RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Remembrance of Things Past – Part 3


What’s it all mean
?

The truth will set your fee…

Well, you’re not paranoid if they really are after you. In 2008 David Rothkopf published a book called “Superclass” (Farrar, Straus and Giroux) wherein he discusses the 6,000 or so people who run the world, how they got to be there and what they intend to do. Highly recommended, very scary.

These folks pretty much have all the useful power and money they need to make things work just the way they want it – then again, so did the Tsars.

The preferred method of control used by the Superclass is the Transnational corporation. These entities have managed, over the last couple of hundred years, to get themselves legal status as ‘persons’, thereby gaining rights of privacy, property and legal recognition that were more properly reserved for individuals. This means they can represent themselves in court on an equal(?) basis as individuals. This seems innocuous until you understand that they now have the ability sue and be sued by other person/entities and that means they have the ability to shield every individual in that corporation from culpability for any actions the corporation might undertake. Most of the tort actions taken by the infamous ‘trial lawyers’ (btw, which lawyers aren’t ‘trial lawyers’?) over the last 123 years are attempts to pierce that veil of protection (go here for more information) In addition, these quasi-legal maneuvers have allowed the transnationals to abstract themselves from the suzerainty of any particular nation-state. They are extra-legal insofar as any effective means of control is concerned and pretty much untaxable as well.

Sort of a conspiracy nut’s wet dream, eh? A bunch of freaky rich people with control of vastly powerful mercenary corporations. No rights, no recourse and not conscience in sight…

If you’re looking for information that would confirm this, you need look no further than NAFTA and CAFTA and GATT (oh my!). NAFTA was the trade agreement that would supposedly open up North America as a ‘free trade’ zone with benefits for all. I was originally in favor of this (hey, we all make mistakes) and didn’t believe H. Ross Perot when he described the “loud sucking sound” as the jobs disappeared in a southerly direction – well ‘doom on me’ as they say, south they all went with CAFTA not far behind. The mother of all these agreements is GATT, the Global Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (go here for more information). This document is so evil it should drip blood, signatory countries essentially give up their sovereignty where transnational corporations are concerned, no rights, no recourse, etc.

The information is out there (apologies to Fox Mulder) we just have to believe… that we can find it and act on it.

Sounds like it’s time for torches and pitchforks to me.

OK, smartass, so what do we do about it?

I will be writing more about this and related subjects as time goes on but this piece is overlong already, so…

Let’s start with something simple: how do we clean up financial mess we’re in?

Craig’s Twelve Step Recovery Program to Clean up the Mess

1. Bring back Glass-Steagall. Let banks be banks, not financial supermarkets.

2. Clean up the derivatives market, derivatives should be tightly defined and closely controlled.

3. Enforce all extant anti-trust laws, enact new anti-trust laws to deal with the legal end runs developed since Teddy Roosevelt’s day – break up the media and banking conglomerates.

4. Mandate position limits in all commodities markets and force immediate disclosure of all positions over 5% in any market.

5. Put into immediate effect strict restrictions on naked short selling and price manipulation.

6. Institute reinstatement of the ‘uptick rule’. This rule requires that every short sale transaction be entered at a price that is higher than the price of the previous trade.

7. Prohibit regulated banks from engaging in any speculative markets either for themselves or as agents.

8. Reinstate usury laws and set up oversight and strict regulation of all interstate financial transactions at the national level.

9. Make the bad paper good: go back two years and guarantee all home loans.

10. Eliminate ARMs. All banks must hold all loans they make (ten years or longer) for at least ten years.

11. Reinstate 1932 tax rates, eliminate loopholes.

12. Corporations with headquarters outside the US cannot get US government contracts.

The first eight are pretty much the steps you take if you actually want to get the markets under control again.

Nine and ten are simple ways to redress the balance in the home loan arena and at a far less cost than TARPs I & II. And please don’t talk to me about those evil people who ‘forced’ the poor lenders into giving them loans when they had no ability to pay – I’ll listen to those expressions of outrage when the Guild of Thieves has given back all the obscene profits they made off those loans.

Eleven deals with the ‘redistribution of the wealth’ issue. The tax rate on incomes of $1 million or more in 1932 was: 63%. Y’know how the right wingnuts always get hysterical about this? They keep saying “Soak the rich and they’ll stop producing jobs!”. What a crock! Let me tell you something about rich people: they’re like gerbils in a running wheel – you take away their money, they’ll just go out and make more, it’s what they love, it’s what they do. You couldn’t stop them with a herd of bulldozers. Go look up what percentage of US wealth is held by the richest 5% of US citizens, then go look up those statistics for 1980 when Ronald Reagan started taking care of his friends. If you still want to talk about this, I’ll be here.

Twelve addresses (in a very minor way) the responsibility I feel that corporations owe to the country that made them possible. Halliburton – want to move your HQ to Dubai to avoid paying US corporate taxes? No problem: no more US government contracts for you – have a nice life!

To wrap this up: there are a lot of bad people out there doing a lot of bad things. We just saw them install a sock puppet as president and go merrily on their way looting and pillaging our country.

You don’t have to be a conspiracy nut to see the writing on this wall, at this point they’re so confident that they’re barely bothering to conceal their tracks.

The question for us becomes: what do we get out of all of this? How do we find our way through this bog of liars, thieves and con men?

What we get is the opportunity to be clear eyed and perceptive, to refuse to be steamrollered by a truly shitty healthcare plan because Max Baucus’ face turns purple when he shrieks “Single payer is off the table, single payer is off the table!”

