RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Hillary Rescues Honduras

(Bumped up from Wednesday.)

US HondurasAfter Barack Obama’s team of White House amateurs overreacted to the expulsion of Honduran President Zelaya two weeks ago by lining up with Fidel Castro and Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, Hillary Clinton’s State Department has brought some adult leadership to the process. What Barack Obama should have done at the outset was coordinate with his Secretary of State. But apparently Barack likes to listen to the likes of Dennis McDonough, who is a political hack on par with Karl Rove. McDonough is clueless on policy but always eager to play a political angle.

Rather than check with the intelligence community, who could have briefed President Obama on the fact that intelligent agents of Cuba and Venezuela were plotting with Honduran President Zelaya to circumvent the Honduran Constitution, Obama quickly denounced the Hondurans and failed to do anything behind the scenes to prevent the blow up or reassure the Hondurans that the United States would not abandon them to Chavez. Although the Honduran military had the full support of the Honduran Supreme Court and the Honduran Congress when it moved against Zelaya, the action exposed Honduras to charges that it was reverting to the bad old days of military governance.

Enter Hillary the Savior.

Secretary of State Clinton, while condemning the action of the Honduran military, mounted a behind the scenes diplomatic effort to counter the meddling of Cuba and Venezuela. Her efforts paid dividends yesterday with the news that Nobel laureate and former Costa Rican President, Oscar Arias, would mediate the conflict. The Wall Street Journal reports:

Mrs. Clinton said both sides had agreed to work with Mr. Arias, who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1987 for brokering an end to civil wars in El Salvador and Nicaragua. She called him “the natural person to assume this role.”

Talks will begin Thursday in Costa Rica, Mr. Zelaya told Honduran radio. It was the Obama administration’s idea to bring Mr. Arias in as a mediator, said a senior U.S. official briefed on the diplomacy.

Mr. Arias could help the U.S. try to find a solution in which Mr. Zelaya returns to his post temporarily. Political parties here also have discussed moving up presidential elections already scheduled for November.

But a solution could prove tricky, with Honduras’s political establishment opposed to Mr. Zelaya resuming his post for any period.

Honduras’s acting president, Roberto Micheletti, applauded the designation of Mr. Arias and said, “We are ready for dialogue,” but added, “Only if it’s about President Zelaya’s surrendering himself to the tribunals of justice, and not about his return.” He told reporters, “No way.”

Washington has sought to make clear it prizes democratic principles by quickly condemning the coup and throwing its weight behind Mr. Zelaya, though he is a leftist ally of Venezuela’s Hugo Chávez and a frequent critic of the U.S.

The Wall Street Journal is a tad hysterical here. The reality is that a deal is likely in place that will let Zelaya finish his term after a public commitment to forego his effort to circumvent the Honduran Constitution and seek a new four year term for himself.

The Honduran press sees it differently. The lead article in today’s La Prensa states:
EEUU parece abandonar a Manuel Zelaya (The United States Appears to Abandon Manuel Zelaya).

La Prensa also reported on the testimony of proposed Under Secretary of State for Global Affairs, Arturo Valenzuela who told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee yesterday that this was not just a matter of resolving Zelaya’s expulsion from Honduras but that there also is a need to look at Zelaya’s effort to circumvent the Honduran Constitution and the efforts of Venezuela to interfere in Honduran internal affairs.

This is the message that the United States should have delivered on day one but Barack Obama circumvented the State Department. It has been Hillary’s leadership over the last two weeks that has moonwalked the Hondurans back from the precipice of crisis and set them on the road to a peaceful, legal resolution of the matter that will protect Honduras from the subversion of Cuba and Venezuela. Well done Madam Secretary.

From the State Dept. Web site:

  • Elder Jane

    Of course Obama sided with Castro and Chavez, while Clinton sided with democracy and diplomacy.

    • Thinker

      Exactly.

    • Jack

      Did he side with Chavez? I think he was lulled by Chavez, with promises from Chavez bypassing State for “talks” that appeal to Obama’s sense his speaking can chaaaannnge others. Also heightened shock from Chavez, and I bet his team used all the right kind of language to appeal to Americans.

      Why? The phony election, with its Venezuelan printed ballots and Cuban hirelings, is much, much more than about Zelaya and Honduras. This must have been viewed as a dress rehearsal for Venezuela. Chavez’ failed to get term limits removed the legal way. Even a majority of his supporters were against removing term limits. Similarly, a majority of Zelaya’s own party was against him on term limits.

      Not only a failure, but Honduras also sets the precedent of military action, successful military action, against Chavez when (not if) he pulls this kind of stunt in a year or two.

      This is scary to Chavez. Remember, in the coup against Chavez, the military was sending him out of the country, some say the escape plane was already loaded, when the new president said he would suspend the constitution and otherwise sounded like an old style dictator. That flipped the military and they brought Chavez back. Oddly enough, at that moment, Chavez sounded more like a democrat than the president-for-a-day. But he chaaaannged.

      The Honduran government will use the time-worn tactic of “talks” which in diplomatese often means “delay” and the world will forget the fuss. As for the “Leftist” other leaders for Zelaya, some may face term limits too, but I think the biggest factor, overlooked, is that Chavez gives them a lot of money.

    • Jack

      Did he side with Chavez? I think he was lulled by Chavez, with promises from Chavez bypassing State for “talks” that appeal to Obama’s sense his speaking can chaaaannnge others. Also heightened shock from Chavez, and I bet his team used all the right kind of language to appeal to Americans.

      Why? The phony election, with its Venezuelan printed ballots and Cuban hirelings, is much, much more than about Zelaya and Honduras. This must have been viewed as a dress rehearsal for Venezuela. Chavez’ failed to get term limits removed the legal way. Even a majority of his supporters were against removing term limits. Similarly, a majority of Zelaya’s own party was against him on term limits.

      Not only a failure, but Honduras also sets the precedent of military action, successful military action, against Chavez when (not if) he pulls this kind of stunt in a year or two.

    • James Guglielmino

      Well, OF COURSE, Obama sided with despots…NOTHING says democracy better than a military coup.

    • CardonBluff

      Nonsense squared. There is nothing remotely democratic or justifiable in this ramshackle Honduran coup, as dearly as the expedient Ugly Americans wish there were. Sorry, there is not a line in a constitution anywhere that says you can physically eject a sitting President from his nation and prevent his return by gun, while shooting down protesters and closing pro-Zeleya TV and Radio stations. It is a total non-starter and a fraud.

      I guess the Ugly Americans are nostalgic for the good old days of the Contras and murdering obstreperous anti-American Presidents– actions that have lead to our name rightly being despised by tens of millions in South America, and lead directly to people like Chavez.

      Luckily instead of expediency we have a principled President who says plainly a wrong is a wrong, whether it serves our cheap short term interests or not. And this won’t stand as a result. And when Chavez tries to pull anything — we’ll actually have some credibility instead of our usual self-serving “American interests.”

  • Phillip

    I am no fan of Hillary but thank god she took control of this situation after Dear Leader screwed this up royally. Seems Barry couldn’t wait to get in bed with his new buddies Chavis, the Castro brothers, and Ortega. Can’t help himself I guess.

