<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding Men, Part One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/26110/understanding-men-part-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/26110/understanding-men-part-one/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 08:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzisbackLatte</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/26110/understanding-men-part-one/#comment-1220301</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzisbackLatte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26110#comment-1220301</guid>
		<description>Bravo, Steve!  I enjoy your articles.  And yes, NQ is a place for politics and even for the humorous politics of sex!

I have to agree on the militant feminist outrage being boring.  It is.

No humor in sex?  Now that is a cosmic joke!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo, Steve!  I enjoy your articles.  And yes, NQ is a place for politics and even for the humorous politics of sex!</p>
<p>I have to agree on the militant feminist outrage being boring.  It is.</p>
<p>No humor in sex?  Now that is a cosmic joke!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAB</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/26110/understanding-men-part-one/#comment-1220299</link>
		<dc:creator>DAB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26110#comment-1220299</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t Leave Steve!  You&#039;re a riot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t Leave Steve!  You&#8217;re a riot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uppity Woman</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/26110/understanding-men-part-one/#comment-1220166</link>
		<dc:creator>Uppity Woman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 04:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26110#comment-1220166</guid>
		<description>The rule of thumb is, Steve, if you cheat and then come home, we&#039;re gonna know-- and you&#039;ve got to fall asleep sooner or later. you know what I mean? Wink wink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rule of thumb is, Steve, if you cheat and then come home, we&#8217;re gonna know&#8211; and you&#8217;ve got to fall asleep sooner or later. you know what I mean? Wink wink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Understanding Men, Part Two : NO QUARTER</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/26110/understanding-men-part-one/#comment-1220118</link>
		<dc:creator>Understanding Men, Part Two : NO QUARTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26110#comment-1220118</guid>
		<description>[...] Part One (Lessons One and Two) can be read here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part One (Lessons One and Two) can be read here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CentralMass</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/26110/understanding-men-part-one/#comment-1218357</link>
		<dc:creator>CentralMass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26110#comment-1218357</guid>
		<description>Or a wife to make him ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or a wife to make him <img src='http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trixta</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/26110/understanding-men-part-one/#comment-1218298</link>
		<dc:creator>trixta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26110#comment-1218298</guid>
		<description>i.e. ... my boneheadedness and vino....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i.e. &#8230; my boneheadedness and vino&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trixta</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/26110/understanding-men-part-one/#comment-1218203</link>
		<dc:creator>trixta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26110#comment-1218203</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification, Steve. It just goes to show that one should never mix boneheadedness with a glass of vino! 

BTW, although I believe that honesty is the best policy, I, too, see that there are occasions where it might do more damage than good.  But as you say, if the remorse is genuine...otherwise the very relationship the secret is supposed to protect becomes a lie in itself.


In any case, you do have wicked sense of humor!  Keep on making us laugh, cause we sure need it these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification, Steve. It just goes to show that one should never mix boneheadedness with a glass of vino! </p>
<p>BTW, although I believe that honesty is the best policy, I, too, see that there are occasions where it might do more damage than good.  But as you say, if the remorse is genuine&#8230;otherwise the very relationship the secret is supposed to protect becomes a lie in itself.</p>
<p>In any case, you do have wicked sense of humor!  Keep on making us laugh, cause we sure need it these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve_in_KC</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/26110/understanding-men-part-one/#comment-1217993</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve_in_KC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26110#comment-1217993</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s very nice to hear! Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s very nice to hear! Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Country First</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/26110/understanding-men-part-one/#comment-1217959</link>
		<dc:creator>Country First</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26110#comment-1217959</guid>
		<description>I loved this article.  I grinned and laughed all the way through it.  Sometimes we need to lighten up and forget for a minute or two the depressing state of our country.  Thanks, Steve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved this article.  I grinned and laughed all the way through it.  Sometimes we need to lighten up and forget for a minute or two the depressing state of our country.  Thanks, Steve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foxyladi14</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/26110/understanding-men-part-one/#comment-1217883</link>
		<dc:creator>foxyladi14</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 21:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26110#comment-1217883</guid>
		<description>mine too.bravo Steve....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mine too.bravo Steve&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foxyladi14</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/26110/understanding-men-part-one/#comment-1217880</link>
		<dc:creator>foxyladi14</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 21:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26110#comment-1217880</guid>
		<description>WE GOTTA DO IT  NOW..can&#039;t wait another day.
seize the POWER.it is ours..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WE GOTTA DO IT  NOW..can&#8217;t wait another day.<br />
seize the POWER.it is ours..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve_in_KC</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/26110/understanding-men-part-one/#comment-1217875</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve_in_KC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 20:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26110#comment-1217875</guid>
		<description>emma, I very much appreciate your comments and support.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>emma, I very much appreciate your comments and support.  <img src='http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emmag</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/26110/understanding-men-part-one/#comment-1217864</link>
		<dc:creator>emmag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 20:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26110#comment-1217864</guid>
		<description>steve, this is priceless.  as a lifelong feminist from the 1960&#039;s, I LOVE it when feminist men have the audacity to reveal their experiences with snark and humor.  can&#039;t wait for part II, pay no attention to the self righteous pseudo feminists.  there will always be twinks who don&#039;t get it, as well as those of us who do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>steve, this is priceless.  as a lifelong feminist from the 1960&#8242;s, I LOVE it when feminist men have the audacity to reveal their experiences with snark and humor.  can&#8217;t wait for part II, pay no attention to the self righteous pseudo feminists.  there will always be twinks who don&#8217;t get it, as well as those of us who do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Anselmi</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/26110/understanding-men-part-one/#comment-1217852</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Anselmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26110#comment-1217852</guid>
		<description>You Betcha Steve!

