Rant for Hillary

Boycott Oprah!

If you get a chance please watch John McCain strategy briefing video on his website. I am not trying to promote McCain but it gives you a good insight in to how pragmatic and logical republicans are when it comes to winning election and why they really win election. The republican video admits that region of Eastern Ohio, Western Penn and North West Virginia is probably key to winning in 2008 and is most certainly Clinton country. How stupid democrats are to throw this election away by not nominating Hillary is beyond me. Even republicans seem to understand this.

http://www.johnmccain.com/strategybriefing/

I so agreed with your point about the core democrats. I’ve debated with myself over this one. On the one hand, I do think it’s smart to appeal to the youth. The Republicans have a problem right now. They are out of youth. That’s “start-over” time.

On the other hand, even the great Potomac blow-out, the statistic I noticed that kept getting ignored was that she won 6 out of 10 registered Democrats.

That was an eye-opener.

Right then, I saw we’d end up in a horrible split party. I was right.

And it is the core Democrats that are mad.

Where I’ve come out on this issue is that this split is due to a failure of leadership. It shouldn’t have happened.

There was a way to expand the base without kicking the core group to the curb and telling us to suck it up.

This is the failure of the lions in our party.

They will have to be responsible, too.

I am truly torn. I feel the pain as a Hillary supporter. At the same time, I was proud of my candidate as she gave a profoundly historical speech. To clarify, I have always been proud of Hillary. I just have mixed feelings about all the infighting. I am educated and well informed (yes, a Hillary supporter). I understand what is at stake, and I understand the difference between a Republican or a Democrat in the White House. Yet, I cannot forgive that the so-called party leaders did not speak out sooner against the blatant sexist attacks and misogyny that was largely perpetrated and promoted by the MSM and Obama supporters/surrogates.

Hillary’s speech was truly moving, inspiring. I AM ONE OF 18 MILLION. Although, I can appreciate why Hillary has endorsed Obama, I do not have to follow. This is now bigger than her. This party use to stand for something. I see no evidence of that, when the party decides to meet in secret and votes to ignore the “fair reflection” of the will of the people.

Nonetheless, Hillary has won more votes, 18 MILLION, than anyone ever running for President. She is the first woman to win a major primary and she started a movement. Yes, a movement. Women have taken notice to the latent misogyny that was let out of the gate like a race horse. No more. I AM MAD AS HELL, AND I AM NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE!

My vote counts as a full vote, not this half nonsense. To Howard, Donna, Nancy, and Reid, I say goodbye. Never felt so good to leave.

I never believed Hillary was entitled to the presidency. Instead, I believe she fought for it with the passion of a boxer in the ring. She earned it. She was deserving of fair and civilized treatment. Even after her concession speech, the good old boys at MSNBC continued the attacks.

I do not believe there is anything anyone can say to me to get me to vote for BO. If Hillary can’t do it…well, no one can.

To Hillary and her family, my gratitude and best wishes. To the party, good riddance.

Below is a discussion of the board legislation by Evelyn Pringle, who published a very detailed series on Obama’s crimes at opednews.com. These articles have been cited around the world.

Following her discussion is a link to a discussion, also reproduced, of 18 USC 1346, which, again is the section under which Obama will be prosecuted.

First, Evelyn’s discussion:

