RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Palin Takes Obama On in Her WaPo Op-Ed: The ‘Cap And Tax’ Dead End

For those of you who thought Governor Sarah Palin would go quietly into that good night, think again. Her Op-Ed in today’s Washington Post strikes directly at the heart of President Obama’s cap and trade plans. She misses no opportunity to point out that his recovery plans are not exactly helping those in need, well, recover:

There is no shortage of threats to our economy. America’s unemployment rate recently hit its highest mark in more than 25 years and is expected to continue climbing. Worries are widespread that even when the economy finally rebounds, the recovery won’t bring jobs. Our nation’s debt is unsustainable, and the federal government’s reach into the private sector is unprecedented.

Unfortunately, many in the national media would rather focus on the personality-driven political gossip of the day than on the gravity of these challenges. So, at risk of disappointing the chattering class, let me make clear what is foremost on my mind and where my focus will be:
I am deeply concerned about President Obama’s cap-and-trade energy plan, and I believe it is an enormous threat to our economy. It would undermine our recovery over the short term and would inflict permanent damage.

Palin points that “American prosperity has always been driven by the steady supply of abundant, affordable energy”…

There is no denying that as the world becomes more industrialized, we need to reform our energy policy and become less dependent on foreign energy sources. But the answer doesn’t lie in making energy scarcer and more expensive! Those who understand the issue know we can meet our energy needs and environmental challenges without destroying America’s economy.

As with everything the Obama Administration is doing, cap and trade also employs the ram-rod technique of shoving legislation down the gullet before anyone has had a chance to give it a second thought. Palin then makes a point I’m sure Obama would rather she gloss over:

Job losses are so certain under this new cap-and-tax plan that it includes a provision accommodating newly unemployed workers from the resulting dried-up energy sector, to the tune of $4.2 billion over eight years. So much for creating jobs.

In addition to immediately increasing unemployment in the energy sector, even more American jobs will be threatened by the rising cost of doing business under the cap-and-tax plan. For example, the cost of farming will certainly increase, driving down farm incomes while driving up grocery prices. The costs of manufacturing, warehousing and transportation will also increase.

The ironic beauty in this plan? Soon, even the most ardent liberal will understand supply-side economics.

The Americans hit hardest will be those already struggling to make ends meet. As the president eloquently puts it, their electricity bills will “necessarily skyrocket.” So much for not raising taxes on anyone making less than $250,000 a year.

Even Warren Buffett, an ardent Obama supporter, admitted that under the cap-and-tax scheme, “poor people are going to pay a lot more for electricity.”

Governor Palin urges us to move in a new direction and states we can achieve energy independence if we:

…responsibly tap the resources that God created right underfoot on American soil. Just as important, we have more desire and ability to protect the environment than any foreign nation from which we purchase energy today.

In Alaska, we are progressing on the largest private-sector energy project in history. Our 3,000-mile natural gas pipeline will transport hundreds of trillions of cubic feet of our clean natural gas to hungry markets across America. We can safely drill for U.S. oil offshore and in a tiny, 2,000-acre corner of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge if ever given the go-ahead by Washington bureaucrats.

Of course, Alaska is not the sole source of American energy. Many states have abundant coal, whose technology is continuously making it into a cleaner energy source. Westerners literally sit on mountains of oil and gas, and every state can consider the possibility of nuclear energy.

Whether one agrees with her or not, one thing Governor Palin can speak to with authority is energy, given her service at the Oil & Gas Commission:

We have an important choice to make. Do we want to control our energy supply and its environmental impact? Or, do we want to outsource it to China, Russia and Saudi Arabia? Make no mistake: President Obama’s plan will result in the latter.

For so many reasons, we can’t afford to kill responsible domestic energy production or clobber every American consumer with higher prices.

Can America produce more of its own energy through strategic investments that protect the environment, revive our economy and secure our nation?

Yes, we can. Just not with Barack Obama’s energy cap-and-tax plan.

Loved the “Yes, we can” reference. What is your reaction to her position? I do not pretend to know that right answer here, but certainly she raises issues worth discussing.

Everyone else out there is having quite a big reaction. In a few hours, her op-ed in WaPo has attracted over 3,000 comments. All over the blogosphere and on news sites, people are reacting and as usual, Governor Palin is a lightning rod for both love and hate. HuffPo, typically, cannot kill the message, because she does have a point, so they shoot the messenger, claiming she is “too stupid” to have possibly written this piece. I thought the piece was pretty coherent myself, and yeah, I’m sure she wrote it. By the way, did I mention that I despise elitists. You can her article it in its entirety here.

Further, since the surprise announcement of her resignation on July 3rd, Palin has raised over $200,000 for her PAC, in addition to over $700,000 raised in the five months since its formation. CBS just put out a poll saying 65% of those asked think Palin would not make a good president and most pundits left and right are harping about the fact that her political career is effectively over. Wishful thinking, perhaps. I have no idea what Palin’s actions will be or what her political career will look like going forward, but one thing is assured — as long as these ridiculous attacks continue, her following will grow and she will get plenty of free press that she may use to her advantage.

As for the “chattering class,” as Palin calls them, I can only say, gee fellas, that’s an awful lot of copy to devote to someone with nothing to say, no platform to say it, no following and no hope of making a dent. Evah.

Somebody seems awfully scared of this lady.

Just sayin’.

  • American

    Putting aside all the political BS, lets just talk about policy and what she is actually saying. As usual, Palin makes absolutely no sense. Her piece is complete garbage.

    First of all Palin has absolutely no particularly expertise in energy. Here limited time on the Alaskan energy commission, less than one year, and as governor really don’t make her an energy expert, especially compared to the 100s of experts who worked on the Waxman-Markey bill. She only talks in very watered down generalities and talking points. She gives no particular insight or analysis about any of the issues regarding energy and cap and trade. She adds nothing to the conversation.

    In fact what she seems to be saying makes no sense whatsoever. The purpose of cap and trade is to restrict Co2 emissions. She seems to be talking about oil. The petroleum industry will hardly be impacted by cap and trade. In fact, car emissions have already be dealt with separately. It is the coal industry that will be really impacted. I am not sure how she equates oil with cap and trade. It just does not make any sense.

    In addition she says “We have an important choice to make. Do we want to control our energy supply and its environmental impact? Or, do we want to outsource it to China, Russia and Saudi Arabia? Make no mistake: President Obama’s plan will result in the latter.” This also does not make any sense whatsoever. There is absolutely nothing in the Waxman-Markey bill that would cause more of our energy to be produced elsewhere. What exactly in cap and trade would cause us to import more oil or energy from Russian, China or Saudi Arabia? That simply does not make any sense. Cap and trade is about emissions. Importing more oil/energy as she suggests has nothing to do with reducing emissions or cap and trade.

    Do you really want this imbecile to be your President? She really had no idea what she is talking about.

    • Animal Control

      At least she uses her own name when making comments.

      • JozefAL

        Can anyone point out the irony of the comment immediately above this?
        Or is YOUR “own” name really “Animal Control”?

        • Animal Control

          No irony stupid. I was pointing out that at least she used her own name when writing a critical opinion unlike “American”. Now, why don’t you do something about your own user name.

    • barry bums a ciggie

      Do you really want this imbecile to be your President?

      And the one sitting in the WH is qualified and not an imbecile? Please. The guy can’t formulate a sentence together without his teleprompter. And the flip flopping of the whole Iran thing was the works of a total amateur.