    I don’t see eye to eye with Mrs Clinton on domestic issues at all but I’ve never doubted her commitment to defending the interests of her country.

    Obama? I have very real doubts. I just wonder how long she will be welcome in Obama’s administration. Seems she is being isolated and that’s not good.

    • Ani

      Thank you so much for your comment. It is so refreshing to see someone comment about Secretary Clinton in a respectful way, even though you disagree with her on certain issues.

      I hope you will take the compliment in the spirit in which its meant. :)

      And yes, I too, am gratified to see an adult at the table and hope Pr. Obama will be smart enough to get out of her way and let her do her job.

      • tango

        And yes, I too, am gratified to see an adult at the table and hope Pr. Obama will be smart enough to get out of her way and let her do her job.

        I just don’t see it happening. He will cockblock her (meant in a non-sexual manner) from doing her job because he wants her to have limited power & positive public attention. Why else hire so many others to do so much of her job? Why else take his wife & kids but not his SOS to visit Russia and Europe? I can see him only allowing her enough power that it reflects well on him but not so much that it grealy increases Mrs. Clintons stature. And I figure if something horrible happens, he’ll throw her under the bus. He’s done it to others that he supposedly liked, it’d be nothing to do it to a woman he doesn’t really like and knows is his superior in every way imaginable.

        I know someone was floating out there the idea that Hillary will tire of being marginalized, will resign & run for Senate in 2010. I guess it might decide on how the political winds are blowing.

        • elise

          Sigh. It never fails and is predictable as the sun rising every day, when Hillary name is mentioned certain commenters take the opportunity to undermine her efforts as Sec of State.

          If she does her job and does it well, why would you believe, Tango, she requires recognition by people like you? If she works behind the scene to find solutions, why can’t you (and others) understand it gives her personal pride and satisfaction to know she has made a difference?

          Personal glory is what Obama is looking for and she doesn’t seem to feel the need for or expect people to worship at her feet for doing her job. In this video she appears relaxed, in charge and beautiful. I wanted her to be president, but that apparently isn’t meant to be and I can’t think of a single person more qualified for this position. Her approval polls are higher than Obama’s which would seem to indicate over 70% of us think she is doing her job well.

          Obama needs her because he needs to succeed. And if he would rather have the spotlight on himself when things go well, it will be more and more difficult to turn it off if things go wrong. This wonderful woman gives 150% for the country, not self aggrandizement. Go crawl back into your pen piglet.

          • tango

            Excuse me?? What did I say about Mrs. Clinton that indicates power is all she’s after?

            I love Mrs. Clinton, she was my choice all along for President. I am certainly no Obamabot. Even so, I feel Obama HAS marginalized her because doing so props him up. She should be front and center or at least next to Obama for a majority of these foreign affairs issues and she’s not. I think she is the ultimate professional so she does her job and keeps plugging away behind the scenes as necessary trying to make a difference as best she could. But she is also ambitious and while she might not be motivated by gaining power but by ultimately serving her country, she is human. And humans like to be recognized by their bosses for doing a good job. They also like to be trusted to do the job they were hired to do. Obama asked her to be SOS and it’s to his discredit that he hasn’t fully used her to the best of her capabilities.

            If thinking Mrs. Clinton has gotten a bad deal from Obama means I’m a pig, OINK!

            • SWPAnnA

              It is my sense that Obama didn’t “ask” her to be SOS: she dealt for it at Finestein’s home the night before she announced she’d suspend her campaign. I just wish I could get a look at the clause in the contract she made him sign as to the penalties should he renig after she went for the Unity Pony in the trade.

              • mim

                actually Hill is on record in an interview that TOTUS asked her multiple times to be SOS, she said he was quite insistent

                she traded nothing, but dont let that stop your CDS..

                Pfft! and BWAAAAHA!!

        • PYW

          Hillary didn’t go to Russia because of her elbow. It’s that simple. There’s no conspiracy by Obama here.

          BTW, she’s also giving a major foreign policy speech next week, and going on her first overseas trip since the injury.

          • http://! stodgie

            pyw, that is just so cute! obama did nothing. Please! you are writing to people with good minds that aren’t fools. that bull might work on the obit sites but not here. keep moving, nothing from this poster worth reading!

            • QueenofHearts

              “that bull might work on the obit sites but not here.”

              LOL, stodgie – I’m sure you meant to write ‘obot sites’ but you made me think of how much I crave seeing an obot obit site!

              I can’t wait to read the obit of the obots – either they all walk off a lemming cliff together, or they wake up from their self-induced hypnotic slumber wondering where they are and where their country is. Then the adults who retained their critical thinking skills can clean up after them……..

              • SWPAnnA

                howllllll

              • http://! stodgie

                actually queen of hearts, i didn’t make a mistake. it is a pun though it is maybe a small one. it is my small way to show the total lack of respect i have for them.

      • kgirl1028

        LMAO. Ani this is Obama we are talking about…the only reason Hillary has been able to do this is because Obama is in a country far away that is almost as big as his ego. Trust me when he and his ego returns it will be more of the same. Especially since the Russians seem less than impressed.

    • wbboei

      Phillip, when you say that you are not a fan of Hillary because you disagree with her on domestic issues, bear in mind that if she were president she would apply the same prudential approach to the economy that she does to foreign policy. In other words, she might well have a different concept of the proper balance between the private sector than the pubic sector than you do, but I can assure you she would not be overloading the circuits with new costly programs we cannot afford like he does at a time like this.

      You have put your finger on the pivotal concern going forward. When you join the enemy team for what you perceive to be the good of the country, as Hillary did, you run the inevitable risk that you will be marginalized. When you are secretary of state and the president does not allow you to be the chief diplomat, rushes around the world making bad deals for the country, and when there is a change in policy does not inform you so you can inform the department you lead, I say the handwriting is on the wall. The motive is equally clear. He cannot handle the truth and he is worried that her numbers will be better than his.

      I have my own thoughts on what she should do in these circumstances, but she knows the landscape better than I do. Its her call. However, and here is where you and I differ, I think she would be a great president in 2012. I just hope he does not destroy her political capital in the meantime. Meanwile, the media whores are shadowing her ever more, censoring her successess, and looking for failures where there are not. Thanks to them the public knows more about the trivial resetting the relationship with Russia gaff, than they do about the critical leadership she has provided in this intance, while covering for the idiot boss.

      Someone asked me when I will accept the fact that he is president. I told them the twelth of never, and after the uber corrupt primary, I am inclined to say that he holds the presidency by adverse possession.

  • Eastan

    And well done Mr. Johnson. You have been clear and informative since this crisis began. Maybe someone can add NoQuarter to the president’s iPod bookmarks so that, between listening to rap diddies, he may find some proper guidance.

  • Shainzona

    Phillip: I agree….with one obvious modification:

    “I am A HUGE fan of Hillary AND thank god she took control of this situation after Dear Leader screwed this up royally. Seems Barry couldn’t wait to get in bed with his new buddies Chavis, the Castro brothers, and Ortega. Can’t help himself I guess.”

    Strange, isn’t it. At least we both agree about Barry and his Buddies (DC and otherwise!).

