RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

“Slack Like Me”

In yesterday’s NY Times, there was an article about Obama entitled, “A Delegator, Obama Picks When to Take Reins.”

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Just the opening photo alone is telling – he is stretched out on a sofa, talking to someone who is not in the frame. It reminds me of another photo I saw of him recently, sitting back with his feet up on the conference table. If you put a little cowboy hat on him, he reminds me of someone else, too – and I don’t like THAT someone, either!!! Anywho, as the title would indicate, Obama intends to “delegate” his workload to the members of his inner circle, rewarding their loyalty to him.

Ironically, or similarly, there was a lengthy article in the NY Times Magazine about George W. Bush on January 14, 2001, entitled, “The Bush Years; C.E.O., USA.” This article includes statements like, ”A good executive is one that understands how to recruit people and how to delegate,” he said after he presented three designees in Austin right after the New Year. ”How to align authority and responsibility, how to hold people accountable for results and how to build a team of people. And that’s exactly what we’re going to do. This is a team of people who’ll be dedicated to doing what is right for America.”

Hmmm. See, here’s the thing. I have said for MONTHS that Obama is the MIRROR opposite of Bush. The above referenced NY Times articles basically make that point for me. Obama likes to “delegate,” i.e., unload his work on someone else, taking the credit when it goes well, and spreading out the blame to everyone else when it goes wrong. In other words (as Bush likes to say), he accepts no personal responsibility.

Oh wait – I should say, neither ONE of them accepts personal responsibility. Interesting. And by THAT I really mean, TELLING. So, lessee – they both like to delegate, and they both take other people’s work as their own. I mean, really – was there ANY policy that OBAMA came up with on his very own?!?! Not of which I am aware.

He would take Clinton’s policy statements, sometimes changing a word or two here, most often not, and the media would claim HERS was like HIS. Say HUH?? Who said cheaters never prosper?!? Don’t even get me started on the whole Florida debacle of voter disenfranchisement, but there’s another big ol’ similarity for you!

The author of the Obama article makes statements like, “He is personally even-keeled, but can be prickly when small things go wrong.” Um, that does not sound even-keeled to me. No, rather, it just sounds a whole lot like Bush, whose temper is legendary.

Obama, on more than one occasion, has demonstrated that same quick trigger, like in one of the debates where he turned on Clinton and accused her of having ties to Wal-Mart (oh, yeah – YEARS ago, and hardly surprising since it IS an Arkansas based company. But – in throwing out this accusation, Obama was also engaging a smoke screen, hiding his WIFE’S work for a company closely affiliated with Wal-Mart. And, Michelle’s work was long after people began to question the hiring practices and employee treatment, unlike when Clinton was involved with them. A simple Google search bears this out.).

Every single time he has been pressed, his ratchet response is anger – hardly what I would call, “even-keeled.” (Perhaps the media is trying to equate his quick temper to being even-keeled the same way they equated Bush’s arrogant swagger as “charm.” Yeah, okay.)

I imagine, though, that for someone who claims he cannot keep up with paperwork, having someone ELSE to do it might just be helpful. I reckon that’s what happened to all of the paperwork from when he was in the IL Senate – he just couldn’t keep up with it, and *POOF* – it disappeared! What a shame! No paper trail for him!!! Hey, wait! Another Florida association!!! Ahem.

This is the same man who says he doesn’t even have a datebook for that time period. Really? What grown up with a job or family or LIFE does NOT have a datebook?!?! Since he already admitted he cannot keep up with things, it would seem to me a datebook would be MANDATORY for him. Yet, nope, no datebook for the ENTIRE time he was in the IL Senate. Huh – as I recall, there was a whole bunch of other paperwork “lost,” too! Oh, RIGHT! Bush’s Air National Guard paperwork!!!! Somehow, the military just happened to lose ALL of the paperwork for the son of the then Ambassador to the UN…Sure – that could happen – in about a gazillion years!!

Well, it is too bad it never occurred to Obama to at least get someone to do his SENATE work for him. But, hey – he was BUSY, okay?!?! He was CAMPAIGNING!!! And playing basketball – sure couldn’t take time to debate CLINTON – he had to play some round ball with the Tar Heels (I am originally from NC, and a Tar Heel fan, but REALLY – that was just silly.). And riding his bike! Oh, Good googly moogly – the comparisons just keep rolling on! You cannot make stuff like this UP, people!!!

There is ONE big difference between them, though. Yes, and it pains me to say it, but Bush is actually FAR more experienced than Obama. There, I said it. And it is TRUE.

At least Bush was the Governor of a pretty large state for a couple of terms. And owned a baseball team. That is a HECKUVA lot more than Obama can say. Who cares if Bush failed up at absolutely EVERYTHING he ever did?!?!

How is that different from someone claiming he was a community organizer, when he was really registering people to vote? Or that his buddies were the ones who really put his name on things to give him credibility he neither earned nor deserved?? Emil Jones? Tony Rezko? Bill Ayers? Yep – very little difference in that regard.

I simply do not have the time to ennumerate the VAST number of lies each one of them has told – Bush to get the US into a war, and Obama on getting us out of the Iraq war, which he claimed he did not say, just for starters. Oh, here’s a fun game – go find your OWN comparisons! Here are some topics: family history, policy issues, NAFTA…

What kills me is that MANY of the same people who went BALLISTIC about Bush’s lack of credentials are now the same ones jumping on the Unity Unicorn. The same ones saying it doesn’t matter that there is no paper trail, that Obama does very little of his own work, that he spends more time on the court than he did IN court, that he is arrogant, partonizing (I wonder if he gives nicknames, too? For instance, does HE call Axelrod “AxelRove”??), OR sexist. It doesn’t bother them in the LEAST that he has an inner circle controlling the message, no, CREATING the message, and he just goes along with what they tell him (oh, until he lost PA, now he is paying a little more attention), then blames EVERYONE but himself.

WHY can they not see that these two men are MIRROR IMAGES OF EACH other, slack as the day is long, riding a sense of entitlement bigger than Big Brown?? I don’t get it, I surely don’t. Maybe they wanted their own slacker president since Clinton worked his heart out. Maybe that whole slacker mentality appeals to all the young folk they claim as his supporters.

All I know is that these two men look a WHOLE lot alike to me.

  • roseeriter

    Yup. Its the hypocrisy stupid obamabots. Bush and Obama are so much a like even though at opposite extreme wings, but as I said before a bird (eagle, USA) needs both wings to fly. If Nobama gets in the WH we’ll have another disaster and crash landing just like the other one that lasted for 8 freakin’ long miserable divided years and NOTHING for and of the people will get accomplished..NOTHING!

    NOBAMA

  • obamaphobe

    I remember recently the media was saying that Obama was using Hillary’s talking points from her playbook, and McCain was using Hillary’s talking points from her playbook. If everybody is a Hillary wanna’ be, why isn’t she the Nominee?

    • shano

      Because Mr. Obama ran a better campaign and won the nomination because he had more primary delegates and more superdelegates under the current Democratic Party rules?

      Hillary and Obama=95% in agreement on policy issues

      McCain and Bush=95% in agreement on policy issues.

      Larry Johnson is an undercover operative for the McCain camp.
      Good luck with that Larry.

      McCain=WORSE than Bush
      McWorse.

      • memyself&i

        Humans and mice = 99% shared genes

        Obama and Wright = ???% agreement
        Obama and Pfleger = ???% agreement
        Obama and Ayers = ???% agreement
        Obama and Resko = ???% discount

        How are you counting all his “present” votes?

        • Slim Tyranny

          Voting “present” in the Illinois state legislator has strategic value. It’s pretty disingenuous to attack him on “present” votes when those “present” votes have legitimate, substantive value.

          • memyself&i

            I did not ask what strategic value a present vote had or did not have beyond being a cover for a future run for the presidency. My question was how people counted these votes when comparing Senator Clinton’s voting record with Senator Obama’s record.

          • LDW

            Voting ‘Present’ is an automatic vote with the majority opinion, but without having to say one actually has an opinion.

            The Planned Parenthood W.O.R.M. (What Obama Really Meant) Sutherland, who made up this stupid strategic voting nonsense, did it to help Obama, who didn’t want to be too closely associated with either side of the issue. She didn’t do it to help Planned Parenthood, unless, of course, Obama threatened some funding cutback if she didn’t play ball.

          • Caya

            http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/02/the_everpresent_obama.html

            He voted “present” on SB 759, a bill that required mandatory adult prosecution for firing a gun on or near school grounds. The bill passed the state Senate 52-1.

            He voted “present” on HB 854 that protected the privacy of sex-abuse victims by allowing petitions to have the trial records sealed. He was the only member to not support the bill.

            He voted “present” on SB 609, a bill prohibiting strip clubs and other adult establishments from being within 1,000 feet of schools, churches, and daycares.

          • Mawm

            That is one of the biggest crocks of the campaign. Funny that you got sold on it.

            Present votes are gutless votes plain and simple.

        • Slim Tyranny

          Voting “present” in the Illinois state legislature has strategic value. It’s pretty disingenuous to attack him on “present” votes when those “present” votes have legitimate, substantive value.

          • Hope Floats

            Yeah. They say ‘Present.’ They might have value, since they mean you showed up to vote. But that’s all they really mean: Obama likes waffles.

          • socalannie

            Not taking a stand when that is your job is chicken-shit.

          • IndayHill

            slim, IMO, voting “Present” by Obama, while a state senator meant he was CHICKEN!! COWARD!!

            It was either he did not want to offend the bill sponsors OR he dID NOT KNOW what was in the bill !

            Present = Empty head

            Present = COWARD

        • Jack

          “Obama and Ayers = ???% agreement
          Obama and Resko = ???% discount

          Discount? You are funny!

        • wry

          This is funny!!!

        • Judith

          Funny stuff!!!

      • hoodwinked

        not to worry!

        we’ll just get another lazy prez for 4 years – instead of a VERY hard worker.

        just hope he gets the draft going in time to suck in all his naive young supporters!

        • Northwest rain

          Obama is one of the LAZIEST individuals ever to run for Prez — except for bushie.

          THIS is the guy that the DNC has chosen?

          The voters chose the hard worker who LISTENS. Obama could care less about anybody except himself.

          The Democrat Party is Dead.

      • IndayHill

        shano, Obama stole the “crown” from Hillary, the smartest of them all!
        Obama is a Chicago corrupt politician, under training by the mob.
        Obama = WORST than GWB!
        HILLARY IS THE BEST!!!

        If you love America, vote for the BEST!!

  • Idiots

    She’s not the nominee because she failed to win the majority of the pledged delegates.

    • Nicole

      Is that you, Hippie Girl, in disguise?

