DesireG “gets” Gates
By LisaB on July 24, 2009 at 7:01 PM in Current Affairs
CNN ireport has a great retort to the Professor Gates brouhaha. Someone named DesireG posted a video outlining her opinion of the incident and why it doesn’t merit the outrage Gates thinks he’s due.
DesireG mainly blames the neighbor for racial profiling, but she may be off the mark on that one if the “neighbor” wasn’t really a next-door type of neighbor but only someone who lived within a few miles. Hard to know your neighbors if you’re talking about a 5 mile radius. Anyway, DesireG makes some points only an AA woman could legitimately make, and she’s right.
But if I said the same, I’d be a racist.
DesireG is onto something here.
Interestingly enough, other AA writers are threading the needle in a similar way. Generally, I’m seeing commentary that Gates was profiled by either the “neighbor” and/or police but that Gates himself should have known better than to run his mouth at police officers. Some even say that anyone – even whites (gasp!) – get in trouble for this.
Mansfield Frazier at the Daily Beast had this to say:
So, was Gates right in asking the officer if race played a role in how he was being treated, even after he had proved he was indeed the homeowner? Of course he was, but in the real world, you get to mouth off to an officer only once. He had made his point and his statement; his continued aggravation, and the venting of it, was sure to end with him being handcuffed—and I believe race played no role in that outcome.
However, Frazier clearly thinks police, by and large, are the problem.
When Gates was in his domicile, he was protecting his turf; when he got loud with the officer on the porch, the officer was protecting his. Had he not arrested Gates, he would have caught hell from his fellow officers after the incident. They would have talked about him as if he had a tail, and would perhaps begin to doubt out loud his fitness to wear a badge. Peer pressure among police officers, I am told, is a bitch. They simply are never going to lose face.
Lose face? THAT’S what it’s all about? Harsh. However, “a Phantom Negro” at Salon says Gates is angry more for class reasons than racial reasons.
Which brings me to Skip Gates. He isn’t outraged because he feels he was the victim of racial profiling by the police (that dubious honor goes to his foolish neighbor) [in fact, the woman who called the police is not a neighbor, but works nearby]. He’s outraged because he was the victim of class profiling. He didn’t resent being identified as black; he resented being identified as that kind of black, the kind of black that can be hassled and pushed around by simpleton cops. How dare you hassle me? I’m Skip Gates: Harvard professor!
———-Skip Gates thought that he’d worked hard enough, achieved enough, become Harvard enough that this sort of treatment did not apply to him. And now, rather than channel that outrage in a way that is subtle but effective, he’s very publicly suffering the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, having “joined the ranks of the million incarcerated black men in America.” That’s laughable. He does not see those million men as kin and he doesn’t, by and large, give a damn about those guys. He’s merely annoyed that such an irritation as police misconduct found its way into his home. If he read about this story happening to a plumber in Roxbury, he’d shake his head in disappointment and then go on with his life.
So before we heed the call of racism, let’s be mindful of the tower from which that call came. This has something to do with race. But it has a lot more to do with messing with Skip Gates.
The Ivy League Effect, people. The Ivy League Effect.
Interesting stuff. During the 2008 election, I thought the biggest fault line was actually the class line rather than the racial one. However, that just wasn’t going to fly during the “historic” election where hope and change were “making a comeback.” I don’t have anything against hope and change, but I resented seeing class warfare relabeled as race warfare at every turn.
So, here we are. A man who benefits from nearly every advantage our society has to offer in terms of education, standing and influence still chooses to call himself a victim rather than putting into context a bad day against all he has. That doesn’t make Gates a “black man in America.” That makes Gates a “black poser in America.”
That is, unless Obama promised to provide ivy league educations, prestigious jobs and a high profile for every AA in America.
I wouldn’t mind that myself.


















Pingback: NQ First Responders - Sadly overlooked articles : NO QUARTER
Pingback: Fault Lines of Class : NO QUARTER