    • felizarte

      She did all of that with one hand tied.

      • Ani

        lol

      • mary

        Yes, she did indeed with one hand tied…can you imagine with both?!!

        Hillary’s recovering nicely I heard. A friend of someone I knew had asked President Bill Clinton about Hillary’s recovery and apparently she had two small pins placed and a tiny rod in her right elbow so it is very painful still, but her recovery is guaranteed to be PERFECT…excellent surgery and prospect…FULL recovery!

        God bless Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton…..

        We can only guess what she’d do with both “unitied” and up front to combat the stupidities of Barack–the Laughingstock of Moscow!

      • Thinker

        lol!!

  • mel

    Maybe Obama was using this event as a testing ground to see how it could work for him to circumvent the US constitution for his own self interests which has been his entire political life anyhow of self interest!

  • yttik

    Not a day goes by that I don’t feel extremely grateful that Hillary Clinton is our SOS. I believe that she is all that stands between us and complete disaster. Without her wisdom and experience we’d be sunk.

  • HARP

    Let`s not forget but Hillary did it with one hand tied up.

  • Clara

    Great observation, Harp! And her right hand at that.

  • J

    Larry,

    Hillary looks haggard and very tired.

    • jbjd

      If she looked “haggard and very tired” this might be because 1) she has a serious injury, for which she may be taking medication that also affects her; 2) she is working very hard; and 3) she does not employ a make-up person / hair stylist on the State Dept. payroll, to conceal her real state. (Listening to what she said, I thought she looked fabulous.)

      • kgirl1028

        Heck no, she is looking tired and haggard because she’s working for Obama, just look at Michelle, if that’s not tired and haggard i don’t know what is.

      • http://noquarter foxyladi14

        she always looks fabulous to me..

        • dc

          Hillary is working her butt off, as usual, and doing the heavy lifting in foreign policy. Traveling to a different country every other day has got to wear you out fast. I think she looks great, but hell do you ever hear people commenting on how males are looking tired? Not.

    • TeakWoodKite

      “haggard” ?

      Tired perhaps, but that is to be expected when the POTUS is sleeping it off below deck dreaming of White house pies.

    • elise

      That’s a strange observation J. To me she looked serene, sure of herself and in full possession of the facts. They say beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

  • NomNomNom

    well, why don’t we just send in Negroponte to “negotiate”? I’m sure he’ll have the situation ironed out in no time. Srsly.

    • TeakWoodKite

      NomNomNom, I don’t get your meaning. I would not send him there considering his past.

      Snark?

      • NomNomNom

        yes. Archbishop Oscar Romero. Sister Laetitia Bordes. Father José Andrés Tamayo?

        • elise

          I love comments full of hidden meaning and existential wisdom Nom. Even if I don’t grasp all the nuances, I feel there are great truths hidden in obscurity.

        • NomNomNom

          Still another comment spammed. Wow, I am so surprised. Really.

    • candymarl

      Negroponte would be great! By the time he’s finished everyone would be dead and no conflict! problem solved! Trust me. Really.

  • Hot Librarian

    If Zelaya is to “surrender himself to the tribunals of justice ” then he has to be allowed to return.

    He cannot be tried in absentia if he is wanting to come back.

    They must charge him with some national offense if they have a case.

    Honduras shut down its airports -how is that helping the economy& the country?

    Rather than a victory for Honduras they have been forced to the card table.

    Term limits have merit but one term is limiting. But if you agree that this is a great thing for Honduras -why not USA?

    • WMCB

      Re: term limits, ours are set by our constitution, same as theirs. We have a process to amend/change that constitution, and have done so in the past re: term limits. Honduras also has a legal process. Zelaya wanted to circumvent that process.

      We cannot hold a public referendum and change our presidential term limits. Neither can Honduras. Calling it “democratic” because people would vote for it does not change the fact that it would be ILLEGAL. If we here in the USA want to change ours, it takes 2/3 of Congress, and 2/3 of the state legislatures agreeing. That is the law.

      • elise

        Zelaya doesn’t have the means to change the constitution and he has only a little over a year left in office. “We don’t always get what we want”. military coups are unpredictable and dangerous.

      • NomNomNom

        The law does not prohibit referendums on the Constitution: it prohibits referendums and plebiscites within 6 months either side of an election.
        And the only reason it does this is because the congress passed the law AFTER Zelaya proposed the referendum. When Zelaya made the proposal to hold a nonbinding referendum, the proposal was legal.
        While one doesn’t dispute that Zelaya continued with plans for the referendum after it was made illegal, it’s a bit devious to omit the changing of the law to suit the military and congress– taking away a right citizens formerly enjoyed– and state that the military and congress are all in favor of democracy. Democracy has a freaking vote.
        http://majikthise.typepad.com/majikthise_/2009/07/more-on-honduras.html

    • Don

      “Term limits have merit but one term is limiting. But if you agree that this is a great thing for Honduras -why not USA?”

      Frankly I would not mind at all if we changed our constitution to allow for only one term (I would probably even be agreeable to a six year term); however, there is a thing called “process”. As I understand it, Honduras, like the US, has a process for changing its constitution and from what I have read and heard, it appears Zelaya did not want to abide by that process. But then of course, I guess we cannot put ourselves up as a shining example of following a constitution either; i.e., FISA, POTUS that isn’t required to prove he is NBC, etc., etc.

    • Ashy1

      I think the wisdom behind two terms is apparent. Things can go haywire very quickly. In fact, I wish the US had a one-term limit right about now–at least in Obama’s case. At least we can vote him out–or has that been changed, too? Regarding Honduras, in view of their political history, a one-term limit seems appropriate.

      • Scout

        ‘we can vote him out–or has that been changed, too?”

        Well, the DNC is working to change the rules of the primary and how the ultimate candidate is selected–oops, meant elected, so maybe, maybe not. IIRC, challengers have gone up against an incumbent in the past, but if they cheat their way through the primary like they did against Hillary, then we’d be stuck relying on the general election. And if the repubs put up a horrible candidate, there you go.

        Of course, all this speculation may amount to nothing if the entire process is controlled by the uber-wealthy, which I am tending to think is plausible.

    • TeakWoodKite

      Hot Librarian, some where in that library of yours is the Honduran Constituion.

      It states that only the Honduran Congress, by two thirds majority, may amend the Constitution. Much like ours.

      It also states that the manner (mechanics) in which the constitution maybe changed, CAN NOT be modified by the Honduran Congress or anyone else.

      So I ask what, does the left do after 8 years of the “Executive Doctrine” President?
      It calls what happened in Honduras a “coup”.
      To my way of thinking, the Honduran Congress, Supreme Court and Military did what our own government did not have balls to do. Uphold their sworn obligation to the Constitution when confronted with a tyrant.

      While the left in the US cries foul, they ignore a stark reality.

  • Ginger

    She is awesome.

    • Ani

      She is at that. How great to see an adult at the podium.

  • chris from Chicago

    It seems to me whatever “l’enfant terrible” touches he screws up….because he is inexperienced, ineptand oh so very arrogant.