      • Idiots

        So, who won the most pledged delegates under the rules of the DNC that all candidates agreed to before the process began? Hint: even if you add in FL and MI under the proportions you want, it still wouldn’t have changed the result. It’s utterly fascinating that you’re screaming that the person who came in second under the delegate rules should be awarded the nomination. Either way, can anyone tell me an actual substantive policy difference between the two candidates that is so great that you are being driven to such anger? I mean, look at this blog, there isn’t a single solitary post about POLICY. It’s all scare-mongering and insults and threats. Voting for McCain won’t make the person who came in second in the Democratic nominating process the President. Not now and certainly not in 2012.

        • ulahane

          Character is an issue! I do not accept that a person who was a member of TUCC for twenty years is fit to be president. I do not accept that a person who associates with a terrorist like William Ayers is fit to be president.

          Policy alone? Though I don’t see why, when Obama can’t be trusted.

          Universal Health Care: If implemented, Obama’s plan is doomed to failure and will delay real reform by decades. Clinton’s would work.

          Abortion: Clinton is, like most Americans, opposed to partial-birth abortion. Obama, not only supports this particular precedure, he voted against the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act.

          Iraq and Iran: Clinton’s position is based on reacting to conditions on the ground. Obama claims, sometimes he changes this, that his deadline is carved in stone.

          NASA: Obama supports delaying building the space shuttle replacement, costing thousands of jobs in Florida and leaving us to hitch rides from the Russians for ten years or more. Clinton has never suggested such a delay.

          The UN: Obama has implicitly stated that U.S. is subordinate to the U.N.. Reference his statements about the global poverty act and his imfamous “We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our … then just expect that other countries are going to say OK,”

          (There are many, many more policy differences)

          Voting for McCain does, however, make certain that Obama looses. And as much as you hate it, character and experience are as important as professed policies.

        • destardi

          Can anyone tell me what other modern day president used race as a divisive factor, ripping open old wounds, just to gain votes?

          Yea, uh huh.

          “typical white person”

          • Slim Tyranny

            Maybe you should realize that race in America is not merely “old wounds.” It’s still a real issue, and talking about it is legitimate.

            • Mary

              Sure is, Slim.

              I can’t vote for Obama. He didn’t show us any tears after Katrina.

        • etc.

          “It [the country] is ready for a leader who will bring this great country together. No, that’s what this country wants. They want a leader who understands how to lead, how to bring folks together to achieve the people’s business. As you’re out campaigning for us, make sure you talk about the issues, because people when they hear it are going to find out, we stand squarely with the people.

          There’s a big difference of philosophy in this campaign. I’m running against a man of Washington, by Washington and for Washington. Ours is a campaign that stands squarely on the side of the people and the families and the workers of America.” – George W. Bush, 2000

          Sound familiar?

          And for the delegate count, have Obama stripped of the Iowa and South Carolina delegates. Didn’t those states break the rules of the DNC by having their primary early?

          Oh, wait… they voted for the messiah so their votes should count.

          What a load of horseshit

      • Stephanie

        I think it is Howard Dean in Disguise.

    • obamaphobe

      She didn’t fail to win them. Obama bought them.

      • Idiots

        Really. The pledged delegates? Name the delegates you feel were “bought”. Oh, and provide proof of your charge. You know, check stubs, campaign memos, etc. The constant invocation of the word “steal” is inaccurate because the person who will be the nominee for the Democratic Party was actually the front-running for several months starting in March. To award the nomination for the person who was in second place for the last three months of the campaign would actually be “stealing”.

        • power coast FL dave

          He stole it.

          Really.

          • Idiots

            Prove it. Find me check stubs. Campaign memos. Anything. He won the majority of pledged delegates. That’s how the nominee is determined. You say that Hillary won the majority of pledged delegates, so prove your case. Name the delegates, name the states where she actually won these pledged delegates that somehow were “counted” for Obama. Again, FL and MI wouldn’t have changed the result even if Hillary had received all of them. So, prove that the pledged delegates were “stolen”.

            • Hope

              Check stubs? Are you really that stupid?
              HE DOES NOT HAVE ENOUGH PLEDGED DELEGATES TO WIN THE NOMINATION!

              Check out some donation info from 5/22:
              Elected Officials Voting for Obama Who’s constituents voted for Clinton

              Robert Cramer – Alabama
              Gov. Janet Napalitano – Arizona
              George Miller – California
              Gerald McNerney – California – Obama Donation $5,000
              Fortney Pete Stark – California
              Zoe Lofgren – Cal.
              Howard Berman – Cal.
              Adam Schiff – Cal.
              Henry Waxman – Cal
              Linda Sanchez – Cal
              Joe Donnely – Indiana – Obama $7,500 Donation
              Baron Hill – Indiana – Obama $12,500 Donation
              Ben Chandler – Kentucky – wow Obama drew less than 10%
              Bill Delahunt – Massachussetts
              Gov. Deval Patrick Mass.
              Sen. Ted Kennedy Mass. – $10,000 from both candidates
              Sen. John Kerry – Mass.
              Gov. Bill Richardson – New Mexico
              Carol Shea-Porter – New Hampshire
              Gov. Brad Henry – Oklahoma
              Patrick Murphy – PA Donations from Clinton $2500 Obama $18,826
              Sen. Bob Casey – PA
              Patrick Kennedy – RI
              Charlie Gonzalez – Texas
              Eddie Johnson – Texas
              Rick Boucher – Virginia
              Nick Rahal – WV
              Sen. Robert Byrd –WV $10,000 from both candidates
              Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV – WV – Obama $5000 Donation

              Here’s some interesting one’s that are undeclared whose constituents voted for Clinton (please note the donations):

              Sam Farr – Cal.
              Jim Costa – Cal. – Obama Donation $5,000
              Bob Filner – Cal
              Joe Courtney – Connecticut – Obama $5,000 Donation
              Gov. Steve Beshear – Kentucky
              Rep. John Oliver – Massachussetts
              Rep. Niki Tsongas – Mass. – Obama $5,000 donation
              John Tierney – Mass.
              Ed Markey – Mass
              Travis Childers – Mississippi
              Sen. Frank Lautenberg – New Jersey – Obama $9,000
              Gov. John Lynch – New Hampshire
              Charlie Wilson – Ohio – Obama $7,000
              Marci Kaptur – Ohio
              Dennis Kucinich – Ohio
              Zack Space – Ohio – Obama $7500
              Sen. Sherrod Brown – Ohio $10,000 from both
              Dan Boren – Oklahoma
              Jason Altmire – PA – Obama $10,000
              Tim Holden – PA
              Gabriel Gifford – Arizona Obama Donation $9,000
              Michael Honda – California
              Sen. Jack Reed – RI – Obama $5,000
              Lincoln Davis – Tennessee
              Bart Gordon – Tennessee
              Gov. Phil Bredesen – Tenn.
              Nick Lampsen – Texas – Obama $5,000
              Alan Mollohan – WV
              Gov. Joe Manchin – WV

            • obamaphobe

              I don’t have receipts, check stubs, delegate lists. I didn’t make the purchase. But ask your Messiah for that information. I’m sure he’ll be totally transparent. Now your turn, list one of Obama’s accomplishments. And, please don’t say, he inspires and unites. Obviously, you have been checking out this blog as well as others. I have yet to see Unity. Only division. Zero points for Obama.

        • hoodwinked

          try this:

          “Obama, who narrowly leads in the count of pledged, “non-super” delegates, has doled out more than $698,200 to superdelegates from his political action committee, Hope Fund, or campaign committee since 2005. Of the 82 elected officials who had announced as of Feb. 12 that their superdelegate votes would go to the Illinois senator, 35, or 43 percent of this group, have received campaign contributions from him in the 2006 or 2008 election cycles, totaling $232,200″. Note: as of 2/2008, just imagine what the total wound up looking like!

          hint: google “obama money superdelegates”

          tough research, but someone has to do it!

          • OnlyTheTruth

            People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones. From the same article:

            “Clinton’s PAC, HILLPAC, and campaign committee appear to have distributed $205,500 to superdelegates. Only 12 percent of her elected superdelegates, or 13 of 109 who have said they will back her, have received campaign contributions.”

            So… it’s O.K. for Hillary to do it because she didn’t spend as much? Or, are you miffed that her campaign was mismanaged and she spent her money in the wrong places?

            Selective journalism abounds on No Quarter. Any distorted or edited information that continues to feed this pathetic and never-ending Hillary pity party, and conspiracy theories, is called “research”?

            • hoodwinked

              hold on!

              the O-bots think their candidate is holier-than-she.

              news flash: HE ISN’T!!

              he’s just as slimy (o.k. slimier) but pretends otherwise.

              that’s the real trajegy.

            • selective journalist

              and by the way, in the interests of full disclosure, you should have cut and pasted the first line in the para about Clinton:

              “Clinton does not appear to have been as openhanded”.

            • Hope Floats

              Obama outspent Clinton 3 to 1… again. Guess what his PAC is called? The Man From Hope Fund. That’s right.

            • IndayHill

              hey! only the truth, you misled me with your name, only the truth! PHONY!
              So, what you are saying is, this NQUSA site is giving false journalism about Barack Hussein Obama (his parents gave this name to him, that’s the truth!)& you are upset!
              YEAH?!? How about the MSM giving FREE PASS to BHO, NOT UPSETTING?
              IF YOU LOVE AMERICA, VOTE FOR HILLARY OR MCCAIN !
              HOW WELL DO YOU KNOW BHO????

        • bodemokrat

          Why do all you Obama trolls think you can force
          someone to vote the way you want them to?
          This is not a court case where you can make your “brilliant” argument, win the big case
          and we will all submit to your superior knowledge. We can vote for anyone we please
          for whatever reason we please and all the
          whining and intimidation and vitriol can not
          change that.
          and please remember BOWL BIG TIME IN NOVEMER!

        • athena

          Actually Obama did not have a win from February 19th until his NC in win in MAY where he carried 92% of the black vote and LOST IN, a state which according to polls was his to win.

          • Mary

            Obama won only because of superdelegates.

            There was a time when Donna Brazille said if the superdelegates “chose” our nominee, she’d resign from the DNC.

            But since it was Obama who they chose, Brazille changed her mind.

            When Obama loses in November, we’re all hoping Donna Brazille will finally resign.

            • socalannie

              I’m hoping that Donna Brazilla, Coward Dean & the other Dem meatheads that orchestrated this sham of an election get run out of town on a rail.

    • memyself&i

      The rule does not give the nomination to the person who gets the “majority” of the delegates. It gives the nomination to the person who first receives the required number of delegates. Neither candidate received enough pledged delegates to become the nominee. The super delegates gave the nomination to Obama.