      The thing is, America can’t have it both ways. By relying on foreign oil, we are forever tangled in the affairs of the middle east and bowing to the Saudis.

      • TeakWoodKite

        Do you really want this imbecile to be your President

        Can I frame this one? If it was a bumper sticker and I saw this, guess what? BO hell NO!

        Can I bum one?

      • jwrjr

        The imbecile is already President.

    • Ani

      If the way the stimulus got passed is any indication of how this Administration is carefully reading over and constructing “cap and trade” legislation, we would do well to heed any warnings possible — and slow down to consider exactly what we are doing.

      An op-ed is to promote discussion — not insults. Your comment only indicates how threatening you find this lady. An “imbecile” requires no attention.

      There were many “experts” on the stimulus package as well, including Timmy “Turbo Tax” Geithner, who Pr. Obama just had to have as Treasury Secretary and thanks to old ‘honest Abe’, VP Biden, it was admitted that their plan did not work.

      What makes you think the geniuses coming up with cap and trade are any better? Clearly, she does also accurately quote Warren Buffet, an Obama supporter, who points out the burden that will be created by the bill. Food for thought.

      • American

        Damn right threatened. Threatened by her stupid ideas and evangelical far right-wing ideology.

        http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/07/sarah-palin-does-not-understand-cap-and-trade.html

        CBO estimated in a June 19 analysis of the American Clean Energy and Security Act (H.R. 2454) — a cap-and-trade bill recently passed out of the House energy committee — that the net impact to households from the bill in 2020 would range between a benefit of $40 per year and a cost of $340 per year, with an average cost of $175 per year. CBO stated that its analysis “focuses on the effect of the legislation in the year 2020, a point at which the cap would have been in effect for eight years (giving the economy time to adjust) and at which the allocation of allowances would be representative of the situation prior to the phase-down of free allowances.” The EPA estimated in a June 23 analysis of the bill that the average cost to households averaged over the years 2010 to 2050 will be between $80 and $111.

        http://cbo.gov/ftpdocs/103xx/doc10327/06-19-CapAndTradeCosts.pdf

        • Uhmmm

          American: are you quoting Andrew the Batshit Crazy Sullivan here? Mr. pfth Sullivan who’s deranging about about Gov. Palin’s amniotic fluid?
          That Sullivan? ROFLOL !!!!!!

          • American

            I knew you would like the Sullivan article.

            At least I read the Palin article. At least I am open to reading other ideas and opinions. Just disagree with her right-wing ideology. It is a failed ideology. Hasn’t worked and just got this country into deeper problems. Time for a new direction, particularly on the environment.

            No problem if we disagree on the problems and the solutions. You chose to follow Palin and I don’t.

            • Uhmmm

              Wrong reasoning and incorrect conclusion: your logic is failing you.
              I do not choose to nor do follow Palin; I just refuse to behave like all the low-life pseudo-journalists and faux-progressive bloggers that resort to personal insults and degrading women because they are intellectually lazy and dishonest; they have no integrity and believe that’s the only way the have to make themselves relevant.

              As the saying goes: if [Sullivan] were any lower I could tee a golf ball off his head.

              • American

                read the studies by the CBO and EPA and then read what Palin is saying. Make up your own mind. Stopping being an apologist for Palin’s ideology and getting caught up in the politics. focus on the science. debate the merits of what she is actually saying and get away from the BS. Chose to believe a right-wing ideolog like Palin or the economists and scientists at the EPA and CBO. Your choice.

                http://cbo.gov/ftpdocs/103xx/doc10327/06-19-CapAndTradeCosts.pdf

                http://www.epa.gov/captrade/index.html

                • Uhmmm

                  And who told you I don’t? Especially since I am a scientist pal.
                  Do you read the comments before answering?

                • Ani

                  By the way, even EPA has said cap and trade will not do the job.

            • Chicago Joe

              You choose to follow Obama and we don’t. Along with many Americans. His “passion index” has plummeted from + 16 around the inauguration to – 8. The dolts who weren’t paying attention but wanted anyone but a Republican, thanks to Shrub, just went along with Barry. But they won’t just go along any more.

              • http://deleted BuzzisbackLatte

                ‘American” – who doesn’t really know the meaning of that moniker – is another one of those that just fell off the turnip truck.

                All of a sudden they are all knowledgeable because Obabble is the consummate authority on what’s best for the country in their pointy lil brainless heads.

                The Andrew Sullivan reference was a dead giveaway.

                • tminu

                  YES!
                  Hitler at least had nationalist sentiment on his side and didn’t even lie to get the people to follow him at first.

                  Obama is nothing BUT lies. People will go batshit crazy furious when they catch on to the full extent.

                  The Obama BBQ buddy media is going to be burnt toast!

                  • Docelder

                    People will go batshit crazy furious when they catch on

                    Yes, people are already feeling it… even the ones who don’t get it yet know something is deeply wrong. Watch people standing in lines… negotiating traffic etc. There is so much tension and fear in the air you can feel it. People are sensing impending disaster and most don’t even realize yet why they are upset. When Joe Schmo wakes up from the koolaid with a huge hangover, things are going to go downhill fast.

            • Ani

              Just remember that Andrew Sullivan used to worship at the feet of George Bush and the neo-cons before he figured out (four years later) he’d been betrayed.

              Then he again backs the wrong candidate — Obama, over Hillary. He will likewise feel “Betrayed” by Obama in four years, in fact he is already complaining about him.

              Trust Sullivan to again make the wrong decision with another candidate down the road. The man has lousy judgment so unfortunately he is not a good example to tout if you want someone reliable to trash Palin. I certainly disagree with her on some things, but Sullivan has Palin Derangement Syndrome.

              He is irrationally sick with hatred for her and the very things he wants from her, he is projecting on to her because he cannot get them from Obama (start with medical records and go from there).

              • American

                read the reports he is quoting…. the EPA and the CBO have weigh-in and said the costs of cap and trade are not that much… they are managable and worth paying.

                most of the people at the EPA and CBO have been there well before Obama…. trust the scientists and economists at these two important institutions that actually study this stuff or Republicans like Palin who have done nothing for the environment?

                http://environment.about.com/od/healthenvironment/a/alaskawaste.htm

                “Palin’s beliefs on global warming contrast sharply with those of McCain, who has long warned about the dangers of human-caused climate change and who in 2003 cosponsored the first major bill in the Senate to address the problem. McCain consistently talks up his climate change plan on the campaign trail and in his TV ads.

                Palin’s got a different take. “A changing environment will affect Alaska more than any other state, because of our location,” Palin told Newsmax in an interview published on Friday. But, she added, “I’m not one, though, who would attribute it to being man-made.”

                http://www.grist.org/article/palin-comparison/

                Sierra Club President Carl Pope:

                With the pick of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin for his running mate, John McCain’s race towards the Bush administration’s failed energy policy is now complete.

                John McCain was once willing to stand up to his own party, but now that he is running for President, he supports the same Bush policies and powerful special interests that put us in the grip of the oil companies. One of the last remaining independent policies putting him at odds with Bush was his opposition to drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, yet he has now picked a running mate who has opposed holding Big Oil accountable and been dismissive of alternative energy while focusing her work on more oil drilling in a wildlife refuge and off of our coasts.

                Senator McCain has lost any chance of having a balanced or moderate ticket with this choice and has instead opted for the same, business-as-usual reliance on the outdated oil companies that has been the hallmark of the Bush-Cheney administration. On the third anniversary of the hurricane that knocked loose oil rigs and spilled millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf Coast that is bracing for another hit, McCain is sending a terribly indifferent message by selecting a candidate who only repeats Big Oil’s talking points.

