Reconciling Parts of Barack Obama – How?
By LisaB on May 31, 2008 at 8:48 AM in Barack Obama, Bill Ayers, Black nationalism, Chicago politics
I have often wondered how Mr. Obama integrates the different aspects of his life. For instance, how does he attend Trinity for 20 years with its Black Liberation Theology and then go out and represent all the citizens of his state in the US Senate? Having seen some “sermons” from that church, that’s gotta be a trick. I mean, if you’ve been attending that church, if your faith is very important to you and if you want to go out and change the world based on the ideals you hold (and, presumably faith is important here) then I would think some of his constituents might wonder if he represents them at all.
That aside, Illinois politics has been famous during the last few years for the low quality but quite high quantity of its corruption. The current governor (a friend of Mr. Obama’s) looks likely to be indicted at some point. The last governor went to prison for corruption. Given the high office he holds and the relative speed with which he attained it, Mr. Obama must at least understand how the political machine works, even as he disputes his role in it. But evidence suggests he may be far more involved than that.
Direct reporting from the Chicago Tribune:
But notwithstanding both his church and his “professional contacts,” this is what I’d like to know: How can Mr. Obama be part of two communities like this and be the “everyman” we Americans typically look for in a President? How does he go from church on Sunday hearing that whitey is the root of all evil and then work in a spectacularly corrupt political system during the week and STILL say you are something unique and special?
Also, and probably more important – assuming his faith is as important to him as he says it is, how does he reconcile his likely participation in political corruption? I’ve heard the phrase “by any means necessary” from TUCC and from Elijah Muhammand, Louis Farrakhan and Malcolm X. Is Mr. Obama’s quick rise attributable to application of “by any means necessary?”
If the ends justify the means, what the heck are those “ends” likely to be?
Somehow, all this must make sense to Barack Obama. And I don’t believe these two systems don’t interconnect. I believe that somehow, they do. There must be links between his political life and his church life. That does not necessarily mean the links are bad or even troublesome. But they must exist.
And, even if we knew how these two parts fit, where does Bill Ayers fit?
An interesting piece about Obama’s faith and politics:is here.


















Pingback: OF NOTE during meeting: : NO QUARTER