RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

The Economy Is Still Going South

If you have bought in to the false hope that the economy has hit bottom and has turned a corner then think again. I had a chat this week with a banker friend who works for Wachovia. Wachovia, in case you forgot, was taken over by Wells Fargo. My friend told me that a spate of firings are coming up in the next two weeks. Several mid-level and senior bankers at Wachovia are going to lose their jobs. Their current jobs are basically duplicates of positions at Wells Fargo and, as the saying goes, “to the victor belongs the spoils.”

This is not an isolated instance. Remember the Colonial Bank take over?

Here’s what the Financial Times reported today on that bank collapse:

A consolation of failure should be lessons learnt from the experience. So it is troubling that bank collapses in this cycle are proving more expensive than in the past. Big bank busts, as a rule, cost relatively less than small ones. Estimated losses, say, from last week’s failure of Colonial, the Alabama-based lender with $25bn in assets, were unusually low at 11 per cent of assets. Its sale also included the first “clawback”, allowing the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to share in a buyer’s potential gains.

Yet analysis from Ely & Company, industry consultants, shows that across all failures in the past two years, the FDIC estimated its losses at a quarter of failed banks’ assets. That is much higher than between 1980 and 1995, when failures cost an average 11 per cent.

Regulators are at fault. The fact that banks are in such a sorry state by the time they fail suggests intervention should be occurring earlier – especially where soaring brokered deposits indicated rapid growth in low-quality assets. Meanwhile, drawn-out sales – such as that of Guaranty Financial, with $16bn assets – risk hurting the underlying business. Fears that the FDIC’s fund, which protects depositors, may run out are unfounded. True, its balance fell to $13bn at the end of March, or just 0.27 per cent of insured deposits – well below the statutory minimum. But that understates the funds available to absorb losses. The FDIC also had $28.5bn set aside for future bank failures. More important, it has a Treasury credit facility, increased to $500bn during this crisis. The deposit insurance fund is not a pot of cash that can be exhausted, but a way of keeping track of the premiums paid by banks versus the costs of failures.

Then there is the commercial real estate market. That shoe still has not dropped and when it does? Bye-bye more jobs. The USA Today offered this sobering analysis in Tuesday’s paper:

The commercial real estate downturn is deepening, threatening to slow the economic recovery.
To try to contain the damage, the Federal Reserve said Monday that it will extend into 2010 a program to help investors buy commercial property loans. But some say that will have limited impact.

“We seem to be nearing the end of the recession but the situation in the commercial real estate market is getting worse,” says Patrick Newport, an analyst at IHS Global Insight.

About $83 billion of office, retail, industrial and apartment properties have fallen into default, foreclosure or bankruptcy this year, says research firm Real Capital Analytics. The default rate for commercial mortgages jumped from 1.62% to 2.25% in the first quarter and should hit 4.1% by the end of the year, says Sam Chandan, president of Real Estate Econometrics. The carnage will likely cut half a percentage point off economic growth this year and in 2010, Newport says.

Fueled by easy credit, developers built too many shopping malls and office buildings from 2004 to 2007. As the economy soured, vacancy rates rose. Property values are down about 40% from their 2007 peak, Deutsch Bank says, and loans for commercial properties have come to a virtual standstill.

Hundreds of smaller regional banks, which are heavily exposed to commercial mortgages, could go bankrupt the next two years, Newport says.

If you think this means “good” news then you know nothing about economics. Sad thing is that the so-called “stimulus” package does nothing for this sector. Until this implosion ends the economy will continue a downward death spiral.

Even some of Obama’s financial gurus are starting to sweat the implications of Obama-nomics. Did you catch Warren Buffet’s piece in the NY Times:

IN nature, every action has consequences, a phenomenon called the butterfly effect. These consequences, moreover, are not necessarily proportional. For example, doubling the carbon dioxide we belch into the atmosphere may far more than double the subsequent problems for society. Realizing this, the world properly worries about greenhouse emissions.

The butterfly effect reaches into the financial world as well. Here, the United States is spewing a potentially damaging substance into our economy — greenback emissions.

To be sure, we’ve been doing this for a reason I resoundingly applaud. Last fall, our financial system stood on the brink of a collapse that threatened a depression. The crisis required our government to display wisdom, courage and decisiveness. Fortunately, the Federal Reserve and key economic officials in both the Bush and Obama administrations responded more than ably to the need.