We get to insist that, while not all questions have simple answers, some do. We can have instant, universal, single payer healthcare – tomorrow. Just take the age limit off Medicare, sure there are and will be problems – these can be fixed. What we will have is a framework that works, we know this because it’s already there and it already works. So, what’s the problem?

We get to insist that acting is important, that actually reading a bill you are voting on is a necessary precursor to that vote. We get to insist that every representative and Senator be held personally responsible by his/her constituents for their votes – we get to let them know that we will absolutely vote them out of office if they fail us on crucial issues.

We get to subvert this corrupt and evil paradigm with our intelligence and with our commitment and with our action. We have the tools, we know what needs to be done, all that is left is to act.

  • Jenny

    Oh come on, sounds like another Alex Jones’ NWO type of BS.

    • http://www.hillaryorbust.com Hillary or Bust

      Extremely shallow and mindless response. Don’t be so automatically dismissive without good reason.

    • tzada

      No, it is you that is wrong. This whole series has been factual and I am impressed. We are lucky to have such an accomplished researcher and writer among other things he has achieved.

      Craig do you know if the Realtors have taken any stand on the Cap and Trade? I am referring to the clause that would make any new home have to be 30% more energy efficient than today’s standards. In addition if a person went to sell or improve their home the same standard would apply. That would have a chilling effect on an already desperate market.

      Do not have the book and page, but I did read it.

      PS why don’t you run for office?

      • Murray

        tzada: I was just wondering the same thing.

      • Craig Della Penna

        I had not heard that any group representing realtors had said anything about this. By itself it’s a good idea – build efficiency into the housing codes the same way we built efficiency into the appliance market or the way we were able to raise CAFE standards in the auto industry (when we actually did that).

        Two points here:

        First, no matter what we do about this, it’s going to cost us. One way or the other we will pay for these things.
        Two, why not do it right? We are the government, we can set the standard and tell the mfgs to meet it. Competition will then give us the cheapest result.

        But Cap & Trade is something else, I believe. Originally it was a bright idea from the left that got screwed by the Law of Unintended Consequences: the transnationals got ahold of it and managed to twist it so that they could screw the poor countries while benefiting the big polluters.

        Run for office? Well, neither the Demmicans nor the Republicrats would have me given the way I’ve been shooting my mouth off. So it would have to be a 3rd party I could support, and one that I think could win…

        • Senneth

          Craig,
          I live in Oregon as well. Have been in politics for a very long time. I think you should run. I’d be happy to help you all I can. Especially if you run as a third party candidate.

          My brother-in-law is a builder – hasn’t sold very much for over a year. He sold one house recently and a lot. That’s it for over a year. My sister is a realtor, has been for thirty or so years. The very inexpensive homes seem to be moving here and a few of the very expensive ones. They both voted for That One (Oilsoc) and don’t listen to me about Cap and Trade or anything else for that matter, although my brother-in-law has been building “green” homes in the last decade. Solar panels or set up to be, geothermal heat pump, recycled water bottles carpeting, etc. They told me the recession was over and everything would be hopey-changey again. Sure it is.

          Let me know if you can be convinced to run for office.

        • tzada

          30% more upon already existing standards in Florida would be nearly impossible to meet. This was what I got from an architect who is doing a job for me.

    • viking

      Jenny-the sole voice of reason commenting on the stunning stupidity of this post.

      I was going to un-knit the distortions but its too laborious and judging from the other comments here, not worth the effort.

      ugh…just ugh.

      • CG

        rather than insult, make your arguments, please do un-knit the distortions, as I would like to consider your points, and will do so carefully and respectfully.

      • http://www.sonicninjakitty.wordpress.com Sonic Ninja Kitty

        Viking, where is your fighting spirit?

      • Onofe’s arm

        Viking, I’m with you, and understand your reluctance to argue point by point. Sometimes the rhetorical mess others make is SO big, and all of the premises so faulty, arguing is pointless.

  • CG

    Craig, excellent. It is difficult to imagine Congress or the president, those with the power to change policy and laws, taking this seriously, unfortunately, since dollars flow so easily, and they are not serious about reforming that either.

    Get ready for the massive freakout with this link…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhydyxRjujU
    features Marcy Kaptur and Elizabeth Warren

    • CG

      I should have added that when you have a population of voters that don’t want to, are too lazy to, to afraid to, not intellectually curious enough or any other excuse, to take this seriously for legitimate reasons or not, and who time after time vote against their own best interests, it can be easy to see that the power will remain as is… I might add one thing to your list, term limits, to perhaps address the Congressional and presidential decisions made based in fear of reelection or the need to raise monies for the next election.

      • Linda Anselmi

        I agree with you on term limits CG.

        Although it will create its own issues. It will at least give us the opportunity to clean house and have a fighting chance to populate it time and again with representatives of the people.

        Would also add that this financial meltdown, may actually focus the voters minds to the importance of citizen participation and public service, in a democratic government of, for and by the people. We the people have not been pulling our weight.

        • CG

          You would think, Linda, that the public might wake from its stupor, after what is happening to them, to their friends and family, and their communities, and agressively engage… Emotionally some may recoil, but before it is really too late, for the vision of what is possible, they must participate, think in terms of non-violent revolution, rather than lying back waiting to be steamrolled.

        • Walter M. Clark

          California implemented term limits. All that happened was the newby legislators depended even more on the special interests for info and support. Now we see what the result of that was.

          I worked in public education, on the business services side, for over 20 years, retired in 2003. I saw the legislature both before term limits and after. I also saw this train wreck coming. We sold our house in southern California in January 2007, rented for a year while we decided where to retire to and moved to eastern Washington state in January 2008.

          I am SO GLAD we got out of California when we did.