                Friends of the Earth Action President Brent Blackwelder:

                Sarah Palin’s record is not extensive — just two years ago she was the mayor of a city of less than 10,000 people — but what her record indicates is troubling. This spring, she opposed the listing of polar bears as a ‘threatened’ species. She supports the brutal aerial hunting of wolves. And she has been a friend of Big Oil, opposing a windfall profits tax on the oil industry that could fund affordable clean energy for more Americans. Palin’s husband works for BP.

                League of Conservation Voters President Gene Karpinski:

                Unfortunately, with her support for drilling in the Arctic Refuge and off our coasts, Governor Palin will simply continue the failed policies of the Bush-Cheney Administration and their Big Oil friends — policies that could make us even more dependent on foreign oil.

                Governor Palin characterizes McCain’s flip-flop on drilling offshore as a positive step in his transformation from maverick to Big Oil’s best friend. She has implored McCain to change his position against drilling in the Arctic — something she will have plenty of opportunities to pursue as his running mate.

                In addition to supporting backward-looking energy policies, Governor Palin has also opposed a crucial clean water initiative, sued the federal government for listing polar bears as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, and opposed other important wildlife protection measures

                • Docelder

                  Replacing oil is fine with me. Replace it first, and then nobody will need to ban drilling as drilling will ban itself. Banning drilling before we have a replacement is asinine. Obama is jumping the shark by unilaterally conceding on every issue to the world at large. He can’t apologize enough for our existence or give enough away unilaterally. Most world leaders will do anything to give an advantage to their own people. Our mistake was in buying into the notion that we were Obama’s people. We clearly are not his people. If he even has a people he cares about.

                • don tufts

                  you and the rest of supporters are fools!tell me oh wise one what differance cap and trade will make other than to enrich goldman sachs if china,india and mexico wont play.and hansnt spain had cap and trade and its been a disater for jobs.GO BACK TO SMOKING HOPE AND CHANGE IN THE COMUNE.

                • Susan B. Athena

                  Cap n trade is yet another way to tax. It is also another form of derivatives and guess who will be one of the brokers of this new derivative? Goldman Sachs.

              • American

                Just read the reports he quotes. He makes some good points

                • Ani

                  Please relax with Andrew Sullivan already. His credibility is completely shot — he actually had the nerve to say Hillary gave him “cootie vibes” even though he praised her work as a Senator — yet he would not support her. He is a woman hater. I do not trust anything out of his mouth anymore. He pissed that away.

                  • http://deleted BuzzisbackLatte

                    Why hasn’t he been deported already? Is Britain paying big bucks to keep Andrew here? LOL!

        • Chicago Joe

          Seriously, Andrew Crazy Insane Hater Sullivan? My theory is that he actually finds her attractive, threatening his whole persona, so he has to hate her in a way that is completely out of proportion to reality.

        • Andy

          American: why do you trust Obama on the environment? Do you remember the 2005 Cheney energy bill? Yes the one that was hush hush dealt on closed doors and pave the way for Oil Co. to make record profits and dirty the environment at pleasure. Do you remember that criminal (for the environment) infamous and disgraceful bill?

          Well, almost all Democrats voted against it. Sen. Hillary Clinton voted against it of course. But I say almost because one
          Democrat Senator stood out in voting in favor of it: Senator Barack Obama (IL).

          So you might forgive my deep distrust of the Obama Administration vis a vis its truthful care for the environment.

        • Wisewoman

          Hey American. Have you forgotten that this started as a Bush administration Republican idea that was laughed at by the Dems as a way to reward polluters for polluting. Now it is to be the savior of the environment? You silly people will believe any horseshit that Obama shovels your way. He is truly Bush III(Fisa, Cap & Trade, Stay in Iraq, Expand the war to Pakistan, etc.)

    • WMCB

      Um, yes, it will cause outsourcing. Do you honestly think that industries will stick around here and be taxed more, or continue to flee to China where they can pollute all they want?

      • Ani

        Just ask the millionaires of Maryland who decided to move away when their taxes went up. That’ll learn ‘em.

        • brendy

          Just ask the millionaires of Maryland who decided to move away when their taxes went up. That’ll learn ‘em

          ***

          And, as will the tax increase on the wealthy to pay for Obummer’s health care plan for the uninsured. These people who are REALLY wealthy are NOT going to hang around here in the USA and support others. First of all, they shouldn’t HAVE to, and another reason is – the rich are NOT that generous (but of course, some of the very liberal rich ‘claim’ to be; but we all know how THAT works).

    • tzada

      Another obot from obasma nation heard from. What I say is this he nor you are any friend of the USA. Maybe you both are friends of the americas but not of the USA.

    • Claudy

      Obama ran on half her resume and you bought it.

      You’ve been told how to think about Palin, about the bailouts, about healthcare that you don’t even know you’re looking at the world through the blinders manufactured for you by Obama and his people.

      Unemployment will climb well into double digits. Soon.

      There are now four major sectors of the economy which have contracted or will once major legislation is passed, namely:

      -Financial Services
      -Automobiles

      followed by Energy (as SP alludes to but so do others like Warren Buffett – you’ll believe him won’t you? He’s on the Approved for Consumption list) and Health Care.

      The tax base will shrink and won’t cover the spending already in the pipeline; we’re at $1 trillion in deficit spending in 09 and it’s only June.

      When they come for your job and it never returns, you’ll change your tune.

      Cars don’t run on fumes and people can’t live on Hope alone.

      The woman makes great sense. Please at least ask yourself why you are so resistant to her as either a person and/or an elected official.

    • tango

      The Cap and Trade bill will kill jobs:

      1. Businesses will pay higher energy costs and have to pass those costs onto consumers. They will be competing with countries like China who will NOT be required to limit emissions so they will have a cost advantage over US companies. Ooops, there goes some jobs.

      2. Businesses will have to buy carbon credits. Once again, that’s an additional cost that will be added to the price of their goods or passed onto the consumer somehow. China, India, etc, will not have to buy carbon credits or pay higher energy costs so now their advantage is doubled. Ooops, there goes more jobs for American workers because China can do it cheaper.

      3. Fuel costs to transport American made goods by plant/train/truck will increase. Add that cost to the price of goods and no longer will American companies be able to compete with foreign ones. There goes more jobs.

      Also, American petroleum refiners will have to buy carbon dioxide allowances for the oil they refine AND for cars that buy their fuel. Well guess what? If they buy foreign fuel to refine, they only pay for the car emissions. So why would they willingly refine American drilled oil and pay double the fees? They won’t which means more dependence on foreign bought oil. Oh well, there goes some American oil jobs.

    • tango

      Lastly, this beauty part of the bill:

      “New federal policy that residential, commercial, and government buildings be retrofitted to increase energy efficiency, leaving it up to the states to figure out exactly how to do that.

      This means that homeowners, for example, could be required to retrofit their homes to meet federal “green” guidelines in order to sell their homes, if the cap-and-trade bill becomes law.”

      People will not not necessarily be required to retrofit their home/business, etc. It’s up to the states exactly how they want to handle it. The state could also award up to 50% of the expense to help with the owners cost to retrofit their structure.

      BUT HERE IS THE KICKER: to get federal money, the state has to prove it is meeting minimum standards in participants and upgrades. So it will be FORCING people to retrofit their homes and businesses so it can continue to receive the money and meet standards established by the government.

      • Claudy

        I heard that homeowners will be required to retrofit their homes for new energy or they will be fined.

