Palin: The Bad Mother
By Monica Jean Alaniz on July 14, 2009 at 4:01 PM in Current Affairs
Originally published at The New Agenda.
Many of us are still unclear as to why Sarah Palin resigned as governor of Alaska. I know that I am. One thing that seems apparent to me is that Gov. Palin has not actively sought the spotlight since her resignation; if anything the media has sought her out, wanting answers to questions that many of us have.
Whether Gov. Palin resigned for personal family reasons, a desire to make sure her state had the best representative in office, or financial reasons, we should respect her decision. Leave her alone already. If she wants to fish with her family, let her fish with her family.
Yes, there is disappointment that one of the most recognizable female figures has decided to step down from office (even if I don’t hold the same political views that she does). What I can’t understand is the backlash that she is receiving from other women, particularly Washington Post reporter Kathy Quinn.
In her article entitled Palin’s Peculiar Family Values, Quinn, once a strong Palin supporter, attacks Palin about her commitment and dedication as a mother. The blurb used by The Washington Post for this article goes so far as to state, “Sarah Palin should have resigned as Alaska governor for one reason only: To care for her special needs son.”
The article goes on to badger Gov. Palin for the way she handled her family and political career. It accuses her of using her family, putting her political career before her family, exploiting her children to advance her political career, and even of exploiting the fact that her son has Down Syndrome.
I find this article disturbing, sad, and it angers me on several levels.
As pointed out previously on blogs written for The New Agenda (Our Children are Off Limits!!! and Dear Neal Conan and NPR, Is This Really Normal? ) the attack on Palin’s son Trig have been more than a bit insulting. To my knowledge Gov. Palin does not go around mentioning her special needs child as a center point of her speeches or interviews. If anything, she treats him the same as her other children. He’s part of the group.
Quinn points out how Trig was on the stage with Gov. Palin and her family during the Republican National Convention and how this made Gov. Palin a bad mother due to the fact that a baby shouldn’t be up at that time. What should Palin have done? Hide her child away? What kind of message would that have sent? I would hope we no longer live in a time where we hide away relatives with disabilities.
Palin is being attacked for her parenting skills, not her policies or role as a politician. We have never questioned male candidates like this. It’s all right for male candidates to be absent from their children lives, or vice versa, tag their children along when they happen to be there on the campaign trail or photo-ops. In fact, many times they are praised for including their children and point out what good fathers they are. But, in the case of a woman candidate, you’re damned if you do and damned if you don’t. If you take the kids along, you’re a bad mother for exploiting them; if you leave your kids at home, you’re a bad mother for neglecting them.
Why does the media continue to do this? Why can’t they focus on the real issues such as candidates’ stances on political issues that are important to the public?


















Pingback: New CBS Poll: Most Americans feel…. John Kerry: What Gov. Palin Forgot…. | Total Info