    In contrast Hillary is extremely competent, experienced and accomplished..in all that she does….and she is smelling like a rose in her position…

    Her excellence must haunt BO[ZO]…and it is causing him to make some very egregious errors in foreign policy…

    What an idiot this guy is!

    • CardonBluff

      Oh yeah, Hillary is so competent she got the entire Iraq war wrong while Obama issued a speech that was one of the best models of common sense and strategic wisdom given prior to the invasion. It was the speech so many WISHED they had given once the worm turned in Baghdad.

      Obama knows more because he is more principled and clearer about where we need to go. The welter of nationalistic or narcissistic self-interest that rules Hillary and the right wingers is a strategic loser in the long run and that is why Obama won, and Hill and McCain didn’t.

      We will do ten times better under Obama than Hillary’s visionless equivocating and selling out for political gain. She now is dependant on Obama, and any future she has depends on backing him as he tries to change the rotten way this country has behaved since 2001.

      • virginian_without_a_party_now

        Please stop, your ignorance hurts my head and your pathetic words offend the eyes. I suggest you read speeches then Senator Clinton gave about Iraq in 2002 and at least one article describing how then Secretary of State Colin Powell personally asked her (after he received requests from the UN) to help pass a tough measure with the appearance of teeth to try and force Iraq to comply with the UN. Ultimately, it was either vote against the resolution and go against the counsel and requests made by Secretary of State Colin Powell and people within the UN or vote for the resolution and believe that the US could force inspectors back in with our threat of potential forceful action. I doubt few people knew what a hard-on Bush had for Iraq. Hell, even members of his own cabinet (fellow republicans) were taken aback by his desire to tie September 11 to Iraq.

        I am in no way condoning what the Bush administration did in Iraq – but when you grow up you will probably find out that while principles are key and must ultimately govern our lives the world is a complex place requiring savvy planning and posturing to try and accomplish your desired end. This is something many in the Bush administration failed at. Senator/Secretary Clinton didn’t make this mistake but people like you who don’t really know what you are talking about and the MSM have done a sadly effective job of making it so that the facts and truth don’t matter, it is only your perception that matters.

        On a side note:

        My recollection is that then state senator Obama had to give his speech twice, because the cameras weren’t rolling the first time he gave it. Might I remind you that he wasn’t in the US Senate to vote on the Iraq resolution. When he did become a US Senator he voted to fund the war. He was planning to vote for Justice Roberts to support Bush but was warned that this would cause him political damage so he changed his vote, he voted for FISA, he voted for the Energy bill, he voted for the PATRIOT ACT reauthorization. Funny, he had numerous problems and concerns with the final text of the PATRIOT ACT, without the amendments he wanted, but voted for it anyway because it came down to a choice to either vote for or against the final version. This is something you seem to allow him to do but are critical of Secretary Clinton about. That was when he was even there to vote. This doesn’t sound like the champion of principles that you gush on about.

        Colin Powell lost all credibility for allowing himself to be misused and manipulated, he should have known better. Why he didn’t resign in protest when he discovered the truth shows a fundamental flaw in his character. Then as if he couldn’t get lower he let Senator Clinton take the fall for him and endorsed Obama and my bet is people like you ate it up.

  • standard

    Nice piece, Larry.
    I know that HRC is doing a lot that she isn’t being credited for.

    • Wazza Blue Dot in Texas

      I concur. Thanks for the link to Hillary, Larry. What a breath of fresh air to hear an adult addressing serious issues.

    • Lily

      I think Hillary has done alot she has not been credited for since Bill Clinton was elected Governor of Arkansas.

      • Ani

        :) I agree.

      • mary

        Hillary’s recovering nicely. Her surgery was p-e-r-f-e-c-t. President Clinton had told someone inN.Y. that Hillary had 2 small rods and a pin during surgery and her prognosis is excellent. The mending process should be uneventful.

        Can you imagine what she can do with both hands UNTIED,eh? This is a dynamo-woman!

        God speed her healing!

        Meanwhile, back in Moscow, the TelempropterDummy met with 2nd in command and no one paid attention to Him! Ouch! It mush hurt his Rezko-roots Ego…

  • Waiting4Hill

    Hillary does look tired. I can’t imagine how difficult it must be for her to sleep comfortably with her arm in a sling. that being said– her voice sounds strong and her words are always brilliant. God bless her health and may she have a speedy and comlete recovery from her injury.

    • Mandelay

      Amen!

    • listing starboard

      It really ticks me off that she is working herself so hard behind the scenes and Obama gets to take all of the credit.

    • mary

      HILLARY’S ON THE WAY TO FULL RECOVERY….
      GOD BLESS HER….

  • Mandelay

    Related to this? See:
    http://www.miamiherald.com/news/americas/story/1133642.html?asset_id=Venezuelan%20TV%20chief%20talks%20to%20Herald%20editors&asset_type=html_module

    “TV officials: Clinton backs us
    The head of a Venezuelan opposition television network made a stop in Miami after meeting with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who expressed support for Globovision’s stance against Hugo Chávez’s government.
    BY LUIS ANDRES HENAO
    LHENAO@MIAMIHERALD.COM
    Fresh from a meeting with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the head of Venezuela’s main opposition television network said he’s returning home convinced Clinton supports Globovisión’s efforts to speak out against Hugo Chávez’s government….”

    • jbjd

      You can see/hear this press interview on the State Dept. link, above.

      • Mandelay

        Thanks much jbjd … and for those who thought she looked very tired on the clip above (I saw it live and also thought the same), this interview with Globovision shows her with her great smile and looking in the pink. Much appreciated, thanks!

  • tango

    I’d be tired too after dealing with the inexperienced Obama.

    I don’t know if it’s been linked previously, but hotair did an article a few days ago about Hillary Missing in Action and the marginalization the Obama Administration is doing to her. When a right leaning website sympathizes with how she’s been pushed off to the side and is the least visible SOS in recent history, you know it’s serious.

    http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/07/06/amber-alert-for-hillary-clinton/

    • listing starboard

      Its time to stop stereotyping Conservatives, don’t you think? Seems to me that most of the truthful fair information is found on conservative sites.

      • ces

        Seems to me that most of the truthful fair information is found on conservative sites

        …unless the conservatives are in control.

        Once in control do, say, report anything to stay in control. This applies to both sides.

      • dc

        One thing I will agree with there is that conservatives were eg. Pat Buchanan, Joe Scarborough were much fairer, and still are, to Hillary during the primareis than the so-called left.

  • Texas Playwright

    bho the fraud is clueless. Selfish, self-centered, narcissistic, lying, cheating, stealing man child still looking for daddy in some scary, anti-American places–we know all that. The fact that he is clueless is becoming more frightening by the day.

    • felizarte

      True! True! He must be terribly disappointed with the lukewarm reception he received in Russia. His rockstar status is fading and his trips abroad are probably his attempts at recreating the cheering he got before his election. I wonder if he senses that it is downhill for him from hereon as people wait for him to deliver the hoped for change. I am not happy with being right about him being the wrong person for the job.