They made mistakes, of course. How could it have been otherwise when supposedly indestructible pillars of our economic structure were tumbling all around them? A meltdown, though, was avoided, with a gusher of federal money playing an essential role in the rescue.

The United States economy is now out of the emergency room and appears to be on a slow path to recovery. But enormous dosages of monetary medicine continue to be administered and, before long, we will need to deal with their side effects. For now, most of those effects are invisible and could indeed remain latent for a long time. Still, their threat may be as ominous as that posed by the financial crisis itself.

To understand this threat, we need to look at where we stand historically. If we leave aside the war-impacted years of 1942 to 1946, the largest annual deficit the United States has incurred since 1920 was 6 percent of gross domestic product. This fiscal year, though, the deficit will rise to about 13 percent of G.D.P., more than twice the non-wartime record. In dollars, that equates to a staggering $1.8 trillion. Fiscally, we are in uncharted territory.

Because of this gigantic deficit, our country’s “net debt” (that is, the amount held publicly) is mushrooming. During this fiscal year, it will increase more than one percentage point per month, climbing to about 56 percent of G.D.P. from 41 percent. Admittedly, other countries, like Japan and Italy, have far higher ratios and no one can know the precise level of net debt to G.D.P. at which the United States will lose its reputation for financial integrity. But a few more years like this one and we will find out.

An increase in federal debt can be financed in three ways: borrowing from foreigners, borrowing from our own citizens or, through a roundabout process, printing money. Let’s look at the prospects for each individually — and in combination.

Warren can’t bring himself to admit that Obama has screwed the pooch but here’s the reality. If Obama-care goes forward and the so-called stimulus bill is not recalled the mad spending spree is going to accelerate and our nation’s plunge into uncharted debt waters will accelerate. Warren senses the danger but is still having trouble blowing the whistle on the Messiah’s gross incompetence when it comes to economic policy.

  • CG

    I’ve read lots and lots of articles on the subject lately, and there is consensus on your doom and gloom point Larry. The thing is there is such complexity in all the contributing factors of the entire economic condition, that no one can predict the ultimate bottom or exactly when the next phase of reckoning will present itself. I also read about something I hadn’t heard of before, which is compounding the foreclosure problems. It is when states sell their tax liens to the big banks that, by the way, got taxpayer bailouts, and the creativity begins. Washington Mutual, the big bank in my neighborhood, went the way of Wachovia, and lots and lots of people lost their jobs. Right now the former executives are battling for promised compensation. My monies were invested with Merrill-Lynch and Bank of America. Perilously hanging on, on the shakiest ground…

    Obama doesn’t have a clue, damn what they didn’t teach at Columbia (just joking)… Is the place that Obama worked in NYC, I think it is Business International or something, a front for the CIA? I read that and laughed.

  • http://liberalrapture.com/ John (from Liberal Rapture)

    Thanks Larry. great stuff. The “green shoots” meme has become increasingly hard to digest.

    Home prices bumped up slightly in LA in July. The headlines blared that the worst was over. Yet if you looked at the charts you see that prices have collapsed 50% in 2 years and the modest uptick in July was fueled by a few bargain hunters.

    The LA times now reports that 51% of homeowners in LA County are “underwater”. A staggering percentage. I shudder to think of what will happen as commercial real estate unravels

    This does not end well.

    • PrahaPartizan

      Just how does the CRE collapse produced during the period 2003-2007 become Obama’s fault? What are you suggesting Obama do to fix the problems the banks generated on their own over the preceding six years? He can ignore them and allow the banks to fail, dumping their problems in FDIC’s lap, or try to put together another bail-out program to help put the banks on a gentler glide path. I suspect you’d find fault with either option. What’s your suggestion, beyond Obama submitting his resignation? That’s the problem with Larry’s bitching. He’s got nothing to offer and his candidate wouldn’t be doing anything different either if she were sitting in the Oval Office.

      • tzada

        Before you bathe yourself to0 heavily in the froth of Obama koolaid, you need to educate yourself.

        Obama was an attorney for ACORN and sued CITI bank to make bad loans to unqualified people. Do any of those 3 names, Obama, ACORN and CITI ring any bells?

