RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Leon Panetta, Frigging Moron

My Agency brother, who writes under the name, “Retired” was right. Panetta is a boob. I was wrong. I sincerely thought Panetta had the experience to be smart CIA Director. Nope. The clown is a complete, incompetent tool.

The Daily Beast’s Joseph Finder has the story:

CIA Director Leon Panetta stunned Washington earlier this summer by disclosing, in an emergency closed-door briefing to Congress, that for the last eight years, the agency he now runs illegally concealed a secret terrorist-assassination program. The reaction was predictably explosive. The House intelligence-oversight committee launched a major investigation. Here was official confirmation, from the very top, that the CIA in the Bush years had been flagrantly and systematically violating the National Security Act of 1947.

But according to a half-dozen sources, including several very senior, recently retired CIA officials, clandestine-service officers, and Cabinet-level officials from the Bush administration, the real story is at once more innocent—Panetta was mistaken; no law was broken—and far more troubling: an inexperienced CIA director, unfamiliar with how his vast, complicated agency works, unable to trust senior officials within his own agency, and desperate to keep his hands clean, screwed up.

The Daily Beast has learned that shortly after his electrifying June 24 disclosure, Panetta spoke personally with each of his three predecessors—George Tenet, Porter Goss, and Michael Hayden—and only then realized the mistake he’d made about the program. An innocent mistake, but the consequences of his gaffe, which he’s unable to admit without damaging his own reputation further, will likely subject U.S. intelligence capabilities to unnecessary and intrusive oversight for years to come.

Read the rest here.

This is not even amateur hour. This is unbridled incompetence. Retired? My bad, you were right.

  • rose

    there are too many bunglers in this administration. whats going to be the cost to this country and the world? See there goes that experience thing again.

  • Tricia Spiegel

    Yikes!!!!!!!!!!

  • Diana L. C.

    The link for the rest didn’t work for me.

    • sowsear

      Nor for me.

  • Objective Analysis

    Larry,

    We told you. Well, people voted for this Usurper and his SS men (czars, SEIU thugs, ACORN crooks, illegal aliens to disguise the actual support he DOES NOT HAVE)

    Ya’ll who voted for The One have been played like a bad habit. When is this nightmare going to be over.

  • yttik
  • TeakWoodKite

    LJ how far down the road will they kick this can?

  • VRWC – Scared Dept.

    Sometimes I discount a little the rhetoric from my own side. This news is validation in a department where I’d have preferred otherwise. I remember (vaguely, but still) Larry’s discussion, a while back, of how Panetta could actually be a smart choice as CIA director, partly because he “gets” the politics. For my part it seemed a ray of hope and I think that it actually mellowed criticism from the right a bit at the time, I seem to remember some conservatives online who considered Larry’s argument.

    Panetta knew he was flying blind and didn’t handle it well, because, I guess, he saw an opportunity, partly political, like he were a general still fighting the last war – so his political smarts disserved him? But it doesn’t even require executive experience, it requires just plain common sense, if you’re put in charge of something and you find something that seems unusually and anomalously bad, don’t you check with the people who were previously in charge before running off half-cocked? Not that Panetta should have had to do that, but, if there was nobody at the CIA whom he could trust to explain it, he was flying blind and knew it.

  • Billluv

    well i guess larry things never change…I guess fining out blackwater mercs were hired to do the cia’s ILLEGAL assassinations.

    no one unsourced daily beast story is all you need.

    what about eric prince the mob boss?

  • CG

    I read something today that this episode regarding the Panetta briefing to Congress was actually about the use of Blackwater personnel/contractors as assassins for the CIA, which is a little different than the Daily Beast’s tale.

  • CG

    Blackwater: CIA Assassins?
    By Jeremy Scahill

    In April 2002, the CIA paid Blackwater more than $5 million to deploy a small team of men inside Afghanistan during the early stages of US operations in the country. A month later, Erik Prince, the company’s owner and a former Navy SEAL, flew to Afghanistan as part of the original twenty-man Blackwater contingent. Blackwater worked for the CIA at its station in Kabul as well as in Shkin, along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border, where they operated out of a mud fortress known as the Alamo. It was the beginning of a long relationship between Blackwater, Prince and the CIA.

