Comments on: Father Pfleger the Gift that Keeps on Giving

By: normita

normita — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:27:03 +0000

IdioSavant…go away.

By: NObama

NObama — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:32:03 +0000

No one knows the real meaning of 666. The 666 is the sign of the beast. Three digits refer to the three persons of the unholy trinity. (antichrist, beast and false prophet) The 777 is the number of God and the three Persons of the Holy Trinity (Father Son and Holy Spirit).
But why sixes and sevens? Perhaps this is a question of purity. 7 is the number of purity. The Jews washed seven times for ritual cleansing. Gold is refined seven times to produce twenty four karat gold, pure gold. Seven repetitions create a habit. The list goes on. The sixes are the representation of near purity which in actuality is most impure because it looks good even though it is not good.
God is pure and satan is not, but… satan is not ugly red full of teeth and horns. You see satan was the chief angel in command of all the angelic host, second only to the Trinity, a.k.a God. Satan is beautiful and powerful and passionate and very evil. The sixes in 666 refer to an incomplete purity, a counterfeit purity. It’s like having a delicious hot fudge sunday on the deck of a cruise ship, with juuust a little e-coli. It looks good to a man but it is full of evil that will kill you.
If you really want to know who the antichrist is, see who he worships, I mean what form he worships. Ultimately he worships satan and himself through the indwelling of satan, but he would never make that obvious. Read Daniel 11:38. Be sure to read the surrounding verses and then read 2 Corinthians 10:4. Daniel is Old Testament and 2 Corinthians is New Testament.

By: Hotspur

Hotspur — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 12:44:14 +0000

gentlerabbit is right. the ignorance displayed in these comments is not only flabbergasting. it’s terrifying.

By: Kickass Old Lady

Kickass Old Lady — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 12:36:35 +0000

Comment by Kickass Old Lady | 2008-06-04 22:42:30

I hope it is not too late to reply to Amy. Amy, dear, nobody was talking about voting rights specificly, though we revere the women who fought for us for those rights. You have no idea, it seems, about what the women before you have done to give you reproductive rights, a fair and decent workplace and access to hundreds of more jobs than were open to women than before. You should be kissing the older women you are dissing. I have decided to vote for John McCain, and you unappreciative young women can fight for your reproductive rights all over again. I would love to hear more comments on this.

By: Ivory Bill Woodpecker

Ivory Bill Woodpecker — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 11:25:20 +0000

Jeff, just what have you been smoking?

By: KVB

KVB — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 08:24:06 +0000

The Indians were killing each other before the white man came. Is it somehow worse when a white man kills an Indian?

By: Mr.Murder

Mr.Murder — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 06:35:11 +0000

He lost the TX popular vote to Hillary. Don’t let the truth get in the way of your narrative though.

By: Jeff Capell

Jeff Capell — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 05:54:27 +0000

Within the compass of this letter, I can do no more than indicate, as concisely as I can, relevant considerations that must be taken into account if we are to discuss Sen. Hillary Clinton’s distasteful roorbacks in a rational manner. It may help if I begin my discussion by relating an innocuous story in order to illustrate my point: A few days ago I was arguing with a gin-swilling moron who was insisting that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points. I tried to convince this treacherous litterbug that Sen. Clinton says that she needs a little more time to clean up her act. As far as I’m concerned, Sen. Clinton’s time has run out. The mess that she has left behind is sometimes hard to see but eventually will be impossible to ignore. But there is a further-reaching implication: Sen. Clinton is trying hard to convince a substantial number of putrid analphabetics to condemn children to a life of drugs, gangs, drinking, rape, incest, verbal abuse, physical abuse, and a number of other horrors. She presumably believes that the “hundredth-monkey phenomenon” will spontaneously incite bloody-minded, birdbrained wackos to behave likewise. The reality, however, is that dirty, callous kleptomaniacs are born, not made. That dictum is as unimpeachable as the “poeta nascitur, non fit” that it echoes and as irreproachable as the brocard that if you’ve read any of the jealous slop that Sen. Clinton has concocted, you’ll decidedly recall Sen. Clinton’s description of her plan to pander to our worst fears. If you haven’t read any of it, well, all you really need to know is that odious, Stalinism-prone pettifoggers who ensure that there can never in the future be accord, unity, or a common, agreed-upon destiny among the citizens of this once-great nation will, hopefully, eventually be replaced by people who believe in freedom, justice, and the pursuit of personal growth. That should serve as the final, ultimate, irrefutable proof that she has gotten away with so much for so long that she’s lost all sense of caution, all sense of limits. If you think about it, only a woman without any sense of limits could desire to promote, foster, and institute phallocentrism.

