RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Freaky Frogs and Girlie Man Fish

webfoggirlyman_edited-3

It’s been a many years since W. C. Fields claimed he never drank water because “fish fuck in it.” Were he alive today, he would no doubt express far more creepy reasons for avoiding drinking H20 straight. It seems Mother Nature is really pissed off and has started getting more bizarre, more terrifying, while reaping her wrath for what we have done to our rivers, ponds, and oceans.

She sent in the frogs with multiple or missing appendages and other deformities. Presumed causes include pesticides (largely from chemical fertilizer), UV rays, and parasites. It seems clear to me, since freaky frogs are a relatively new phenomenon, that several human-influenced causes converged. Here is a good study that well illustrates conspiring forces.

The study showed increased levels of nitrogen and phosphorus cause sharp hikes in the abundance and reproduction of a snail species that hosts microscopic parasites known as trematodes, said Assistant Professor Pieter Johnson of CU-Boulder’s ecology and evolutionary biology department.

The nutrients stimulate algae growth, increasing snail populations and the number of infectious parasites released by snails into ponds and lakes. The parasites subsequently form cysts in the developing limbs of tadpoles causing missing limbs, extra limbs and other severe malformations, Johnson said.

“This is the first study to show that nutrient enrichment drives the abundance of these parasites, increasing levels of amphibian infection and subsequent malformations,” said Johnson. “The research has implications for both worldwide amphibian declines and for a wide array of diseases potentially linked to nutrient pollution, including cholera, malaria, West Nile virus and diseases affecting coral reefs.”

Recently, Mother Nature’s message is getting more intriguing, more hair-raising, more shocking. What would get red-blooded male’s attention quicker than the prospect of the contaminants flushed into our water supply causing them to turn into females?

This could be the beginning. Endocrine disruptors entering our water system through a variety of means, are apparently making their way up the food chain. According to the Federal Wildlife Services research:

We found female germ cells (oocytes) in the testes of 82% to 100% of the male smallmouth bass and in 23% of the males from the single largemouth bass collection near the Blue Plains Wastewater Plant in Washington, DC.

The baseline prevalence of testicular oocytes in male smallmouth is uncertain but may be in the range of 14% to 22%; baseline for male largemouth may be closer to 0%. We found vitellogenin [an egg yole precursor protein expressed in females of fish, amphibians, reptiles birds, and insects] in the blood of 33% to 90% of the male smallmouth and 85% of the male largemouth.

…Multiple environmental contaminants were found in the sampling devices, often with higher concentrations of wastewater chemicals (near the treatment plant outfalls). Pesticides currently used in agriculture were detected at all locations. Hormones were not detected in the passive water samplers. However, laboratory tests (yeast screening assays) suggested that estrogenic endocrine-disrupting chemicals were present at all locations. These tests do not identify single compounds, rather an overall response.

Based on the results of these samples, we cannot identify a single chemical or sources that may be causing the intersex and vitellogenin induction. Multiple chemical stressors that are not solely associated with agriculture or wastewater treatment plant effluent may be responsible.

So, where do these estrogen enhancers that are creating intersex fish come from? Seems there are a wide variety of sources, from materials used in agriculture and industry to women’s urine flushed down the toilet, with the strongest dose from women taking estrogen pills. (Stephen Colbert recently suggested that women now just “have to hold it.”)

Estrogen disruptors appear to have their strongest impact on the developing male fetus. Nicolas Kristof is taking the big leap (based on real data summarized by the National Wildlife Service) by suggesting that sexual organs of human boys are already trending towards “intersex.”

Now scientists are connecting the dots with evidence of increasing abnormalities among humans, particularly large increases in numbers of genital deformities among newborn boys. For example, up to 7 percent of boys are now born with undescended testicles, although this often self-corrects over time. And up to 1 percent of boys in the United States are now born with hypospadias, in which the urethra exits the penis improperly, such as at the base rather than the tip.

So, OK Mother Nature, you certainly have my attention!

  • SHV

    Estrogen disruptors appear to have their strongest impact on the developing male fetus.
    ********

    Hypospadias is apparently not on the rise in the U.S., casting doubt on claims that phthalates and other endocrine disruptors cause reproductive abnormalities in humans”

    http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=phthalate-fears-questioned

    • Tricia Spiegel

      The author adds:

      Nevertheless, she added that it doesn’t rule out that phthalates or other chemicals have a role in causing the defects. Looking at how birth defect rates change over time is not an adequate way of examining environmental connections.

  • Clara

    There is an article in today’s paper about the deterioration of water that makes up the Chesapeake Bay. This is a vast body of water, the health of which has been rapidly declining.

    Now they’re warning not to fall in if you have a nick or a scratch and don’t get one while being in the water. You may just be contaminated with the organism that causes necrotizing faciitis, AKA flesh-eating bacteria. What does that say for the fish and crabs harvested from the Bay?

    Water, water everywhere and not a drop to drink, play or eat from.

    • oowawa

      Water, water everywhere and not a drop to drink

      It’s a good thing we can go to the supermarket and buy some. You can still buy a bottle of water for less than a bottle of beer! I have a confession to make: when I was a boy, our family used to drink water straight from the tap! But we were very poor . . .