    Now the New York Times is reporting that in 2004 the CIA hired Blackwater “as part of a secret program to locate and assassinate top operatives of Al Qaeda.” According to the Times, “it is unclear whether the CIA had planned to use the contractors to capture or kill Qaeda operatives, or just to help with training and surveillance.”

    The Times reports that “the CIA did not have a formal contract with Blackwater for this program but instead had individual agreements with top company officials, including the founder, Erik D. Prince, a politically connected former member of the Navy Seals and the heir to a family fortune.” A retired intelligence officer “intimately familiar with the assassination program” told the Washington Post, “Outsourcing gave the agency more protection in case something went wrong.” The Post reported that Blackwater “was given operational responsibility for targeting terrorist commanders and was awarded millions of dollars for training and weaponry, but the program was canceled before any missions were conducted.”

    “What the agency was doing with Blackwater scares the hell out of me,” said Jack Rice, a former CIA field operator who worked for the directorate of operations, which runs covert paramilitary activities for the CIA. “When the agency actually cedes all oversight and power to a private organization, an organization like Blackwater, most importantly they lose control and don’t understand what’s going on,” Rice told The Nation. “What makes it even worse is that you then can turn around and have deniability. They can say, ‘It wasn’t us, we weren’t the ones making the decisions.’ That’s the best of both worlds. It’s analogous to what we hear about torture that was being done in the name of Americans, when we simply handed somebody over to the Syrians or the Egyptians or others and then we turn around and say, ‘We’re not torturing people.’”

    Reached by telephone, Illinois Democrat Jan Schakowsky, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said that because of her oath of secrecy on sensitive intelligence issues, she could neither confirm nor deny that Congress was aware of Blackwater’s involvement in this program before the Times report. Schakowsky also declined to comment on whether Blackwater came up at a June briefing by CIA director Leon Panetta, which she attended. That briefing sparked calls for an investigation into whether Vice President Dick Cheney ordered the CIA to conceal an assassination program from Congress.

    “What we know now, if this is true, is that Blackwater was part of the highest level, the innermost circle strategizing and exercising strategy within the Bush administration,” Schakowsky told The Nation. “Erik Prince operated at the highest and most secret level of the government. Clearly Prince was more trusted than the US Congress because Vice President Cheney made the decision not to brief Congress. This shows that there was absolutely no space whatsoever between the Bush administration and Blackwater.”

    As The Nation has reported, Blackwater continues to operate on the US government payroll in both Iraq and Afghanistan, where it works for the State Department and the Defense Department. The CIA will not confirm whether Blackwater continues to work for the agency (or, for that matter, if it ever has).

    Blackwater’s work for the CIA was the result of meetings in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 between Prince and Alvin “Buzzy” Krongard, then-executive director of the CIA, the agency’s number-three man. Krongard and Prince, according to a former Blackwater executive interviewed by The Nation, “were good buddies.” In a 2006 interview for my book, Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army, Krongard said that the company was hired to provide security for the CIA in Afghanistan. “Blackwater got a contract because they were the first people that could get people on the ground,” Krongard said. “The only concern we had was getting the best security for our people. If we thought Martians could provide it, I guess we would have gone after them.”

    The relationship between Krongard and Prince apparently got chummier after the contract was signed. One former Blackwater executive said in 2006, “Krongard came down and visited Blackwater [at company headquarters in North Carolina], and I had to take his kids around and let them shoot on the firing range a number of times.” That visit took place after the CIA contract was signed, according to the former executive, and Krongard “may have come down just to see the company that he had just hired.”