    • jbjd

      Anytime I can watch Representative Kaptur or Professor Warren…I actually wrote a post about the Representative some months ago. Wouldn’t you love to see HRC as POTUS; Professor Warren as Secretary of the Treasury; Representative Kaptur as Speaker of the House…can you say, affordable single payer health?

      • oowawa

        Yes, Professor Warren seems like a calm intelligent goddess, an angel of truth . . . I just know she’s going to leave me heartbroken and bitterly disappointed. Oh well! Looks like a good lineup to me, jbjd.

      • CG

        yes! America needs it’s house cleaned, disinfected and fumigated. Who you gonna call… a good place to start might well be that particular trio of extraordinary talent!!

  • NomNomNom

    I agree that your 12 steps are among those necessary to regain control of our country, but I do not see how implementing them is possible: there are not enough candidates that are not already stooges to the interests maintaining our present situation for whom one can vote.
    Also, our personal behavior supports our present fascism: we purchase products derived from human and environmental abuses that enriches these people, we work for these people, we support these peoples’ wars around the globe, even if only through taxes; since most will not even recognize their own participation, it seems doubtful that they will assist in remedying it.
    Our only ability to manipulate these people is refusal to work, refusal to buy, refusal to pay taxes. But mostly we need to kill them all.

    • oowawa

      But mostly we need to kill them all.

      How Shakespearean! Bring on Act V.

      • NomNomNom

        :lol: I think you are on to something, it does begin with a bunch of clowns.

    • Craig Della Penna

      I agree that we need to change the paradigm. the parties that share power now are utterly corrupt. there is not now a third party with the credibility to throw a monkey wrench into things. We need to think about what that kind of party should be.

      Meanwhile, don’t shop at Walmart, show up at political meetings waving signs, write letters to your Senators and Reps. Keep complaining, loudly.

      These actions won’t change things overnight but they will give other like-minded people the idea that they are not alone.

      And keep thinking about that 3rd party…

  • oowawa

    Thanks, Craig. I’m really going to look into all your points and consider them carefully. It’s really bewildering. Like Bob Seger wrote: “I Feel Like a Number,” a meaningless insect:

    I feel like just another
    Spoke in a great big wheel
    Like a tiny blade of grass
    In a great big field

    I feel overwhelmed by the hugeness of the problem and the seemingly limitless power of the instigators of this debacle.

  • tzada

    Here is an article that is in keeping with what you are saying.
    From a Floppin Aces Reader

    Few Americans have the time to educate themselves on the operations of those who control the most critical elements at the heart of the Nation’s well being. The Kings of Wall Street have long coveted the absolute supremacy they now enjoy over the largest economy in the world. Their road to ascendancy has been long and methodical, but with the collapse of the mortgage and equity bubbles, the past year’s actions by those pillars of persuasive absolutism on Wall Street confirm that their dominance is unprecedented in American history.

    http://www.floppingaces.net/

  • Tricia Spiegel

    Thanks Craig for this incredible set of essays. I am going to reread them all again, very carefully.

    Excellent work. (And don’t mind the trolls–they come out when they feel threatened.)

    • Craig Della Penna

      I regard their mindless spew as a signal of effectiveness.

      Thanks for the support.

  • NomNomNom

    admin: :( plz rescue from Spamatory, thx

  • European

    The world is globalizing very fast and that automatically reduces the level of democracy. People elect talking heads who make their decisions based on the information they receive from non-elected organizations. No one elects the leaders of powerful INGO’s like WHO and Red Cross. No one has direct power over banks. They’re not accountable to anyone, yet they are gaining more power by the day.

    Globalization is often justified with peace and social justice. When countries are linked with strong ties, they can not wage a war against one another. And when the companies run off to poor countries, they also improve the countries’ economy.

    Open borders are the best example of the new type of politics. When the people are mixed, they lose their sense of unity. People without a sense of unity will never unite against an oppressive leadership. They will fight with each other instead.

    This is not the first time leaders of the world has pushed globalization. The last push happened in the late 19th century Europe. In the early 20th century political scientist declared that “the era of wars are gone, since countries have to work together”. Little did they know that just some years after the professors of the US taught their students that wars are no more, began a world war. Followed by another one. I’m not too confident this current push would end differently.

    • Joe

      Good comments.

      I too worry about what may be on the horizon.

      There are 2 sure-fire ways to deal with a massive debt like ours: devalue your currency AND/or start a war with those who you owe the money.

      AND its not a bad way to get the people’s minds off of the domestic s#@tstorm.

  • Diana L. C.

    Craig,

    I like all your ideas, but especially #3:

    Enforce all extant anti-trust laws, enact new anti-trust laws to deal with the legal end runs developed since Teddy Roosevelt’s day – break up the media and banking conglomerates.

    If we could get just that going, maybe people who sit in front of a t.v. screen all day will see some of your ideas instead of the talking heads doling out talking points provided for them by the people who own their contracts.

    One of the commenters on the 2nd part felt Bush was too stupid and that all these money guys were really Dem-leaning. I just can’t buy that, but I didn’t have time to try to get you to respond.

    No one will convince me that Cheney had really disengaged himself from Halliburton during his reign as puppeteer for Bush. I still see red anytime I see a Halliburton logo on a truck. Their desire for IRAQ contracts fueled the push by the WH, I’m sure, for going into IRAQ. I have no proof, but it just seems so logical.

    Twelve addresses (in a very minor way) the responsibility I feel that corporations owe to the country that made them possible. Halliburton – want to move your HQ to Dubai to avoid paying US corporate taxes? No problem: no more US government contracts for you – have a nice life!