    • blueasthesky

      Neither candidate has enough pledged delegates to get nominated. The notion that Barack won because he got more pledged delegates is a lie promoted by the Obama campaign to cover up the unpleasant fact that Hillary got more popular votes.

      • Auntie Meme

        Getting more pledged delegates did have something to do with the support of the supers however.

        What’s great is how Hillary’s campaign kept switching tactics depending solely on what would help them: first they tried to put the nomination in the bag as early as possible, by lining up as many supers as possible, saying “this is a delegate race”. Then after Obama fought her to a draw on Super Tuesday and racked up all those victories in February, Clinton’s campaign started asking supers to hold off from committing, saying that “every voter needs to be heard from”. Conveniently ignoring the fact that in ’04 Kerry wrapped it up basically after New Hampshire, effectively “disenfranchising” most of the country, and that it was their hope that Super Tuesday would accomplish the same for Hillary.

        And much the same with MI and FL: they were against seating the delegates before they were for doing so. That sort of win-at-all-costs hypocrisy didn’t escape the notice of supers, nor of voters. All it accomplished, in the end, is that it ginned up zillions hundreds dozens of Hillary voters to get pissed off and say they’re going to support the progressive McSame over Obama, who shares 90%+ of Hillary’s positions.

        But it’s not going to be Harriet Christian-types deciding this election. It’s going to be swing voters and an energized Dem party base, both of which are supporting Obama according to reality-based measures.

    • Hope Floats

      It was never about winning the majority of the pledged delegates. It was about hitting the magic number, something Obama could not do even with cheating. The SD’s had to come in, but their votes don’t count till the convention. Then they should vote for the strongest GE candidate. That’s why Hillary is making a case for the popular vote. The Dem primary voters in caucus states and open primaries chose a weak candidate who no one really knows too much about.

    • alee21

      Abetted by Obama hooligans like you, the MSM, the undemocratic DNC and of course the unspeakable caucuses. Obama may have “won” the nomination, but he will not win the election.

      I will do everything I can to make sure Obama will lose.

      Go PUMA.

      Go Hillary, 2008, 2012

  • Darryl

    See, what everyone doesn’t understand, is that corporate America has taken over. It doesn’t matter if its democrats or republicans, they choose a pawn and they go with it. Whom ever is the biggest sell out wins.

    • Nicole

      Obama’s definitely a major-league sellout although I still don’t think he’ll win the GE.

    • AF catfish

      Yep – you know who received less in contributions from the Health Insurance industry? McCain!

  • Pragmatist

    Obama is a fraud and a liar; pure and simple.

    • Stray

      Uhm a Thats not the campain I remember.

  • Joe Smith

    No one really knows what this guy really stands for. He does not write his own speeches and did not formulate his own policies.That is very apparent since he can’t talk about them with out the prompter. He has no track record besides being part of an anti-American church. Which from everything that I ahve seen was for him a means to an end. That is why it amazes me when people vote for him. How do they know he will be any different than Bush. For all we know on day one he would come out and say. I changed my mind. I think Bush was doing the right thing and I will continue it. If you don’t like it you can get under the bus.

    • Nicole

      Obama’s a poseur, a cypher, and a blank slate: he’s anything you want him to be.

      • Fred C. Dobbs

        Except GONE.

    • shano

      Mr. Obama writes his own speeches.

      Mr. Obama went to the best schools on a scholarship-for those that dont know how this process works:
      That means Mr. Obama was smart enough to deserve special consideration on his own merits. He excelled because he was exceptional in his intellect and drive to succeed.

      Not because his family had money and connections (like McCain and Bush).

      How do you know Mr. Obama will be anything like Bush with absolutely no evidence this is possible? Are you a psychic? What other historical events have you correctly predicted?

      Larry Johnson is an undercover operative for the McCain camp.
      McWorse than Bush.

      • power coast FL dave

        Mr Obama’s parents attended Harvard.

        Obama was a legacy admit, as well as financially connected.

        Like affirmative action, for the connected and crazy, kook-aid, say.

        • Slim Tyranny

          Obama went to Columbia University undergrad. Ivy League school, no legacy.

          Try again.

          • memyself&i

            I don’t care about how he got into Harvard Law School, but you need to get your facts straight.
            His father went to Harvard to get a masters in Economics.

            • Slim Tyranny

              My facts are straight. Obama got into Columbia University for his undergrad years WITHOUT the benefit of any alleged legacy.

      • bonita

        LMAO:

        Writes his own speeches!! That’s a good one. Have you been paying attention at all during this election.

        By the way, Obama went to Harvard as a Legacy, not because he earned it. Just in case you don’t know, a legacy is granted if one of your parents went to the school which his father did.

        • oldvoter

          No, that’s not true. There are NO legacy admits to law school. That’s only a factor (among many) for undergraduate/college admissions.

        • Slim Tyranny

          Wrong, he earned his way into Harvard.

          Look, I know it’s tough for some of you to accept, but there is a mountain of evidence showing that Obama has an impressive intellect and great academic abilities. Harvard Law wouldn’t accept someone with no money just because their father attended a grad program in another part of the university, with no donations factored into the equation.

          Nice try.

          • Hope

            Do you award him “smart” points for each utterance of the syllable telling sound of, “uh”?
            Please note the correlation of the sound with the perception that one does not think quickly.

            • Slim Tyranny

              That all you got?

              He graduates Magna Cum Laude from Harvard Law School, and all you got is your perception that he says “uh” too much?

              You fail.

          • memyself&i

            I don’t care how he got into Harvard. It could very well be on merits. One think I do know is that he was not “someone with no money” as you suggest.

            His grandmother, the woman he threw under the bus, raised him from the age of 10. She was the Vice President of one of the biggest banks in Hawaii. From the age of 10, he attended Punahou, one of Hawaii’s best private schools. There is nothing wrong with growing up privileged. What is wrong is his lying about it. It’s like him saying his parents met and fell in love at the Selma March. I guess it’s more romantic than the truth, his parents met in a Russian language class at the University of Hawaii.

          • Mary

            No, SLim. Legacy AND Affirmative Action.

            • Slim Tyranny

              Wrong again. Look, diminishing his accomplishments as based on “affirmative action” with NO evidence is ridiculous.

              He graduated Magna Cum Laude from HLS. Was that based on affirmative action, too?

              You are wrong, sorry.

              • Mary

                Check out your posts.

                You said he EARNED his way into Harvard.

                You didn’t KNOW he was a legacy from his Dad’s Harvard PHD until we told you that.

                He WAS a legacy.

                You’re chasing your own poorly informed tail, like my cat does.

                Doesn’t matter. Can’t vote for Obama. No tears after Katrina, according to Jesse Jackson Jr.

                • Slim Tyranny

                  No, Mary, you’re wrong.

                  See, you’re making a simple logic mistake. You can both EARN your way into a school and be a LEGACY.

                  Obama’s father was a legacy in a different Harvard program than the law school. A parental PHD doesn’t mean automatic admittance. It might even make zero difference, especially if donations are not involved.

                  So yes, he was a legacy. And YES, he earned his way there. He went to an Ivy League school undergrad and had the grades, and at Harvard itself he proved he had the intellect and work ethic (Magna Cum Laude).

                  Legacy does not preclude admittance on merit. You’re just confused.

                  Sorry that your presidential choice comes down to what Jesse Jackson Jr. said.

              • Observer

                He needs to release his grades from Columbia and Harvard… That will settle some questions on that front.

                http://tinyurl.com/4tzpm2

      • Hope

        He does not write his own speeches by any stretch of the imagination. Granted, politicians may use speech writers; however Obama flat out plagiarizes.

        See if you like this.There are lots more if you do.
        http://youtube.com/watch?v=eqOaVbznE5o

        • Slim Tyranny

          Obama wrote the entire “race in America” speech he gave in Philadelphia. That’s pretty impressive.

          • ulahane

            You mean the one where he swore he could no more disown Wright than he could disown the Black community? Right before he disowned Wright?

            The one in which he said he had heard controversial sermons? Just days after he said he had controversial sermons?

            Impressive? Yes, but not in the way you’re implying.

            • Hope

              That would also be the one where he insulted his own grandmother in front of the nation for a perceived political gain.

              • Slim Tyranny

                So you admit you were wrong/lied about him writing his own speeches?

                • Hope Floats

                  Obama delivered an entire speech that had been given already by Deval Patrick. I don’t know or care about who writes which speech, but I know he freely plagiarizes and lies.

                  • Slim Tyranny

                    Deval Patrick has nothing to do with the Philly speech. I was merely disproving the lie that Obama never writes his own speeches.

                    • Hope Floats

                      Alright, so he only sometimes plagiarizes other politician’s speeches and only lies sometimes as opposed to never. Well, that’s a horse of a different color.

            • memyself&i

              The one where he threw his grandmother under the bus. Knowing he wrote those words himself makes it even more horrendous.

              • Mary

                Yes. Apparently it was his OWN IDEA to call his loving grandmother a racist.

                He used “racist” a lot during the primary, to his own personal gain.

                Won’t work in November, though.

      • athena

        Obama’s father also attended Harvard. His father is from a WEALTHY farming family in KENYA. The sheep our out is force today!

      • blueasthesky

        Mr. Obama writes his own speeches.

        If by “write” you mean cutting and pasting speeches from Deval Patrick. All that nonsense about hope, change, and “yes we can,” that’s all from Patrick.

      • Steven Mather

        Senator Obama mouthed Patrick Deval’s speeches word for word.

        How do you manage to type while at the same time using your head as a probe in a self-administered proctocological examination?

      • Anee

        Obama plagerized most of his speeches and can’t speak without a teleprompter… some education. He probably was a slacker in college too.

      • alee21

        FYI, affirmative action is alive and well, especially at the top schools.

        See this article from the Brookings Institute:
        http://www.brookings.edu/articles/2002/winter_affirmativeaction_schuck.aspx>http://www.brookings.edu/articles/2002/winter_affirmativeaction_schuck.aspx

        Statistics from this article for U of Michigan:
        “the odds were approximately even that black applicants with scores between 1100 and 1199 would be admitted, whereas the odds for whites did not reach that level until they had scores in the 1450-1499 range. With a score of 1500 or above, more than a third of whites were rejected while every single black gained admission.”

        “At Michigan, being black, Hispanic, or Native American gives one the equivalent of a full point of GPA; minority status can override any SAT score deficit. And a recent study of 47 public institutions found that the odds of a black student being admitted compared to a white student with the same SAT and GPA were 173 to 1 at Michigan and 177 to 1 at North -Carolina State.”

        It’s not racism, these are the facts of life.

    • oldvoter

      He wrote two books by himself, something neither McCain nor Clinton did — they both had ghostwriters. And neither McCain nor Clinton write their own speeches.