    The relationship between Blackwater and the CIA quickly evolved. Shortly after Prince arrived in Afghanistan in May 2002, according to a former Blackwater executive who was with Prince, the Blackwater owner focused on winning more business with government agencies, providing private soldiers for hire. In 2002 Prince, along with former CIA operative Jamie Smith, created Blackwater Security Consulting, which would put former Navy SEALs and other special ops on the market.

    Prince subsequently tried to join the CIA but was reportedly denied when his polygraph test came back inconclusive. Still, he maintained close ties with the agency. He reportedly was given a “green badge” that permitted him access to most CIA stations. “He’s over there [at CIA headquarters] regularly, probably once a month or so,” a CIA source told Harper’s journalist Ken Silverstein in 2006. “He meets with senior people, especially in the [directorate of operations].”

    Prince would also go on to hire many senior Bush-era CIA officials to work at Blackwater. In July 2007 Buzzy Krongard joined the company’s board; Prince offered him a $3,500 honorarium per meeting attended plus all expenses paid. “Your experience and insight would be ideal to help our team determine where we are and where we are going,” Prince wrote in a letter to Krongard. At the time his brother, Howard “Cookie” Krongard, was the State Department inspector general responsible for overseeing Blackwater’s work for the State Department. In September 2007 California Democratic Representative Henry Waxman accused Cookie Krongard of impeding a Justice Department investigation into Blackwater over allegations the company was illegally smuggling weapons into Iraq.

    Prince hired several other former CIA officials to run what amounted to his own private CIA. Most notable among these was J. Cofer Black, who was running the CIA’s counterterrorism operations and leading the hunt for Osama bin Laden when Blackwater was initially hired by the CIA in 2002. Black left the government in 2005 and took a job at Blackwater running Prince’s private intelligence company, Total Intelligence Solutions.

    While at the CIA, Black ran the “extraordinary rendition” program and coordinated the CIA “Jawbreaker” team sent into Afghanistan to kill or capture bin Laden and senior Al Qaeda leaders. In the days immediately after 9/11, he told Bush that his men would aim to kill Al Qaeda operatives. “When we’re through with them, they will have flies walking across their eyeballs,” Black promised Bush. When Black told Bush the operation would not be bloodless, the president reportedly said, “Let’s go. That’s war. That’s what we’re here to win.”

    Before the CIA Jawbreaker team deployed on September 27, 2001, Black gave his men direct and macabre directions: “I don’t want bin Laden and his thugs captured, I want them dead…. They must be killed. I want to see photos of their heads on pikes. I want bin Laden’s head shipped back in a box filled with dry ice. I want to be able to show bin Laden’s head to the president. I promised him I would do that.” According to CIA operative Gary Schroen, a member of the Jawbreaker team, it was the first time in his thirty-year career he had been ordered to assassinate an adversary rather than attempt a capture.

    In September 2002, five months after Blackwater’s first known contract with the CIA in Afghanistan, Black testified to Congress about the new “operational flexibility” employed in the “war on terror.” “There was a before 9/11, and there was an after 9/11,” Black said. “After 9/11 the gloves come off.” Black outlined a “no-limits, aggressive, relentless, worldwide pursuit of any terrorist who threatens us,” saying it “is the only way to go and is the bottom line.” Black would later brag, in 2004, that “over 70 percent” of Al Qaeda’s leadership had been arrested, detained or killed, and that “more than 3,400 of their operatives and supporters have also been detained and put out of an action.” The Times reports that the Blackwater-CIA assassination program “did not successfully capture or kill any terrorist suspects.”

    In addition to Black, Total Intelligence’s executives include CEO Robert Richer, the former associate deputy director of the CIA’s Directorate of Operations and second-ranking official in charge of clandestine operations. From 1999 to 2004, Richer was head of the CIA’s Near East and South Asia Division, where he ran covert operations in the Middle East and South Asia. As part of his duties, he was the CIA liaison with Jordan’s King Abdullah, a key US ally and Blackwater client, and briefed George W. Bush on the burgeoning Iraqi resistance in its early stages.