    Many will whine about this one–but we do this sort of thing in state government all the time. State offices, for instance, in our state must purchase office furniture made on the assembly lines in our state prisons. It makes absolute sense for me.

    Perot did much better than I thought he would, though it wasn’t close. I do keep hoping for a viable, sensible third party rising up as another populist wave. People with sense just need to get over their nostalgia for the two major parties. I know I have.

    • Linda Anselmi

      I’m with you Diana L. C.-

      #3 was my fav. We can trace most of our ill fortunes as a nation and a people to this one.

      Great post Craig!!

  • Murray

    ADORE #12!!!

  • oowawa

    Craig’s Twelve Step Recovery Program to Clean up the Mess

    I am reminded of the 12 Labours of Hercules, the 5th of which was to clean the Augean Stables in a single day. Whole bunch of BS to shovel there. Are you up to this 12 step program, Craig? Okay, flex, let’s check out the manpower available here . . . hmmmmm . . . maybe you’d better go get some help . . . Okay, I’ll volunteer, but I can’t shovel as well as I could 40 years ago . . .

    • tzada

      I will just fire up the ole John Deere, with the shovel on the front. ;)

      Hell might as well make it work for us before the obama man repo man comes a callin

    • Craig Della Penna

      I’m a bit creaky too, we need to get some young’uns involved so we can make them do the scut work.

  • tzada

    How is this for a remberance of things past?

    Does anybody out there have any memory of the reason given for the establishment of the DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY …. during the Carter Administration?

    The ‘Department of Energy’ was instituted on
    8-04-1977
    TO LESSEN OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN OIL.

    Hey, pretty efficient, huh?????

    AND NOW IT’S 2009,
    32 YEARS LATER
    AND THE BUDGET FOR THIS

    NECESSARY DEPARTMENT IS AT $24.2 BILLION A YEAR

    IT HAS
    16,000 FEDERAL EMPLOYEES
    AND APPROXIMATELY
    100,000 CONTRACT EMPLOYEES
    AND LOOK AT THE JOB IT HAS DONE!

    THIS IS WHERE YOU SLAP YOUR FOREHEAD AND SAY
    ‘WHAT WAS I THINKING?’
    Ah, yes, good ole bureaucracy..

    And NOW we are going to turn the Banking System, health care & the Auto Industry over to them?
    God Help Us !!!

  • joe nunya

    “Go look up what percentage of US wealth is held by the richest 5% of US citizens, then go look up those statistics for 1980 when Ronald Reagan started taking care of his friends. If you still want to talk about this, I’ll be here.”

    Huh? You might be confused (like in the 90s with NAFTA and other obvious things). The stats actually support the idea that lower taxes means the rich are more active producers. I’m not sure I would emulate any of the policies of 1932, especially the state soaking the people. Not sure you have a great case for that working out.

    If you failed to understand NAFTA in the least, maybe your understanding of the economy is still flawed. Businesses need capital to grow. When they are heavily taxed, like the oppressive rates you suggest, the capital is destroyed. Not transferred, destroyed. Remember, the federal government does not produce anything of value. It is a cancer (that for some reason you want to feed).

    As Andrew Mellon said accurately: “The history of taxation shows that taxes which are inherently excessive are not paid. The high rates inevitably put pressure upon the taxpayer to withdraw his capital from productive business.”

    And so you get depression where only only militarization of the economy thrives. Rinse and Repeat.

    • Craig Della Penna

      This is absolute crap. You are merely repeating the mantras of Ayn Rand and Milton Friedman. This feed-the-rich propaganda has run our country into the ground, even Saint Ronald Reagan’s hand-picked trickle-down theory economic czar, David Stockman, admitted that it was utter bullshit.

      Here’s a quote from the recently released report on “The Evolution of Top Incomes in the United States”

      “Average real income for the top percentile grew faster (6.8 percent growth), further increasing the top percentile income share from 22.8 to 23.5 percent (Figure 2). Year 2007 is therefore the second highest year on record since 1913 almost equalling 1928, the record year when the top percentile share reached 23.9 percent (Figure 2). Even within the top percentile, the gains from 2006 to 2007 are extremely concentrated. The top .01% (top 14,988 US families, making at least $11.5m in 2007) share increased from 5.46% in 2006 to 6.04% in 2007 leaving well behind the 1928 peak of 5.04 percent (Figure 3). This shows that 2007 was an incredibly good year for the super rich”

      The concentration of wealth in this country is the single greatest threat to our democracy. You need to choose whether you want a democracy or capitalism – they are not the same thing.

      Furthermore, the tax rates I propose for the superrich (63%) are well below the maximum rate that Saint Ronnie had in 1980 (77%). In his fervid desire to serve his friends he managed to reduce that to reduce that rate to 28% – and we promptly had a recession. Bill Clinton raised it to 39.6% in 1992 and we had an eight-year boom.

      Stop spewing mindless Chicago School propaganda and try to actually think about the subject if you can.

      And while we’re at it, the only thing I ‘failed to understand’ about NAFTA was the lightning speed and the level of ferocity with which your capitalist friends put tens of thousands out of work in the US in order to open sweatshops in Mexico.

      Government is not the problem, good government is the only weapon we have to fight the depredations insatiable capitalism. Go be their slave if you want, I prefer to fight.

      • Diana L. C.

        It always seemed so logical to me that unless we actually make goods in THIS COUNTRY our economy could not hold up.

        Think about all the older adults you see now doing the type of work that high school kids used to do for spending money.

        The jobs that are readily available in this country are service industry jobs. But who will need their services when no one has money to pay them? We can’t all work as nannies.