        Penny Pritzker, of Chicago,
        and former national finance chair of Barack Obama’s presidential campaign. She was also a shark a predatory lender. Read the in depth articles done here at NQ

        http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/category/obama-barack-president-barack/obamas-illinois-associates/penny-pritzker/

        Also see the article below.

        http://amok.asianweek.com/2008/02/28/obamas-campaign-finance-chair-has-links-to-subprime-debacle/

      • oowawa

        or try to put together another bail-out program to help put the banks on a gentler glide path

        HaHaHaHa. You’re kidding right? I’m so worried about the banks having a “gentler glide path,” especially the ones that are “too big to fail.” Here’s my glide path: Yeeeeeeooooowwewwee! Crash! Burn! But then, I’m not big to fail. Seems like none of us individual taxpayers are too big to fail–in fact, we’re just the right size for failure! Little.

        To hell with these big banks that are “too big to fail,” and to hell with their “gentler glide path.” I want to see some of them suffer like they deserve! I’m really hurting! Why should the same “too big to fail” scumbags who caused this crisis be rescued by the taxpayers and the taxpayers’ children? Let them fail, and let the chips fall where they may!

  • Linda Anselmi

    Excellent post LJ.

    I read the Warren Buffet op-ed this morning and was stunned that The Oracle would tiptoe up to the truth, then spin shades of it for this administration. Spinning is not what The Oracle is suppose to be about. Very sad reflection of where we are.

    • J.J. (The PUMA)

      Buffett has been critical of the economic policies of the administration from the beginning, but has avoided saying anything bad about the guy responsible.

      “Hey, he’s young, he’s good looking, and by the way, he inspires my kids”.

      • NoBamaNoWay

        heh heh.

        • http://deleted BuzzisbackLatte

          Or like Claire McCaskill’s eighteen year old told her the Obama was the one. GAG

      • apishapa

        Buffet has made a bundle offf the bailouts, no wonder he thinks Obama is so marvelous.

    • Doc99

      The Wizard of Uh’s wants America to party like it’s 1929. (Apologies to Prince)

  • WMCB

    The last figures I saw said that two banks failed in all of 2007. 15 failed in all of 2008.

    We are up to 77 bank failures SO FAR in 2009, and we’re not even 2/3 of the way through the year. When that commercial real estate that’s underwater hits, expect a wave of exposed banks going under. The FDIC is already broke, so any failures from here out will have depositor guarantees funded via their credit line from the treasury, which will further increase the debt load on the taxpayers.

    Green shoots, my ass.

  • apishapa

    I work for the State of Colorado. Last week our retirement fund PERA held several “listening tour” meetings broaching the idea of raising retirement age, increasing donarions, decresing benefits, increasing vesting time, etc. Not sounding good for us.

    Then yesterday we were informed there will be 260+ layoffs, in addition to the 10% budget cuts, furlough days, and 12 layoffs we already had. Sad part is that Colorado is probably doing better than most states. if the econopmy was really getting better, they would not be cutting services to this degree.

    • Clara

      The State of Virginia just had a special session of the General Assembly to announce a 1.3 BILLION dollar short fall for 2010. Tim Kaine will have to cut deeply into the state services and probably add to the employees that have already been laid off. Virginia was supposedly one of those states doing better than average, too. This doesn’t bode well for the election of a Democrat in our gubernatorial race this year.

  • jwrjr

    If the U.S. Govt. does not get spending under control, the U.S. dollar will do what the Deutschmark did in the 1930s. No amount of hopey-changey will change that.

    • TeakWoodKite

      Reserve a Pimped out Wheel Barrel o’er at Seattle Moss’s store. I hear he’s got a new model coming out with a suspension like a monter truck, to handle all the weight of worthless paper.

      The butterfly effect is a phrase that encapsulates the more technical notion of sensitive dependence on initial conditions in chaos theory. Small variations of the initial condition of a dynamical system may produce large variations in the long term behavior of the system.

      Great! Buffet is talking about chaos in the market.

      Slowing them down will require extraordinary political will. With government expenditures now running 185 percent of receipts, truly major changes in both taxes and outlays will be required. A revived economy can’t come close to bridging that sort of gap.

      .

      • layercake

        At a company I freelance for, 3/4 of the staffers have been laid off. The place is so quiet now, full of empty offices. It’s spooky.

        Meanwhile, CEOs are getting their mega bonuses.

    • PrahaPartizan

      No, it was the Reichsmark and it was the 1920s. If you don’t know the history, how can you offer a valid comment? The vitriol you poured on “hopey-changey” would seem to identify you as a pure Obama hater, which combined with the apparent lack of knowledge about the interwar period would appear to severely discount the value of any comment you offer. Maybe you can prove me wrong?