      Now, 60 years later, I’m paying the price. I’ve been going downhill for a long time. I’ll bet I’ve got those necrotizing thingies all through my body . . .

  • Denise

    Good drawing, good article. Thanks, Pat.

  • pm317

    What a fine toon, Pat! One creature’s comfort (excessive) means another creature’s discomfort.

  • mamakay

    I think that if we knew what was in most of what we eat and drink we would be scared out of out minds. Our bodies seem to take care of alot of it. We live longer now than in the days when families grew all their ouw food, but of cours there was not refrigeration so their stuff probably was rotten half the time. Id just asoon stick my head in the sand and not think that deeply about it. If their were solutions that could make a difference ok, but I dont think any one is trying. The cloning of corn etc is very scary because the seeds blow in the wind and get mixed up with the good corn. Gad there is no end to it. Sorry for the ramblilng. Maybe its because I drank tap water today.

  • Don X

    Your clever cartoon depicts a very real problem not only in the water where sea creatures live, but in the drinking water humans consume. This is part of the larger problem of world wide environmental pollution that many, but ot all, countries now recognize must be dealt with if we are to survive as a species. The health and physical integrity of all species is threatened by all the poisons we dump in the streams, rivers, the oceans and the air. The interaction of global warming with increasing pollution is another issue that some politicians deny is a problem but worries many in the scientific community. The question is whether our legislators and our president have the guts and political will to make a concerted effort to recognize and deal effectively with these issues. Words and flowery speeches are not acceptable substitutes for effective action on target issues.

  • http://noquarter foxyladi14

    they could even use some of that stimulus money to clean ut the waterways.roads too.

  • http://ksclematis ksclematis

    A great and timely post, Pat.
    Another perspective: Consumers and purchasers of fruit and vegetables without blemishes and of great size: pesticides are used to kill the insects to have blemish-free fruit, veggies, flowers, nursery plants which leads to bird-kill from consuming pesitcide-killed insects. Bees are used for pollination of all fruiting and flowering plants are killed by pesticides; they also make honey for human consumption as well as for their own consumption. I’ve read that some fruit growers will not allow bee hives within a certain distance of their orchards so the bees will NOT pollinate the fruit blossoms which causes the fruit to produce seeds!!! Thus our seedless watermelons, clemantines, etc….

    In order for larger and faster growth of plants, nitrogen (N) is used; for larger plants, and fruit, and more flowers phosporus (P) is used. The residues of all these chemicals at some point enter the water system. Wal-Mart has been selling their own brand of garden fertilizers with 0% phosporus. Demand by commercial growers and gardeners will create demand of higher potency of phosporus manufactured for and purchased from garden centers. It is also becoming much more expensive because it has been mined out at a rapid pace.

    The big pharmas’ R & D of better, more potent, more “creative” and more effective medicines are eliminated by the users of such meds., and the meds which are not consumed are flushed down into the water system. It was suggested to me that any unused prescription drugs be returned to doctors’ offices or pharmacies for disposal, or crushed and put in trash disposal; and, I would presume enclosed in plastic containers which don’t decompose for 700-1,000 years! Then what?? for what generation?? will there be anyone left in any reasonable condition to know what’s happened??

    Food for thought??? I think so…..

  • elise

    Tens of millions of sharks are being killed every year and more than forty species are either endangered or “critically” endangered. There was a report from Venus, FL (It is called the shark tooth capital of the world). There haven’t been many sharks in the area in the last few years.

    There is another recent report of huge jelly fish infestation off the coast of Japan. They are Box-jellyfish and they kill fish. Where they have tried to control the population, they found the females were making several thousand times more eggs than normal.Scientists studying the situation believe the populations will appear in other parts of the world.

    There may be some connection to these events. There are fewer fish for sharks to eat.

    I remember a line from Jurassic Park where the Jeff Blume character is told the dinosaurs couldn’t reproduce. He said, “Nature will find a way”. Nature is going to cook our goose one day.

    Your cartoon is great, Pat. Thank you.

  • Rich

    A very beautiful and creative cartoon that must have taken a long time to create! However that is also part of the problem. It make light of a very serious problem. Next to global warming this may be the most dangerous to our survival. Just because we are not experiencing mass human change does not mean it is not happening on a lower level just like changes had to take place long before we started to actually see changes in frogs and fish. Once we see the changes, then it could be to late because then we would be in a reverse engineering mode or trying to reverse changes in people.

    This is very similar to a problem that started when we were young. We baked in the sun and did not see any immediate changes to our skin (cancer) and the only change we noticed was a nice tan and attention from others. Now they tell us that the skin cancers we are dealing with today actually started 20 years or longer ago and even if we do not expose ourselves to the sun any more, we can still have the cancer show up.

    This problem also shows that what we put into our bodies can affect not only ourselves but also others. In addition it shows the effect that if each of us only flushes one bottle full of medication a year, consider how many bottles and medication would be flushed down the toilet each year and how that accumulates in our water systems.

    Rich

  • Pingback: Green Tech Girl | Water Water Everywhere But Not a Drop to Drink