        Obama is sapping America’s energy — we are a dynamic, powerful capitalist economy. He is killing jobs, exporting jobs…and making it difficult for people to MOVE.

        MOVEMENT = GROWTH = UPWARD MOBILITY = FREEDOM

        You know the American way of life.

        • tminu

          Lame Cherry says OBama has wiped out 7.4 million jobs, the number that increased during the Bush administration.

    • Andy

      hey American, you say that

      She only talks in very watered down generalities and talking points. She gives no particular insight or analysis about any of the issues regarding energy and cap and trade. She adds nothing to the conversation.

      But that exactly what Obama did all his life and he is now POTUS. So?

      And this is an op-ed it is not a research paper. If you want to hear more wait until she gives a speech on energy — and I bet will be with no teleprompters.

      • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com/ Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy

        This is pretty much what Palin was saying during the Election, too. Not for nothing, but Alaska’s economy is complex, with a huge budget ($10 billion last year), and to demean the governor of that state, who has done pretty well by Alaska, and prop up a man who has never even been an administrator, much less an executive, is truly upside down world.

        Ani, I think Palin is making fun of Chuck Schumer for calling US the “chattering class” this past year. I thought it was pretty funny of her to use that term, actually!

        Again, I don’t agree with all of her politics, but I do know this – I would have more rights in HER state because of HER than I do in most other states in the Union. Just sayin’.

        • Ani

          Yes, Amy, I know that to be true, which is why I wanted to give some oxygen to her piece.

          She got two references in — one for Schumer and the other for the Obama ‘yes we can.’

          Not bad for an ‘imbecile.’:)

        • Uhmmm

          RRR Amy: Amen sister !!

    • Andy

      hey American, you say that

      She only talks in very watered down generalities and talking points. She gives no particular insight or analysis about any of the issues regarding energy and cap and trade. She adds nothing to the conversation.

      But that is exactly what Obama did all his life and he is now POTUS. So?

      And this is an op-ed it is not a policy paper. If you want to hear more wait until she gives a speech on energy — and I bet will be with no teleprompters.

    • kato

      This is totally a canned response from the Obama team trying to spin a story to the unwashed and uneducated Obama supporters. This bill has not been worked on by hundreds of environmental experts. It’s been worked on by hundreds of lawyers who haven’t a clue about how to improve our environment. It’s been worked on by hundreds of people that profit from the bill. A bill that truly wants to limit our emissions wouldn’t allow for middlemen to make money and it wouldn’t require the American taxpayers to pay for the improvements plus the profits to the middle men. We’ve made serious improvements to our water and air quality in the past without putting financial interests in the middle. This bill is a sham.

      You’re a complete dolt that has no beneficial regard for your country.

      You better be really good at your real job because, if not, you will be one of the first people let go because you have no real understanding of what it takes to improve things – that probably translates into your real job performance. That’s assuming you have a real job. You probably think your life is going to be better when we all get taxed to death so financial interests can make more money. You probably think that somehow, you’ll benefit like Goldman-Sachs will if this bill passes.

      Sarah Palin has more instincts and understanding about what has made this Country so great in her pinky than you will have in an entire lifetime. One of the reasons people like her is that she speaks frankly and in a way that people understand. Every thing she said in her Op-Ed was true.

      You are either too uneducated, ill-informed, or pre-programmed to get it. In any of these scenarios you’re not a person that cares about the big picture for the USA.

      You, or those of your opinion, will be one of the first people I terminate when the time comes. You simply can’t be trusted to do the right thing.

      Good luck in your future.

    • http://deleted BuzzisbackLatte

      Sarah must scare the holy do-do out of the obots.

    • NewOrleansPuma

      American: And what you have written here is supposed to convince anyone that you do?
      Your comments indicate an inability to even distinguish among the issues and after that distinction to articulate any relationship among them.

      What you have done here is to bring back the good ole days of the campaign…primary and general…with the “talking” points of robot obots…which you clealy are…Putting on regular shifts again are they?

  • Acaha

    As far as I can tell she is not running for any office whatsoever. Just stating her opinion. You keep saying she makes no sense. Why do you need to say it half a dozen times. His bill does have a provision for unemployment benefits due to loss of jobs. Uh, that does sound like outsourcing to me.

    I wonder if you have had this long post ready and have been pasting it all over the internet to try and stop or distract from conversation…

  • http://deleted BuzzisbackLatte

    I would really prefer that the imbecile that wrote the first comment would refrain from blathering on without credible references to the innuendo thus spewed on this thread.

    Reality.

  • http://deleted BuzzisbackLatte

    spewed, of course, by said first poster imbecile.

    Just for clarification.

  • www.conservatives4palin.com

    Hey American read the critique of her article at C4P might help clear up the confusion you seem to be experiencing

  • Anonymous

    I think she makes a lot of sense.
    Want to know why?

    MoveOn ready to go after Palin on cap and trade

    CNN) – Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s political action committee is confirming a flood of new donations that push her cash haul close to the million-dollar mark, as one of the nation’s largest liberal PACs announced an ad targeting the former GOP vice presidential candidate.

    Palin spokeswoman Meg Stapleton confirmed a report in the Anchorage Daily News that more than $200,000 had poured into SarahPAC since Palin’s announcement a week and a half ago that she would be leaving office by the end of the month.

    Those funds, along with $732,867 received through June 30 according to federal campaign finance filings, leave the governor just shy of a million dollars in donations to date since SarahPAC’s January launch.

    Stapleton told CNN that the PAC, which supports conservative candidates, had received contributions from more than 11,000 supporters, with the majority of the money coming from outside Alaska.

    The news came as MoveOn.org began e-mailing members Tuesday, asking them to fund a rapid response ad blasting Palin’s new Washington Post op-ed that criticized President Obama’s position on “cap and trade” legislation — a major part of the administration’s effort to overhaul the nation’s energy policy.

    The group said Palin was positioning herself as the face of conservative opposition to Obama’s energy policy, telling supporters her op-ed was “a marvel of misinformation and outright lies.”

    The group has not yet said where the spot would air, or revealed the scope of any potential ad buy.

    • Doc99

      Speaking of Cap & Trade, Al Gore proclaims the climate bill will bring about Global Governance.

      • http://firefox AnnieCollier

        Yep, as if that’s a good thing…

    • http://firefox AnnieCollier

      And don’t you know they already have their minions combing through Sarah’s donors for another ethics “gotcha”? Be vigilant, Sarah and above question.

      Hire an attorney to make sure they can’t slip in, set you up and immediately crow about it. Surely by now, you put absolutely nothing past these crooked people. Since when did “scorched earth policy” become the standard to drown out discussion? Oh, yeah in 2008.

      Sarah just became an “Outlaw” and as we used to say in the 60′s “If you’re an Outlaw, you have to be more honest and above board than anyone else.”

  • Ellen D

    It would seem that any bill that has a provision for dealing with unemployment is anticipating a loss of jobs as a result of that bill.
    Otherwise, why mention it at all?

    • Ani

      Agreed.

    • Claudy

      Obama wants nothing more than all of us to be beholden to HIS government — He is crippling every single major industry sector in our economy.

      Extended unemployment benefits – doled out to millions of Americans – will keep us quiet and in a state of fear. He’s whipped “you” into a state of frenzy as it is. Right out of the Bush play book.

      How many entrepreneurs start companies and create jobs on unemployment?

      How many people lose confidence in themselves as worthwhile workers during periods of unemployment and never return to the workforce? We don’t even calculate that number.

