DEMOCRATS: Wake the F–K UP! You’ve got a BACKLASH on your hands
By SusanUnPC on May 22, 2008 at 5:49 PM in 9/11, Advertising, Bamboozling, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Clinton, Current Affairs, Hillary Clinton, Hoodwinking, White People
HE CANNOT WIN IN NOVEMBER! As Larry wrote, only slightly tongue-in-cheek about the Obama campaign’s dilemma, “If we would just figure out a way to get rid of those damn middle aged, non-college educated, cash strapped white bitches, then we would appreciate the utopia Obama is offering.”
Thing is, this lower-class white bitch (okay, sorry, I do have a B.A.) knows that Obama can’t win. And so do millions of others, including the hundreds who signed our “MUTINY MANIFESTO” here on May 20th. (If you missed it, it’s not too late to sign!)
I know, I know — you Dem party leaders assume that we’ll all kiss and make up come August. Well, get a clue. Millions of us will NOT. We will REFUSE to come around. Because we know that Obama is not experienced enough or knowledgeable enough — or honest and trustworthy enough — to be president. Obama’s tactics against Hillary–from hoodwinking to attacking Bill — and the DNC’s selective disenfranchisement have been beyond the pale. It took Neil Cavuto, on Fox News on Tuesday, to state the obvious:
[The Democratic party], even if [Hillary] continues to win or perform well, they’ve kind of have already written their ending on this … her victories or strong performances just get in the way of that. … [I]t’s like they’ve got the script written and she’s annoyingly disturbing that script.
From CBS News’s blog on May 21, 2008:
In Kentucky, 77 percent of those voting for Clinton said they would be dissatisfied with Obama as the Democratic nominee while just 21 percent said they would be satisfied. Forty-nine percent of Obama voters in Kentucky said they would be dissatisfied with Clinton as the nominee while 47 percent would be satisfied.
More worrisome, just 33 percent of Clinton voters in the Bluegrass State said they would back Obama in a general election. Forty two percent said they would support Republican John McCain and 23 percent said they would not vote in the fall. Seventy one percent of Obama voters said they would back Clinton in the fall should she win the nomination. Those are striking number and larger than were reported in West Virginia, Pennsylvania and Ohio but the trend has held throughout a crucial region of the country for November’s vote. …
NOW LOOK AT MASSACHUSETTS POLLING — Massachusetts being the ONE state that Democrats can always count on winning (at least historically), but polls show Obama either TIED with McCain or only winning by two points:
(a) “A loss of cataclysmic and historical proportions is afoot!” [Update]”
(b) “Massachusetts: The Canary in the Coal Mine”
My God in Heaven. If Obama can’t be in the lead against McCain in the heretofore Democratic-safe state of Massachusetts, along with the endorsements of both its senators (Kerry and Kennedy) and its governor (Patrick), what chance does he have?
OBAMA IS a fraud! Why don’t you get it?! MILLIONS OF US DO! HE is a marketing-created myth specifically designed to appeal to elite neo-liberals, whose silence regarding the sexism against Hillary has been deafening. He lacks any populist economic message which would appeal to the voters needed to win. The low income white bitches will vote for national security (McCain) if no one is speaking for their economic security, and these are voters essential for a Democrat to win. Just ask John Kerry.
We KNOW BETTER than to vote for him. He is not qualified to be president, yet many in the Party seem intent on putting the less qualified male candidate over the much more qualified woman. But us bitches are experts on that game.
“The one thing his voters can count on is that they will ultimately be disappointed.” Der Spiegel has it exactly right.

