    Total Intelligence’s chief operating officer is Enrique “Ric” Prado, a twenty-four-year CIA veteran and former senior executive officer in the Directorate of Operations. He spent more than a decade working in the CIA’s Counterterrorist Center and ten years with the CIA’s “paramilitary” Special Operations Group.

    Total Intelligence is run out of an office on the ninth floor of a building in the Ballston area of Arlington, Virginia. Its Global Fusion Center, complete with large-screen TVs broadcasting international news channels and computer stations staffed by analysts surfing the web, “operates around the clock every day of the year” and is modeled after the CIA’s counterterrorist center, once run by Black. The firm employs at least sixty-five full-time staff–some estimates say it’s closer to 100. “Total Intel brings the…skills traditionally honed by CIA operatives directly to the board room,” Black said when the company launched.

    Representative Schakowsky says the House Intelligence Committee is investigating the CIA assassination program and will probe alleged links to Blackwater. “The presidential memos (often referred to as ‘findings’) authorizing covert action like the lethal activities of the CIA and Blackwater have not yet surfaced,” says Ray McGovern, a retired twenty-seven-year CIA analyst who once served as George H.W. Bush’s national security briefer. “They will, in due course, if knowledgeable sources continue to put the Constitution and courage above secrecy oaths.”

    more at http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090831/scahill1

  • CG

    C.I.A. Sought Blackwater’s Help to Kill Jihadists
    By MARK MAZZETTI

    The Central Intelligence Agency in 2004 hired outside contractors from the private security contractor Blackwater USA as part of a secret program to locate and assassinate top operatives of Al Qaeda, according to current and former government officials.

    Executives from Blackwater, which has generated controversy because of its aggressive tactics in Iraq, helped the spy agency with planning, training and surveillance. The C.I.A. spent several million dollars on the program, which did not successfully capture or kill any terrorist suspects.

    The fact that the C.I.A. used an outside company for the program was a major reason that Leon E. Panetta, the C.I.A.’s director, became alarmed and called an emergency meeting in June to tell Congress that the agency had withheld details of the program for seven years, the officials said.

    It is unclear whether the C.I.A. had planned to use the contractors to actually capture or kill Qaeda operatives, or just to help with training and surveillance in the program. American spy agencies have in recent years outsourced some highly controversial work, including the interrogation of prisoners. But government officials said that bringing outsiders into a program with lethal authority raised deep concerns about accountability in covert operations.

    Officials said the C.I.A. did not have a formal contract with Blackwater for this program but instead had individual agreements with top company officials, including the founder, Erik D. Prince, a politically connected former member of the Navy Seals and the heir to a family fortune. Blackwater’s work on the program actually ended years before Mr. Panetta took over the agency, after senior C.I.A. officials themselves questioned the wisdom of using outsiders in a targeted killing program.

    Blackwater, which has changed its name, most recently to Xe Services, and is based in North Carolina, in recent years has received millions of dollars in government contracts, growing so large that the Bush administration said it was a necessary part of its war operation in Iraq.

    more at http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/20/us/20intel.html?_r=2&hp

  • CG

    another of my comments with reference was spam filtered, but here is a link to Ray McGovern’s piece Blackwater’s Unwritten Death Contract at http://consortiumnews.com/2009/082009c.html

    • http://! stodgie

      cg, i want to commend you on nearly putting me to sleep with your incessant cut and paste dog and pony show. boring!

  • http://www.recoverybull.com Jenny Watts

    Leon Edward Panetta is the current Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. An American Democratic politician, lawyer, and professor, Panetta served as President Bill Clinton’s White House Chief of Staff from 1994 to 1997 and was a member of the United States House of Representatives from 1977 to 1993. He is the founder and director of the Panetta Institute, served as Distinguished Scholar to Chancellor Charles B. Reed of the California State University System and professor of public policy at Santa Clara University.
    Jenny Watts

    • http://! stodgie

      jenny why the resume? your point is what? he acted like a fool. deal with it.