      The unions are Obama-owned. So are the banks, GM and soon enough health care insurance and energy companies if this legislation passes.

      He’s certainly spreading the wealth around.

      It feels so fair, don’t it.

  • Anonymous

    Do you remeber Pelosi saying
    It is all about JOBS JOBS JOBS

    • Doc99

      It requires the patience of Job to sit through a Nancy Pelosi presser.

    • tango

      As Joe Biden so famously said about Obamas policies – they will bring that “3 letter word: jobs”

      I think Joe needs to have his emissions capped too.

      • Andy

        LOL !!!

        tango, you are sharp. I enjoy all our comments!! Thanks.

    • Docelder

      JOBS JOBS JOBS JOBS… whatever. She needs to go back to the wax museum she came from and stay there… and take Reid and the rest of her flying monkeys with her when she goes.

      • http://deleted BuzzisbackLatte

        Good one Docelder, good one! LOL!

    • http://firefox AnnieCollier

      Maybe Pelosi really meant that as in Gone, Gone, Gone.

  • http://ezinearticles.com/?Three-Basic-Parenting-Styles&id=744499 Northwest rain

    Geothermal

    Alaska has great geothermal potential as does Washington State. To date geothermal is one of the greenest and reliable forms of electrical power generation. THIS is where the research should be and funding for geothermal plants would help revive America’s industrial base. We Americans are very creative people — and we should be funding and researching and BUILDING the next generation of energy.

    The poor overseas ARE paying very high electrical bills — most of the islands use diesel generators for electrical power and they import oil at increasingly costs every month. There is a 1999 study by the DOE (US Department of Energy) about Geothermal potential — and many countries could become energy (electrical) independent and rely on Geothermal for 100% of their power needs.

    Drilling and pipelines are just a stop gap measure — we need to look to the future and plan like the future is here now.

    We’ve had 8 years of oil guys in the white house — and their plan is a status quo (I count 0zero as part of the last 8 years since he seems hell bent on continuing the bush/cheney backward focus).

    SOMEONE needs to talk back to 0zero — and if Palin has the guts to take on the narcissistic jerk more power to HER!!

    And to the 0bot who started the comment section — how much are you being paid to be a traitor to future generations?

    • http://deleted BuzzisbackLatte

      Alternative Energy resources have been kicked around for the last 30+ years.

      Waste to Energy, nuclear, solar, wind and geothermal have been out there for decades in Washington State. I made a solar panel for a summer class in the early 1980′s. Hanford had Batelle offices where scientists were looking for resources in the late 1970′s.

      What’s stops the progress everytime?

      • http://deleted BuzzisbackLatte

        Battelle.

      • Docelder

        We don’t even need volcanic activity to use geothermal energy. The stored temperature of the Earth can be used in heat pumps most anywhere. We could do better… no question about it we could. Putting an extra layer of tax and government control isn’t going to promote new development… nor is oppressively raising the price of energy. How about government grants for new energy? How about tax holidays for new energy businesses? Put down the big stick, and try some carrots for a change.

        • http://deleted BuzzisbackLatte

          True on the carrots vs the big stick.

    • CodaCuda

      Gov. Palin also proposed a green energy bill early this year. Geothermal was part of that to help remote Alaskan villages.

  • http://www.historynet.com/peter-francisco-american-revolutionary-war-hero.htm Port Rev War Hero PFrancisco

    PELOSI was right it is JOBS JOBS JOBS she forgot to mention the other part LOST LOST LOST.

    Obanana Promised that many more wouldn’t pay any taxes AGAIN he was right. With all the JOBS LOST income is lost no Income not TAXES TO BE PAID.
    The Collapse of our Economy is just Starting. Many Foreclosure are over 9 months delnquent and no foreclosure yet. A huge percentage is deliquent in credit accounts. We are still looking down to see a bottom. It will take more than 5 yrs for all of the to flush out. Recovery won’t happen for 5-10 yrs if Obanan is stopped. One great thing about all this is that with all this LIE-beral Erosionism the Democrats are commmitting final suicide.
    Rise Up America….stand for the Constitution, Family, Traditions, etc. Help destroy the LIE-beral Erosinist Perverts that have been Destroying America for more than 50 yrs. Time to restore America to it’s foundings with God’s Blessings.

    The BaWRECK Obamerica Continues.

    Orly Taitz knocks on Obanana’s door

    OT: Knock knock
    BO “Who’s there?”
    OT “Kenya”
    BO “Kenya Who?”
    OT “Kenya show America your Birth Certificate and that you are NBC”.

    The Plunderer-in-Thief PONZI PREZ has got to SHOW or GO.

  • DaddysDarlin

    Honestly I don’t believe Sarah will run for president, and if she does I don’t believe she would win, even if she changed party’s. Sarah is no Hillary and although she is a strong woman, I don’t believe her following would be anywhere near that of Hillary’s. However, I love what she had to say to Obama and his administration. She can now use this time to say whatever she would like to say about this administration, without hurting her political career. I hope this is only the first of many more pieces by Sarah, watch out Obama!!!!!

    • Susan B. Athena

      I love Hillary. She broke the glass ceiling with 18 million votes. That is astounding not to mentio nmaking her the clear winner in the primaries. However, McCain/Palin garnered over 58 million votes. McCain got as many as he did because of Palin…. I think she could do it. Obama isn’t the shiny penny anymore and has already lost 6 or 7 percentage points on favorability in just the past week to 10 days.

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    I don’t bother to read the bots anymore. They go nuts any time the letters S or P are in a headline. So redundant and really, really boring.

  • Andy

    Ani, superb post; it summarizes pretty much what I think.

    Also, I am all for the environment and alternative energies including nuclear (look at France!) not `if or buts’ but the country is in the pits at the moment and Obama is behaving like a spoiled glutton kid in a candy store.

    His agenda is just “All I can because I won” with no priorities nor a disciple vision of what’s possible now, incrementally and what later. He is behaving as if there is no tomorrow (which might end up in a self-fulfilling prophecy if he continues like this). His administration is incredibly chaotic.

    It is like a ship set to run full steam ahead everything is on everything goes without looking over the ocean what’s ahead of it. He says: People just ram it through no matter what.

    And the worse is that Obama is like a puppet reciting speeches which obviously he has not thought through and whose details he does not fully grasp.

    Just like Bush, Obama is the “Delegator in Chief” : party comes first; whatever the party leaders say as long as he is assured he is set to superficially shine.

  • Diana L. C.

    <eWhat no one wants to think about is the semantics of this bill. I clearly remember sitting in an audience while the primary was almost over, hearing George Lakoff tell us how we should “reframe” issues using using euphemistic terms. He said that instead of using the dreaded word tax, we could use terms like carbon credits, for example in regard to environmental issues. To his mind, he was not bing Orwellian. In my mind he was, while touting openly his praise for O’s conscious efforts to “reframe” issues. To paraphrase one of my favorite American literary figures, Gertrude Stein, a tax is a tax is a tax.

    We do need to work on Co2 emissions, but let’s do it honestly.

    And for heaven’s sake, let’s get over this China Syndrome paranoia. If the French can develop nuclear energy, we could too and do it better–if we get political appontees out of policy making and get people with real work and real world experiences working to honor our planet. But that might not fit the politically correct way of being green.

    • Diana L. C.

      Sorry—typing one-handed; the other in a cast. I obviously hit a strange button on my comment.

