Tawana Proctor

I truly believe you would be the best nominee for the Democrats this year. There is no official nominee until voting is finished at the convention. Please continue onward to Denver this summer.

Rhetoric rarely matches reality in this world, and the U.S.A continually represents itself as a beacon of democracy. What has happened during this primary campaign and the two previous presidential elections clearly shows the reality. Many have lamented the decline in educational standards over the decades, but every citizen from primary school to retirement should learn how the executive and legislative branches of our government are elected. You have given a master class in this topic, but it is not yet time for the final exam. Please, please, Senator Clinton, continue educating the country by going to Denver and seeking the nomination for PRESIDENT from your party.

The super- or automatic delegates should do their job. I have seen too often how those with some amount of power become lazy–it is go along to get along in order to keep what they have and a ready acceptance of taking the easy way out of whatever conflict or challenge that might arise. You won the popular vote, and you won the (almost) winner-take-all system that will actually happen at the end of this year. The former is democracy, the latter is not. The in-between system of the Democratic National Party, using delegates is really a mixed bag. What has become painfully clear is that your party believes some votes are more valuable than others. The Rules and Bylaws Committee of your party also believes that the certified votes of states can be apportioned however they decide, not how the voters decide. How is this different in effect from changing vote tallies after-the-fact or stuffing the ballot box with fake ballots?

I believe your campaign can clearly make the case to ALL of the delegates (Some pledged delegates are not bound.) that you are the best candidate, by the numbers, for president: popular vote, electoral college, ¿number of Congressional districts?, ¿number of counties?, and the vote:pledged delegate ratio. The numbers approach is a place to start; experience, history of service, and gravitas will serve to close the argument.

While I believe there is a place for forgiveness on a personal level, not challenging unethical and possibly illegal conduct during elections serves only to re-enforce the notion that you can get away with it if you have enough money and to discourage further participation in the fragile representative democracy that exists in the United States.

You are a role model for every American. Thank you for inspiring me.

Sincerely,

I truly believe you would be the best nominee for the Democrats this year. There is no official nominee until voting is finished at the convention. Please continue onward to Denver this summer.

Rhetoric rarely matches reality in this world, and the U.S.A continually represents itself as a beacon of democracy. What has happened during this primary campaign and the two previous presidential elections clearly shows the reality. Many have lamented the decline in educational standards over the decades, but every citizen from primary school to retirement should learn how the executive and legislative branches of our government are elected. You have given a master class in this topic, but it is not yet time for the final exam. Please, please, Senator Clinton, continue educating the country by going to Denver and seeking the nomination for PRESIDENT from your party.

The super- or automatic delegates should do their job. I have seen too often how those with some amount of power become lazy–it is go along to get along in order to keep what they have and a ready acceptance of taking the easy way out of whatever conflict or challenge that might arise. You won the popular vote, and you won the (almost) winner-take-all system that will actually happen at the end of this year. The former is democracy, the latter is not. The in-between system of the Democratic National Party, using delegates is really a mixed bag. What has become painfully clear is that your party believes some votes are more valuable than others. The Rules and Bylaws Committee of your party also believes that the certified votes of states can be apportioned however they decide, not how the voters decide. How is this different in effect from changing vote tallies after-the-fact or stuffing the ballot box with fake ballots?

I believe your campaign can clearly make the case to ALL of the delegates (Some pledged delegates are not bound.) that you are the best candidate, by the numbers, for president: popular vote, electoral college, ¿number of Congressional districts?, ¿number of counties?, and the vote:pledged delegate ratio. The numbers approach is a place to start; experience, history of service, and gravitas will serve to close the argument.

While I believe there is a place for forgiveness on a personal level, not challenging unethical and possibly illegal conduct during elections serves only to re-enforce the notion that you can get away with it if you have enough money and to discourage further participation in the fragile representative democracy that exists in the United States.

You are a role model for every American. Thank you for inspiring me.

Sincerely,

Drugs,sex(gay in the closet),Murder!
Larry Sinclair Donald Young
Hate whitey
more Weather Underground
more Rezko
Ahkmadov & Brzezinski terrorism
Wall Street & Soros kickbacks
Selective Service record?
HIV+ ?
The lost years at Columbia
Brzezinki’s Catamite

Drugs,sex(gay in the closet),Murder!
Larry Sinclair Donald Young
Hate whitey
more Weather Underground
more Rezko
Ahkmadov & Brzezinski terrorism
Wall Street & Soros kickbacks

I think it is largely over for the primary season of 2008. Short of Obama fathering a white baby outside of wedlock, I’m not sure anything could convince superdelegates to avoid the oncoming trainwreck. They are like deer caught in a set of headlights.

Hillary should go to the Convention have the vote and concede then, and only, then. In the meantime, Hillary supporters should seriously look at their options on how to proceed next. The central question is whether or not the Party should be punished, and if so, what is the way to do it. My suggestion is to vote for the Green Party candidate for President, yet vote Democrat all the way down the ticket even if that would mean voting for those awful Zel Miller types.

If the overall party is given evidence that Hillary voters turned against the party, it makes it extremely difficult for her run in 2012. If you care enough for Hillary, vote for Congressional Democrats because I can’t see her ever leaving the party. I think she is too faithful to it and we should be too.

If it makes you feel better, the Green Party I believe is running a woman named Cynthia McKinney for President. Since she is both black and a woman, what can Obama supporters accuse Hillary voters of? Abandoning Democrats? Not so if Congressional Democrats win yet Obama loses.

In the meantime, what is the best approach to keep Hillary in the media spotlight until the Convention? If you have any clever suggestions, do not post them here. Send them to her campaign.

Let’s all just calm down, sit back and calculate. Right now, I’ve come up with a few clever fake slogans for his ticket.

Oh, for the Obama trolls, I eagerly encouraging you to depart and fly solo in a sexual manner. Translation: Go f*ck yourselves.

There is no respect for her in his camp. She would be used — as they specialize in in Chicago — and then abused. She’s too smart for that I pray.