      • tminu

        Russians like substance, they mock manipulative schmoozers. Russians parody fake charismatics just like Obama, he doesn’t know it but he just walked into their political version of SNL as the fall guy and they’re laughing at him. Look at Medvedev’s stiff-arm distanced handshake and he NEVER made eye contact, he was not about to let the weirdo-wizard try no Obamacaine on his brain, no leg touchies (like OBO did with O’Reilly which seemed to put him in line) allowed.

        • AF catfish

          Obama is so touchy in his handshakes I need to shower after witnessing them. It shows he’s never worked in a real workplace where he would be disciplined for that.

      • http://noquarter foxyladi14

        from hero to zero in such a short time too.

  • VMorris

    Thank you, Hillary! And God Bless you…

  • WMCB

    I hope the Ozero can keep his jealous narcissism in check long enough to let her continue to do her damn job.

    I had a Republican friend tell me recently, “At least when Hillary talks I get the feeling I’m hearing from a grown-up.” Amen!

    It’s the COMPETENCE, stupid.

  • http://! stodgie

    hmm, hillary did it while ole barry was out of the country being insulted by russia. that may be just the way it happened, but i wonder. hillary needs to resign in my view. get while the getting out is easy rather than harder.

    • felizarte

      One of these days, BO will ask her to fix another of his screw-ups and she’s bound to say, “you fix it yourself!”

  • http://bullmoosegal.blogspot.com bullmoosegal

    At least they haven’t totally hamstrung her (yet).

  • http://thenewagenda.net/ Amy Siskind

    I’m glad the “somebody” is covering Hillary. Thanks Larry.

  • Chicago Joe

    This is the message that the United States should have delivered on day one but Barack Obama circumvented the State Department. It has been Hillary’s leadership over the last two weeks that has moonwalked the Hondurans back from the precipice of crisis and set them on the road to a peaceful, legal resolution of the matter that will protect Honduras from the subversion of Cuba and Venezuela. Well done Madam Secretary.

    Absolutely right. And naturally, the MSM is too busy covering lead in the victory garden and the t-shirt choices of the Obama daughter to actually explain this as you have.

    And BHO is overseas sending doublespeak messages on his health care agenda instead of keeping his eye on the ball.

  • Peggy Sue

    And this is why I am absolutely grateful that Hillary Clinton is SoS. I couldn’t figure out what was going on with this whole fiasco, partcularly after Obama appeared to be linking arms with Chavez and the Castro boys.

    Thank God we have someone competent and dedicated to the interests of the United States. I don’t know whether this job will serve Hillary’s best interests. But I don’t think there’s any question that she’s serving ours.

    Thanks for the piece, Larry!

    • Seattle Moss

      And this is why I am absolutely grateful that Hillary Clinton is SoS

      You and me both!

    • tminu

      Obama needed the cocaine narco money to keep flowing–he’d made deals — Zelaya was Chavez’ cocaine mule/bitch, receiving upwards of 4 planeloads of bricks every day…they found hefty bags of us currency at his residence. Zelaya was who pleaded with the UN that cocaine should be made legal. Obama’s team met with Zelaya prior to election—this is all about the drug money river, which got dammed up when Zelaya got the boot. Of course Chavez and Ortega NEED him back in business!

      • listing starboard

        Same reason that Obama wants U.S. troops in Afghanistan under the pretext of “Democracy” –he wants his share of the poppy trade. The efforts of the Iranians and Hondurans to secure their freedom and Democracy doesn’t concern him. YOu are spot on about the drug connection.

        • mary

          Yes!

          OBAMA’S VIETNAME = AFGHANISTAN!

          Baracks has elbowed Congress into approving $106B for the war in AFghanistan. The military budget is $700B plus $1.2 Billion per month to “RENT THE PAKISTANI ARMY” to fight a war to protect his Wall Street backers’ pipeline interests at the Af-Pak Border!

          So far the results: 90 Americans killed

          THREE MILLION REFUGEES 3,000,0000 homeless, maimed, injured children without fathers and orphans roaming the country’s tenthomes looking for food! Yes, this is the OBAMA WARMONGER’S new face.

          He could eliminate HALF THE DEFICIT with this useless spending to catch a dead guy! Or he can have SINGLE PAYER UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE at half the cost.
          Canada only spends $3,500 percapita on health care. Obama spends $7,500! Shame on this liar who used the Harry and Louise Ads to SLANDER HILLARY during the primary.
          And asshole McCAFFERTYof CNN called her “SCOLDING MOTHER’ cause HIllary dared to defy Obama’s fraudulent misrepresentaiton of her policies in the 90s. Hillary was the pioneer back then when Obama was sucking the Chicago Rezko Slum Landlord Development Fund….writing letters for millions to be donated to start the old people’s tenements….

  • politicsisdirty

    She looks unhappy. Who would be when you are being marginalized. Poor Ms Clinton. All the knowledge and skills and she can’t use it just becuse the Pres is son insecure.

  • politicsisdirty

    She looks unhappy. Who would be when you are being marginalized. Poor Ms Clinton. All the knowledge and skills and she can’t use it just becuse the Pres is soo insecure.

  • marie3548

    http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12737

    Nearly Six Months In, Obama Still “Achievement” Free

    By John Lillpop Wednesday, July 8, 2009
    As tough as it is to admit it, Hillary Rodham Clinton got one right when she tried to warn America that Barack Obama was an inexperienced, naive poser without any achievement to his credit.

    As reported by the LA Times, in part, during the heat of the 2008 campaign:

    “I think that I have a lifetime of experience that I will bring to the White House. Sen. John McCain has a lifetime of experience that he’d bring to the White House. And Sen. Obama has a speech he gave in 2002.”

    The unwashed masses fell in love with this bright and silver-tongued man of color who, if elected, would make your car and mortgage payments for you, provide free health care for everyone, and end partisan squabbling.

    He would deal with Iran, North Korea, Al-Qaeda and other avowed enemies of America by simply talking nice to them.

    He would solve the energy crisis by reminding everyone to check the air pressure in his or her tires.

    He would declare all of America a “nuclear-free” zone which would immediately end the threat of nuclear war and eliminate the need for all of those silly missile shields that Republicans kept pushing to keep their pals in the defense industry rich and happy.

    Weakest, least able, and least pro-American presidency in our history

    Nearly six months into the weakest, least able, and least pro-American presidency in our history, Barack Hussein Obama remains a man without achievement.

    The only CHANGE he has managed is to the US dollar which, after months of Obamanomics, has been downgraded to change!

    Thank goodness, the people are starting to wake up, as in Ohio where Obama’s approval rating has slipped to 49 percent.

    A counter-revolution is in the air.

    The people have pretty much had it, and will soon demand CHANGE in the Oval Office and in the halls of Congress presently clogged with lefty nut balls like Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid.

    Hang on patriots! This too will pass.

  • tminu

    Witness Hillary begin to assert herself as a leader unto her own, away from the madness of Obama, who is going to sink like the Titanic…you watch, the stink is in the wind, a negative five approval index and like sharks they’re gonna turn on him one by one then altogether there will be a chorus of whining over how ‘they’ were misled.
    70% of conservatives say they believe Palin implicitly and think Obama is full of shit. That’s remarkable considering she’s not even running for anything

    • tminu

      oh and I cannot wait to watch the public rub the Gibson Couric Olberman faces in the doodoo pie they created…

      • http://! stodgie

        it is already starting. i saw on the internet today that the independents are desertng ole zero. the conservative dems are in revolt. didn’t take long!