    • Docelder

      Yep, just like renaming the war on terror and renaming terrorists. The word “investment” literally translates into the native Hopium language as “tax”. McCain warned us to parse his words… but nobody listened to McCain… in part because he can’t type for war injuries. Pathetic.

    • Andy

      Agreed Diane L.C. : excellent comment.

      I find they are really insulting my intelligence with all this rephrasing; like
      terrorism now is “man made disaster” …. WTF!!!??…
      It is soooo farcical so absurd and as you point out in the example of “tax” and “carbon credits” it is so dishonest….

      You know those are our pols today: dumb down the populace and they’ll make you king…

      • NewOrleansPuma

        ANdy: No Andy…dumb down the language and thought and they will and have made him DICTATOR.

  • IndieDogg

    “…Palin has absolutely no particularly expertise in energy. Here limited time on the Alaskan energy commission, less than one year…”

    The italics are only there to highlight this poster’s inability to actually spell. But, spelling and grammar aside, the highlight of the comment’s analysis of the Palin op-ed piece is the pronouncement that it’s “garbage.” Well, there’s an example of well-reasoned expertise on energy.

    By the way, Governor Palin has never claimed, nor does she claim, that her time on what you call the “Alaskan (sic) energy commission” makes her an expert on energy. She has a long history of involvement in energy issues even before she assumed the office of Governor.

    You might also be interested in the following (which you can find merely by checking the Governor’s bio):

    Governor Palin is past chair of the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission, a multi-state government agency that promotes the conservation and efficient recovery of domestic oil and natural gas resources. She was recently named chair of the National Governors Association (NGA) Natural Resources Committee, which is charged with pursuing legislation to ensure state needs are considered as federal policy is formulated in the areas of agriculture, energy, environmental protection and natural resource management.

    The energy officials of other states and the Governors of other states do not share your “garbage” viewpoint with respect to Governor Palin and energy issues.

    Perhaps if you will post your background and political affiliation, we might get a better idea of where your head is at (I know, bad grammar, but on purpose), as if we didn’t know already.

    GREAT PIECE, as always, ANI. Thanks.

    • Ani

      Thanks, IndieDogg — and by the way — YOU ROCK!!

      I appreciate your posting the facts about Governor Palin’s credentials in this regard.

      Whatever side of the aisle people are on, it is important to deal in fct, not spin. To give credit where it is due and criticism likewise.

      If more citizens did that, we wouldn’t be in this mess, which has been building for years in our celebrity driven, junk politics, fast food, tabloid sucking, consumer culture.

  • http://firefox AnnieCollier

    OK,only slightly OT: A post on Sarah’s facebook page…

    A business in Whiting, Indiana has prominently displayed a sign in its front window reading as follows:

    WE WOULD RATHER DO BUSINESS WITH PRESIDENT OBAMA, NANCY PELOSI, HARRY REID, AND ALL THE ELITES OF CONGRESS, THE MASS MEDIA, AND HOLLYWOOD, THAN WITH ONE CONSERVATIVE AMERICAN!

    The establishment is a funeral parlor.

    • Andy

      ROFLOL !!

    • jwrjr

      Sounds good to me … as a public service.

  • Cathy6224

    Obama supporters are so fucking stupid, all they do is believe anything Obama and his supporters say. They will defend him even when they have no IDEA what is being said, INSTEAD of actually checking facts and seeing if what they say is true. GOD HELP AMERICA! Because by the time his idiotic supporters question shit it will be too fucking late!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YES I AM PISSED OFF AT THE LACK OF ABILITY OR WILLINGNESS TO QUESTION THIS PRESIDENT! I questioned Clinton and Bush and I damn well will question this president!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Hunky Dory

    I’m not going to link up with the first responder here whose name should be Up Obama’s Ass rather than American. And though I am not an environmental expert I do have a degree in Environmental Policy. That said, let’s examine the facts of this horrendous piece of bullshit they call an environmental bill.

    First: It will do NOTHING to stop global warming.

    Second: It will displace millions of American jobs.

    Third: It will raise the cost of our energy use.

    Fourth: It will unfairly disadvantage the less fortunate.

    Fifth: It will create even more Barackracy.

    Sixth: It will intrude upon the freedoms of ordinary Americans.

    Seventh: The cost of this bill will be paid by future generations. Several generations.

    And that’s enough for a good start.

    Sarah Palin today was a real leader. She had the tenacity to speak the truth. And for that I am grateful and humbled.

    The pundits and the asswipe so-called liberals that cannot deal with the truth resort to their tried and true method of attacking the person rather than attacking the problems she outlines very clearly.

    In the end Sarah Palin will be proven right. It may take a while, but the American people are not as stupid as the Dumbasscrats and their ilk take us to be. I’m not so sure the Republican party in general is smart enough to take them on. But Sarah sure as hell did.

    Thank you for a wonderful piece.

    • American

      What is your solution? or maybe you do not believe in global warming?

      cap and trade is a market solution and makes sense to me… it is actually based on a very conservative idea of letting the free market decide, by putting a market driven price on the environment/pollution. It would for the first time put a cost on pollution, a price that is usually never factored in to economic decision making…. the costs which will come over a fairly long period of time are manageable and a price worth paying.

      Palin just does not understand the issue. It seems by her comments in WaPo that she has not studied the issue enough.

      • jwrjr

        You are hardly one to talk as your Deity (Obanana) and apparently you think that the solution to rising energy use is to make energy so expensive that few can afford to use it.

        • http://deleted BuzzisbackLatte

          Here’s a guess: American has spent exactly ZERO hours on an energy board. As opposed to Governor Palin who not only was on an Energy board, but whose husband worked at the North plant AND is still governor of the richest in resources state in the nation, of course.

          But, Nooooo…Governor Palin would have no idea what she’s talking about and Obabble, who has also spent exactly ZERO hours on an energy board, knows everything.

          Ludicrous and then some…

      • hbk

        Yeah, we know dude. Palin doesn’t understand, and you do.

        Why not write your own editorial for WaPo? Here’s the link for submitting an Op Ed piece:

        http://projects.washingtonpost.com/opeds/submit/

        I’m sure they’ll publish you. It’s not like you’re an imbecile who cuts and pastes incoherent talking points.

        • jwrjr

          It’s not???

          • justme_kc

            surely nobody here believes that Pailin actually wrote that op-ed. she can’t string enough coherent words together for a sentence, muchless several paragraphs. read anything she’s posted and the writing style is not her.

            • Uhmmm

              I read those talking points in a few ObamaMachine propaganda blogs already today. Go detox yourself. As if you were an ‘expert’ on her writings or thinking…And besides: Obama doesn’t write nor grasps anything he says either; he a good reader though…..
              (please do not bring up his ‘books’ The first germinated and is entitled after
              a long sermon by Rev. Wright–)

            • don tufts

              AND YOU CAN PROVE THIS BECAUSE OF?AGAIN WITHOUT CHINA AND INDIA ALL THIS IS IS PUNISHMENT FOR BEING AMERICAN AND A NEW WAY FOR GOLDMAN SACHS TO MAKE MONEY.PLEASE TELL ME HOW MUCH DIFFERANCE IT WILL MAKE WITHOUT CHINA AND INDIA AND BE SPECIFIC.

      • Susan B. Athena

        Cap and trade is not about pollution. It is about carbon emmissions. BIG difference. The “experts” on global warming or is it global cooling, awe what the hell it has now been changed to global climate change because the trend is changing, once again – like that hasn’t been happening already for BILLIONS of years are smoking hopium. Their theories are debunked time and time again. What caused the carbon emmissions during the times of the dinosaurs? Dinosuar driving SUV’S? Coal plants in cave man times? Pah-lease. This is a tax. Another way to manipulate the wealth into the hands of the government disguised as a feel good attempt to save the planet.

