Ok, So Tell Us What IS Allowed
By Alegre on May 20, 2008 at 9:56 AM in Barack Obama, Fox News, Health Care, Hillary Clinton, Karl Rove, Kentucky, Tony Rezko, William Ayers
I’ve noticed a pattern here on the blogs of late and it was ratcheted up to deafening levels when people decided that BO’s already won our party’s nomination. Ok maybe a while before that but my point is there’s a definite double standard here on the blogs and there has been for quite some time. Anything goes when it comes to pointing out Hillary’s “shortcomings” or “faults”. Hell they rip into her with half-truths, distortions, lies and some of the most misogynist and hateful shite I’ve ever seen. And that’s coming from other Democrats!
But god(dess) forbid we point out BO’s short-comings or faults, or try to point out that the bridge is out and our party leaders are driving us straight toward the edge of a cliff in pushing Obama on us as our nominee. If we dare question his ability to beat McCain – mention folks like his pastor of 20 years (Rev. Wright), his friend of 17 years (Tony Rezko), or that Ayers fella everyone’s been talking about, we’re tagged as divisive, undermining a guy who’s obviously going to be our nominee (according to his supporters anyway), disloyal to our Party, turncoats, GOP Operatives, Karl Rove mouth-pieces, or worse yet – racists.
I mean I catch hell for pointing out something as simple as the differences between their healthcare reform plans. Or if I ask that most uncomfortable of questions – how does he plan to bring about all that change he’s always talking about?
If we point out the fact that he’s having a hell of a time appealing to the working stiffs out there people jump down our throat. The lunch bucket work-a-day crowd and families just getting by (like mine) are not voting for him. We haven’t and we won’t and if anyone dares point out that inability to attract voters like us, we’re painted as… well you know. You’ve seen the “discussions” in the comments in response to things we’ve posted.
Take for example this latest report out of Kentucky, where Obama’s apparently not even bothering to campaign in the lead-up to tomorrow’s vote. Even with Edwards’ recent endorsement, he’s given up and is blaming the coming shellacking on some emails and rumors. I hate to point out the obvious but if BO claims he can’t win KY because of some emails and rumors, how in the HELL will he beat McCain when the RNC and the 527s really start in on him?
Obama blames Fox News, e-mail for likely loss in Kentucky
LEXINGTON, Ky. — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama, facing a likely defeat in next Tuesday’s primary election, won’t travel to Kentucky before the voting, but said he hopes to have much more time to win over Kentucky voters before the November general election.
He also blamed Fox News for disseminating “rumors” about him and said that that and e-mails filled with misinformation that have been “systematically” dispersed have hurt him in Kentucky.
When we point out that he’s made excuses like this in the past for losses like this, we’re called every name in the book. When we point out that he and his team rarely take responsibility for these losses (ie no loss is ever his fault) rather than acknowledge that maybe he has a problem with those voters and come up with a plan to reach out to folks, we’re called divisive and accused of posting “hit diaries.” When we ask whether it has ever occurred to the Democratic Party leadership, that if rumors and e-mails have hurt his ability to woo voters in Kentucky, what will the situation be when the Republicans REALLY start throwing the bs at him, we’re accused of being turncoats.
Watch the comments guys – the very fact that I’ve pointed out these weaknesses in his game-plan for the general election will elicit cries of foul and unfair. But look around this site – there’ve been plenty of posts here about Hillary like this – only a lot worse.
Ok, I get it. There’s a double standard here and I’ve finally figured out that we’re all playing by two very different sets of rules. So do us all a favor – spell out for us just how we’re supposed to campaign for Hillary, and maybe point out how she’s a much stronger candidate than her opponent when it comes to going up against McCain in the GE without getting trashed or worse yet – stalked and insulted on a personal level.
And please (!!!!) do us the courtesy of respecting our intelligence and this process by refraining from telling us to be nice to BO because he’s obviously going to be our nominee, because that’s simply not the case here guys. Nothing’s set for sure until the delegates vote on the convention floor in August.
We’ve still got a campaign here and we have just as much of a right to promote our candidate and question yours as you do. So can we please dispense with the double standards, let the people vote and see where the dust settles come convention time?
Hillary’s not backing down and neither am I and dammit – I’ll make my case the same way you guys are making yours. It’d be great if we could all do it on an even playing field for a change.


















Pingback: “CHICAGO MACHINE” : NO QUARTER
Pingback: Rezko Speaks, Prosecutors Interested in Obama Listen : NO QUARTER
Pingback: CORROBORATED: Rezko Speaks, Prosecutors Interested in Obama Listen : NO QUARTER
Pingback: About the Financial Institution Mentioned in the Sun-Times: Obama, Tony Rezko, Amrish Mahajan, the Kenwood Mansion & Rita Rezko : NO QUARTER
Pingback: BREAKING: Obama Land Deal with Rezko and Mutual Bank Subject of New Court Complaint : NO QUARTER