  • oldvoter

    I don’t keep datebooks from previous years. When the new year comes, I toss the old one in the trash. I would think Obama does the same thing, especially since there are NO REQUIREMENTS in IL state law to keep them and they don’t archive state legislators papers.

    Oh, and Bush’s lack of credentials never really were an issue. That’s a straw man. The problem was HIS POLICIES – his positions on health care, education, taxes, military spending and reproductive rights.

  • elsie

    I have observed a long while ago that Obama is actually Bush III…. and not McCain. In fact I wrote about this as comments in the NYT blogs. He is running a very effective and well heeled campaign, surrounded his campaign with very smart and clever people just like Bush did…. Just like Bush, he will use his constituency and then abandon them just like Bush did with the Christian right being promised the compassionate conservatism BS. and the no child left behind BS. Then there is the reaching across the aisle BS. Obama claims he did it but could not specify when interviewed by Jake Tapper. Bush claimed the same thing and once elected, did not care about compromising with the Democrats.. Leaves a bad taste for me and so what can Obama say about change.. There is no change, He is just a continuation of GWB.

    Hillary represented the real change…. and can explain change and worked for change. It did not matter to the DNC, so they won’t matter to me in November. I will not vote for another idiot in the White House..

    • Fred C. Dobbs

      Pray for stale pretzels!!!!!!!!

      • Idiots

        CLASSY. Instead of explaining your objections to Obama’s policies vis a vis your Queen, you express a thinly veiled desire for harm to befall Obama.

        Again. What was the actual policy proposal difference between the two candidates that makes a President Obama so unacceptable to you? You need to come up with something specific. Obama simply running against Hillary (and defeating her) isn’t good enough. If you wanted the country to go in a different direction, voting for McCain (which is exactly what this asinine blog is advocating) won’t change things. In fact, it will keep them the same until we go to war with Iran.

        If you honestly think that a President McCain will result in a President Hillary in 2012, you are sadly mistaken. If she doesn’t put her foot down on you clowns, she is the one who will be blamed for President McCain, and she’d be lucky to win her Senate primary in 2010. The Democratic Party and the United States are both bigger than the Clinton family. We aren’t required to have a Clinton in the White House, nor are we obligated to pave the way for them. Hillary had her chance to earn the nomination (including a huge financial and superdelegate advantage), and she lost it all on her own.

        Oh, by the way, you did see that she endorsed Obama on national television two weeks ago, didn’t you?

        • Stephanie

          Hey,

          I saw the Stockholm Syndrome speech too!

          (Stockholm syndrome is a psychological response sometimes seen in an abducted hostage, in which the hostage shows signs of loyalty to the hostage-taker, regardless of the danger (or at least risk) in which the hostage has been placed)

          • Idiots

            So, what you’re saying is that Hillary was lying when she said that it was important for the Democrats to elect Barack Obama?

            • Stephanie

              Dear Idiot,

              Where does it say lying in the above definition?

              • Stephanie

                Sorry, I meant Idiots,

                Does it take two or more of you to think of this crap?

                • Hope

                  Wow, I will continue to ask the Obamabots to explain THEIR candidate, most likely to no avail. But this “idiot’s” argument is too ridiculous to elicit a direct response.
                  Pathetic, even for a kool aid drinker.

                  • Mary

                    They think they’re still running against Clinton, don’t they?

                    They have no idea that they have to give Americans a reason to vote for Obama instead of McCain.

                    And they have no idea that every time they imply “harm for Obama” or some such paranoid bullshit, they drive another vote away from Obama.

                    Stupid trolls.

                    • Stephanie

                      Telling me to vote Obama, and I said No No No

                      Yes, you’ll unite

                      My ass, you can wipe, and I said No No No

                      He is just a slime, and he should be doing time

                      Telling me to vote Obama, and I said No No No

            • memyself&i

              I agree with Hillary Clinton, it is important to the Democrats that Obama get elected. It just isn’t important to me.

              NOBAMA

            • Rob in Chicago

              No, Hillary had to say that. Despite the poor traetment and lack of support from her own party, she is a loyal Democrat. If she hopes to receive any cooperation when she returns to the Senate, she had to say that. She could have been a lot tougher on him during the primary, but she held back. Those who have followed Senator Obama through his political progress in Chicago understand what most Chicagoans appreciate. Nobody gets where he has been in Chicago by merit. The electoral history of Illinois, Cook (“Crook”) County, and Chicago are filled with brilliant do-gooders who were buried at the polls. If you do happen to get elected (from either party), either you play ball with the “combine”, or you are a one-termer (like former Republican Senator, Peter Fitzgerald, who ran on a platform of bringing an outsider into the U.S. Attorneys Office, asn was responsible for the appointment of U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald. He was unable to get the support of Dennis Hastert and other members of the “combine”, so he declined to run for a second term, virtually handing the office to Obama).

        • power coast FL dave

          And kook-aid gets you kooks, right, Joe, kooks, and mediocre Ivy league right and left wing…

          Jeez…

        • POdVet

          Is his rigging the boards in Illinois to allow his good friend and real estate fairy Rezko to defraud the people of Illinois and steer campaign contributions to Obama enough of a reason to not vote for him? He’s a criminal…get it? He’ll be indicted by Fitzgerald, and end up in prison.

          Maybe you should do yourself a favor and buy Andy Martins book: Obama The man behind the mask. You can order it here:

          http://www.orangestatepress.com/
          Educate yourself about the real Obama before it’s too late!

          Those you see following the Obamessiah are not Democrats, though the species may try to look similar. They are in fact nothing but JACKASSES!
          P.U.M.A.

          • shano

            Sorry, but the Rezko trial ended up being an embarrasment for the Attorney General scandal.

            It came out in the trial that Karl Rove was trying to get Fitz fired, hahah.

            Boy, that ended any controversy or coverage by the msm. Wish Larry Johnson would cover that story that was buried in this Rezko trial.

            • POdVet

              Sorry to tell you stupid. That was only the first trial. The next trial for Rezko and his co-defendant (another Obama fundraiser) is scheduled to start next year. And Rezko will be singing loud and clear when he’s sentenced.

              Those you see following the Obamessiah are not Democrats, though the species may try to look similar. They are in fact nothing but JACKASSES!
              P.U.M.A.

            • Mary

              Sorry. But Obama is a PRODUCT of that corrupt Chicago political machine, where money flows through pay to play.

              Americans don’t want that in our White House.

            • Hope Floats

              Oh. “Ha ha.” Rove was trying to get a good prosecuting attorney fired. Shano loves some corruption after all.

        • IndayHill

          WOW! idiot! besides being a paid Obamaniac blogger, you are also shoving to us your crossed-eyed vision of Senator Hillary Clinton’s losing her senate bid, just because she is a victim of your thief idol!
          I feel sorry for America, if BHO’s supporters have the pea brain like yours!
          We LOVE AMERICA, that’s why we are NOT VOTING for BHO!!
          President McCain, Republican
          USA Congress, Democrat
          EQUALS CHECK AND BALANCE
          *************
          BHO =Democrat
          USA Congress = Democrat
          EQUALS DANGER FOR AMERICA!!

    • Joe Smith

      I second that.

    • Idiots

      Can you name an actual POLICY that you feel Obama will implement that is causing you to be so upset?

      • bonita

        None since he’s never implemented anything in his life or did you fail to read that too.

        • Idiots

          Answer the question, what policy that Obama has proposed during this campaign is troubling you so much? The war? Taxes? Health care? Come on, let’s hear it from you. Try to debate the actual issues instead of hurling slogans and invective.

          • IndayHill

            Idiot, have you read & watch your candidate’s speeches? COPIED !!
            He even copied his cousin, Raila Odinga’s rhetoric, http://www.rail07.com : CHANGE; HOPE
            Policies??
            WHICH ONE? THE ONE HE PROMISED TO MAKE THE EARTH FLAT?? THE ONE HE WILL BRING THE GAS PRICE EVAPORATE???
            (pun aside, there is nothing believable that comes out from his mouth!He needs more time to sweat hard, so he has something concrete & beneficial to prove to the country. He needs to be patient to reach the top!)
            I love America so much,I’ll vote McCain!!!

          • NY still loves Hillary

            The war? Taxes? Health care?

            The war: Yes. First he’s for it in his book, then he’s against it in his speeches, then he funds it on every vote, now he says he never promised to bring the troops home. Just a wee bit disturbing.

            Taxes: Yes. Tax the Middle Class investor, against a windfall profits tax on big oil, raise taxes with unfunded programs. Yep, got a problem with that one, too.

            Health Care: Yes. 15 million uninsured, but that’s ok cuz he says those 15 mil. won’t want it anyway. BTW – see Taxes on that one – who do you think funds those 15 mil?

            Any more questions?

        • shano

          He will implement the Democratic Platform. Or does electoral politics mystify you?

          the Democratic Platform.

          • Hope Floats

            Well, we know that’s bullshit, since the biggest tenet of the Democratic party is democracy which means countting votes and holding fair elections.

    • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com AmyinSC

      Exactly. They are both “Uniters” – apparently, that’s a euphemism for “Dividers”!!! Hillary really DID work across the aisles, but Obama?? Heck, he’s only had two pieces of legislation anyway, and I really don’t think worrying abt what to name a POST OFFICE is a major issue, but that’s just me…

      If OBAMA cannot really detail his accomplishments, and his SUPPORTERS cannot, why ARE they supporting him? That’s what I don’t get. I think the parallels between him and Bush are numerous – and just like Bush supporters, his don’t let facts influence their opinions!

      • Idiots

        What were Hillary’s actual legislative accomplishments? Can you name them, especially the ones that weren’t implemented by her husband?

        • power coast FL dave

          She restructured the student lenders laws, so kids can’t be charged usury rates.

          Of vital importance.

          You are really DUMB.

    • shano

      Glad you are not voting for McCain!

    • Stephanie

      Maybe he is really George W. You never actually see them in the same room at the same time. hmmmmmmm

      • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com AmyinSC

        Stephanie -

        LOL – good one! And a nice place for a laugh while glancing over these trolls’ comments…

  • http://obamafact.blogspot.com/ Mel

    More troubles for Obama!

    Obama Troubles Keep Growing

    Senator Obama had a stranglehold on two key demographics in the Primary season, but it appears one has completely abandonded Senator obama.
    Could this be the sign of the times which is hurting his core base of support? Could Senator Obama’s financial troubles be another indication in his loss of this strong support base of his?

    Maybe it is the long campaign season, or the realization people have been coming to grips with concerning Senator Obama, but a loss like this must be devistating for the Senator. We will keep you appraised as to the status of this former stronghold of the Senator’s and let you know if we spot any paid fainters at any future Senator Obama rally’s. Maybe the curse of the not enough talking about Ben Franklin’s has derailed this group of Obama supporters over the past few months, time will tell and we will keep on top of it!