      • http://www.sonicninjakitty.wordpress.com Sonic Ninja Kitty

        Democracy leads to oligarchy and is not the United State’s original form of government: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7M-7LkvcVw

        This may be the best spent 10 minutes of your entire day!!

        I choose a capitalism and a constitutional republic to preserve liberties and protect rights.

        • http://www.hillaryorbust.com Hillary or Bust

          I watched that video (excellent) and I fear that we will end up like the Roman Empire. Obama will be Caesar and then we will have a decline, collapse, and a thousand year Dark Ages to follow.

          This may be the only way this will be fixed – when the robber barons screw with the people to the point where everything just falls apart.

      • Joe

        Thanks for the lesson! I’m actually not in favor of this “democracy” you speak of. I (supposedly) live in a REPUBLIC. You did pass 8th grade civics, no?

        You can have your mob rule.

        Raising taxes in the 90s didn’t create the boom. Innovation did. If anything, Clinton co-opted HUGE parts of the Contract with America and turned into a Republican Lite with the help of Dick Morris.

        I know this site is full of Clinton worshipers, but it is absolutely laughable for you to whine about Ronnie and his “friends” when Clinton repealed Glass-Steagall. Let’s be honest here.

        I worship no politician. I didn’t bring up Reagan. But since you did, there is no denying that those slashing of tax rates was good for the country. Unfortunately, Reagan spent like a drunken sailor with a democratic congress.

        Make no mistake, the bloated, corrupt federal government is bankrupting America. You can root for Hulk Hogan or Andre the Giant or whatever fake tool you want.

        I’m no Chicago school. In my school, all those “friends” of mine you mention would be penniless right now. In 1920 we had an 18 month depression that was WORSE than 1929. Know what the Us Government did? Cut itself in HALF!!! Imagine that. And guess what happened? The economy turned around and we had the roaring 20s. Similarly, the American people rejected HillaryCare (start foaming PUMAs) and elected the Republicans. Instead of huge federal expenditures, they actually balanced the budget. And guess who writes the budget? Remember 8th grade civics? Congress.

        By the way, thats not the ONLY thing you fail to understand about NAFTA. You also fail to understand that your favorite puppet IMPLEMENTED it. And guess what else? That awful Reagan was the last protectionist president we had. So don’t give me any of this crap about sending jobs over seas. Bush/Clinton/Bush did that. And it was a tragic mistake. And all you partisan fools got played along the way.

        I agree with a lot of your points in the original piece. But soaking producers and soft currency worshipers like you and Krugman have been proven wrong OVER and OVER and OVER again by history. Look into it.

        • imustprotest

          Oh give me a freakin break. Bill Clinton was a moderate and ran as one. He was hit from the far right wing Newt and the Nuts in their scorch the earth ideas as well as from the left wing with their far out ideas. And if Newt and the Nuts had allowed “Hillary care” as you so rudely called it now and probably worse then, we wouldn’t be in the mess we are right now with heath care costs. Give it a rest wing nut.

          • Joe

            Well America decided Nationalized Healthcare was not so moderate of a first project. Bill got trounced in 94 as a backlash. He triangulated to save his ass. It’s not a big secret. It is easy to do when you have no principles.

            You are probably right though. With Medicare and Medicaid totally solvent, I’m sure we’d be in great shape if we would have nationalized the whole health economy 15 years ago. Government has a great record of controlling costs. Who the hell is the wingnut?

            • imustprotest

              Sorry wing nut. You take the prize. Clinton vetoed Newt and the Nuts scorched earth “budget” and the government was even shut down. Clinton presented his own balanced budget and it passed. The only balanced budget (except for Nixon in ’69) in our history. The debt clock stopped under Clinton and he left office with a SURPLUS. You can re-write history all you want because of your Clinton Derangement Syndrome I guess, but it doesn’t change the facts wing nut.

              • Joe

                You can’t be serious.

                First of all, if Clinton had his way policy-wise, we would not have had a balanced budget in the first place. The Democrats absolutely REFUSE to face reality that FDR and LBJ’s Ponzi schemes are INSOLVENT.

                I’m not going to defend Newt’s handling of the situation, but like it or not, there was an element of the Republicans coming in to be the growns ups and get serious about the solvency of these entitlement programs. Yes, its a third rail and people like you make your “scorched earth” comments and get all wee wee’d up to you use the parlance of our times, but here we are STILL fighting about those issues.

                God forbid the Republicans try to reign in S.S. before it bankrupts everyone under 40. And the Dept. of Education? Don’t even get me started. And what did we get in the meantime? Today we have Dems saying the Ponzi scheme will last 2 more years! And ask ANY teacher what they think of Teddy/Dubya’s No Child Left Behind. Total disaster of central planning. Just like your precious entitlements.

                Who are the wingnuts? The people that want MORE entitlements WHILE thinking controlling illegal immigration is IMMORAL/RACIST. You are smoking crack. And the politicians you worship are the most cynical of them all. Behind closed doors, they know the Ponzi scheme is bankrupt, so they do everything they can to pump up the bubble economy so that it doesn’t crash on their watch. Meanwhile, they ensure the collapse by inviting the entire 3rd world into the US to get on the dole and become loyal Democrats. Another poor person on your plantation. I’m sure you guys will cure poverty, just as soon as you drag us all into it. History does not need to be re-written, it only needs to be studied by those who lick the boots of the central planners.