The evidence presented in “Tony Rezko’s] trial focused on his influence over officials in getting members appointed to the Boards. Prosecutors did not discuss how the legislation got passed that enabled the Planning Board to be set up in a way that allowed for the appointment of members to rig the votes to begin with. That part of the scheme will likely be detailed in future indictments, probably starting with Blagojevich. Blagojevich signed the Illinois Health Facilities Planning Act with an effective date of June 27, 2003. However, before he could sign the act, a bill had to be passed by the Illinois House and Senate. As discussed fully in Curtain Time Part II, Obama was the inside guy in the senate who pushed through the legislation that resulted in the Act. Obama was appointed chairman of the Senate Health and Human Services Committee. The minute the bill was introduced, it was referred to his committee for review. The sponsors of the bill also served on this committee with Obama. Within a month, Chairman Obama sent word to the full senate that the legislation should be passed. On May 31, 2003, Senate Bill 1332 passed and specified that the “Board shall be appointed by the Governor, with the advice and consent of the Senate.” The legislation reduced the number of members from 15 to 9, paving the way for the appointment of a five-bloc majority to rig the votes. The corrupt members appointed included three doctors who contributed to Obama. Michel Malek gave Obama $10,000 on June 30, 2003 and donated $25,000 to Blagojevich on July 25, 2003. Malek also gave Obama another $500 in September 2003. Fortunee Massuda donated $25,000 to Blagojevich on July 25, 2003, and gave a total of $2,000 to Obama on different dates. After he was appointed, Dr Imad Almanaseer contributed a total of $3,000 to Obama. Almanaseer did not give money to Blagojevich. When the first pay-to-play scheme was put in play, and the application for approval of a new hospital was submitted, the Department of Human Services, along with four other Illinois agencies, sent recommendations that the project should be approved even though experts said the hospital was not needed. During the trial, Rezko’s attorney presented an email exchange to the jury that hinted at Obama’s role in setting up the scheme. The exchange showed that Obama and seven other top Illinois politicians consulted on the legislation passed in 2003 and were involved in recommending the members for the board. Matthew Pickering wrote the memo to Blagojevich’s general counsel, Susan Lichtenstein, on behalf of David Wilhelm, a former chairman of the Democratic National Committee, who headed Blagojevich’s 2002 campaign for governor. Pickering said he and Wilhelm had “worked closely” over six months with state legislators. The memo recommended the appointees listed above and stated, “our attached recommendations reflect that involvement” with the political leaders. The persons appointed to rig the votes, including those who contributed to Blagojevich and Obama, are cooperating in exchange for immunity or lighter prison sentences. Feds shut down pay-to-play schemes. Only two pay-to-play schemes succeeded before the Feds swooped in and shut them all down. Blagojevich did not receive the $1.5 million from the Planning Board deal because the hospital was never built. But Obama received $20,000 from the first kickback paid in the pension fund scheme and the straw donors used to funnel the $10,000 payments, Elie Maloof and Joseph Aramanda, also made $1,000 contributions to Obama’s failed run for Congress in 2000. In addition, Aramanda gave $500 to Obama’s senate campaign on June 30, 2003. In the summer of 2005, Aramanda’s son landed an intern position in Obama’s Washington office. Obama also received contributions for his senate campaign from the two persons appointed to rig the vote on the pension fund board. On June 30, 2003, Jack Carriglio contributed $1,000, and the other appointee, Anthony Abboud, donated $500 on June 30, 2003, $250 on March 5, 2004, and $1,000 on June 25, 2004. The person chosen to funnel the kickback in a future scheme, Michael Winter, donated $3,000 to Obama on June 30, 2003. All these people are also cooperating in exchange for immunity or lesser prison sentences but prosecutors pointed out during closing arguments that people who entered into agreements with the government are required to tell the truth or all deals are off.

FOLLOW THE MONEY! This is an “insider’s view,” which sounds credible:

Okay, so now that Hillary has issued a statement to the press, I’ll elaborate on what I know:

Basically, on Tuesday Hillary spent the day at home calling superdelegates. In doing so, she discovered that Obama supporters, Uncommitted supers and a few of her supporters had essentially made a pact with the DNC that they would not support Hillary at the convention. She was essentially told that she needed to get out of the race asap. Someone told the press that she was going to get out last night, but Hillary didn’t want to exit the race when someone else told her to do it (the media) and instead, decided she would exit on her own time, under her conditions. I think it was her last opportunity to actually call her own shots versus having the DNC, party officials and media do it. In fact, during the meeting today, she joked that she had realized that she wanted to be a person who “talked for a living”, as you always had work and the things you said didn’t even have to be true. Anyway, apparently, the idea that Obama isn’t going to be able to win the nomination came up while talking to the DNC/supers and the response she received was that Obama brought in a lot of new Democratic voters (and ultimately, a lot of new Democratic money) and thus, while the party might lose the election in the short term (the presidential election, that is), the long term would be good, as the party would have lots of new voters and money. The belief was that even though Obama might not be able to win the presidency, the fact that he had “all these new voters” would help to ensure that the party won the congressional and senatorial seats in play in November. I asked if Hillary had read the comments posted by her supporters and was told that she did and that if she felt she could win the election (garner the superdelegate support at the convention), she would have stayed in the race. However , the DNC and supers made it very clear to her that they would not support her and that she needed to get out.