    • Joe Smith

      Where did this come from?

      • http://obamafact.blogspot.com/ Mel

        did you read it?

        • Joe Smith

          Was this in an article or in a post?

  • Will Smith

    Where’s The Bounce? Obama Gains No New Ground After Clinch?
    http://www.breitbart.tv/html/113713.html

    • Mary

      New ABC poll shows Obama behind 20 points in married white suburban women. A HUGE concern for November.

      Also shows that 25-30% of Hillary supporters still not supporting him.

      25% of 18 million is enough votes to LOSE the general election.

      • AF catfish

        Call them “Experience Moms” – they don’t swoon over Obama like the men do.

  • Hillraiser429

    Great read. You are the first to point out (and with much accuracy) what irks me the most about this man. At the very core of my upbringing was the principle of hard work. My parents were always quick to point out lazy people, and to heap insults on sloth. Thanks to them (be in right or wrong!) my days are filled with work and achievement.

    I have watched and heard while commentator after commentator have talked about how the two Democratic contenders have similar plans–ignoring the fact that Clinton came up with all the solutions and implementation plans while Obama adopted them and laid claim to them.

    I have seen Obama shoot pool while his opponent spent the last hours of a long, weary campaign talking with the American people about things that mattered. I have seen him chauffeured to his health club on Sunday morning while neighbors walked to church. He complains about all the speeches, bites the head off working people who disturb his waffle-eating special self, and preaches ethics to hard-working, clean-living fellows Americans while taking the money from mobsters and crooks who live off the taxes of those Americans.

    I would not vote for Obama based on his lack of a work ethic alone. I remember that Bush/Kerry debate where Bush said approximately 11 times “being President is hard work.” Well, DUH. If you can’t take the heat, don’t even try to be a chef. What did you expect? Mr. Obama has neither the character nor the sense of public service to succeed.

    • Idiots

      Can’t take the heat, huh? This coming from the blog that views honest criticism of the Clinton campaign as a racist, sexist conspiracy.

      • Pragmatist

        Idiots:
        You’re an idiot!

        • Idiots

          Wow..what a witty retort. So, tell me, what policy proposal of Obama’s is so unacceptable that Democrats will vote for McCain? Does this mean you agree with McCain’s stances on the issues?

          • power coast FL dave

            Says the stupidest troll I have yet to read, this one note flower with the low IQ who doesn’t understand why he, and his trolls, are ineffective.

            Psssst…you’re stupid.

            • Stephanie

              They are extremely effective in helping me maintain my resolve against Obama

          • Rob in Chicago

            You just don’t get it. This is a character and integrity issue more than a policy issue. And any policy stance that he takes is undercut by staffers who whisper something to the effect of , “don’t worry, he doesn’t really mean that and he won’t do that.”

          • IndayHill

            Idiot,correction pls.You should state:
            WOW! how PATRIOTIC !! Voting for Senator John McCain is really a civic, patriotic duty.Senator McCain earned the job! Where was BHO during his early 20′s? Having confused mentality that he was snorting dope, rather than serving his country?Organizing community!
            WOW! sponsored by shady characters!WOW!! WOW!!
            Give me a break!
            Hero or Dope?

      • roseeriter

        Idiots obamabot- you are being duped and used, how many points are you getting for posting at an anti-Obama blog? Obama needs to disclose and stop flip-flopping, and you bots need to do your own research. C-ya.

    • Slim Tyranny

      Your characterization of Obama is false. Your last sentence is especially egregious, given that Obama has had the character and sense of public service to succeed at every step of his career (from his education to his community organizing to his legal career to his academic teaching career to his political career).

      I guess the one big positive is that you ARE wrong, so we’ll be okay when Obama is elected president in November.

      • Pragmatist

        Slim Tyranny:

        Obama is false, too!

      • Joe Smith

        I guess everybody has the right to dream.

        • power coast FL dave

          I only wish everyone could see themselves as they really are, as opposed to what they think they are, right?

          Dangerous, being that DUMB.

      • http://obamafact.blogspot.com/ Mel

        Obama has had the character and sense of public service to succeed at every step of his career (from his education to his community organizing to his legal career to his academic teaching career to his political career

        Education? You seen his transcripts he hides like his real birth certificate?

        Community Organizing? So what did he succeed at there?

        Legal career? Again what did he do there?

        Academic teaching? Again what did he do there as a part time lecturer?

        Political career? Yes Congo is very grateful for its recognition and that Post Office is really doing great now that it has a new name on it!

        So please verify your unverifiable statements or else stop with repeats of Obamalies, thanks!

        • Slim Tyranny

          Wow. Well, you clearly haven’t looked into the man’s career enough. From his education, community organizing, legal career, academic teaching and political career, the answers to your questions are all out there to be found.

          What’s most disappointing is that you ask these questions rather than finding the answers yourself. For example, it would take you less than 5 minutes to learn all about Obama’s impressive time spent in academia, as a professor at one of the most prestigious law schools in the country, teaching constitutional law courses, with the school administration wishing they could get him to become a full-time professor. You’d find great quotes from faculty and administrators at Chicago Law, and learn about how well-regarded he was by both his fellow professors and the students themselves.

          Disappointing you won’t make that effort.

          • mel

            Have checked, let’s do academic, only available info is high school, a B student, all other info locked up. Got to Columbia on inter-school transfer via Occidental, so much for ability there and Harvard was legacy program, prove otherwise aside from Obama’s words, excuse me, lies.

            U fo C is not one of the top law schools in the country, but good try and he is a part time lecturer there not a Prof as stated in ever article prior to 2007 when his title rigging there was done. But when your major money bags Crwon is Chair of the Trustees at U of C what can you expect otherwise?

            Where are his legal work accomplishments you stated?

            And his community service accomplishments??

            Back up your claims with proof not Bambi words would be real nice, but this is Bambi we are talking about, so not much to say about an empty suit is there?

            Oh and you forgot Michelle at Princeton, legacy also, you forgot that, another average student on coat tales!

            Read her thesis? Obviously not an english major!

            • Slim Tyranny

              hahahahahahahaha wait, what? A lot of what you said is false/misleading, but this sentence just jumped out at me: “U fo C is not one of the top law schools in the country”

              What are you talking about?

              • http://obamafact.blogspot.com/ Mel

                Just what I said

                • Slim Tyranny

                  You don’t know much about law schools, do you?

                  • Mary

                    You don’t much about Harvard legacies, do you?

                    • Slim Tyranny

                      Cmon, Mary, I’m trying to deal with one outrageous lie at a time. Right now we’re focusing on lies about Obama and University of Chicago Law.

            • Slim Tyranny

              As for the rest — getting into Columbia requires academic achievement, even as a transfer. So you fail there.

              There is no evidence that legacy contributed to Obama’s admission to Harvard Law. Neither parent attended Harvard Law, no major contributions were made. Just because your parents were in a grad program at the school doesn’t mean auto-admittance.

              And here’s some proof — Obama graduated Magna Cum Laude from HLS. That isn’t the work of an undeserving legacy student. Calling someone an “average student” when they graduated with honors from Harvard Law makes you a liar.

              As for legal accomplishments, here’s a link to do some reading. Impressive work given the number of years he was a full-time associate (prior to starting his political career):

              http://articles.latimes.com/2008/apr/06/nation/na-obamalegal6

              There are plenty of sources to see what he worked on/accomplished during his community organizing days.

              • http://obamafact.blogspot.com/ Mel

                Ummm quote his own words from his book, got recommmendations to transfer to Columbia from professors at Occidental and sustituted drugs for a work ethic at Columbia, enough said from the liars mouth, or is he just a liar in print?

                If he got into Harvard on his own without the aide of legacy or people at Sidley Austin, then open his records as to provve it otherwise you are using Bambi words as verification of facts, and we all know Bambi’s words huh, Rev Wright, NAFTA, Rezko et al.

                Nothing makes me a liar when basising things on a proven liars word and Mr tranparency refusing to expose his records, makes him a liar.

                As for his legal work, provide something other than a Chicago tribune papaer like the la times ok and as for his community organizing work, you mean the credit he took for Altgeld Gardens that he had little to do with but lies in his book taking all the credit…..hmmmmmmm patterns of Obama lies huh?

                How about adding Obama’s l;ies at a pulpit in a church in Selma claiming in a house of worship being a product of Selma, 54 yrs prior to Selma……Bambi also so smart he invented the first time machine?

                • Slim Tyranny

                  Heh, where to start?

                  He got recommendations to transfer to Columbia from professors? The horror! This proves… well, that his professors supported his placement at Columbia, and Columbia agreed. It’s funny you think professor recommendations are a mark against him.

                  And again, you lied. You can’t call someone an “average student” when they graduated Magna Cum Laude from Harvard Law School. So STOP LYING.

                  I’m sorry you don’t like the sources of the facts I provided, but facts are facts. Deal with them.

                  • http://obamafact.blogspot.com/ Mel

                    facts provided by paid sources aree no facts, and as for his transfer, you shot yourself in the foot, you said it was his grades, and I am tired of battle with someone who can’t even list something factual and bases everything on Bambi’s words, which again Rev Wright, NAFTA, Bill Ayers, Selma, Kennedy Airlift says it all…liar but especially a pathalogical liar, so enjoy the roast when Babmi is exposed, those who have ability to think already know the sort of person as MLK says just not by color of skin but by character of the person, and Bambi is a liar a pathalogical liar, great words of MLk to live by huh!

                    • Slim Tyranny

                      So you think the professor recommendations HURT him? You don’t think that the good grades PLUS high regard from his professors all worked in his favor for the transfer?

                      Heh, pretty funny. “Paid sources.” As in, actual journalistic research into his legal career.

                      Again, please stop lying. Obama was no “average student”, and you know it.

                  • Rob in Chicago

                    Jimmy Carter was a good student also, but he made a better ex-president than president.

                    • Slim Tyranny

                      Thanks, Rob, at least you can admit that Obama has academic skills.

            • Slim Tyranny

              Another lie by you: “let’s do academic, only available info is high school, a B student, all other info locked up.”

              Obama graduated Magna Cum Laude from Harvard Law School. That information tells us plenty about his academic skills and work ethic.

              • http://obamafact.blogspot.com/ Mel

                Oh it does, how so, if he is so great then how come his records are sealed up, taking a person who lies continually as gospel truth sort of makes the one believing the lies gullable doesn’t it!

                He not want to show how many classes he took of Martha Minnows to boost his grades perhaps, and since you cannot prove otherwise, time for you to simply say sorry no proof Bambi locked his records up to be able to dispell that. Hmmm transparency and locking up records, now is that not a contradiction of words, like a con man, a liar…..hmmmmmm yes it is!