      • Wisewoman

        And American as said before, it is a Bush idea that was once derided by the Dems as pay to play for polluters. How then can it help to “clean up the environment?” Obam’s/Bush Cap & Trade policy is a bunch of crock.

  • Docelder

    Obama plans to tell Michigan some auto jobs aren’t coming back and are casualties of the new economy.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/wtUSInvestingNews/idUSWNA899320090714

    Not to worry, they can draw subsistence wages when the unions get their share of the carbon taxes now that GM isn’t going to be making cars as we know them today. Wonder if they feel proud… now that they helped elect the man that will end their way of life forever?

  • Babs

    I live in PA, and we are shortly going to be facing deregulation of the electric industry that will add an estimated 30%-50% to our electric bills. Add to that the additional increases coming if cap and trade passes, and how many frozen senior citizens are we going to find in PA in the coming winters? My gosh, half of them can hardly afford to heat their homes now. This cap and trade is insanity in a prosperous economy. In this economy, it’s criminal.

  • http://deleted BuzzisbackLatte

    Neato! President Obabble is proving just how bad of an idea his presidency is so soon!

    How are all those ex-auto industry workers gonna pay those union dues?

    Hey, what happened to Obabble’s townhall meeting that was supposed to happen this week?

    • Ani

      He turned it into a speech instead. Guess he didn’t want to answer any questions this week.

      • Susan B. Athena

        Probably couldn’t find enough “supporters” to plant in the meeting with pre-selected questions…..

  • JozefAL

    Not sure if this has been brought up yet, but apparently Gov Palin has “flip-flopped” on “cap and tax”.

    From the VP debate last year:

    IFILL: We do need to keep within our two minutes. But I just wanted to ask you, do you support capping carbon emissions?

    PALIN: I do. I do.

    Either Gov Palin was LYING last October or she’s changed her mind but, conveniently, failed to note the change in her op-ed. Changing her mind is less troubling, but it would be nice if the op-ed acknowledged this “change of heart”.

    • Animal Control

      Do the same rules apply to Obama?

    • tango

      Supporting capping carbon emissions doesn’t mean you have to support ANY and EVERY bill that’s introduced that proposes to do that.

      I support efforts to decrease crime in my town. But that doesn’t mean if a bill is introduced that proposes to do that by raising my property taxes 50% to hire more local police officers doesn’t mean I have to wholeheartedly agree to it just because it attempts to solve an issue I support.

    • Wisewoman

      Capping carbon emissions simply means trying to limit the amount of carbon in the atmosphere to some “amount” so that increases are not generated year after year. That is not the same as a Cap & Trade scheme that allows major polluters to pollute or “trade” carbon pollution by buying pollution credits from industries with less polluting processes. That was Bush’s great idea that allowed coal companies to continue polluting. You Obots are really dense.

      • Chicago Joe

        Thank you.

    • Peggy Sue

      How about Obamatrons acknowledging the huge, huge list of flip flops from Obama??? Sarah Palin is not the POTUS. Your hero is and his list of turnarounds is infamous. Where’s the outrage, the beating of breasts???

      Crickets!

      The silence of hypocrits.

  • Glennmcgahee

    The use of oil and gas (petrol) can be diminished one day, but its not going to happen over night. We can’t even get our utility conglmerate to assist us in placing a wind turbine or solar system on our home and connected to the grid. Thats just one single family home. People are ready to do it, but only if it can be affordable and easy. Its neither. Our automobiles run on gasoline. Sure, there are hybrids, but the industry has yet to come up with a standard so we’re stuck with internal combustion engines for the forseeable future. We’re stuck with all these things that are out of our control , yet, we are going to be punished financially for it. Maybe the rich can afford to take the hit, but those of us struggling at home to keep a low paying job and stay in our homes just found life a little tougher and alot more expensive. Once again, a feel good idea was implemented without a thought for how it would effect the working people of this country.

  • Pagar

    “We’re stuck with all these things that are out of our control , yet, we are going to be punished financially for it. ”

    IMO, that is because we have no one in the Obama Administration that has actually ever succeeded in a working for a paycheck job. We have a Sec of Treasury who can’t figure out his own taxes using Turbotax. The Crap and Trade bill is designed to do one thing (and do it well); that one thing is to destroy US jobs and US private companies.

  • Tom god bless america

    I see a bunch of OBOTS HERE Or should I see thugs in the white house- press-media people who are here to oh, try to save the day for Obama the fraud loser and corrupted liar he is. wall street buddy that’s what he is most inportantly…. The biggest fraud in america history.for the forst time in american history we have no president or first lady !

    FRAUD IS WHAT HE IS ! HAVE HIM GO DESTORY HIS OWN COUNTRY WHERE HE WAS BORN..KENYA

    Go sarah the only hope and change we have for america is Sarah Plain.

  • OilyMess

    “We can safely drill for U.S. oil offshore and in a tiny, 2,000-acre corner of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge if ever given the go-ahead by Washington bureaucrats.”

    Give an inch and they will take lots of miles. Not including the industrial mess and dripping pipelines.

    • Docelder

      2000 acres is just over 3 square miles. Alaska is twice the size of Texas. If there were rigs in those three square miles nobody would know. I doubt the caribou would even pay attention to the rigs. Caribou have a life. There is a newly discovered oil find now again in North Dakota below the existing shale deposits. What we were running out if was the easy to get at oil. Going deeper from where the oil originates in the Earth, there is much more. All raising the cost of oil has done is made it more feasible to drill the deeper reserves, along with making oil companies rich. If we stop burning oil and gas, it will flow from the deep Earth to the surface on it’s own anyway. Except instead of being released by burning by us as CO2 which plants need, it may be released as methane which is an actual pollutant.

  • Tina

    I agree Tom. Our only hope and change is Gov.Sarah Palin. She is a strong women who will look after the welfare of the america people not special pockets as Obama Administration. Wait he and his Administration are not real cause he is a fraud who sits in our country.Anything he does is just words in any bills.Congress destory the banking sector as they played a big roll as when ask who was in congress the people who voted for this fraud Obama did not know who was in congress. Here is a clue -) – ) -)
    - ) DEMOCARTS are the one in congress. The damage of our contry continues and if people of what’s less of supporters of this fraud don’t wake up but, instead hate and don’t want to say Man, was I wrong.Oh wait.It’s pundits who run from blog to blog to put their uneducated information on these blogs to and in hopes to save what’s left of the fraud.

    So much is right in their faces man are they that stupid of this fraud Obama ?

  • I’m a Linda too

    Governor Palinn wrote an excellent article and covered some very important points.

    The Democrats are again, RESTRICTING, instead of giving opportunity.

    I read further , the Cap and Trade program IS absolutely crap. They are issuing allowannces to the Coal industry and Electricity Industry. And giving Coal 35 percent of the permits which they can sell. They will be selling, as of right now (sure to change) 15 percent of the permits to be sold on the open market, Wall Street, so they can gamble and drive up the prices of Energy. Obama wanted 100 pct of the permits sold openly (no doublt for his Hedge Funders). THIS IS BAD. Speculation and driving up on energy, but worse, they will NEED these permits. That is the supply part that will drive up energy unbelievably.

    And worse, this bill has nothing in it about creating Green Jobs…and they watered down the Renewable Energy that it be only up to 12 percent of the enrgy the states draw from.