The airwaves today were full of Obama supporters demonizing Hillary for not dropping out of the race last night. They went on and on about how selfish she is and how “dare she strong arm for the VP position”. I was told that she has never once asked for the VP spot AND that she hasn’t been talking to the Obama campaign at all about what to do next. She came to her decision on her own, but did indicate that she would use some of her delegate support to get the healthcare plan on the Obama platform. In typical Obama fashion, he allowed the media to go on and on for the last two weeks about how Hillary is staying in the race so she can be the VP. Today that rhetoric reached a ridiculous level and the hate directed at her was completely over the top. Again, no statement from Obama regarding the truth: That she had NOT asked for the VP spot. (In fact, from what I understand, Hillary has no obvious desire to be a part of the Obama campaign whatsoever. This seems good, as right now, people love her and she can exit this looking like the queen that she is. If she goes with Obama, then the media will say that they were right all along-that Hillary stayed in this after March because she wanted the VP spot…his supporters will also go crazy with that logic, as they have no idea that she stayed in for us and because she should have been able to win had the supers and DNC not been in Obama’s pocket.) Regardless, around 6:30, the media began reporting that Hillary would concede on Friday. Apparently, she hadn’t reported this to the media and they were again frustrated with the media’s attempt to strong arm her into conceding on Friday. Despite the fact that she was going to concede, she wanted it on her own terms. Thus, she decided to set a date to concede, but scheduled it for Saturday-one last opportunity to stick it t o the media (we love Hillary for that). About one hour after that, Obama issued a statement admitting that Hillary did not negotiate anything before indicating she would concede. Once again, he believed it would make him look good to appear “gracious”, but clearly fails to realize that her supporters are not the idiots that he and his supporters think we are. It seems that today, his supporters are starting to figure out that they will need her supporters to win the election (though it’s too little, too late in my opinion…) and are attempting to opportunistically seize upon the moment.

Take this very unifying and non-condescending article in which an Obama supporter attempts to explain why the morons, also known as Hillary’s supporters, should will vote Obama…unless they really are the uneducated, self centered idiots that he clearly thinks they are:

The last statement of the article speaks volumes:

I guess I’m (as an Obama supporter )not self centered enough to throw my daughters chance at a happy life away by throwing a vote McCain’s way. (like those selfish Hilary supporters) I (unlike Hillary’s supporters) have this petty little thing called a conscience. It forces me to make decisions while viewing the consequences to everyone (hmm….how very giving and kind of you…wish Hillary’s supporters could be a little more like that).

The democrats are now officially the party of jeremiah wright, louis farrakhan, black nationalists, black liberation theology, islamists and move on, dailykos, george soros radical left marxists. The party has effectively purged itself of blue collar moderate and conservative whites, the Reagan democrats who will now become McCain democrats. What a proud moment for the party this truly is, it would do well to change its name to the stalinist party. The demorats are now being lead by the likes of Barack Hussein Obama. An empty vessel with virtually no experience and no qualifications to be president. And once again, he has yet to win an election legitimately. Back when he ran for the Illinois state senate he sued to have ALL of his opponents removed from the ballot and was able to run unopposed. When he ran for the US senate he had his opponents divorce files released publicly to knock him out of the race and then the Republicans put up a weak candidate in Alan Keys, a good man, but not an effective candidate. Now he has seized the democratic party nomination where he lost the popular vote, trailed in the pledged delegate majority the vote resulted in, but was saved by a group of elite superdelegates to hand him the nomination he failed to earn. Not to mention much of his delegates came from the corrupt, antiquated caucus process. This is the ultimate example of affirmative action gone insane. Why should the country put its trust in a party which cannot even conduct a simple thing like a primary election process? Any kindegardner can understand that the candidate receiving the most votes should be the winner in a democratic election. How can a party which runs such a convoluted, corrupt mess of a primary be able to run the affairs of the country? I certainly hope America wakes up and chooses the right candidate, John McCain, in November.

