Comments on: Live Blogging Committee Hearing [Update with notes of Craig Della Penna and Truthteller]

By: AnninCa

AnninCa — Sat, 31 May 2008 16:39:48 +0000

This compromise is absolutely undemocratic. It should be challenged.

I’ve never heard of any proposition so stupid in my life.

You vote uncommitted?

Your delegate goes to the convention uncommitted.

Simple.

Then, you want to vote for Obama once there, go ahead.

By: Alex01

Alex01 — Sat, 31 May 2008 16:39:27 +0000

That MF (Brewer) is NOT uncommitted.

By: Uppity Woman

Uppity Woman — Sat, 31 May 2008 16:39:05 +0000

I KNEW Iches didn’t answer Wexler for a reason. All his peanut gallery laughed but they won’t be laughing now.

By: Sugar

Sugar — Sat, 31 May 2008 16:39:02 +0000

Aw damn! I’m trying to go back and forth from my sofa to my computer and I didn’t get that poitn of this plan! Obama should get NOTHING!!!

By: Catharine

Catharine — Sat, 31 May 2008 16:38:51 +0000

Wexler is a big Obamabot for sure. Here is a letter to a local Fla paper after Obama visited a Jewish Temple:

“”These are Wexler surrogates you are interviewing. Most members of the Temple did not attend. Only 100, 600 were outsiders brought by the campaign. The Rabbi was inundated with complaints. He even had to send a letter explaining his actions to the membership. It is all a facade by the Wexler people to try and deliver the Jewish vote to Obams. It;’s a “Shanda” disgraceful.”"

Wexler is paid for By Barak Obama and does not represent the people who voted him into office.

By: Andy

Andy — Sat, 31 May 2008 16:38:29 +0000

Is Conyers a member of the RBC ?

By: SusanUnPC

SusanUnPC — Sat, 31 May 2008 16:38:20 +0000

WE ARE CLOSING COMMENTS IN THIS THREAD.

GO TO THE TOP THREAD – at the top of the page!

THANKS!

By: Al

Al — Sat, 31 May 2008 16:37:59 +0000

Let’s make sure lunatic Wexler loses his seat. He sounds more like a Gooper with his tone.

By: Uppity Woman

Uppity Woman — Sat, 31 May 2008 16:37:56 +0000

Ah Hey Mr. Wexler, now you are learning what “fair reflection” means, yes???

By: Michelle

Michelle — Sat, 31 May 2008 16:37:36 +0000

Look the ONLY good part about whatever they decide today is this:

HOWEVER the delegates are seated, once they are – THEN the POPULAR vote from FL and MI will have to count. AND then after tomorrow (Puerto Rico), HRC will have won the popular vote in EVERY way you can measure it (because she is sure to overtake him).

Hence, she’ll have more ammo. to keep going to the convention.

By: Sugar

Sugar — Sat, 31 May 2008 16:37:33 +0000

Wait a minute? is he saying 69 for Hillary and Obama should be handed 59 delegates?

By: THREAD #2 / Live Blogging Committee Hearing [Update with notes of Truthteller] » : NO QUARTER

Sat, 31 May 2008 16:37:29 +0000

[...] Comments Sugar on Live Blogging Committee Hearing [Update with notes of Craig Della Penna and Truthteller]AnninCa on Obama’s Support Is Cracking and — Frankly — It Is In FREEFALL!Alex01 on [...]

By: Alex01

Alex01 — Sat, 31 May 2008 16:37:04 +0000

There is no “rationale” for 59 and 69.

By: HARP

HARP — Sat, 31 May 2008 16:36:15 +0000

I don`t care if they seated them 100 %, I will never vote for Obama.

By: Sugar

Sugar — Sat, 31 May 2008 16:35:54 +0000

Brewer makes some very valid poitns…so far.