It is certainly the height of ironies that Sen. Clinton’s hallucinations about the benefits of obscurantism are so deep and inveterate that they can be broken, if at all, only if we work beyond the predatory plasticity of her campaigns of malice and malignity. I’ll go further: I have frequently criticized her unspoken plan to confuse, disorient, and disunify. She usually addresses my criticisms by accusing me of cannibalism, exclusionism, child molestation, and halitosis. Sen. Clinton hopes that by delegitimizing me this way, no one will listen to me when I say that Sen. Clinton’s recommendations may have been conceived in idealism, but they quickly degenerated into delirious sectarianism. Sen. Clinton twists every argument into some sort of “struggle” between two parties. Sen. Clinton unvaryingly constitutes the underdog party, which is what she claims gives her the right to gum up what were once great ideas.

What, then, does “piezocrystallization” mean? It means considerably more than any dictionary is likely to say. I am not fooled by Sen. Clinton’s incomprehensible and eristic rhetoric. I therefore gladly accept the responsibility of notifying others that there is a format Sen. Clinton should follow for her next literary endeavor. It involves a topic sentence and supporting facts. The take-away message of this letter is that Sen. Hillary Clinton is leading us down a slippery slope of economic strife, social turmoil, cultural chaos, and exploitative scapegoatism. Think about it. I don’t want to have to write another letter a few years from now, in the wake of a society torn apart by Sen. Clinton’s postmodernist, feral smear tactics, reminding you that you were warned.

By: GYRENE

GYRENE — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 05:50:57 +0000

The black race has been given many oppurtunities,The majority would rather stake
their claims with ‘poverty pimps’ such as
Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakhan who
by the way should be in prison for treason, &
Jeremiah Wright who has been spewing his nonsense for years, But is a “johnny come lately” to the mainstream media. These NUTS have been selling blacks a bill of goods for
decades, Getting wealthy themselves because
they know they can count on so many blacks
flocking to them when they scream racism.Your
own people began the slave trade by selling
captured blacks from other tribes.If the black
race is disenfranchised, It is because they
have chosen the path they walk.You cannot blame the white race forever.At some point
you have to take responsibility for the “leaders” you have chosen to follow & support.A good first step would be to drop
the hyphen, Go with American not Afro-American
that alone may surprise you. Look at Obamas
nomination, That alone should show you how far
the Dem’s are willing to go to erase the
‘white guilt’ trip Sharpton & his ilk have been building on for years.This guy is where
he is now because he’s black.The bottom line
is the only ones at fault are the ones who
choose that path by waiting on what they have
been led to beleive, (falsley)is that because
they are black, The Goverment owes them, The
Al, Jesse, Louis, Jerimiah, “poverty pimps”
contribution to the black race. NOTHING!!!

By: MessyMarcy

MessyMarcy — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 04:43:24 +0000

This was meant to be a reply to Mel’s comment above about Obama being in jail. I don’t know how it got down here, but I think it means I need to run along to bed. Good night everyone, even you trolls.

By: MessyMarcy

MessyMarcy — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 04:30:44 +0000

While I don’t want Obama anywhere near the White House, I wouldn’t mind at all seeing him in the Big House (and not the one in Michigan).

By: MessyMarcy

MessyMarcy — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 04:26:49 +0000

Don’t be so mean to claribel and her great, great, etc., grandmother Elsie. With so many Obamabutts on here so frequently, claribel may be needed to translate all the bullshit. I know I will be grateful for the help, since the idiots never seem to make sense to me. And don’t feel bad about being related to the Cheney and Obama livestock, claribel. I’m sure they are much nicer than the Cheney and Obama humans.

And apologies for addressing you without permission, HT. I didn’t realize blogs had such strict rules.

By: MessyMarcy

MessyMarcy — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 04:09:01 +0000

Seems to me he is just manipulative. Lots of people in prison are really smart, they just focused all their intelligence and energy into taking illegal shortcuts to get what they wanted rather than working honestly for it. I don’t know how smart Obama is or what he might have been able to achieve had he worked for what he has been given rather than deciding to get ahead by doing favors for people like Rezko and Ayers. I just know that I don’t want his Chicago associates running this country through their puppet Obama.

By: Kickass Old Lady

Kickass Old Lady — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 03:42:30 +0000

By: ulahane

ulahane — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 02:55:37 +0000

gentlerabbit, slavery was a horrible evil but genocide is “the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group.” Slavery was not an attempt to exterminate anyone. It was unimaginably horrible but not genocide.

But wumhenry, when Colonel John M. Chivington ordered his troops to kill all Native Americans (including babies and children)that they could find because “nits make lice” he was attempting to commit genocide. There are many other similar incidents of attempts to exterminate “cultural groups” of Native Americans.