Just to give my fellow Clinton supporters something to smile about before you go to bed. The Rezko trial begins it’s sentencing phase in September. They will have enough time to consider the charges, and “argue” about the length of time he should serve. Then Rezko will have just enough time to squeel like a little piggie, and then we can expect the indictment of Senator Obama in October. So no matter how much the little Obamatons whine and cry…no one is going to vote for their headed to the big house candidate.

Those you see following the Obamessiah are not Democrats, though the species may try to look similar. They are in fact nothing but JACKASSES!
P.U.M.A.

http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2008/06/05/aol-straw-poll-june-5-june-13/146#c12531079

AOL straw poll. Lets show the DNC we WILL vote against Obamessiah! Right now McCain has a 5 percent lead and the map is VERY RED!

Those you see following the Obamessiah are not Democrats, though the species may try to look similar. They are in fact nothing but JACKASSES!
P.U.M.A.

Remember:

He’s going to start to talk “sweet” things to women trying to get us back to the den of political corruption.

We must post our comment is the Wapo and NYTimes. Just to irk those Obamabots.

PLEASE, DON’T FEED THE TROLLS.

Arguing aside. I just saw an AOL poll that has it 53-47 for McCain and get this, 52-48 in MA, the bluest of the blue, the only state that went for mcgovern. And looks like most have replied to howie’s unity e-mail with a large collective fuck you!

I am not for Obama but he was not golfing when Hillary gave her speech. He was at home watching her on his computer.

We have got to stop listening to the MSM. They make everything up. They have Hillary begging to be VP and you know that is not true. The only thing she ever said was she would be willing to do anything Obama wanted her to do and if it included being VP, she would do it. That doesn’t tell me she is begging to be VP. She has been there and done that. People seem to forget she was already in the WH for 8 years.

I have listened to all the pundits on TV and they are making up everything they say because neither Hillary or Obama has released any information. The MSM are playing puppet masters brainwashing the American public. We have got to stop listening to them or we will never know truth again. We won’t even be able to recognize it.

I feel like I am living on another planet when I watch television. It has no relevancy to my real life and my perceptions as an American citizen. It is a wonder we are not all crazy.

Where are the professional journalists that used to report truth? And if there was nothing to report, they kept their mouths shut.

One of the reasons I stopped supporting Obama (besides him giving marching orders to grass roots organizations in Florida to circulate petitions NOT to seat the delegates), was what an ego this man has. How do you thumb your nose at 18 million voters and say they are not important? How do you say you stand for unity and diversity, and then call groups of people “bitter” just because they support your opponent? It’s like he’s attempting to marginalize everyone who voted for Hillary Clinton. Some people did vote for her just because they liked her healthcare plan better, or that she’s a moderate, or that Bill balanced a budget. Hell, maybe they just liked her pantsuits. Who knows! It does not mean they are “racist.”

True, there are people who do vote on race… or gender… but I might know one person in 200 who voted for Hillary who even made a single comment about Obama’s race. Most people today who are still registered as Democrat are looking forward to the day a person of color or a woman takes the show. Just not this man.