  • Scout

    It strikes me as the height of irony that SOS Clinton has had, as some of her first challenges, situations in Iran and Honduras where the question of election validity is central to the conflict.

    My god, I cannot see how she can quote B0 (the selected democracy usurper) on elections and having the will of the people respected without absolutely choking on the words.

    It is so ironic as to be almost macabre. I feel for her and wish for her star to continue to rise while his plummets and burns.

  • candymarl

    I looked and read the Honduras Constitution. True the President cannot serve more than four years.

    However, the Constitution does not allow for a military overthrow of the government either. If the Judiciary and Congress agreed to this they also violated the Honduras Constitution.

    This Zelaya may be bad a guy. But he did call for a referendum and not a military take over. Perhaps they need to amend their Constitution to limit the power of the Executive branch. Perhaps they could add clause that says the Constitution cannot be amended by referendum.

    But of course I’m not sure who is in power now. Who is the President of Honduras? Surely we should be talking to?

    • http://deleted Aaron Kramer

      There is no allowance for the president to seek a referendum, this is the job of Congress. Zelaya pursued a referendum despite this restriction and he actively worked against it. He ordered a vote and Congress said “no,” he ordered a ballots and Congress and the Supreme Court said “no!.” He marched a mob to a military base in order to grab ballots and have a referendum run by him for him and the Attorney General, Congress and Supreme Court asked the military to stop him. Now the election which was scheduled to occur in November will take place as planned. the VP a member of Zelaya’s party is in office and the problem is what?

    • NomNomNom

      The power of the executive office is limited by the term limit. The term limit was designed to limit the ability of military dictators from installing a puppet government with no recourse to remove it by voting.
      As chief exec the pres appoints the military leaders, usually this is what keeps them somewhat in check: the pres is not likely to appoint his outright enemies; but he can only pick from the pool that is there. If the army’s internal leadership, and it is the army who decides whom to promote, is against the pres, then again the military ends up running the show because in reality if not law, the military controls the judiciary and the military is functionally largely immune from prosecution. The military is essentially autonomous, the so-called 4th branch of the government.
      The intent was supposedly to provide a separation of the government proper and the military for the security of the government, for example the military may not vote; in reality this separation has made the military less controllable because it has very limited civilian oversight.
      Of course, since the Constitution was written while the country was still ruled by the military dictatorship of Policarpo Paz García, this is not exactly a surprise.

    • Wisewoman

      The military, congress, and the court could have simply refused to allow voting places to open for a vote to extend the term of the president if that vote was illegal. The military could have made sure that no voting places would open. They could have had a public relation campaign to inform the people that they would be doing something illegal. Instead they too broke the law and constitution in an even more sinister way by kidnapping an elected president and throwing him out of the country. Hillary, I hope you are successful in turning this situation around. Larry is 100% correct in his assessment.

      • WMCB

        Zelaya was not kidnapped. He was actually given the choice to resign, and face arrest for his crime (and what he did WAS a crime by their constitution). Zelaya also attempted to unilaterally remove the head of the military to fend this off – a power that he DOES NOT have under their law. He was making power grabs all over the place.

        He himself refused arrest and judicial process. So they exiled him, and BTW, their CONSTITUTION SAYS that a leader who tries to circumvent the constitution or term limits IMMEDIATELY loses CITIZENSHIP. I’m not saying the manner in which it was done was the best way to handle it. But to paint the military, and congress and the court as somehow kidnapping him in some violent military coup is far, far from the truth.

        • NomNomNom

          Refused arrest?? He was kidnapped at gunpoint by the order of School of the Americas trained generals Vasquez and Suazo.
          You omit the others kidnapped as well from your little story. And Micheletti’s false statement to his entire country that Zelaya had resigned.
          I have a copy of the Honduran constitution: in Article 42 which details conditions for loss of citizenship subpragraph 5 states: “Incite, encourage or support the continuity or re-election of President of the Republic”.
          But the referendum did not say anything about term limits: any suggestion that it involves term limits is an unsubstantiable inference. It said: ¿Está de acuerdo que en las elecciones generales de 2009 se instale una cuarta urna en la cual el pueblo decida la convocatoria a una asamblea nacional constituyente? = Sí…….ó………..No.
          Do you agree that a fourth ballot box be installed through which the people will decide to convene a constitutional assembly? Yes…….or………..No.
          http://faustasblog.com/?p=13740
          You also omit Article 43, which details how citizenship may be restored, Article 44 which states that voting is a right and public service and is universal, obligatory, egalitarian, direct, free and secret, and Article 45 which says that interfering in citizens’ ability to participate in the country’s political life is a punishable offense. One might conclude that passing a law to limit citizens’ ability to vote in referendums and plebiscites (direct voting) within 6 months of an election was infringed by the midnight law the congress passed taking away this right so as to make the formerly legal referendum illegal.
          As for the absurd insistence that this coup had anything to do with democracy, what is your explanation for Micheletti’s installing his nephew as mayor of the second largest city in Honduras (a contest for which he came in third back in November)? Does it change your mind when you learn that the real mayor was taken out and shot?
          http://narcosphere.narconews.com/thefield/coup-%E2%80%9Cpresident%E2%80%9D-installs-nephew-%E2%80%9Cmayor%E2%80%9D-honduras%E2%80%99-second-city
          Stop being stupid. It’s a freaking military coup.

          • TeakWoodKite

            NomNomNom
            The citation does not say he was shot. He has not been heard from again. He may well be dead, that can not be assumed.

            At 11 a.m. this morning, workers and citizens in and near San Pedro Sula City Hall heard gunshots and explosions, while riot police attacked a crowd that was demonstrating outside against the coup. More than 50 citizens were reportedly arrested. And nobody has seen Mayor Padilla ever since.

            .

            Where does it say he was shot?

            • NomNomNom

              It does not say he was shot, you are correct; it says shots were fired and he’s not been seen from since, and the nephew of the “troglodyte coup” president now has his job.
              So where is he? Do you think he’s coming back?

          • http://! stodgie

            nom, we get it. you don’t like the people of honduras throwing out the pres trying to do an end run over their will. why i can’t understand. i am sure i’ll get a lengthy response explaining how the rest of us don’t have a clue. however larry makes a lot of sense. anyone that chavez supports is questionable in my view from the get go.

            • NomNomNom

              stodgie if you’d really read anything I posted you’d know I said the very first day I thought Zelaya should have been arrested. I haven’t suggested I think Zelaya is a good guy or Chavez either, though imo they’re both preferable to military dictatorships.
              “you don’t like the people of Honduras throwing out the pres trying to do an end run over their will.”
              that’s bs, “the people” didn’t decide anything, some SOA trained military goons did. The people could have decided what to do with him in court. And how would you know what the people of Honduras think, when all the dissenting news and tv has been shut down; they’ve even shot and killed at least one Chilean journalist, several protesters, and hundreds of people have been rounded up and jailed?
              I have a real problem with the assumption that somehow because it’s SA that it doesn’t matter if the military takes over the government, just as I do seeing Northcom troops stationed in NA.
              And you’ve got plenty of posts yourself.

