Comments on: The Big Bad Fox Did It

By: ginamc

ginamc — Wed, 28 May 2008 04:00:09 +0000

Edwards being the biggest loser of them all because he cannot even win a primary

Edwards is such a fake — this is the guy who wanted us to vote for him because he was the tough one, the one that was going to STAND UP on behalf of the “little guy” to the big PharmCos, the Insurance Companies, and fight, fight, fight for universal health care, and take on the capitalist pigs and the status quo on our behalf. Such Sh*t.

By: beebop

beebop — Tue, 27 May 2008 19:14:30 +0000

He is basically a COWARD. Hillary has campaigned in every state — even in North Carolina when she was down a BUNCH ….. he is a dime store cowboy. Another Bush.

By: oh really

oh really — Tue, 27 May 2008 18:55:16 +0000

With luck, in November you’ll have “the immense pleasure of watching Senator Barack Obama lose big time” to John McCain. Then, one assumes you’ll have the immense pleasure of watching McCain nominate more right wing justices to the Supreme Court. Then, continuing your pleasurable line of reasoning, one assumes you’ll have immense pleasure watching McCain and the Supreme Court finish the job Bush began on the Constitution.

When I think that the drivel you’re spewing here is in support of someone like Senator Clinton, I’m simply astounded. I’m not a great Obama fan, but sorry, Senator Clinton has demonstrated repeatedly that she isn’t fit to president. If she is somehow able to steal the nomination, and I have to vote for her to stop McCain, it will be the most extreme lesser evil choice I’ve ever faced. But unlike you, I would get no pleasure watching Commander in Chief McCain continue Bush’s assault on the Constitution and world peace.

Perhaps, you can join forces with Reverend Hagee. He’ll be interested to know that you’ve discovered the Anti-Christ.

Note for Helen McCombs | 2008-05-27 11:30:24

“I think Hillary should run as a third party candiate win and then spend the next four years humiliating the Democrat men…”

Great idea, Helen. Let’s see, Hillary would finish a distant third in that race, and McCain would win. I look forward to all the progress women’s rights will make under President McCain.

After tossing the presidency to the Saint, Hillary could return to the Senate to join Joe Lieberman in their dominant party of “independent” Democrats. Really good plan. Let’s hope no one tells Hillary about the “inevitability” of her victory in a three way race. I imagine she’d be willing to dodge a lot more bullets in Tuzla if it meant she could run as a third party candidate and get to “humiliate” all those men for her BFF Helen. What a great rationale for a candidacy.

By: Helen McCombs

Helen McCombs — Tue, 27 May 2008 16:32:46 +0000

I do not think Bill will work for Obama he is one angry man and I do not see the Clintons doing anything for Obama in fact I bet we see her run as an independent.

By: Helen McCombs

Helen McCombs — Tue, 27 May 2008 16:30:24 +0000

yes that is why they are backing him they dont want to take a chance that a girl can win but the losers club cant. Edwards being the biggest loser of them all because he cannot even win a primary oh and Kennedy who will never be anything because he split the convention. I think Hillary should run as a third party candiate win and then spend the next four years humiliating the Democrat men

By: Mad Vlad

Mad Vlad — Tue, 27 May 2008 14:36:42 +0000

Hey Donkey,

Do you hang out over at PatriotRoom?

By: susan

susan — Tue, 27 May 2008 14:29:49 +0000

this is the guy who’s gonna “talk to our enemies”?? he’s already displaying a disturbing Bushesque quality of courting only people who already support him.

Hillary, on the other hand, has repeatedly gone to the lion’s den and emerged with more strength and support.

By: Pat Hickey

Pat Hickey — Tue, 27 May 2008 14:16:26 +0000

Why Shucks, Them Th’ar KainTucks was a’whittlin’ hard comments ’bout Obama in the barks a trees down th’ar!

Sum wa’r plum ugly. Like – this ‘un hy’ar:

‘I can not, in good conscience, exercise my public franchise by casting a vote for a gentleman who neither appreciates my upbringing, Faith nor worldview, let alone the palor of my skin, nor a gentleman of so thin a curriculum vita as Senator Obama.’

Carved into an Old Hickory it wa’r!~

http://hickeysite.blogspot.com/2008/05/john-mccain-road-to-baghdad-now-thats.html

By: Doral

Doral — Tue, 27 May 2008 14:10:16 +0000

Southern Illinois did not vote for Obama either. It should be an embarrassment for him. People know how shady South Chicago is. That is why the neighboring states didn’t vote for him.

By: Doral

Doral — Tue, 27 May 2008 14:06:43 +0000

Obama did campaign in Louisville Ky, he did have 4 ads on tv per hour,sent fliers through the mail everyday, had his foot soldiers campaigning for him. Lots of money was spent for the election by Obama. Maybe he needs to realize that you can’t buy everyone.
Hillary spent less money and visited several towns in state of Ky.

By: Ellen Tenn

Ellen Tenn — Tue, 27 May 2008 14:02:25 +0000

I read the article and thought it was wonderful. Then I read the comments,bad idea. The hate for Hillary is unbelievable. I think the reason why so many believe that the Clintons have run a “dirty campaign” is because many of them get their news from CNN or MSNBC. It makes me so mad that this is what it has come down to in America. That the media has so much power that it can try and choose our next President. And the reason why I will never vote for Obama is that he has done nothing to stop it. He enjoys seeing the Clintons ripped apart from the media. He has even added to it. Bill and Hillary Clinton are fabulous people who are trying their best for our country and getting shit thrown at them every day.

By: ProudMilitaryMom

ProudMilitaryMom — Tue, 27 May 2008 13:52:31 +0000

Thanks Pagan! Another insightful post!
So how many groups exactly are under this bus?????

By: Bill

Bill — Tue, 27 May 2008 13:43:46 +0000

Well he also lost Indiana and Pennsylvania because those folks were racists too. That includes not only Republicans, but Hillary supporters too. Just ask the Washington Post. http://patriotroom.com/?p=333

By: JohnnyB

JohnnyB — Tue, 27 May 2008 13:42:18 +0000

Ob outspent Hillary 2 to 1 in both Kentucky and West Virginia. He had more offices in both states. He CAMPAIGNED heavily in both states, he just didn’t show up, so it looked like he didn’t care, but his team tried to close the gap in both states. In fact, Hillary was favored by 25 in Kentucky and won by 35. Yes, Hillary outperformed the polls by 10% in Kentucky. This is face of Ob’s claiming he’s the nominee. Same in West Virginia, she won by 41%, 8% more than expected in the polls. Remember, Hillary was outspent 2 to 1 or more in both states and came out with HUGE victories.

By: ProudMilitaryMom

ProudMilitaryMom — Tue, 27 May 2008 13:30:26 +0000

Great article- now has 31 buzzes