What’s really sad to me, too, is that Obama has the support of many young voters. He’s done NOTHING to educate these young voters about the process and neither has the DNC. These young folks are now coming into the world disillusioned not only with Bush and America, but also with the political process. “It’s bad to count votes.” “The RULES — even if the rules aren’t really being applied fairly — are more important that voter’s rights.” “Do anything to win — block the doors to polling places — scare old ladies in parking lots and fill out bogus voter registration forms — who cares!” “It’s okay to make death threats and race-bait.” “Don’t say anything bad about Obama, but my candidate can call yours a bitch.” “It’s okay to play sexist and Marxist songs at American political rallies.” “Long primaries and convention fights are bad, because we must have a candidate RIGHT NOW.” This is what I’m hearing from several young Obama supporters I know, and it’s very sad. Are these young people a true representation of how young Obama supporters feel? If so, you older Obama supporter have a responsibility to set the record straight, even if he is your candidate of choice. Or do you all not really care if the American process falls apart?

The DNC shut this race down because of new voter registrations and money. What kind of message does that send to these new voters? If Obama were really a leader, he would have stepped in when the DNC applied these tough sanctions (violating their own rules — as both states were only to lose half), and said, “No way! I’m the civil rights candidate and I won’t run if you do this.” That would have garnered him my unwavering support, and I did question the campaign about why he wasn’t proceeding in this manner and what I got back for a response was a bit of a stonewall. If he would have taken responsibility for some of the race-baiting and ugliness that spewed from his campaign, instead of letting these young supporters think that Hillary ran the dirtiest campaign in history, I would have had some respect for him, too. But to call the Clintons “racist” and then allow his supporters to continue that dialog just shows that he just plain doesn’t care.

Message: It’s all about Obama.

You know, I have serious doubts about a man who wants to be our commander-in-chief, but would rather have lunch with a terrorist-supporting leader of a rogue nation than to come to terms and understanding with the people of Appalachia, those very people he would have to swear to “protect and defend.” I’m all for diplomacy, but a great president has to learn how to listen to the concerns of the people he or she leads, and then structures his programs and plans accordingly, striking a balance between the will of the people and what his advisors tell him or her to do. That’s what’s been lacking these last 8 years with Bush, and that’s what we’ll get more of if we support Obama.

For copies of this transcript, please send $2.99 to… just kidding. Have a wonderful Sunday, folks. I’m going swimming.

DON’T FEED THE FREAKING TROLLS!!

I don’t understand this thread.

According to the media, Hillary Clinton supporters are all uneducated Slugs.

Only Obama has the educated vote.

None of you sound like you have motor cycle parts in the garage next to the SUV.

What’s the deal?

Boycott. Contact advertisers. Make the press pay for giving free reign to insults and misogyny.

CNN and MSNBC have already lost millions of viewers who can no longer stomach the sycophant pundits fawning on Mr. Obama at every opportunity. This is real. Fox News now has millions of voters that they did not have before the primaries.

Thanks Ambrozine. Super-Dons….appropriate name!!

Ok, Obama supporters, here’s a serious question for you with absolutely no snarkiness or derision:

If party unity is so paramount, and you truly believe it is so critical for a democrat to be elected in November/McCain must be defeated – why don’t you ask Senator Obama to step aside and accept the nomination as VP in order to achieve your stated goals? This would ensure 16 years of Democrats controlling the White House, so it seems to me that you ought to consider the sacrifice for the greater good.

This is a legitimate question, yet I’m sure most of you would never even consider it. So if you are just a legit Obama supporter and not a paid troll, I would ask you to consider that the overwhelming majority of posters at No Quarter feel similarly about the views you try to foist on us, and give us the consideration of posting only thought-out, documented statements supporting your candidate rather than trying to convince us that Senators Clinton and McCain are evil. That will allow us to return to an itelligent, legitimate debate of our views and opinions. Thank you in advance for your consideration.

The only way dems down ticket are going to win in the south is to claim they don’t know Obama and never met the guy. So much for Dean’s 50..er or 48 er or 57 state strategy.

BTW I used to own a motorcycle…does that count???

I really don’t see a “floor fight” at the convention. I can see Clinton pushing her agenda with her retained delegates and votes. If something happens and Obama “resigns”, I don’t even see that as a positive for Hillary Clinton in the general election. No matter what, the party has boxed itself in a corner. The DNC has put all of their eggs in the Obama basket.I believe Hillary Clinton to be human and not She-Ra. If this basket continues to break, I don’t think even she can fix it quickly enough in time for the general election.

