NARAL’S BAD CHOICE

WTF?

Ah Feminism…. Funny we should be talking about that. Yesterday I spotted none other than Gloria Steinham strolling on NYC’s upper West Side.

Feminism was an abject failure. It focused too narrowly on the ideological premise of patriarchy being the sum total of all our woes. Emphasis on ALL!

I happened to be on 5th Avenue the day of that infamous march. By accident. And certainly it was inspiring to a young female like me at the time. But as time went by, I saw the immediate flaws in the Movement.

How much frivolous time was spent on trying to shut down beauty pageants and to what end? They still are alive. And what about pornography? How much luck did they have with that? Pornography keeps the Internet free and profitable, so deal with it.

Worse, feminists tried to advance the idea of a new woman that to many was simply a too unattractive, intellectually smart, but tough and manless creature. The problem with this in a word is: heterosexuality. Heterosexual women love, like and are attracted to men. They enjoy the sense of power their beauty has on heterosexual men. It’s the right-of-passage of a young girl. Too bad the feminists didn’t realize this because they lost the next generations of younger women en masse.

But men wisely did understand and the male-dominated entertainment industry has relentlessly hammered at young girl’s psyches and objectified them and oversexualized them so that now women pimp themselves in Girls Gone Wild videos and whatever other venue they can find. Any of you who have daughters surely must know that there is no talking to young women in the throes of fascination with their own self-lust.

The Feminist Movement FAILED to take in the natural instincts of the female. Some women like to cook/bake/sew/have children or whatever. Some women enjoy primping and under-reported is how much women like to do this for themselves only. By failing to address issues like this and others like female competiveness and in-fighting resulted in the perpetuation of bad blood among women. They failed to establish a positive framework for women to work together for our own vested interests. They failed pass on a guide to self-awareness and sexual empowerment for young women. Instead of condemning pornography women should have been taught how to seize control of it, at least those who wish to involve themselves in the industry. And yes there are those who do, so instead of condemning them, they needed to be empowered because pornography, prostitution, like it or not, ain’t going anywhere. We have a better chance of ridding the society of illegal drugs (and that’s a toughie too).

If anything, this Primary has pointed all of this out and then some. Does that mean that all women should have fallen lock step in line behind a woman candidate? The answer to that question is the black community certainly did. And behind an unqualified, inexperienced candidate at that.

As deep as the troubles of the AA commuity are, the problems within the female gender are much deeper.

National Organization for Women (NOW) has been in Hillary’s corner big time! State NARAL organiztions are outraged. Emily’s List too. Do not lump this lumpheaded National NARAL absurd endorsement with other feminist organizations. They have been corrupted. The question is why and by whom.

The reason there are so few female politicians is that it is too much trouble to put makeup on two faces.

Ah Feminism…. Funny we should be talking about that. Yesterday I spotted none other than Gloria Steinham strolling on NYC’s upper West Side.

Feminism was an abject failure. It focused too narrowly on the ideological premise of patriarchy being the sum total of all our woes. Emphasis on ALL!

I happened to be on 5th Avenue the day of that infamous march. By accident. And certainly it was inspiring to a young female like me at the time. But as time went by, I saw the immediate flaws in the Movement.

How much frivolous time was spent on trying to shut down beauty pageants and to what end? They still are alive. And what about pornography? How much luck did they have with that? Pornography keeps the Internet free and profitable, so deal with it.

Worse, feminists tried to advance the idea of a new woman that to many was simply a too unattractive, intellectually smart, but tough and manless creature. The problem with this in a word is: heterosexuality. Heterosexual women love, like and are attracted to men. They enjoy the sense of power their beauty has on heterosexual men. It’s the right-of-passage of a young girl. Too bad the feminists didn’t realize this because they lost the next generations of younger women en masse.

But men wisely did understand and the male-dominated entertainment industry has relentlessly hammered at young girl’s psyches and objectified them and oversexualized them so that now women pimp themselves in Girls Gone Wild videos and whatever other venue they can find. Any of you who have daughters surely must know that there is no talking to young women in the throes of fascination with their own self-lust.

The Feminist Movement FAILED to take in the natural instincts of the female. Some women like to cook/bake/sew/have children or whatever. Some women enjoy primping and under-reported is how much women like to do this for themselves only. By failing to address issues like this and others like female competiveness and in-fighting resulted in the perpetuation of bad blood among women. They failed to establish a positive framework for women to work together for our own vested interests. They failed pass on a guide to self-awareness and sexual empowerment for young women. Instead of condemning pornography women should have been taught how to seize control of it, at least those who wish to involve themselves in the industry. And yes there are those who do, so instead of condemning them, they needed to be empowered because pornography, prostitution, like it or not, ain’t going anywhere. We have a better chance of ridding the society of illegal drugs (and that’s a toughie too).

If anything, this Primary has pointed all of this out and then some. Does that mean that all women should have fallen lock step in line behind a woman candidate? The answer to that question is the black community certainly did. And behind an unqualified, inexperienced candidate at that.

As deep as the troubles of the AA commuity are, the problems within the female gender are much deeper.

I’m too cynical (a realist) to buy that: they may “claim” that’s the reason, but I bet there’s more to it. $$$$

pshhhht……..it’s appropriate. And women bound in these groups need to abandon them fast.

You know what I found?

Get involved on a community level. I took teens into a program and we went to various events, camping, etc.

Those were the teens who finally came forth and shared: Granddad is molesting me. I’m pregnant. My sister is doing heroine.

I have no interest in intellectualism or groups that are overly removed.

Get down into the community.

Nuh-uh. Not the point: NARAL should have endorsed Hillary, since she’s the superior candidate and has done more for women than anyone running for POTUS. Obama has done squat. By making endorsing BO, NARAL has made itself irrelevant to most women. Dumb mistake.

By the way, Bwana, you’re boringly predictable.

I agree. The disrespect, fed by Obama’s republicanism, has created a real backlash.

It’s unacceptable. We’re not going to stand for it.

THere is absolutely no excuse.

Interesting.

Guess what? You underestimate women. We vote with our heads not our uterus’. Or is it our uteri?

Can’t hold Roe as blackmail, it isn’t as if whomever McCain selects as a potential nominee for SCOTUS just marches into a seat.

You can bet there will be plenty of women to stop it as there always has been… or if not, so what.

It is up to the new generation to support somebody like Hillary who will fight for them. If they are stupid enough to want a faux rock halting stupid teleprompter reading sexist like that sham ob, then the hell with them, let them fight for their rights.