                • imustprotest

                  I’m not smoking crack I just see through this meme that Newt the Nut was some kind of hero and that Clinton just went along for the ride. I was there in the 90s I saw the reality of Nutty Newt. My guess is you’re kind is getting ready to roll out Nutty Newt for 2012, well I say, go ahead, to quote the last RETHUG in office “bring it on”. Bring out the fat boy and see what happens. Reagan was a disaster, Bush II was a disaster and now because of you sicko neocons we are stuck with Bush III (Obaaama). Bring back Newt, yeah, can’t wait.

        • http://www.hillaryorbust.com Hillary or Bust

          Umm…Hillary is NOT Bill…and I do blame Democrats for the Glass-Steagall repeal.

          • http://theheraclitanfire.blogspot.com/ CRAIG DELLA PENNA

            Despite the antics of Mr. Foaming-at-the-mouth above, the repeal of Glass-Steagall was signed by Clinton because they had veto-proof majorities in both house and Senate.

            Clinton made two big mistakes (three if you count welfare reform). Glass-Steagall and NAFTA.

    • http://www.sonicninjakitty.wordpress.com Sonic Ninja Kitty

      As Andrew Mellon said accurately: “The history of taxation shows that taxes which are inherently excessive are not paid….”

      I’ll say! Big corporations that are supposed to pay upwards of 39% tax are getting by with paying 8%. How? Loopholes! Thanks to Congress for letting this happen. You can’t blame the corporations as this is all LEGAL and they would be stupid not to maximize their profits.

  • Tammy

    That piece had some excellent ideas, Craig. I don’t agree with going back to the tax code of 1932 unless we go back to the tax provisions of that time. In other words, get rid of all of the loopholes.

    But those ideas were really good, especially the one to break up the monopolies. Years ago, when the media companies were being bought out by other corporations, I said to myself, “Isn’t this going to be a conflict of interest? How can the media remain neutral if they are owned by GE?”

    Well, the answer to that is, they CAN’T.

    Too bad we don’t have a party that will push through your ideas.
    On either side.

    • Craig Della Penna

      Agreed.
      Agreed.
      Agreed.
      and agreed.

  • Peggy Sue

    Thanks, Craig, for another thought-provoking article. Your suggestion/steps, 1-10, are things I have read from independent financial types, who wonder where this [the economy] is going. And the tax figures you give are really interesting. I’m a fan of Madmen and watched the premiere over the weekend. There was a short bit of dialogue about taxes: if you made over $40,000 the tax rate was 40 something percent and over $80,000 in the range of 60%. I thought, oh no–that couldn’t be right. Then I did a quick search only to find that in 1963, the tax rate on personal income, anything from $400,000 and above was a staggering: 87-91%.

    Yikes! No wonder my father was always grumbling about the Government.

    I don’t think it matters what party we lean towards, the fraud affects us all, our kids and future grandkids. And for Jenny and her cohorts who pooh-poo what’s going on? They simply are not paying attention.

    Btw, Cannonfire had a very interesting article up today, third essay down on “The Real Reason Why Single Payer is Unthinkable.”

    The tangled webs we weave [or have woven for us].

    Thanks again!

  • tzada

    Obama Administration to Increase 10-Year Deficit Estimate to $9 Trillion
    The 2010-2019 cumulative deficit projection replaces the administration’s previous estimate of $7.108 trillion

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/21/official-obama-increase-year-deficit-trillion/

    • Tammy

      Tzada:
      Proof that this Marxist President is hell bent on destroying this country.
      I used to think that those people who call for impeachment are kooks.
      Not anymore.

  • NoBamaNoWay

    i agree with pretty much all of your points, Craig; one thing i would add is that we need to do something to downsize the federal government across the board, and get power and money back to the states. the federal government has simply become so big that it is unmanageable.

  • http://www.sonicninjakitty.wordpress.com Sonic Ninja Kitty

    Craig, I don’t get it. In this series, why do you spend tons of time detailing government-corporate ties, rail on the ‘free market’–which you just PROVED is an oligarchy and not free at all–and then suggest MORE government involvement is the answer? It either is an oligarchy, or it is a free market–these things are mutually exclusive. If you agree with your own proof that it is an oligarchy, then we must stop blaming the free market for our problems!

    Definitions: NAFTA, GATT, et al, despite their labels, are NOT ‘free trade agreements’. They are trade agreements–which are government interferences in the free market. They lay out restrictions and tariffs that a free market would NOT lay out, so, again, we must stop blaming the free market for problems caused by these agreements–blame government interference!

    As for your suggestions, some of them I agree with as I believe government’s role is to plan FOR a competitive environment, which means making sure all doors to entry and information flow in every industry are/is open and available.

    But a few of your suggestions amount to having government plan AGAINST a competitive environment, which breaks down a free market’s system of checks and balances (i.e., a company screws up, it goes out of business and a better provider prospers).

    And rather than return to a 1932 tax rate, which further crippled the economy (the Depression never actually ended!–war halted the direction of everything and later necessitated a reset of resources in the economy), why don’t we follow Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon’s lead during the 1920-21 recession and CUT taxes? By 1921, the government was heavily in debt (due largely to WWI) and the top tax rate was 73%. Mellon immediately cut it (and rates at all income levels) to 58% then to 25% by 1925, where it remained until FDR. The result? The government ran budget surpluses EVERY YEAR of the 20′s. (This was also due to Coolidge’s pro-free market policies which prevented government interference and allowed prosperity to flourish.)

    Every dollar government takes out of someone’s hands means there is one dollar less for them to put towards another small part of the economy. The beauty of the free market is that it reflects the demands of its participants. Government spending only reflects the whims of the top cronies, who are unduly influenced by special interest groups (as you have nicely illustrated) and who have much less incentive to reign in waste.