  • spider

    The best way to screw something up is to give the job to someone without credentials for the job. With the exception of Obama, of course, who had no credentials at all. Instead of escaping the frying pan, America is now in the fire. I keep thinking of the parable of The blind leading the blind.

  • tzada

    My take on this is this. Maybe the intent was there, to achieve exactly what was achieved, more scrutiny. In other words Panetta was the stodge and the fall guy and it was the plan.

  • tek

    I didn’t like the Bush administration, but if the Democrats wanted to go after those people they should have done it two years ago, once they gained the majority. Instead, they let a lot of bad stuff continue so voters will be sure to elect a Democrat in ’08, then they come back and start investigating people no longer in power. It’s some of the worst political bungling I’ve ever seen.

    Today’s Yahoo! headlines: Americans Losing Faith in Obama. I’m going to go out and celebrate.

  • Tammy

    Larry:
    You think Panetta is bad? How about the attorneys who showed PHOTOS of CIA agents to terrorists?

    I don’t know what your friends inside the CIA think, but I’m guessing they are pretty nervous about this administration.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/20/AR2009082004295.html

  • tzada

    This just up on todays Drudge Report

    Detainees Shown CIA Officers’ Photos
    Justice Dept. Looking Into Whether Attorneys Broke Law at Guantanamo

    The Justice Department recently questioned military defense attorneys at Guantanamo Bay about whether photographs of CIA personnel, including covert officers, were unlawfully provided to detainees charged with organizing the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, according to sources familiar with the investigation.

    Investigators are looking into allegations that laws protecting classified information were breached when three lawyers showed their clients the photographs, the sources said. The lawyers were apparently attempting to identify CIA officers and contractors involved in the agency’s interrogation of al-Qaeda suspects in facilities outside the United States, where the agency employed harsh techniques.

    If detainees at the U.S. military prison in Cuba are tried, either in federal court or by a military commission, defense lawyers are expected to attempt to call CIA personnel to testify.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/20/AR2009082004295_pf.html

  • politicsisdirty

    ON THE JOB TRAINEES …. they all are?

  • Barry 0351

    Hunters do not normally alert their game/prey/victims with loud proclamations of Here Deer, deer, deer! or we have a “secret assassination program here for you Haji terrorist!” if they did we all would be up to our asses in Deer and terrorist.
    sometimes, sometimes it pays to keep a secret secret no matter who is president.

  • Joe

    Classic! The CIA and other guilty parties proclaim they didn’t do anything AND case closed!

    Is this still America? I guess by this logic, we should have let the Nazi’s try themselves at Nuremberg.

    CIA always gets to exonerate itself. And the proof is always classified.

    This is pure conjecture Larry. You are a loyal company man, but a horrible lawyer.

    • http://! stodgie

      joe, do you work at it or does being obtuse just come naturally. don’t mind answering, i already know.

  • PotVsKtl

    More crying from Larry due to the fact that Panetta chooses to follow the rule of law. What a travesty!

    • http://! stodgie

      pot, panetta is a tool of the far left, which i am guessing of which you are a card carrying member. deal with it ya’l have screwed the pooch and on your way out the door never to return.

  • d2i

    I recall your endorsement of Panetta and was a bit startled by it, and honestly couldn’t understand why, at that time, you were so defensive when others raised serious concerns about his experience.

    It’s too bad that his stellar resume will be tarnished due to his demonstrated ineptness at CIA. He needs to go before he does more damage to our country’s security and greater damage to his reputation.

    The thing that bothers me is the fact that he had the hubris to accept the appointment when his resume and experience is obviously quite thin in this area. And now that he’s been found out, he lacks the humility to take responsibility publicly so as to quell the tinder box growing at CIA.

  • http://www.recoverybull.com Richard Baker

    Really shocking news and I appreciate Leon Panetta’s courage and efforts and hope concerning government agency would soon come with a right explanation for all this.