<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting Smart on Sotomayor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25368/getting-smart-on-sotomayor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25368/getting-smart-on-sotomayor/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 07:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where Do You Stand on the Sotomayor Nomination? : NO QUARTER</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25368/getting-smart-on-sotomayor/#comment-1228250</link>
		<dc:creator>Where Do You Stand on the Sotomayor Nomination? : NO QUARTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 05:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25368#comment-1228250</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Getting Smart on Sotomayor,&#8221; by Larry Johnson, June 1, 2009: There is so much ill-informed, emotional garbage floating around the internet that I thought a factual pause might be appropriate. Here’s a new rule–unless you have actually read the legal opinions written by Judge Sotomayor and examined the original decision in the underlying cases you are not qualified to have an opinion about her. You do have the right to be stupid and ignorant, but if you have not actually read the legal reasoning in the disputed cases then you are simply operating on hearsay. Third hand hearsay at best. [...] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Getting Smart on Sotomayor,&#8221; by Larry Johnson, June 1, 2009: There is so much ill-informed, emotional garbage floating around the internet that I thought a factual pause might be appropriate. Here’s a new rule–unless you have actually read the legal opinions written by Judge Sotomayor and examined the original decision in the underlying cases you are not qualified to have an opinion about her. You do have the right to be stupid and ignorant, but if you have not actually read the legal reasoning in the disputed cases then you are simply operating on hearsay. Third hand hearsay at best. [...] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Getting Smart on Sotomayor : NO QUARTER &#124; RantNet.com</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25368/getting-smart-on-sotomayor/#comment-1216890</link>
		<dc:creator>Getting Smart on Sotomayor : NO QUARTER &#124; RantNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 01:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25368#comment-1216890</guid>
		<description>[...] Originally posted here: Getting Smart on Sotomayor : NO QUARTER [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Originally posted here: Getting Smart on Sotomayor : NO QUARTER [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen Wynne</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25368/getting-smart-on-sotomayor/#comment-1213432</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Wynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25368#comment-1213432</guid>
		<description>The age old excuse against women having power was that they were not properly educated, had the requisite experience or mental capacity to hold powerful office as men &quot;naturally&quot; were.  Well, that male myth has been blown out of the water.  Now, women have to deal with the bizarre, inexplicable, biased, and psychology deranged reasons men (and subservient women) put forth to undermine a woman&#039;s rise to power.  

You talk about Sotomayor hiding who she is...well, that&#039;s a load of BS.  What about obama? He has hidden who he is throughout his entire political career and he has never been attacked for it -- not the way the women are!

Why aren&#039;t you just as concerned at obama&#039;s lack of disclosure when it comes to his grades during his college years (since he is considered so brilliant, why would he not disclose his brilliant GPA?); his state senate records have been destroyed (why?); and what about his obstructive actions in producing a certified birth certificate to show he is an American citizen?  Form copies of birth certificates don&#039;t count...besides, a President must be a native born American in order to be President.  Don&#039;t you think we should hold a person vying for the most powerful position in the world to the same standard we hold a woman who is about to be a Supreme Court Justice and who will have far less power than a President?

Again, the double standard continues to be applied to any and every woman who dares think she is equal to or better than any man, no matter how medicore his record may be compared to her more extraordinary one -- the question is why?  Fear that with this long overdue access to power women will use it to treat men the same way they&#039;ve treated women for centuries?  What will it take for men to stop considering women the &quot;enemy&quot; and judge them through the same lens they judge each other? Is fairness only to be applied to men?

It just doesn&#039;t stop...during the &quot;error&quot; of obama alone, we have seen the vilification of some extraordinary women who have met higher standards in order to be considered on equal footing with men -- Hillary, then Palin and now Sotomayor and they still get attacked on a daily basis.  

