for state and local governments due to decreased tax revenues & baloon pension contracts
    5. higher taxes for the rich who in turn give up or leave “Atlas Shrugged”.

    The US government is not having any trouble selling their T-bills at near 0% interest rates because the stock market has proven be a way to throw away 1/2 of your life savings.

  • Craig Della Penna

    Larry:

    This is a thoughtful piece and I have no doubt that the folks who are making these predictions are basing them on the best knowledge base they have.
    However…

    1) I think this is limited viewpoint based on assumptions about the current state of political stability, as per the early 80s. At that point in time there were very strong political/military machines engaged in a low resolution conflict that functioned as a giant flywheel for the economy. In contrast, today we have one military machine and an inchoate mass of theocratic nihilists whose only purpose is destruction. Not much grist for the flywheel there.

    2) Even more important, this viewpoint is based on a status quo ante assumption, that is, an assumption that the status of the world economy as it was say, five years ago, is the desired condition. This is understandable given the flaccid actions of the Obama administration thus far in response to the continuing financial debacle.

    And that is the problem in a nutshell: those who see the present condition only through the lens of the past will, of course, come to the conclusions set forth. What will actually happen is unlikely to follow that script. Arguably, it will get worse, much worse with riots in the streets and fights for ever scarcer resources around the globe. Indeed, given the facts as presented above, I would expect the worst.
    There is another course, however, one that involves a new way of thinking about global resources and a willingness to apply technologies we already have at hand. We have the tools to make the necessary changes, the only thing that stands in our way are the vested interests of the men and the companies they control (and their puppets in office) who do not want change and will do absolutely anything to prevent change from happening. These are, of course, the same people who make predicitons for the future based on their status quo ante dreams of days gone bye.

    Like it or not we live in ‘interesting’ times, who will win, I wonder.

  • Fran

    I think that this will be worse than the eighties. I expect stagflation, and I have said from the beginning that we are in for a lost decade, like Japan.

    I also believe, with the person above, that things could be reorganized in a productive manner with the right leadership. I just think that the majority of people do not react to things until it is too late, and until they are personally suffering.

    In the eighties I lived in California. The state still had money to help people. Not now. I have pretty much always lived within my means, which at times seemed almost silly, but not anymore.

    Right now it is two different worlds, depending on whether one has a job or not.

  • politicalidentitycrisis

    I do expect bad, scary times to come. I have been trying to prepare, but it is hard when you don’t know how long you are saving for and how much things will cost. I am terrified that I will not be able to afford my diabetic son’s insulin. I am a single parent and have done fairly well, but I have survived 2 rounds of layoffs at work and more are expected. They are reassessing every 3 months. I expect to see things that I never expected to see in my lifetime, worse than the unexpected that I’ve already seen like Desert Storm and 9/11. I wish we had leaders who seemed to give a damn, but I see none. Not one, willing to put country first. This was the absolute worst time to bet on a high risk Obama and why on earth we would not have chosen a known leader is way beyond my comprehension. I still pray I don’t have to stand next to an Obot in the bread lines! I will not be able to control myself by that point!

  • socalannie

    Makes me sad. I remember the early 80′s. I had to work two jobs while going to school.

    it is of paramount importance to cut expenses and minimize debt as much as possible. Servicing debt will be an ongoing challenge and increasingly problematic. Be proactive at this point in time in adjusting your finances to this reality.

    We are doing these things now, but I wish we had started several years ago. Keep up the good work, LD. You are appreciated!

  • Patience

    I remember the early 80s and it wasn’t a good time. Our small business couldn’t get enough financing to grow as credit was tight and very expensive. A private loan from a wealthy individual kept us going. We couldn’t afford union labor or otherwise highly-skilled labor — only novices — which was problematic. Our customer base was narrower because small businesses (who we cater to) weren’t able to expand or grow. Like now, unemployment was high. The only thing good that stands out in my mind is that we had some CDs then which earned a lot because interest rates were so high. But that was small consolation for us — we needed then, and continue to need, access to credit. I almost feel like we’ve come full circle in that respect since credit is so tight again.

    Now, with an older US workforce, more global labor to compete with , skyrocketing government debt, etc., I feel the prospect for getting whole again will be much tougher than in the 80s.

  • NomNomNom
    • whoisjohngalt

      CA running out of cash in 2 weeks will not cause stagflation, only deflation.