      • maryann

        LOL there’s no stopping dollar devaluation and hyperinflation thanks to your dumb messiah’s Cloward Piven bankrupting of America. Better get out of dollars before they’re worthless paper!

      • http://deleted BuzzisbackLatte

        Technically it was the papiermark that was replaced by the rentenmark to turn the 1922-1923 German hyperinflation around.

        The reichsmark wasn’t introduced until later. 1924.

        But hey, don’t let a thing like obamaesque arrogance stop you there, Pharthead Parmesan.

        • candymarl

          Pharthead Parmesan! HAHAHA! ROFL!

      • jwrjr

        By your comment you prove yourself to be a hater, impure and exceedingly simple. I didn’t bring Obama into the matter. You did. And while you scream about technicalities, you do nothing to address the basic premise of my comment – uncontrolled govt. spending causes uncontrolled inflation (any beginning economics student knows this) and thus, a worthless “dollar”.

      • tzada

        If you knew your history you would know Obama contributed to this mess.

        Do the names ACORN, Obama, and CITI in the same sentence ring a bell?

        Read the following articles from NQ.

        http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/16/obamas-finance-chair-failed-bank-owner-penny-pritzker-and-todays-wall-street-problem/

  • lark

    Great article and timely. My truth continue to remain unchanged: Chaos is ahead of schedule in the Obama administration. Obama is definitely well set in ensuing total chaos by 2011. Obama is not incompetent. He is simply a pathological liar and our fate will follow the path of his disease, which usually is total bankruptcy. The government in the U.S. simply wants to take over the country. I think they believe it belongs to them. So that effort will continue to steamroll and in the end some type of break up will conduce to street violence and great civil unrest. All of that for one simple little Constitutional flaw, making school classroom prayer unlawful.

  • http://www.sonicninjakitty.wordpress.com Sonic Ninja Kitty

    And still it will get worse. OK, can we now move the guys who got it wrong out of the picture? (Krugman, Bernanke, Geithner, Paulson)

    The ones who called it should be running the show.

    • PrahaPartizan

      Pray tell, just how Krugman got it wrong and just how he should be gotten “out of the picture?” Krugman isn’t even in the administration. For that matter, neither is Paulson who left when Bush ended his administration. Besides, Krugman is generally considered to be one of the people (along with Stiglitz and Roubini) who actually got it right on what was happening back in 2007 and 2008. He had even pushed for a bigger stimulus, recognizing that the nation’s economy was even weaker than the perma-bulls were admitting through the middle of this year.

      If you’re advocating getting Bernanke and Geithner out of the picture, then you might be on to something. Bernanke comes up for a new term at the end of this year anyway, so he might be eased out of the Fed pretty handily. Removing Geithner at this point will take heavy artillery. Or course, I’m not sure we would find Summers to be a better choice for the Fed.

      • mountainaires

        Krugman “..even pushed for a bigger stimulus, recognizing that the nation’s economy was even weaker than the perma-bulls were admitting through the middle of this year.”

        Well, yes, Krugman did suggest such nonsense. But, that’s not a recommendation.

        Borrowing MORE money and increasing the debt will not help us in our current debt crisis. You wouldn’t do that in your own budget; and you would laugh if anyone suggested you do it. Yet Krugman wants you to believe it’s going to solve our national economic problems. It won’t; in fact, it’s making them worse.

        We have to unravel the debt, stop borrowing; deleveraging and default of bad companies ARE the solution. Obama’s policy of life support paid for by taxpayers is sucking all the oxygen out of the treasury.Krugman is completely wrong to suggest more debt is the answer to suffocating debt which is strangling our economy!

        • http://www.sonicninjakitty.wordpress.com Sonic Ninja Kitty

          Thanks, Mountainaires. And just a few weeks ago, Krugman was calling for a second stimulus (!!). Keynesianism has to go.

    • tzada

      Geithner did not he have income tax evasion problems? Seems like Gates Gate had something fishy on his returns too.

  • Vince P1974

    I been warning for a year on this blog that this economy is terminal… by design.

    The ultimate destination of this trip will be the destruction of the US Dollar.

    This will damage our ability to pay for Imports. Imports like oil.

    Say goodbye to the US Military.

  • candymarl

    Mr. Johnson I too remember when the few people who called this were laughed at on CNBC, MSNBC, and the three networks.

    Too bad no one listened.

    • maryann

      I bought platinum and foreclosures and Euros. This will get BAD.