It&#039;s this way of thinking which is literally destroying the planet.  Thank you, patriarchy, for nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The age old excuse against women having power was that they were not properly educated, had the requisite experience or mental capacity to hold powerful office as men &#8220;naturally&#8221; were.  Well, that male myth has been blown out of the water.  Now, women have to deal with the bizarre, inexplicable, biased, and psychology deranged reasons men (and subservient women) put forth to undermine a woman&#8217;s rise to power.  </p>
<p>You talk about Sotomayor hiding who she is&#8230;well, that&#8217;s a load of BS.  What about obama? He has hidden who he is throughout his entire political career and he has never been attacked for it &#8212; not the way the women are!</p>
<p>Why aren&#8217;t you just as concerned at obama&#8217;s lack of disclosure when it comes to his grades during his college years (since he is considered so brilliant, why would he not disclose his brilliant GPA?); his state senate records have been destroyed (why?); and what about his obstructive actions in producing a certified birth certificate to show he is an American citizen?  Form copies of birth certificates don&#8217;t count&#8230;besides, a President must be a native born American in order to be President.  Don&#8217;t you think we should hold a person vying for the most powerful position in the world to the same standard we hold a woman who is about to be a Supreme Court Justice and who will have far less power than a President?</p>
<p>Again, the double standard continues to be applied to any and every woman who dares think she is equal to or better than any man, no matter how medicore his record may be compared to her more extraordinary one &#8212; the question is why?  Fear that with this long overdue access to power women will use it to treat men the same way they&#8217;ve treated women for centuries?  What will it take for men to stop considering women the &#8220;enemy&#8221; and judge them through the same lens they judge each other? Is fairness only to be applied to men?</p>
<p>It just doesn&#8217;t stop&#8230;during the &#8220;error&#8221; of obama alone, we have seen the vilification of some extraordinary women who have met higher standards in order to be considered on equal footing with men &#8212; Hillary, then Palin and now Sotomayor and they still get attacked on a daily basis.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s this way of thinking which is literally destroying the planet.  Thank you, patriarchy, for nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: to77</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25368/getting-smart-on-sotomayor/#comment-1213253</link>
		<dc:creator>to77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 04:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25368#comment-1213253</guid>
		<description>so then why was it brought up with Carswell? 

If the Dems gave Alito special treatment because he&#039;s white and a male it is clearly the Dems that you think are the racists and sexists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so then why was it brought up with Carswell? </p>
<p>If the Dems gave Alito special treatment because he&#8217;s white and a male it is clearly the Dems that you think are the racists and sexists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elise</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25368/getting-smart-on-sotomayor/#comment-1213066</link>
		<dc:creator>elise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25368#comment-1213066</guid>
		<description>HC can we agree to disagree on whether a similar statement by any man would be a serious consideration in confirmation hearings? After all, who would ask the questions? Diane Fienstein or Amy Kloubuchar? 

I could also disagree on the definition of prejudice. Several thousands of years of history has shown who have enslaved women and which group has had to defer to whom. These are facts and not indicative of hate my part or a desire of my gender to become the enslavers.

Your last paragraph is one we can completely agree on without question. So why the emphasis on the gender and ethnicity of Sotomajor instead of focusing on her rulings, education, character and experience? 

BTW diversity does live in the mind and since we are all more or less born with an equal ability to reason, we must conclude the rules of our society and our environment create the little neurons firing in the cerebrum exciting the memories which determine our behavior and reaction to daily events in our lives.