    I also wonder if everyone here is getting the same message as I–that you want government to lead the way, centrally plan large sectors of the economy, and make decisions as opposed to individuals (through the free market system) doing so. Am I off?

    Already we have seen what happens in this situation–bailouts to government cronies prop up companies that the market is saying “We don’t want!”.

    • Craig Della Penna

      SNJ:

      You nake a common mistake in these times, your statement:
      “It either is an oligarchy, or it is a free market–these things are mutually exclusive.”

      Incorrect, you are mixing political systems with economic systems and they are vastly different.

      Politcally what we have today is a nominal republic and a factual corporatist oligarchy.

      Economically we have absolutely uncontrolled laissez faire capitalism.

      What we need govenment for is to use the power of the rule of law to check the egregious excesses of capitalism, ie, the shenaniggans that have cost us trillions over the past two years and will costr us trillions more.

      I agree that govenment’s role is to force transparency in the securities industry, but your statement that the market has checks and balances is given the lie by the events of the past two years – very obviously there no checks and balances at all.

      I find it hilarious that you attempt to use the 1920s as an example of fiscal probity since Coolidges’ “pro-free market policies” led to the very same explosion of thievery and swindling we have just experienced. Let’s not forget that the vast fortunes stolen during the 1920s are, in large part responsible for the Great Depression.

      And, as you point outm FDR’s maximum tax rate was 10% below the one that Mellon was confronted with.

      You are correct in stating that FDR did not lift the country out of the Depression until the advent of WWII, but your assumptions that, somehow, the Depression was interrupted by the war is absurd. The only thing the upsurge in the economy during the war teaches us is that FDR didn’t spend enough money to get the economic engine going. When, finally, the war forced the US government to spend on a level an order of magnitude larger than ever – the wheels started to turn round.

      It would be nice to believe your fantasy that the free market serves its members and the evil government only serves special interest groups, but, the truth is that the free market has been cornered. The only members the so-called free market serves these days are the special interest groups like the huge transnational corporations.

      I keep pounding this point because everyone has been sold a bill of goods, the propaganda line that government=bad. This is a win-win for the real bad guys: if they can get you to believe that the government (btw, you are the government) then they have deprived you of the only weapon you have to fight them.

      And, no, I don’t want a centrally-planned economy as you suggest. I want to fight it out in the House of Representatives and the Senate and try to get the best decisions we can have. I don’t want so-called leadership to take single-payer off the table because his campaign funding comes from Wellpoint and Astra-Zeneca.

      The fact that government has been badly corrupted by the free market you so admire should make you mad, at them, not at your government (once again, you are the government).

      There needs to be a balance. There needs to be a place where the free market can flourish and there need to be controls on that market so the thieves and swindlers don’t take over.

      Our problem is that they’ve not only taken over the marketplace but they’re doing their damnedest to take over the government as well.

    • http://theheraclitanfire.blogspot.com/ CRAIG DELLA PENNA

      SNJ:

      You make a common mistake in these times, your statement:
      “It either is an oligarchy, or it is a free market–these things are mutually exclusive.”

      Incorrect, you are mixing political systems with economic systems and they are vastly different.

      Politically what we have today is a nominal republic and a factual corporatist oligarchy.

      Economically we have absolutely uncontrolled laissez faire capitalism.

      What we need government for is to use the power of the rule of law to check the egregious excesses of capitalism, ie, the shenanigans that have cost us trillions over the past two years and will cost us trillions more.

      I agree that government’s role is to force transparency in the securities industry, but your statement that the market has checks and balances is given the lie by the events of the past two years – very obviously there no checks and balances at all.

      I find it hilarious that you attempt to use the 1920s as an example of fiscal probity since Coolidges’ “pro-free market policies” led to the very same explosion of thievery and swindling we have just experienced. Let’s not forget that the vast fortunes stolen during the 1920s are, in large part responsible for the Great Depression.

      And, as you point out FDR’s maximum tax rate was 10% below the one that Mellon was confronted with.

      You are correct in stating that FDR did not lift the country out of the Depression until the advent of WWII, but your assumptions that, somehow, the Depression was interrupted by the war is absurd. The only thing the upsurge in the economy during the war teaches us is that FDR didn’t spend enough money to get the economic engine going. When, finally, the war forced the US government to spend on a level an order of magnitude larger than ever – the wheels started to turn round.

      It would be nice to believe your fantasy that the free market serves its members and the evil government only serves special interest groups, but, the truth is that the free market has been cornered. The only members the so-called free market serves these days are the special interest groups like the huge transnational corporations.

      I keep pounding this point because everyone has been sold a bill of goods, the propaganda line that government=bad. This is a win-win for the real bad guys: if they can get you to believe that the government (btw, you are the government) then they have deprived you of the only weapon you have to fight them.

      And, no, I don’t want a centrally-planned economy as you suggest. I want to fight it out in the House of Representatives and the Senate and try to get the best decisions we can have. I don’t want so-called leadership to take single-payer off the table because his campaign funding comes from Wellpoint and Astra-Zeneca.

      The fact that government has been badly corrupted by the free market you so admire should make you mad, at them, not at your government (once again, you are the government).

      There needs to be a balance. There needs to be a place where the free market can flourish and there need to be controls on that market so the thieves and swindlers don’t take over.

      Our problem is that they’ve not only taken over the marketplace but they’re doing their damnedest to take over the government as well.

      • Joe

        “Economically we have absolutely uncontrolled laissez faire capitalism.”

        This is when you know to just stop listening to this guy. He absolutely does not know what he’s talking about.

        • http://www.sonicninjakitty.wordpress.com Sonic Ninja Kitty

          {sigh} Joe, you may be right. People can judge for themselves what makes more sense.