                • Slim Tyranny

                  He graduated Magna Cum Laude from Harvard Law School.

                  Magna Cum Laude. That means he graudated in the top 10% of his class.

                  You fail. So then the question becomes, why do you feel the need to lie about this? Why can’t you just talk policy or his experience level? I supported Obama over Clinton, but I would gladly vote for Clinton in the General Election, and I would never lie about her many accomplishments.

                  • IndayHill

                    Slime,it makes me puke every time you mention Obama graduated Magna Cum Laude. What a SHAME!! A Magna Cum Laude graduate, who says there are 57 states in the USA! Who thinks the Canadian leader is a PRESIDENT!! Who proudly says that his KENYAN CITIZEN father’s coffin was draped with USA FLAG!!! Who reads Coca-Cola & corrected by the lady wearing the shirt printed “RECYCLED”,etc
                    Magna Cum Laude ! of WHAT!!!

                    • Slim Tyranny

                      I’m not sure why you want to puke when you hear the truth. Obama graduated Magna Cum Laude from Harvard Law School — that means he graduated with grades in the top 10% of his law school class.

                      I know it’s tough for some of you to accept, but he IS a very smart individual. Just like Hillary Clinton. We were lucky as Democrats to have two great, intelligent candidates to choose from.

    • shano

      Yea, being lazy and slothful is the way Mr. Obama was able to go from a poor family to a scholarship at Punahoe-the best private school in Hawaii. (one that Michener wrote about in his great book “Hawaii”)

      Lazy and slothful is how he was able to become the first Black man to lead the Harvard Review and teach Constitutional Law for years at the University of Chicago.

      You know it is a sin to bear false witness, right?

      You are not a Christian or a moral person to spread lies about Mr. Obama.

      btw, the person who actually took Mafia and mobster money in his early days running for office was John McCain. Google: Kemper Marley/Hensley.

      McCain=Worse than bush
      McWorse.

      • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com AmyinSC

        Poor family??? His family was NOT poor by any stretch of the imagination. His Indonesian stepfather was a succesful businessman, and his grandmother, the one he threw under the bus, was a bank vice-president. This whole meme that he came from a poor, single mother family is more of his lies – his mother was single for a couple of years, when he was QUITE young, but for the most part, he had quite the stable family life.

        Here’s a thought – why don’t you actually do some real research instead of regurgitating false talking points?

        And Idiots, you could do just a little Google search of your own for Hillary’s legislative accimplishments, and there are many. Oh, and they are on REAL issues, not abt naming buildings.

        In other words (ahem), try incorporating FACTS into your opinions!!

        • shano

          I say ‘poor’ compared to McCain or Bush or Clinton. Because it is true.

          The election is now between Mr. Obama and McCain, OK?

          McCain=WORSE than Bush.

          • wcwf50

            Bill Clinton did not grow up wealthy, lol.

            • athena

              Hillary Clinton came from a middle class, hard-working family. She started working in her early teens. She was not priveledged and went to a PUBLIC school.

              • wcwf50

                Let’s not rain on their parade with facts or anything. They can fluff BO’s credentials as much as they want, doesn’t make it so. They are only here because BO & his minions are scared of PUMA’s and independents, and their upcoming loss in the general.

            • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com AmyinSC

              Neither did Hillary. Obama’s grandmother in Hawaii was well-to-do, and said he could go to any school he WANTED, hence the most prestigous one on the island. Poor little Rich Obama!!

              C’mon – really??? This was the tact you wanted to take? That his family didn’t have as much as the Bushes?? Okay – that’s just ONE thing they do NOT have in common among the NUMEROUS ones they DO!

              Again – fact checking is a GOOD THING!!!!!

      • http://obamafact.blogspot.com/ Mel

        You know it is a sin to bear false witness, right?

        Bambi’s granny who he lived and was supported by with was VP of a Bank, dam that is being real poor huh?

        Opps, the heavens are closing up due to the Obamabot lies

  • ummm

    Obama lays on couch. News at 11.

    You’re really riding a thin line with your “lazy black man” line of attack. Of course that sure plays well with the “Obama sockmonkey, Keep the White House White campaign button” buying crowd.

    Still, when Republicans, racists, and Hillary dead-enders floods your internets, you gotta feed ‘em the read meat. Right, Larry?

    • Pragmatist

      Calm down and deal with the truth (try it, you might like it)! Obama is a genuine unadorned loser!

    • shano

      Larry Johnson is a undercover operative for the Republican McWorse than Bush.

      Good post!

      • power coast FL dave

        As long as he tells the truth, it’s unimportant his politics, difference is GOOD, you missed that part, heh, Einstein?

        You miss everything, no one respects you.

    • Joe Smith

      What are you so angry about. Actually why are you even here.

      • power coast FL dave

        Poofessor Random Trite Predictable, I see.

        Brilliant, you’re fucking brilliant.

    • DirOfTheObv

      You need to learn how to tell who the author is of a blog, Right Ummm?

      I think everyone has had their fill of racist red meat comments of Obama and his church.

      Any questions?

      • Idiots

        Racist church, huh. In the 30 second sound bites, what did Rev. Wright say that was actually “racist”? Hamfisted criticism of American misdeeds on the world stage is not “racist” or “anti-white”. And Rev. Pfleger’s idiotic rant about Hillary wasn’t “anti-white” either. Criticising a white person doesn’t make a person “anti-white”.

        • power coast FL dave

          He said all incompetent white trolls should be sold to Hitler, or something like that.

        • cowgirlblues

          Idiots: Perfect name-did your parents name you thatat birth or is it just a nickname???

        • ulahane

          “White folks greed runs a world in need”

          The Pfleger clip about Hillar in’t but the rest of the speech about America “raping” Blacks and White America owing Blacks is.

          • ulahane

            isn’t not in’t

        • Hope Floats

          Rev. Wright said blacks and whites have different brains at the National Press Club.

        • ummm

          What they were really pissed off about was that Wright reminded them that Hillary Clinton stood by and continues to stand by her man while Bill bangs anything in a skirt.

          • Hope Floats

            Do you mean when Rev. Wright was air-humping the podium at TUCC and screaming “riding her dirty!” in front of children?

        • etc.

          Then by your own definition, criticizing a black person shouldn’t be considered racist.

          So why is it that when Obama is taken to task for his faults, his supporters scream racism?

          Be careful that you don’t get caught on your own hooks, there, idiots.

    • Idiots

      LOL…it shows a lack of discipline by the bloggers here when they vascillate so much between “uppity” and “shiftless”. Of course, they have yet to understand that there is a difference between “winner” and “second place”.

      • bonita

        Have you earned enough for that bike yet?

    • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com AmyinSC

      Um, Bush is not black. Just so you know. And I never used the word, “lazy.”

      OH! Another similarity! They both have affected accents!! Bush comes from East Coast families and schools, and adopts a Texas accent, one NO ONE else in his family has. Obama comes from Hawaii, Kansas, a little bit of time in Indonesia, Hawaii again, school in NYC and Cambridge, then Illinois, and all of a sudden, has a SOUTHERN accent when he starts this campaign!!! WOW! How did THAT happen?!?! At least Hillary lived in Arkansas for a long time, and has a Southern husband, so that accounts for her dip into the Southern accent from time to time. Obama? Well, his wife is from the Southside of Chicago, so I guess THAT explains HIS Southern accent…

  • cowgirlblues

    Good read- i had completely missed the similaritys, given the fact GW has no command over the english language—But you are definately barking up the RIGHT tree..thanks for the insight. It appears Obama has given up on Ohio and Fla-most recently saying he doesn’t need them to win–as he also doesn’t need-working class white americans-or hell any white americans-lets throw those white babies out with the bathwater, his plan is to get every black and whitekid to register–that is his 50 state strategy–This is going to be fun to watch–out with the women, the working people, seniors, latinos cubans and jews—good luck buddy–he must have hatched a plan with his internet hackers to change votes on the computer ballots…Its starting to make me nervous–anyone else?

    • shano

      Start with the facts. Mr. Obama now has a double digit lead in Ohio polls against McWorse than Bush.

      from-
      A white working woman over 50, Independent;
      who has a Jewish boyfriend (whos family restored and owned Monticello for 90 years)
      both voting for Obama.

      • power coast FL dave

        That’s too bad.

        Given his attitude, and the people he hangs out with, and the things they do, he’d have no trouble sending you to the ovens.

        LOOK at him.

        Cheney opened a military concentration camp.

        The same people finance both, you just sound stinking stupid, or ignorant.

      • Hope Floats

        Ohio 45.5 41.8 Obama +3.7
        Michigan 40.7 42.3 McCain +1.6

        This is up on RCP’s homepage. What poll has Obama at double digits in Ohio?

        • doctorwang

          Public Policy Polling shows: Obama 50%, McCain 39%, with a ±3.6% margin of error.

      • Hope Floats

        The Levys sold Monticello in 1923. You’re touting the patriotic credentials of people your BF likely never even knew. That’s as silly as the Daughters of the American Revolution: Eating Scones and Talking About Cats since 1775.

  • Ethan

    I wonder whether Obama, like Bush, thinks that every stray thought that interrupts his daydreams is a message from God?

    • Joe Smith

      This guy thinks he is the second coming so all his thoughts are divine.

      • Ethan

        So Bush is merely the Second Son, whereas Obama is the Second Coming of the First Son. I track that…

    • cowgirlblues

      He has been treated like baby jesus–so he thinks he is and acts acordingly–actually a british biographer said that and couldn’t understand why so-me either–judas is more like it, I’ll need to take a 3rd job to pay my share of reparations….

  • Will Smith

    Covers just some stuff about Obama
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNfRb87dtY4

  • antipuma
    • bonita

      The polls I read says he has a triple digit deficit:-)

      To each his own.

    • ulahane

      PPP poll of Pensylvania two days before its primary: Obama 49, Clinton 46. PPP is not very reliable.

    • Pragmatist

      POLL (?)
      What’s the sample size; sampling error? Why no source or other data . . ..looks bogus to me!

  • http://paganpower.wordpress.com/ PaganPower

    Although I enjoyed the whole article my favorite part was this. Because it is just so completely true it’s almost embarrassing.

    There is ONE big difference between them, though. Yes, and it pains me to say it, but Bush is actually FAR more experienced than Obama. There, I said it. And it is TRUE.

    • shano

      Experienced at what?
      Running successful businesses into the ground?
      Getting bailed out by the Saudis?
      Trading Sammy Sousa?
      Being AWOL from the National Guard?
      Getting into the Ivy league because of Alumni connections?
      Having KKKarl Rove gerrymander districts and cage votes for you?

      Sorry, the Bush experience spells failure.