Have you ever noticed that Obama supporters spew comparisons left and right….Obama is like JFK, Obama is like Abe lincon..oh, and the ever popluar he is the next messiah..etc….
Question: Why is it that you have to compare your candidate to someone else? Why does he have to be the “next somebody”, not just the first Obama? Is because he has no identity? At lease not one that is desirable to project?

You never hear “Hillary Clinton is the next….” Maybe that’s because she has established a singular identity that needs no comparisions to support its validity? Maybe you can form an opinion about her based on just her and not some farflung marketing ploy? Just a thought!

Bottom line: the powers that be wanted Obama. They always get their way, by hook or crook, and they ran the sleaziest democratic campaign we ever saw. I especially like the current narrative: that Hillary failed, and it had nothing to do with the DNC’s electoral fraud or the media smear campaign.
Still, one questions remains for Obama supporters. Which part of his speeches do they enjoy most: the shallow rhetoric or meaningless drivel?
It beaks my heart to loose the most knowledgeable democrats of our time, and I’ll so miss the Clinton press conferences and flawless reasoning.
That said, I have no choice but to vote for Obama. He may be be a dingbat pretender, but he’s the nominee.

Dems for McCain 08

Obama is a narcisistic personality. His followers are eerily similar to National Socialists. Can we call them the “Obama Youth”? There is a real cult of personality aspect to this entire debacle. Very little chance of reasoning with them. Most every time I read a post that contains reasoned, sober analysis of why Obama is lacking qualities of leadership, experience, or that his policies are dangerous (such as his economic policies, which are very disturbing), all the obama youth can muster are vulgarites, taunts, insults and screams of “Racist”!
Guess what? They prove the point that this man is a danger.

ANY DEMOCRAT WHO WOULD FORGIVE WHAT COWARD,DONNA AND THE SDs HAVE DONE BY PUSHING THIS UNQUALIFIED FAITHLESS LYING BASTRAD ON THE TICKET IS UNFORGIVEABLE! YOU HAVE TO BE BRAIN DEAD,BLIND AND A DRONE TO FORGIVE OR SUPPORT OBAMA.

THE DNC MUST BE PUNISHED
VOTE McCAIN TO PROTECT AMERICA.. IT’S YOUR DUTY AND OBLIGATION TO DO SO…..

I am a conservative male. I have been following this website for a couple of days. I am sorry Hillary lost because I never though McCain could win.(age)and I thought Hillary would make an O.K president. Something about Obama and his supporters are very scary.(not his race) but his associations and what he truly thinks about white people and this county.

Well now we(Conservatives) are about to go though what
Hillary and her supporters had to deal with. 24 7 pro Obama news.
But you should be very proud of her she put up more of a fight than McCain will.

Pray for this country.

Dear Fellow Democrats;

We have always been a nice and respecting group of folks, and yet something is left well sort of selfishly done and that is inexcusable and shows very low class. During the Primary season, Senator Barack H. Obama called out for Republicans to become Democrats for a day.

Now we being good people in the Democratic Party, have left this favor undone and not yet returned. Is it not our duty as fair-minded people to prepay the services given by Senator Barack H. Obama’s request and fulfillment by Republicans to some form of repayment?

So therefore knowing how selfish Senator Barack H. Obama is, it is our rightful duty as Democrats to repay the favor bestowed upon us by becoming Republicans for a day. The suggested day to repay this favor is in November, well actually November the 4th to be precise.

Now let’s show not only the country but the world that Democrats return favors in 10 fold, as a gesture of good will and harmony between people! Show our children that a favor never goes unreturned.

So following Senator Barack H. Obama’s many passionate pleas for Republicans to be Democrats for a day, show the Democratic spirit and become a Republicans on November 4th, 2008!

In the beginning, lacking any other information on this candidate but the fact he gave a good speech at the 2004 Democratic convention; and absent a full vetting by the MSM, I did my research on Senator Obama. At some point I had learned enough to be certain I could never vote for him for the Office of President of the United States, the soundness of which decision was confirmed over and over again the more I learned about him since then.