          I have only the one request: that people examine the most egregious and damaging basic fallacy he espouses–that destruction brings prosperity. This I cannot abide. This excerpt from Henry Hazlitt’s Economics in One Lesson, which includes the Broken Window Fallacy is probably the best written fallacy buster ever: http://mises.org/story/3000

          If it makes sense to you, then continue reading from the mises.org site. It has excellent articles about what a real free market system is.

          • Joe

            I’m right there with ya Kitty. I was gong to get into this BS that war is good for the economy. As Mises said: “War prosperity is like the prosperity that an earthquake or plague brings.”

            Furthermore, the guy blasts you and says that the great depression was caused by the low taxes of the 20s. Ugg. I think I heard the guy say he was in real estate. Its bad enough to spout off about economics and be completely off the mark, but the ignorance of his own industry is shocking. You need to look no further than the housing crisis to see that there is no free market in the US. The Federal Reserve was manipulating credit like crazy in the 20s, despite sound fiscal policy, the monetary policy was a nightmare, just like it is today. This confuses capital and makes it less efficient as sectors of the economy grow unnaturally.

            The free market doesn’t give away money for free. The irresponsible no money down nightmare was created by the Fed to reinflate the dot.com bubble. It was not the free market, it was the Fed.

            Furthermore, we have to come to terms with the fact that taking all the equity out of your house to remodel your bathroom is retarded. Thats what America was as a whole up to, it was irresponsible and it was fueled by the policies of the Fed Reserve NOT the free market.

            One more point and then I’m going to stop wasting time trying to talk sense to this guy.

            He said:
            “And, no, I don’t want a centrally-planned economy as you suggest. I want to fight it out in the House of Representatives and the Senate and try to get the best decisions we can have. I don’t want so-called leadership to take single-payer off the table because his campaign funding comes from Wellpoint and Astra-Zeneca.”

            Ok. Single-payer means what? Who is that single payer? The federal government. Another term we could use for federal government would be the CENTRAL government. Single and central are the same in this case. You don’t even know what central planning is. And if you are so naive as to say “we are the government” then you are hopelessly not paying attention.

            The corporations are the government. this is not the free market. It is FASCISM, plain and simple. Everyone in America seems to understand that we have Crony Capitalism in America. The free market, the INVISIBLE hand, has no use for cronies. You need cronies when you don’t want to have to compete.

            Like lets say you you are big pharma. You meet secretly with Obama, write legislation, and the go shove it down America’s throat. When they squirm, you tell them to stop pee peeing in their pants.

            WE are not even CLOSE to being the government. As Jefferson understood: We are not the government, the government is a whole ‘nother beast.

            In parting, I’d like to suggest to the original author “The Road to Serfdom”. It may help you understand the difference between fascism and the free market.

            • http://www.sonicninjakitty.wordpress.com Sonic Ninja Kitty

              Joe–thank you for the great reinforcement! You nailed it about the Fed and ‘single payer’ healthcare–I have argued that, too, in various forums. Why do people give all benefit of the doubt to big government when it has proven time and again it can be woefully untrustworthy? Tu ne cede malis….

              Road to Serfdom is excellent! (I’d also recommend Thomas E. Woods Jr.’s Meltdown and Robert P. Murphy’s The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Great Depression and New Deal.)

              When he said “you are the government”, all I could think was NO–for all intents and purposes, I am the free market: a hundred times a day I choose to use a product or service someone else made and trade it for something of value I have done (represented by my money), and the less these transactions are interfered with by other entities, the better.

              This big government, on the other hand, is NOT me. It is the hoard in Washington DC, confiscating wealth at their own discretion from me and giving me scraps in return while funneling the rest of it to their cronies.

              The bigger this government, the less control any individual has over it. We need to move powers away from federal and more towards local government where individuals have much better opportunities to have their voices heard and their demands met—and where they can more readily push it out of the way when it interferes with their liberties and choices.

    • Joe

      BRILLIANT!

      It could not be better articulated.

      Furthermore, how much has the FASCISM (yeah, that’s right) we’ve seen since Coolidge contributed to this skewing of wealth towards a super-rich elite? There was a day when rich industrialists were allowed to die penniless.

    • Joe

      BRILLIANT!

      It could not be better articulated.

      Furthermore, how much has the FASCISM (yeah, that’s right) we’ve seen after Coolidge’s day contributed to this skewing of wealth towards a super-rich elite? There was a day when rich industrialists were allowed to die penniless.

    • http://www.hillaryorbust.com Hillary or Bust

      I don’t think the government needs to be RUNNING things more but we do need better laws to rein in corporate corruption.

      Corporations right now are behaving in the way mafias used to: loan sharking, fraud, and gambling (stock market manipulation). These things were illegal when mafia gangs did it, they should be illegal when corporations do it.

  • TeakWoodKite

    Craig, your three part series was thought provoking and well presented.

    12. Corporations with headquarters outside the US cannot get US government contracts.

    The current reality is a house of cards. You said it was by design and covering your tracks is expressed in terms of Panshetta running faster than Carl Rove up to the hill to fetch a pail of CYA.

    So #12 would require all the floors of Manhatten commercial reale state to be occupied, a first. I would centainly agree that 10 bil for “oil exporation” off Brazil speaks to your point. The balance of trade and what conduits are used to transfer wealth are what they are and the positions that are vacant o’er at Greenback Motel is one less pair of eyes on the problem theft.

    Muldar might wonder after the numerology of this item being assigned the number 12.

    Global Corporations are just tools.

  • http://www.hillaryorbust.com Hillary or Bust

    Caught in spam filter!