The more the brain is used to explore ideas the better we can use logic to make our decisions. Lazy people lose the cells they are born with when they refuse to exercise their brains and react on an emotional level or let others think for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HC can we agree to disagree on whether a similar statement by any man would be a serious consideration in confirmation hearings? After all, who would ask the questions? Diane Fienstein or Amy Kloubuchar? </p>
<p>I could also disagree on the definition of prejudice. Several thousands of years of history has shown who have enslaved women and which group has had to defer to whom. These are facts and not indicative of hate my part or a desire of my gender to become the enslavers.</p>
<p>Your last paragraph is one we can completely agree on without question. So why the emphasis on the gender and ethnicity of Sotomajor instead of focusing on her rulings, education, character and experience? </p>
<p>BTW diversity does live in the mind and since we are all more or less born with an equal ability to reason, we must conclude the rules of our society and our environment create the little neurons firing in the cerebrum exciting the memories which determine our behavior and reaction to daily events in our lives.</p>
<p>The more the brain is used to explore ideas the better we can use logic to make our decisions. Lazy people lose the cells they are born with when they refuse to exercise their brains and react on an emotional level or let others think for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandi78</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25368/getting-smart-on-sotomayor/#comment-1213031</link>
		<dc:creator>sandi78</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25368#comment-1213031</guid>
		<description>Alito was the last Justice to be confirmed. Nobody even mentioned this for him despite his overwhelming worst-ever showing in these stakes. So, yes, I think people are being sexist and/or it&#039;s because she is Latina. Had she been white and male, this would not be a blip on anyone&#039;s screen. Alito is the proof of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alito was the last Justice to be confirmed. Nobody even mentioned this for him despite his overwhelming worst-ever showing in these stakes. So, yes, I think people are being sexist and/or it&#8217;s because she is Latina. Had she been white and male, this would not be a blip on anyone&#8217;s screen. Alito is the proof of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dutch</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25368/getting-smart-on-sotomayor/#comment-1213020</link>
		<dc:creator>Dutch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25368#comment-1213020</guid>
		<description>Larry, Why are you working so hard to defend Sotomayor?????  Let the process work and stop trying to influence us.  The more someone jams something down my throat, the more I resist.  It makes me believe that you know something that you don&#039;t want us to know and reminds me very strongly of Obama!  What&#039;s up Larry?  Who got to you???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry, Why are you working so hard to defend Sotomayor?????  Let the process work and stop trying to influence us.  The more someone jams something down my throat, the more I resist.  It makes me believe that you know something that you don&#8217;t want us to know and reminds me very strongly of Obama!  What&#8217;s up Larry?  Who got to you???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MN in SN</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25368/getting-smart-on-sotomayor/#comment-1213007</link>
		<dc:creator>MN in SN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25368#comment-1213007</guid>
		<description>They didn&#039;t discard until after they had the results.  That little bit of information blows the &quot;neutrality&quot; out of the water.  Once they knew who passed and who didn&#039;t, there was motive.  It&#039;s like Monty Hall asking you if you want to give up the prize you won behind door #1 for what&#039;s behind door #2.  It&#039;s not even odds, because he knows what&#039;s behind the doors, and offers one door over the other based on that info, not randomly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They didn&#8217;t discard until after they had the results.  That little bit of information blows the &#8220;neutrality&#8221; out of the water.  Once they knew who passed and who didn&#8217;t, there was motive.  It&#8217;s like Monty Hall asking you if you want to give up the prize you won behind door #1 for what&#8217;s behind door #2.  It&#8217;s not even odds, because he knows what&#8217;s behind the doors, and offers one door over the other based on that info, not randomly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MN in SN</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25368/getting-smart-on-sotomayor/#comment-1213002</link>
		<dc:creator>MN in SN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25368#comment-1213002</guid>
		<description>The &quot;win&quot; would be to hire the most competent.  There is no requirement to avoid &quot;hurt feelings&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;win&#8221; would be to hire the most competent.  There is no requirement to avoid &#8220;hurt feelings&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MN in SN</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25368/getting-smart-on-sotomayor/#comment-1213000</link>
		<dc:creator>MN in SN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25368#comment-1213000</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s about equal protection under the law.  When a government institution can throw out results because it doesn&#039;t like, or is uncomfortable with, them, then those fire fighters were not receiving equal protection.  If it were the other way around, heads would explode over the crypto-racism involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about equal protection under the law.  When a government institution can throw out results because it doesn&#8217;t like, or is uncomfortable with, them, then those fire fighters were not receiving equal protection.  If it were the other way around, heads would explode over the crypto-racism involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MN in SN</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25368/getting-smart-on-sotomayor/#comment-1212995</link>
		<dc:creator>MN in SN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25368#comment-1212995</guid>
		<description>You need to up your meds.  I&#039;m angrier than I&#039;ve ever been about politics and the direction our society has taken, but verbally abusing everyone I disagree with doesn&#039;t really help me feel better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to up your meds.  I&#8217;m angrier than I&#8217;ve ever been about politics and the direction our society has taken, but verbally abusing everyone I disagree with doesn&#8217;t really help me feel better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MN in SN</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25368/getting-smart-on-sotomayor/#comment-1212981</link>
		<dc:creator>MN in SN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25368#comment-1212981</guid>
		<description>Deception?  Hiding who she really is?  Gee, I dunno, maybe she should stand up for what she really beleives in.  Maybe she&#039;s also covering up the depth and breadth of her allegiance to her ethnicity?  You really can&#039;t say anything without adding an insult can you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deception?  Hiding who she really is?  Gee, I dunno, maybe she should stand up for what she really beleives in.  Maybe she&#8217;s also covering up the depth and breadth of her allegiance to her ethnicity?  You really can&#8217;t say anything without adding an insult can you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MN in SN</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25368/getting-smart-on-sotomayor/#comment-1212972</link>
		<dc:creator>MN in SN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25368#comment-1212972</guid>
		<description>Do you come here just to go off on people?  You don&#039;t seem able to make a statement without adding an insult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you come here just to go off on people?  You don&#8217;t seem able to make a statement without adding an insult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: to77</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25368/getting-smart-on-sotomayor/#comment-1212958</link>
		<dc:creator>to77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25368#comment-1212958</guid>
		<description>I didnt mention it because I didnt know it at the time. But it is an honest point. I am not saying one way or another but at least admit if it was used in the past it is proper review in the present and it is not just people being racist or sexist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didnt mention it because I didnt know it at the time. But it is an honest point. I am not saying one way or another but at least admit if it was used in the past it is proper review in the present and it is not just people being racist or sexist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MN in SN</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/25368/getting-smart-on-sotomayor/#comment-1212950</link>
		<dc:creator>MN in SN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=25368#comment-1212950</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s their spin.  It means what it says.

raza
&lt;em&gt;femine&lt;/em&gt; race (also biology); breed, stock, strain; &quot;raza humana&quot; human race, mankind; &quot;de raza caballo&quot; thoroughbred.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s their spin.  It means what it says.</p>
<p>raza<br />
<em>femine</em> race (also biology); breed, stock, strain; &#8220;raza humana&#8221; human race, mankind; &#8220;de raza caballo&#8221; thoroughbred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