      Mr. Obamas experience spells exceptional excellence and meritocracy.
      (translation-Obama made it on his personal merits, not his connections)

      • Hope Floats

        Obama likes getting bailed out by Middle Eastern crooks, too. Syrian Tony Rezko couldn’t have bought Obama a mansion, if hre hadn’t borrowed money from Nahdmi Auchi who stole Iraqi oil while being Saddam Hussein’s right hand man. come on, Turkey Neck, dry pussy Shano. You don’t really believe Obama has good judgment, do you?

        • shano

          Oh please. Adjust your tin foil hat, man.

          The nurse will be in with your meds shortly.

          • Hope Floats

            WTF are you talking about? Obama himself admitted to taking $250,000 from Rezko. The Chicago Tribune detailed the crooked land deal. And Tony Rezko was just indicted on 14 counts of bribery and corruption. He admitted Auchi was financing him.

      • power coast FL dave

        Just like Obama, really.

        But at least Bush was brought up in a political family, it’s like being brought up around the king, and he DID work with his Dad, and some saner heavy hitters, in his Dad’s crew.

        Obama is a wash, top to bottom, the worst of the worst of the worst.

        Their stupidity, and their inexperience hurts them, period, the gangsta carp all fairy tale bluster.

        Meaning others, who aim to destroy them politically, over time, can manipulate them, can use them as a tool.

        He’s got a crew with the same level of political expertise as K**.

        Really.

        BTW, OT, I found out today sauerkraut, of all things, may somehow be effective in fighting the Avian flu.

        My father used to say when constipated, drink sour kraut juice.

        I wonder if the two are connected.

        Bananas used to be considered the perfect food, I’m wondering now if sour kraut is…

        • Slim Tyranny

          “gangsta”?

          • Hope Floats

            Whatsa matter, Slim? You don’t recognize one of your own. I thought the shoulder brush was cool.

            • Slim Tyranny

              Nothing like diminishing an accomplished African-American by breaking out the racist insults.

              • Mary

                It isn’t “racist” to recognize that Obama is a PRODUCT of the crooked Chicago political machine.

                He doesn’t get excused for that just because he’s Black, dear.

                • Slim Tyranny

                  The “Chicago political machine” has nothing to do with the term “gangsta”.

                  Nice try, though.

                  • Mary

                    It does, Slim, when you’re talking about Obama’s lack of accomplishments.

                    Obama’s only successes are BECAUSE of the Chicago pay-to-play system.

                    He hasn’t even been a governor, like George Bush was.

                    His resume is amazingly slim.

                    • Slim Tyranny

                      Wrong, Mary. The Chicago political system has nothing to do with his academic, community organizing or legal successes, and you have no evidence that his successes in the Illinois state legislature or the US Senate have anything to do with the Chicago system.

                      You’re right, though, he was never a governor (nor McCain or Clinton, for that matter). He has no executive experience. That is a valid criticism.

                    • Hope Floats

                      The Chicago Combine, the Daley Machine, his early involvement with Ayers and Rezko, show that Obama was a bright kid picked up out of Columbia by a gang of filthy influence peddlers and corrupt businessmen.

                    • Slim Tyranny

                      Heh, c’mon Hope Floats, that doesn’t make much sense at all. “Picked up out of Columbia”? Your list provides no support of that (for one example, he never met Ayers until 1995, waaaay after Columbia AND Harvard Law).

                      Some proof of actual corruption would help your cause; all you have is rumor and innuendo.

                    • Hope Floats

                      http://www.chicagoreader.com/features/stories/archive/barackobama/

                      You do not suddenly just decide to go to Columbia University. Obama would have needed either one fantastic letter of reference or 2 solid letters of people well known to Columbia U, even if he applied for an Affirmative Action, or Minority admission.

                      If you look back Obama was a B, B+ student – good but not exceptional. Further there has been no mention of extracurricular or leadership activities at Panahu(sp?) or Occidental. His basketball skills were decent but not good enough to qualify for first string his Junior and Senior year at Punahou.

                      Thomas Ayers, Bill’s Father, personally knew Obama’s mentor Frank Marshall Davis. There is a strong case that Marshall contacted Tom Ayers who provided a name that could be dropped and the key to Obama’s acceptance at Columbia. He would have done this on the condition of kind words from Bill and Bernadette, who had established a relation with Obama in NYC. It seems Obama sought them out after going to he CA radical school Occidental. Obama, as a young man, put himself in a certain direction. As soon as he came out to Chicago, he met started to work in the Daley Machine where Thomas Ayers was in the pay-to-play club and where Bill would follow in his old man’s foot steps… and Obama met Bill officially in 1987.

              • Hope Floats

                He diminishes himself by using hip hop references to appeal to the sexism of some voters. Like the shoulder brush. Like the 99 Problems and a Bitch Ain’t One rumor he did nothing to dispel for months and may or may not be true – who cares? Like the finger flip. That is “gangsta” is it not? Apparently you condone this behavior by supporting Obama and trolling under the name “Slim” Tyranny.

                • Slim Tyranny

                  Sorry, stating facts is not “trolling.”

                  And a couple music references does not make one a “gangsta.”

                  The finger flip is in your head — you don’t actually believe that, do you? Dear lord.

                  • Hope Floats

                    Not only do I believe it, but the LA Times, the Chicago Tribune, the Baltimore Sun and all the people laughing in the video believed it, as well. You are pretty short on facts.

                    • Slim Tyranny

                      Those papers don’t believe he gave her the finger. Video replays even show multiple fingers raised.

                      C’mon, even the Clinton campaign itself never believed this. You have to hate Obama a lot to believe something so bizarre and irrational would be true.

                    • Hope Floats

                      “And that’s the part of the videotape, courtesy of Fox News, where viewers need to pay some attention to the hand that Obama raised to his face, and the finger with which he scratched it.” The Chicago Tribune

                      The presidential candidate raises his right hand to seemingly scratch his cheek. He doesn’t use his whole hand though. Just one finger. Briefly. A couple of strokes. He pauses. He smiles slyly as the crowd begins to mumble and then he tries, somewhat distracted, to continue his remarks, smiling as the buzz spreads through the crowd. He’ll no doubt deny it later, but that mischievous smile seems to confirm plenty. And the crowd sure sees something. The LA Times

                  • IndayHill

                    slime, visit YouTube & type in the search box: “Barack Obama in Raleigh,NC April 17, 2008″ and several video pops out. Select & notice the finger flip immediately after mentioning Hillary’s name, adding to the insult, the trusting of knife, brushing off,all in the “gangsta” manner. He was grinning wide & his supporters joined his undignified behavior by cheering his entertaining “gangsta” number. This took place the night AFTER he lost to Senator Hillary in the ABC one on one debate! His last because he RAN AS FAST AS HE COULD from Hillary when she challenged him for a 4th one on one debate!It existed,slime.

                    • Slim Tyranny

                      That “gangsta” stuff is far-fetched. He NEVER gave Clinton the finger, keep googling and you’ll find plenty of evidence from other camera angles that show multiple fingers raised. The “brushed shoulders” is a pretty innocuous pop culture reference, I’m sorry that just makes Obama a “gangsta” in your eyes.

        • shano

          Yea, Mr. Obama is brining a lot of the Clinton camp into his campaign.

          • Hope Floats

            He can keep Patti Solis Doyle. I hope she does as good a job spending 2,000 a month on donuts, locking herself in her office to watch the first two seasons of Gray’s Anatomy, leaking gossip to the press, fighting with her coworkers, never bothering to return phone calls and still finding the time to make personal phone calls constantly at the expense of actually doing her job. I hope she is that kind of Chief of Staff for the Obama campaign, the fucking nitwit. Too bad Hillary even hired her.

            • IndayHill

              Patti Solis Doyle, according to CNN Cindy, is a long time associate of Axelrod.This was reported today. That could be the reason why she did not work hard for Hillary’s campaign.She is a traitor!
              Obama hired her to lead his VP team,in spite of knowing who she is! This is a SLAP TO HILLARY!AND TO THE HILLARY SUPPORTERS!!!
              Doyle’s prize for messing Hillary’s campaign.SHAME !!! SHAME !!!!
              THIS IS A POOR JUDGEMENT ON THE PART OF OBAMA!
              HILLARY OR MCCAIN FOR PRESIDENT!!!!

            • Hope Floats

              PSD’s first job was working for Mayor Richard Daley. She is awash in the Chicago sewer filth.

          • Mary

            Uh, no. ABC poll today shows that 25-30% of the Clinton campaign still refuse to vote for him.

            Calculate 25-30% of 18million.

            It means a LOSS in NOvember.

    • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com AmyinSC

      Thanks, Pagan Power!

      I know – it is scary, isn’t it? And we all complained abt BUSH having on-the-job-training! Yikes.

      I still cannot figure out how it is that so many of the same people who have despised Bush for his frailties now embrace someone who shares so many of them! What gives?? And their ONLY responses seem to be personal attacks rather than ADDRESSING THE ISSUES!!!!! Sheesh.

  • Hope Floats

    “He is personally even-keeled, but can be prickly when small things go wrong.”

    Like if you’re an Independent Democrat who was savaged by your own party, but then you won anyway, and they keep you around because it gives their majority a skight edge. Now say you’re the only practicing Jew in the Senate, and you take Israel’s safety seriously. If you are Joe Lieberman, then you might have seen Obama’s “prickly” temper when he tries backing you into a corner and shoving you around on the Senate floor. Joe Leberman handled himself well and was not bullied. That comes from the courage of conviction. Can you blame a Jewish voter for objecting to Obama’s antisemitic advisers, his willingness to talk to Ahmadenihad without preconditions, his aide secretly meeting with Hamas, the gospel according to Rev. Wright, etc?

    • cowgirlblues

      sounds like its right out of the Al Queda manual

  • Mr.Murder

    The slacker vote, that’s a certain Michael Moore endorsement.

  • OnlyTheTruth

    Most people would find it impossible to image the sick, twisted, bitter and hateful individuals that exist on this blog. I’ve read some extremely warped rants on ultra neocon PAC527 blogs, but they read like truth tellers compared to this gibberish.

    Rabble Rouse Reverend Amy, I suspect you are a Republican in liberal clothing trying to divide and conquer the Democratic party from within.

    Roseeriter, obamaphobe, power coast FL dave, Nicole, Pragmatist, Fred C. Dobbs, Joe Smith, elsie, AmyinSC, Mel, Hillraiser429, ummm and the rest of you mindless Hillary lemmings continually soak up this distortion and hate and cheer it on like Nazis at a KKK Kool Aid rally. Your fingers must be a blur on the keyboard as you rush to post another negative comment on Obama.