            • NomNomNom

              Well what do you know, my response has been spammed. :shock:

        • NomNomNom

          Admin: another comment eaten by Spaminator, plz rescue, thx.

  • http://deleted Aaron Kramer

    When Hillary was initially offered SOS I stated many times that it was a trap either to marginalize her influence within the administration or discredit critique from the outside. Obama would say “I offered her a position in my administration in order to hear her advice but she she said no. Taking shots at me from outside the administration is unfortunate counterproductive, something I would expect from Republicans. Let’s move on” Hillary and Bill were outsmarted by the appointer of czars and special envoys. OBAMA is 2 moves ahead of most of the USA and 3 moves ahead of those in DC.

    • trixta

      And Obama is a few moves to getting his arse kicked in 2012.

  • NomNomNom

    :( admin: Another comment in the Spaminator.

  • kgirl1028

    And we knew this, that why we voted for her. It wasn’t about making history or being a Hillary fan. I knew out of all the choices I had Hillary Clinton would have done it best. i have my issues with Mrs Clinton but she was the best American for the job. There’s no hero worship, just the cold sobering truth that she would have been able to successfully clean up the mess Bush was going to make and then some. Too bad her the members of her party felt otherwise.

  • choo choo magoo

    Thanks for keeping us abreast of events in Honduras Larry.

    Very much enjoy getting your perspective and insights. And must say love the video of Hillary. It’s great to learn the right things are being done. Even better to know that Hillary that is one doing it.

  • gina

    When I look at Hillary,I see a true leader. Bravo! When I look at Obama,I see Carrot Top. Wait a minute,my apologies to Carrot Top. Somehow,I believe he’s not as clueless as The One.

  • texaslatina

    hillary- what a woman!

  • Diana L. C.

    Larry,

    It’s always good to see a mature, intelligent adult speaking in measured terms and anwering unscripted questions intelligently and calmly, without being sarcastic. Thank you for posting this.

    She should have been president. I’m happy she is still working for us. And now I feel a little less anxious about the world.

    She’s beautiful no matter what her outside appearance shows.

  • http://boscoden.bizland.com/blog/ Bob Stone

    I voted for Hillary in the primary mainly, because I thought she had a better chance of winning. I assumed America would remember the budget surpluses and prosperity of Bill’s term in office. Her vote in the senate for the Iraq war put her in a very bad light among the liberals in the democratic party. Even though I agreed with Obama on this I still felt Hillary had a better chance of winning. Thankfully, I was wrong and now we have the best of both. The fact that they did not work out their story ahead of time just proves how open and transparent this administration is. That Obama denounced a military overthrow of an elected government is not a bad thing. Hillary finding a solution to the problem is a pretty good thing. This time the American voters got it right.

    • Diana L. C.

      We could havw had it right and good in one step instead of two with Hillary.

      Her approval ratings are higher than his, by the way.

    • TeakWoodKite

      That Obama denounced a military overthrow of an elected government is not a bad thing

      BO denounced the action without understanding that the Honduran president was a tyrant seeking to circumvent the constitution of Honduras.

      BO is not qualified. But he would agree with Chavez before he would agree with SOS Hillary Clinton.
      This is proved by his “meddling”.

    • Scout

      The American voters were cheated out of the legitimate Dem primary winner, which was Hillary. The DNC manipulated the election repeatedly and blatantly to select him. They also ignored caucus fraud reported to them in multiple states.

      Your waxing poetic about the election is poison salve and does not respect the truth of what happened.

      Furthermore, the myth of Obama’s “vote against the war” is a complete fabrication–he was even in the Senate!!!! Even his much lauded speech had to be re-staged during the election because there was no recording or written account of it. That it even happened as asserted by him may also be a lie.

      I suggest you go read the content of Hillary’s speech given on the floor of the Senate before she cast her vote re: authorization of force. She was the Senator from New York. The twin towers had been leveled, the dust barely settled; Americans and New Yorkers especially had gone through an immense trauma never before experienced by our country. Even so, her speech was measured and non-inflammatory. She stated her position that every measure should be used, diplomatic and otherwise, to clarify the situation in Iraq. She did not vote to rush the U.S. into war. Again, another lie.

      We, the American people, were denied our rightful president and we should never forget that and fight so that it never happens again.

      • http://noquarter foxyladi14

        AMEN.we were robbed.and i,m still mad about it.

        • maddie

          Me too, foxyladi 14. Not about to forget it, either!

          Flick Obama off the tv, just like I did Bush. Both self-serving selected lightweights.

    • trixta

      Bob Stoned, what a crock of sh@#$t!

    • thinker

      The democratic party had no problem with the fact that Kerry and many other Obama supporters voted just like Hilary and Obama negotiated for and ultimately accepted an endorsment from Powell, one of the authors of the war. What fools!.

      • Thinker

        just wanted everyone to know that apparently there is another “Thinker” that is posting now.

    • Texas Playwright

      No, the DNC corruption, caucus fraud, ACORN illegal registration/voter activities, obot bullying of superdelegates in Denver, Pelosi/Dean/Kerry/Kennedy/Reid/Brazile shenanigans, Axelrod/Favreau immorality and millions of ignorant, idol worshipping Americans all got it WRONG. Hillary is both SOS and de facto President. She is saving bho the fraud’s incompetent self while serving our country in more ways that we can see.

  • tek

    Larry: great article. This issue demonstrates how truly stupid and incompetent Obama is, as predicted by those of us with any sense. I hear people saying that Obama is so smart, he’s smarter than Bill Clinton, etc. Well, let me tell you, Bill Clinton would never, NEVER, do anything stupid like this. He’s too politic.

  • politicalidentitycrisis
    • politicalidentitycrisis

      My favorite part of the above article:

      Should our Afghanistan adventures prove as punishing for our GIs as they have for every other power enticed into that miserable landscape, should GM come back to the people’s feeding trough, should Chavez et al continue to make the president look foolish, Americans may seek relief — and they may spell it HILLARY.

      I still want Hillary! Gosh darn it anyway! I want relief now!!!

      • imustprotest

        Thank God for Hillary Clinton, that’s all I can say.

        • Hg

          BHO will appologize for her American actions when he gets back from his international campaign tour.

  • catherine

    Thank you Larry! Excellent article! It’s very bittersweet though when one considers that we could and SHOULD (had the DNC condoned fraud not occurred) have Hillary as our POTUS at this moment. A stateswoman who world leaders (both friend and foe alike) recognize as a true leader with gravitas who is to be taken very seriously. And not this pop idol clown who’s the laughing stock of the world.

  • Scout

    I posted a reply to Bob Stone. Is it the spam machine?

  • I’m a Linda too

    Thanks for the news and post.

  • memi

    THANK YOU, LARRY JOHNSON….

    This is certainly the antidote–Hillary’s farsighted foreign policy–to OBAMYOPIC foreign policy based on one man’s Ego.

    No wonder the Russians were tremendously, overwhelmingly, absolutely UNIMPRESSED with Barracks!