I supported Senator Clinton throughout the primary, donating more money to her campaign than I could afford and blogging my fingers raw to correct the tomes of misinformation put out by his campaign. Before I knew what I know now, I intended to vote FOR her in November and not AGAINST Senator Obama. But not now. Because knowing what I know now, I am no longer indifferent about Senator Obama him. Just the opposite; as a patriotic American, I know I must do everything I can to prevent this man from being elected the President of the United States, for more reasons than I can possibly list. Or want to. And, I will vote against him. If this means voting for a Republican in order to keep him out of office, I will. If Senator McCain is confirmed as his party’s nominee, I will even contribute to his campaign, and blog my fingers off for him.

And yes, one of those reasons I am not voting for Senator Obama – though not my prime motivation – is that he is a misogynist, both in deed and in silent acquiescence. And, FYI, every time his disciples deign to recruit the women who support Senator Clinton by educating them, to vote for Senator McCain in the general election is a vote against self-interest, they reinforce their marginalization of these women, assuming they – the women – are incapable of well-informed reasoned decision-making; and of course, his supporters – these men – know better.

Contineue to FIGHT!

Don’t send any money to DNC or Dem candidates!

Constantly evaluate who, what, where and why of any news report. Remembering the blackout of any negative Obama news.

Don’t vote for any pol that backed Obama

Know that Hillary has not released her delegates.

Remember, THEY NEED US – THEY SCREWED US AND HILLARY -
FIGHT BACK BY NOT DONATING AND NOT VOTING FOR OBAMA and his SURROGATES.

FIGHT ON!

Most importantly, Nobama.

No to Oprah (Everyone is sick to death of her anyway. Does she still have an audience?). No to MSNBC. No to Air America (has everyone seen Rachel Maddow’s new Minnie Mouse false eyelashes on MSNBC? And Randi Rhoades, now there’s a class act). No to CNN. NO to “uncommitted” Donna Brazile and her ilk.

And bye bye to the corrupt DNC. Way to go, nominating another LOSER. Clinton is BY FAR the best candidate. NO to Howard Dean, who publicly acknowledged sexism against Hillary Clinton the day BO reached his delegate number. Dean, you might be the worst of all.

McCain in ’08. After a lot of thought, it’s the only way to make a point and have a clear conscience. Obama would be a disaster.

If Hillary is for what is best for the country and she believes in doing the right thing no matter how hard and making good decisions…..Then why is she asking us to vote for Obama just because he is the DNC nominee?

It doesn’t take a turnip to smell corruption in the Obama camp. If whiteys are racist then how did Obama get all those whitey votes?

Superdelegates get campaign cash

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor February 14, 2008 03:54 PM

Many of the superdelegates who could well decide the Democratic presidential nominee have already been plied with campaign contributions by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, a new study shows.

“While it would be unseemly for the candidates to hand out thousands of dollars to primary voters, or to the delegates pledged to represent the will of those voters, elected officials serving as superdelegates have received about $890,000 from Obama and Clinton in the form of campaign contributions over the last three years,” the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics reported today.

About half the 800 superdelegates — elected officials, party leaders, and others — have committed to either Clinton or Obama, though they can change their minds until the convention.

Obama’s political action committee has doled out more than $694,000 to superdelegates since 2005, the study found, and of the 81 who had announced their support for Obama, 34 had received donations totaling $228,000.

Clinton’s political action committee has distributed about $195,000 to superdelegates, and only 13 of the 109 who had announced for her have received money, totaling about $95,000.

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/02/superdelegates.html

Good idea — boycott all black businesses, movies/TV shows, sports, and black-endorsed products. I will actively work for obama’s (and later) claire mccaskill’s defeat in Missouri. You want to “ride dirty,” then after what obama and the RBC did with our votes, let’s see how graciously obama’s cult members handle losing the electoral college in November after he wins by 3 million votes!

It’s the train that’s coming, folks.