    HELLLOOOOO

    so, the Democrats are limiting, taxing, driving up price, nothing for creation, no true NEW Renewable energy.

    As I tweeted, It seems ACES has become the Joker that we American’s have been dealt.

  • RKStone

    The purpose of Cap & Trade is to curb global warming. Palin never mentions global warming in her op-ed. The purpose of cap & trade is to raise the cost of carbon based fuels so people and businesses will use less of it. Cap & Trade has nothing whatsoever to do with curbing the importation of foreign oil.
    She doesn’t mention global warming but she does mention “the chattering class” and “supply side economics”? What are her ideas about what to do about global warming? Or does she think that the purpose of cap & trade is to curb the importation of foreign oil?

    • Docelder

      The purpose of Cap & Trade is to curb global warming.

      No, it is a unilateral tax on the working people of this economy to level the global playing field. Call it global economic justice with a little something on the side for those who make it happen. Most leaders try to find every advantage for their people. Maybe we aren’t Obama’s people? Doesn’t look like it.

    • I’m a Linda too

      lmao What, shilling for John “Long Face” Kerry?

      No, the ACES Act was supposed to be for curbing Global Warming. [American Clean Energy & Security Act (ACES)]

      Cap and Trade is part of ACES, which is actually an ingredient to hurt the effort if you actually red it. Here, this might help you.

      A Common Person’s Guide to the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009
      http://www.chesapeakeclimate.org/campaigns/campaign_detail.cfm?id=128

      Manny environmentalists are opposing this legislation and point out that it actually does more harm than good, because with all it’s weakness, like the fact there are no Green Jobs in this bill, it also only asks for 12 percent of energy to come from renewable resources by 2025. THAT’s PITIFUL. States can do better and we can strive for better on theiri own.

      Governor Palin was the first to be so bold to call for 50 percent of their energy to come from renewable resources. NO DEM CAN CLAIM THAT.

      An on that note, I’m reminded.

      A donkey walks in to the bar and orders a Martini
      The Bartender asks, “so, why the long face”.

      • Susan B. Athena

        “A donkey walks in to the bar and orders a Martini
        The Bartender asks, “so, why the long face”.

        thanks for the laugh…

    • Wisewoman

      RKstone. If you truly understood the global warming issue you would be singing Sarah’s praises.
      1. She understands that of all the fuels in wide supply at this point in time, natural gas is the cleanest and cheapest of all. That’s why she was instrumental in pushing for the gas pipeline into the lower 48. This will help energy availability and job creation. Natural gas leaves the least carbon footprint because it burns cleaner than oil, gasoline, or coal and there is no “waste” left behind like the radioactive waste with nuclear power. For example if you have 1 pound of nuclear waste after 1 million years only 1/2 of it would become non-radioactive. It would take another 1 million years for 1/2 of the 1/2 pound to become non-radioactive and another 1 million years and so on. It is called the half-life of a radioisotope. Now we have no place to store this waste so how can we generate more?
      2. We humans breathe in oxygen and breathe out carbon dioxide therfore we are some of the biggest polluters. We can’t say the solution is to stop breathing because we would die. Trees and plants breathe in carbon dioxide and breathe out oxygen. Therefore trees should be planted near the shoulders of interstates and highways to absorb carbon dioxide from automobiles.
      3. Cap & Trade do not mitigate global warming because it does not remove carbon based pollution from the environment.
      4. We need to always remember our high school chemistry and the law that says matter can neither be created nor destroyed. It can be made to change its form or state.

  • Regina

    I am still amazed at how many americans still believe Obama is a legitimate President. I am not a far left loon nor a far right loon. I am a naturalized american citizen who has worked hard to accomplish the American Dream. That dream has been undermined by the biggest fraud this country has experienced since its inception. It’s ironic that it took the white man (woman) to promote the black man to destroy what our founding fathers fought so hard to establish. They are the pseudo intellectual elitists (con artists) along with wall street crooks who believe that americans are stupid and can be fooled easily. Abraham Lincoln once said: (paraphrased) you can fool some of the people most of the time and most of the people some of the time; but you can’t fool all the people all the time. We the people need to save this country from the great imposter and his allies. I know Sarah Palin has his number. It doesn’t take a genius to recognize an Elmer Gantry….it just takes common sense.

    • http://deleted BuzzisbackLatte

      Thanks, Regina. The Obama fraud is the largest scam perpetrated on the United States of America since it’s inception. This young, beautiful country is still too infantile to get past needing to be politically correct and not appear “racist”.

      An opportunity to perpetrate presented itself because American attention spans have dwindled to about five seconds and The One Minute Manager mentality solved the problem without any in depth consideration of exactly who was being deceptively peddled to the voters.

  • Wisewoman

    Remember when Cap & Trade was lambasted by the Dems as a means of allowing polluters to pay for polluting. Now its Obama’s and the Dems policy. What a piece of crock. Another Bush III move by Obama that has nothing to do with mitigating global warming but instead with lining the pockets of his friends and contributors while the average person is taken to the cleaners.

  • USAPROUD

    When in the hell are Americans who still support Obama going to wake up. All I see is Obama’s cronies taxing all of us to line their pockets and the America as we knew it is quickly fading away. I don’t care who is in office, Rep or Dem, I want what is best for America. Right now I think the only way to stop all of this is to neutralize the Congress, so I will be voting Rep to get some kind of control back. Everyone I know is scared right now at what is going on. Obama’s push it through now polices are doind America in.

  • American

    This Op-Ed by Palin is a bunch of bull. She was for it before she was against it.

    She was a 100% supporter of cap & trade during the election. What happened? She is so full of shit. Not only does she have no idea what she is talking about, but now she is against her one platform.

    You only have to watch this Maddow report. It says it all.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/vp/31931699

    Like I said before you really want this idiot to be your president.

  • American

    Palin is so full of crap. Do you know she was actually 100% for cap & trade during the election. Besides the fact that she does not know what she is talking about with cap & trade, she is a flip flopper.

    Check out this clip from Maddow it says everything and says everything you need to know about the Palin Cap & Trade Op-Ed.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/vp/31931699#31931699

    • Acaha

      Ooh. Maddow– another koolaid sipper — give it up — you are convincing no one. Besides there is a big difference between being no. 2 on the ticket and having to agree with no. 1 — these two actually had debates and disagreements on energy during the campaign.

      What you should pull up is Maddow FINALLY calling Obama out on the carpet for his Bush like policies of preventive detention and signing statements, et al. During the campaign all Maddow did was fawn over this phony.

      Obama was also the only Democrat to vote for the disastrous, dirty Bush Cheney oil/energy bill — he is not the person I trust on this kind of legislation, nor do I trust the corrupt party leadership led by Pelosi. Give it up, please.

    • Peggy Sue

      Palin’s a flip-flopper??? Hahahaha.

      You have the brass balls to even bring the term up? Palin is not the POTUS. Check Obama’s record for flip-flopping; it’s quite impressive.

      You’re turning the Democratic Party into a hopeless joke. Hope you’re frigging happy.

  • Miss H

    The ones who really want “Cap and Trade” are the world bankers. Cap CO2 use and trade credits to produce more CO2. Bankers and stock traders are already trading CO2 credits, like a new stock market. Just like the “black-hole” derivatives, the greedy stock traders want to funnel industry and private funds into their trading schemes, so they can milk what is left of the world economy into their coffers. Will these blood sucking zombies never stop. Tell your Senator to VOTE AGAINST CAP & TRADE!