    • Docelder

      No wonder the Russians were tremendously, overwhelmingly, absolutely UNIMPRESSED

      Check out this Alaska remark. He is community organizing… “rubbing raw” the resentments. All the while grinning as if he didn’t know better. Nobody is as clueless as he feigns to be.

      http://www.adn.com/3437/story/856257.html

      • NomNomNom

        he is a pos. I hope a whale eats him.

        • http://noquarter foxyladi14

          i wouldn’t want to make the poor whale sick.or worse.

      • Docelder

        On the bright side though… Muammar Gadafy shares a cozy moment with Obama. They seem to be having fun. Hillary should ask to meet Muammar’s parents before she lets Barack and Muammar play together though.

        http://www.irishtimes.com/homepage/images/1224250381475.jpg?ts=1247173350

  • mary

    Larry’s post should be on the front page of the WashingPost/N.Y.Times and mandatory reading for the kindergartenish media misogynists putting the populace into lethargic slumber with overreporting on Mikey Jackson, Britney, Paris and Barack O.!

    It takes a seasoned, intelligent, compassionate and knowledgeable TOP DIPLOMAT like Hillary to set the record straight and, as Larry says, ACT LIKE THE ADULT BARACK NEVER WAS NOR CAN BE!

    Astutely diplomatic manoeuvre by Hillary Diane Rodham, I say, BRAVO!

  • Andy

    Why why why, could someone please explain me why Hillary isn’t our POTUS??

    Glad her head is prevailing.

    • Andy

      And LJ many thanks for this post !!

    • Peggy Sue

      We know why, Andy. The Democratic Party Leaders, to their shame, decided their champion, the lightbringer was one Barack Obama. The media by and large, became the myth-makers, heralded an unaccomplished and inexperienced man as the next King Arthur and took every opportunity to cut down HRC on blatant sexist terms and even had the gall to call her a racist for standing up and not backing down.

      But even worse, the vast majority of Democratic and Independent voters with even a clutch of Republican voters bought into the ridiculous, prefabricated fairytale.

      Say thank you to Axelrod and his ilk. He proved that you can make people believe anything given the right words and context.

      If anything this is a sad, sad testament to who and what we are as a society, and how easily we can be deceived.

  • NomNomNom

    Interestingly, it now appears that the troglodyte pres Micheletti was born in Lombardy (which would not be in Honduras) which would make him ineligible to be president.
    Those Constitution loving School of the Americas generals are just so funny. HAHAHAHAHAHA.
    http://engforum.pravda.ru/showthread.php?p=2853431

    • Docelder

      Constitutions are so 20th century. ;)

      • NomNomNom

        lol, if ours is any example…
        but I should have checked more before posting: I think it’s probably a hoax, I can’t find any reputable corroboration.

  • NomNomNom

    :( Admin: Another post spammed

    • NomNomNom

      oopsdon’t bother to retrieve, cannot find sufficient corroboration for link posted:

      some articles are appearing stating that Micheletti was born in Lombardy (from where his parents definitely emigrated) which would make him ineligible: I have been unable to ascertain whether or not his parents emigrated after or before he was born.

  • http://noquarter foxyladi14

    great post Larry.it should be sent everywhere.

  • morris1030

    Thanks again Larry for this post re: Hillary and Honduras. Edifying.

  • http://rose4hillary.blogspot.com/ Still4Hill

    Hillary is awesome – Obama should spend more time in Russia!

    I watched her Town Hall at the State Dept. today – it gives you an idea what kind of White House she will have after she

    1. cleans up the personnel problems at State;
    2. coordinates State and USAID;
    3. completes the qddr provisions and gets new laws made to protect the revisions;
    4. finishes devouring every brief she can find;
    5. trains her replacement whom she will name;
    6. finally turns on her kitten heel and walks out on him after a policy dispute in 2011;
    7. runs against him and WINS because everybody will have seen through him and because WE WILL BE RUNNING HER CAMPAIGN – AND WE NOW KNOW THE DIRTY TRICKS TO BLOCK!

    Thanks for the post, Larry.

  • Retired

    SoS Clinton is looking pretty counterrevolutionary with her Honduras actions. If Obama intends to keep his leftist revolutionary credentials with the Castros and Chavez, he will need to get rid of her.

  • NomNomNom

    Micheletti tried to amend the Honduran Constitution to allow Cordova more terms in 1985: only he wasn’t calling for a referendum (legal when Zelaya proposed it) he was calling for a change to the Constitution (treason).
    http://narcosphere.narconews.com/notebook/kristin-bricker/2009/07/micheletti-tried-change-honduran-constitution-1985
    BWAHAHAHAHAHA,

  • wbboei

    Back on Russia for a second. Lest we forget. He came, he saw, he screwed up badly in my opinion. Just ignore the hype and look at the facts.

    I have been a student and practioner of the art and science of negotiation for over three decades. Also, I have supervised subordinates in the exercise in that activity. I know what a good negotiation looks like, and yes, I know what a bad one looks like as well. As a general rule of thumb, you try to avoid bad result when the negotitiation is an important one. And, there are few negotiations which are more important than the one Bambi had last week with Putin. So how did the Messiah do in that meeting with Putin?

    Not worth a shit. On a scale of 0-10 from worst to best, I would give him no more than a 2. Putin handed bambi his head. What exactly did Putin do. He was all 10s: i) he controlled the agenda, ii) he lectured bambi on his improvident remark about having one foot in the cold war, iii) he gave Bambi the history lesson he does not have, iv) he convinced bambi that America needs Russia, but Russia does not need America, ergo bambi will have to deal on Putins terms, v) he put Bambi in a box by linking offensive and defensive weapon systems, vi) he used bambis weakness to signal to Ukranians that they cannot count on America, vii) he used bambis weakness to make Poland wish they had Bush back, and viii) when the short meeting was over, he walked out–no sitting around schmoozing. The clear subtext was this: Obama, I have more important things to tend to than sit here and rap further with you.

    Bambis best moment came when he told Putin he wanted Russia to be strong. His worst moment came when he set us up for a bad bargain whereby Russia would divest itself of cold war nukes which are degrading anyway, and in exchange he singalled a willingness to limit our offensive capacity (submarines, long range bombers, etc.) as well as the defensive shield eastern Europe wants. Worst of all he has no idea just how badly he got had.

    The bottom line is this: whether you like Putin or not you have to admire what he did here. He is a tough disciplined bargainer. He knows a rube when he sees one. He picked up on Bambis little ploy to separate Putin from the president he handpicked. And he kept bambi on the defensive. Oh bambi will go back to his entourage and paper over his mistakes. Big media will print that lie to the American People. But believe me none of what occurred is lost on Putin. He will continue to roll over bambi insofar as it suits his purposes. He smells weakness and all his old KGB instincts will compel him to capitalize on it. Wouldn’t you?

    • jbjd

      Agreed (except for the name calling).

    • jbjd

      wbboei, there’s a new post about Putin; you might want to re-post your comment up there.

  • http://noquarter foxyladi14

    good analysis.Putin had bo for lunch.lol.

  • Pingback: Tune In Now to John Batchelor’s Radio Show : NO QUARTER