    • maryann

      Read up on the financial collapses in Venezuela and Iceland. People literally woke up one day and their banks were closed, their money frozen, to be later refunded at a tiny fraction of its value.
      This will happen here I predict.

      In Zimbabwe you can ride the municipal bus for a couple million.

  • PrahaPartizan

    Larry, let’s get real about commercial real estate. Obama can’t put humpty-dumpty back together again and Hillary wouldn’t have been able to manage that trick either. Greenspan’s low interest rates spawned far more CRE investment than was warranted, particularly with the advent of internet shopping. We never needed all of those strip shopping centers and office building which fool developers invested in for four or five years. Worse, the banksters thought they were getting into more secure investments by backing these projects than alternative investments which would have benefited the nation much more over the long run. It just looked more secure putting money into bricks and mortar than something like alternative energy projects. That was something the new President was going to inherit from a corrupt and incompetent administration in January 2009, no matter who he or she might have been.

  • CG

    way, way, way off topic, but I was struck by this op-ed piece…

    Boycott Israel
    An Israeli comes to the painful conclusion that it’s the only way to save his country.

    http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-gordon20-2009aug20,0,753091.story

    • hokma

      Neve Gordon is a radical kook.

      Rather than me explain that, Alan Dershowitz does a better job:

      http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull&cid=1162378347880

      • mountainaires

        DERSHOWITZ?

        Bwahahahahahahahaha….Alan Dershowitz’ picture is in the dictionary beside the phrase “RADICAL KOOK.”

        Get real.

        • hokma

          Which would then make a radical kook like Neve Gordon what?

    • mountainaires

      My land is mine. Your land is mine, too.

      Quiet slicing of the West Bank makes abstract prayers for peace obscene

      Condemnation of ‘illegal’ settlements and violence only blurs the reality of what the Israeli state is sanctioning, day by day

      On 2 August 2009, after cordoning off part of the Arab neighborhood of Sheikh Jarrah in east Jerusalem, Israeli police evicted two Palestinian families (more than 50 people) from their homes; Jewish settlers immediately moved into the emptied houses. Although Israeli police cited a ruling by the country’s supreme court, the evicted Arab families had been living there for more than 50 years. The event – which, rather exceptionally, did attract the attention of the world media – is part of a much larger and mostly ignored ongoing process.

      Five months earlier, on 1 March, it had been reported that the Israeli government had drafted plans to build more than 70,000 new homes in Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank; if implemented, the plans could increase the number of settlers in the Palestinian territories by about 300,000. Such a move would not only severely undermine the chances of a viable Palestinian state, but also hamper the everyday life of Palestinians.

      A government spokesman dismissed the report, arguing that the plans were of limited relevance – the construction of homes in the settlements required the approval of the defence minister and the prime minister. However, 15,000 have already been fully approved, and 20,000 of the proposed housing units lie in settlements that Israel cannot expect to retain in any future peace deal with the Palestinians.

      The conclusion is obvious: while paying lip-service to the two-state solution, Israel is busy creating a situation on the ground that will render such a solution impossible.

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/aug/18/west-bank-israel-settlers-palestinians

  • Pingback: The Economy Is Still Going South : NO QUARTER : PlanetTalk.net - Learn the truth , no more lies

  • Pingback: The Economy Is Still Going South : NO QUARTER

  • Pingback: The Economy Is Still Going South : NO QUARTER | kozmom news

  • Patience

    As more small banks fail, many will be bought by larger banks. Will this create even more that will fall into the category of too big to fail? Where will it end if this rationale for bailouts continues?

  • CG

    LJ, ha, ha, I just got this from my Merrill-Lynch advisor…

    Attached are articles that were published yesterday August 19, 2009, written by Warren Buffett of Berkshire Hathaway and Bill Gross of Pacific Investment Management Company. These articles give additional comfort that our positioning of your portfolio is aligned with some of the best respected minds in the financial world. In the beginning of the year, we added inflation protections in the form of TIPS and Commodities in order to protect your “greenback” purchasing power. Most recently we are in the process of adding a gold component as well. As for growth opportunities, we are in the process of increasing exposure to Asian Markets in order to take advantage of expected growth in that region which the Pimco article highlights.

    Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding the attached articles or your portfolio specifically. Also if you have not scheduled your 3rd Quarter Meeting, please email or call to set that appointment.

  • Pingback: The Economy Is Still Going South (Reprint) : NO QUARTER