Enjoyed and agree (mostly) with your Manifesto also!  

If we all marched to the same beat on NQ, it wouldn&#039;t be any fun and it wouldn&#039;t be real life.  My own take on NQ is to empower, inform and engage readers in a respectful, adult exchange of information, opinions, and ideas.  Political and other wise.  

Now about lesson #2, Steve- that whole adultery thing.  Hey, it could just be me, but you seemed to have thought way too much about the logic of it all.  (JK!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You Betcha Steve!</p>
<p>Enjoyed and agree (mostly) with your Manifesto also!  </p>
<p>If we all marched to the same beat on NQ, it wouldn&#8217;t be any fun and it wouldn&#8217;t be real life.  My own take on NQ is to empower, inform and engage readers in a respectful, adult exchange of information, opinions, and ideas.  Political and other wise.  </p>
<p>Now about lesson #2, Steve- that whole adultery thing.  Hey, it could just be me, but you seemed to have thought way too much about the logic of it all.  (JK!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arran</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/26110/understanding-men-part-one/#comment-1217838</link>
		<dc:creator>arran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=26110#comment-1217838</guid>
		<description>Much of your post could have been written in the 1950s. You come across as a person who may have read some of the comments by women and men about the sexism and misogyny directed towards Hillary Clinton in the primary, but it didn&#039;t quite register.  What do those women have to complain about anyway?  It&#039;s called misogyny -- the hatred of women.  We are talking about &quot;hatred.&quot;  

Women can also be sexist and even misogynist.  Many of them haven&#039;t evolved to understand how different life would be in a gender-equal, non-sexist culture, one that condemned women-hate, much like the media&#039;s attitude toward AAs, Obama, and his wife and family.  Everyone is not race tolerant, but the media certainly was in the primary, and has been since. 

During this past week, there were 3 occurrences that many women/feminists were responding to:  the Letterman Top Ten List, Contessa Brewer&#039;s interview (posted here), and Margaret Carlson&#039;s post at &quot;The Daily Beast.&quot;  Many women agree with Palin and have opposed this abominable attack on her and her daughters, even though they don&#039;t agree with her politics, like me. 

My response has been specific:  I am challenging your credentials to call yourself a &quot;feminist&quot; because I&#039;ve read little in your writing to support that description.  I understand you as someone who is making some observations, but still has the gall to ask why aren&#039;t women applying in greater numbers for management positions.  I think you can figure that riddle out.

Even though support for women candidates and women&#039;s issues is well-comed and appreciated, there is more to feminism than supporting women in politics and in careers.  There is a belief in gender equality elsewhere, there&#039;s an attitude towards women&#039;s rights, and there&#039;s a determination to actively move the culture towards actual women&#039;s liberation.  

 

As for William L. Donlon (from his comments), he appears to have &quot;gotten it.&quot; 

(BTW, I am not angry or humorless.  It&#039;s a shame that I have to make that statement.  My argument is with your post.  Whether or not I have the support of other blog writers or the administrators is immaterial.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much of your post could have been written in the 1950s. You come across as a person who may have read some of the comments by women and men about the sexism and misogyny directed towards Hillary Clinton in the primary, but it didn&#8217;t quite register.  What do those women have to complain about anyway?  It&#8217;s called misogyny &#8212; the hatred of women.  We are talking about &#8220;hatred.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Women can also be sexist and even misogynist.  Many of them haven&#8217;t evolved to understand how different life would be in a gender-equal, non-sexist culture, one that condemned women-hate, much like the media&#8217;s attitude toward AAs, Obama, and his wife and family.  Everyone is not race tolerant, but the media certainly was in the primary, and has been since. </p>
<p>During this past week, there were 3 occurrences that many women/feminists were responding to:  the Letterman Top Ten List, Contessa Brewer&#8217;s interview (posted here), and Margaret Carlson&#8217;s post at &#8220;The Daily Beast.&#8221;  Many women agree with Palin and have opposed this abominable attack on her and her daughters, even though they don&#8217;t agree with her politics, like me. </p>
<p>My response has been specific:  I am challenging your credentials to call yourself a &#8220;feminist&#8221; because I&#8217;ve read little in your writing to support that description.  I understand you as someone who is making some observations, but still has the gall to ask why aren&#8217;t women applying in greater numbers for management positions.  I think you can figure that riddle out.</p>
<p>Even though support for women candidates and women&#8217;s issues is well-comed and appreciated, there is more to feminism than supporting women in politics and in careers.  There is a belief in gender equality elsewhere, there&#8217;s an attitude towards women&#8217;s rights, and there&#8217;s a determination to actively move the culture towards actual women&#8217;s liberation.  </p>
<p>As for William L. Donlon (from his comments), he appears to have &#8220;gotten it.&#8221; </p>
<p>(BTW, I am not angry or humorless.  It&#8217;s a shame that I have to make that statement.  My argument is with your post.  Whether or not I have the support of other blog writers or the administrators is immaterial.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