    No Quarter. Tired of spin? What an oxymoron! Spin is all that exists on this blog. And fuzzy math. Lots of fuzzy math! Popular vote? Give me a freakin’ break. There was only one out of five scenarios that yielded that result. Most states won, most pledged delegates, and most superdelegates are meaningless?

    • shano

      yea, I think Larry Johnson is an undercover operative for the Republican McWorse.

      • POdVet

        Tell your boss to look out. Fitzgerald is heading his way with an indictment soon. But maybe you can visit your Obamessiah in prison.

        Those you see following the Obamessiah are not Democrats, though the species may try to look similar. They are in fact nothing but JACKASSES!
        P.U.M.A.

        • Hope Floats

          Blago’s next. I hope they all sing like canaries. Maybe this will be wrapped up before August.

    • cowgirlblues

      In the general election–it means squat–No Cacuses-no whin for Obama

    • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com AmyinSC

      Wowie zowie – quite a rant you have going on there! I can assure you, I have never been a Republican a day in my life, and I believe in DEMOCRATIC values. What the DNC, and Obama, are demonstrating are anything but. When a political party actively works to disenfranchise voters, they have completely obliterated their moral compass.

      • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com AmyinSC

        This was to the incorrectly named “Only the Truth”!

  • kevin

    it rich?
    Are we a pair?
    Me here at last on the ground,
    You in mid-air.
    Send in the trolls.

    Isn’t it bliss?
    Don’t you approve?
    One who keeps tearing around,
    One who can’t move.
    Where are the trolls?
    Send in the trolls.

    Just when I’d stopped opening doors,
    Finally knowing the one that I wanted was yours,
    Making my entrance again with my usual flair,
    Sure of my lines,
    No one is there.

    Don’t you love farce?
    My fault I fear.
    I thought that you’d want what I want.
    Sorry, my dear.
    But where are the trolls?
    Quick, send in the trolls.
    Don’t bother, they’re here.

    Isn’t it rich?
    Isn’t it queer,
    Losing my timing this late
    In my career?
    And where are the trolls?
    There ought to be trolls.
    Well, maybe next year

    • cowgirlblues

      Good job!!!you’d think they’d spend their time where they could be useful to their candidate-you ain’t gaining any ground here

      • kevin

        It’s like cockroaches.
        don’t be mean to the messiah, while they can drop every degrading term possible
        disagree = racist
        argue = b**ch
        reason = c***

        I swear its like a revised version of the chevy chase richard pryor word association scetch.

        • power coast FL dave

          I have a map fo the constellations, speaking of cockroaches, and the Ursa major is drawn as a giant cockroach.

          I guess I see Obama as a big cockroach, like the alien in the “Earl suit” from “Men in Black.”

          Which is pretty accurate, come to think of it, Obama as Earl the giant cockroach, from “Men in Black.”

          Same personality.

          • kevin

            lmfao

            thanks dave

  • Left of center

    Obama is a blank slate. There’s nothing there. If he doesn’t want his VP pick showing him up by having way more experience than him, he’ll have to pick some random person off the street.

  • NITEOWL

    Bush/ Rove. Obama/ Axelrod. Just we need another arrogant,lazy, needs on the job training President. Would Obama beat Bush on vacation day taken?

    • shano

      Could you all be any more ignorant about the amn who will be the next POTUS?

      Mr. Obama is full of energy and intelligent vigor and will be able to accomplish much more than any of the other candidates.

      Mr. Gore is right about Mr. Obama.

      AL GORE SUPPORTS BARACK OBAMA.

      News flash for ignorant LJ blog readers and McCain supporters.

      I wonder if Hillary has talked to Larry Johnson?

      • Hope Floats

        Al Gore was a loser. Carter, Kerry, both also losers. The Three Horsemen of the DNC Apocalypse.

      • NITEOWL

        Obama is likeable enough I guess. Qualified? Not so much.

      • Hope Floats

        Obama 08: Competent, Experienced, Black – Pick One

        • Slim Tyranny

          What’s up with the focus on Obama’s race, hope?

          • Hope Floats

            We heard a speech on it in March. It has been insinuated into every political discussion about him. For example, SC.

            Jesse Jackson on Hillary’s tears:

            …there were tears that melted the Granite State. And those are tears that Mrs. Clinton cried on that day, clearly moved voters. She somehow connected with those voters.

            But those tears also have to be analyzed. They have to be looked at very, very carefully in light of Katrina, in light of other things that Mrs. Clinton did not cry for, particularly as we head to South Carolina where 45% of African-Americans who participate in the Democratic contest, and they see real hope in Barack Obama.

            We hear no other reason why black voters in particular would find “hope” in Barack Obama. Jesse Jackson felt confident they would.

            Then Bill Clinton commented on Obama’s victory in SC. One out of three voters was black, and they voted for Obama by 80%. Obama took one quarter of white voters. Hillary and Edwards split the rest. Here’s Jake Tapper for Huff Po.

            Said Bill Clinton today in Columbia, SC: “Jesse Jackson won South Carolina in ’84 and ’88. Jackson ran a good campaign. And Obama ran a good campaign here.”

            This was in response to a question about Obama saying it “took two people to beat him.” Jackson had not been mentioned.

            Boy, I can’t understand why anyone would think the Clintons are running a race-baiting campaign to paint Obama as “the black candidate.”

            Entire states that do not support Obama were labeled as racist in the primaries. So now you tell me. Why does the Obama campaign focus so much on race?

          • Mary

            It’s HISTORIC, Slim. All the media says so.

            Didn’t you know?

  • WestPalm4Hillary

    Let’s see…. the guy graduated from Harvard, was President of Law Review, and never bothered to publish an article.

    Later, despite his education at a top law school, Obama never managed to appear as record of counsel for a single case, and instead sat about writing wills and “being on retainer” for political buddies.

    Lazy. Pure and simple.

    • Slim Tyranny

      Wow, a pretty gross mischaracterization of Obama.

      Given the level of responsibility and amount of work required to run the Harvard Law Review, it’s pretty funny to use that to describe someone as “lazy.” And you flat-out lied about his work at his law firm.

      • WestPalm4Hillary

        When a lawsuit is initiated, or when a new attorney enters an existing case, an attorney files an ‘appearance,- a formal legal document which notifies the court and, more particularly the clerk of the court, that counsel has ‘appeared- in the case.

        Obama has made a career of defrauding the American public about his legal ‘career.- Obama, a Harvard Law School graduate, never filed a single appearance in a single case all of the years he was ‘practicing- law.

        Obama was an ‘Arm Candy Attorney.- Or, to put in a Palm Beachy sort of way, he was a ‘Walker.- In other words, he was almost always paid to show up in court, and do nothing more than be there.

        The Chicago Sun-Times reports during the years Obama was affiliated with a law firm, he never formally was counsel of record in any lawsuit. I have a friend, a retired airline pilot, who has tried more cases than Barack Obama. One.

        Obama describes himself as a ‘law professor,- but he was actually a Lecturer, who is a contract employee paid to teach courses on a semester-by-semester basis. He was never on a ‘tenure track- to become a permanent part of the law school staff. I was an adjunct professor of law, akin to a lecturer but usually with fewer courses.

        Obama’s former partner says Obama ‘wrote lots of substantial memos, but he didn’t try any cases.- Obama would usually show up in court, and then let other lawyers do the talking. He was the legal equivalent of what people in the social pages call ‘arm candy,- someone basically hired to appear in public and make the holder ‘look good.- In Palm Beach we used to call these people -Walkers,- because they were asked to squire ladies of a certain age and walk around with the lady in tow. You get the idea.

        Obama was an arm candy attorney. A make believe civil rights attorney.

        Legal memos are assigned by lawyers to junior attorneys. Indeed, Obama’s vacuous legal career almost perfectly tracks his vacuous career as a national candidate. Barry O is brilliant at getting up and speaking in a situation he controls (compare to writing a memo). But when he has to enter the rough and tumble of political debate (compare to a courtroom hearing or trial) Obama is absent and ineffective. He can’t cut the rigors of a courtroom. Couldn’t then. Can’t now.

        I first walked in to the United States Courthouse in Chicago in 1969. I saw lawyers who would ‘practice- for days to appear in front of a federal judge for a couple of minutes, and argue with passion and vehemenceall for a two day extension of time, or for permission (leave) to ‘file instanter- (instantly). Eventually many graduated to presenting cases before a jury. Obama never graduated. Why?

        Democratic Presidential candidate John Edwards was a real attorney. He tried real cases and he made piles of money for his clients, and for himself. He didn’t only achieve the American ‘dream,- he became American ‘reality.- Sadly, Obama is still in the dream stage. He is a wonderful dream merchant. But reality is another matter altogether.

        Small law firms such as Obama’s, with only a few attorneys, usually send young counsel into the courtroom to fight just as quickly as possible. Obama was never up to the task.

        http://www.pr-inside.com/barack-obama-was-an-arm-candy-r352835.htm

        Deal with it, Slim.

        • Slim Tyranny

          Full of lies. To start off with, the characterization of Obama’s legal career is misleading at best. Being named the counsel of record is not the end-all be-all of legal practice. I am an attorney at a large law firm, and the big-time cases are tried by partners, while associates do plenty of substantive work behind the scenes.

          Obama was at the law firm full-time for only about six years (when he started his political career), and that’s not enough time to make partner. Read this for a quick taste of what he did, your “he only wrote wills” nonsense is a complete lie.

          As for Chicago Law, he WAS a professor. Chicago Law itself said so, and that should be good enough for you.

          Stop lying.

          • WestPalm4Hillary

            Sorry buddy, I’m also a lawyer at a state wide firm and within 6 years, if you’re not trying cases, you’re not cut out for litigation.

            The “partners” take the cases with the most value, but small stuff is farmed out to younger associates to develop them. As the article correctly points out, in smaller firms such as the one Obama “worked” at, the time from “start” to “trial” is significantly reduced.

            • Slim Tyranny

              See the information in the LA Times article below. Obama was cut out for litigation.

              • Mary

                But he never litigated anything.

                Ergo, he’s lazy.

                He was only interested in politics, as proven by his own words in his own book.

                • Slim Tyranny

                  hahahahahaha

                  Your “ergo” is absurd.

                  Look, he’s not lazy. Lazy people don’t graduate Magna Cum Laude from Harvard Law. Lazy people don’t survive at top law firms. Lazy people don’t teach at top law schools. etc. etc. etc.

                  You clearly don’t like him, which is fine. But at least dislike him for legitimate reasons, not pure fabrications.

                  • Mary

                    A non-denial denial.

                    Show me something he actually litigated, Slim.

                    You CAN’T.

                    • Slim Tyranny

                      Actually, I can. Sorry, Mary, I thought you might have read the info I posted a few comments down. Here it is again:

                      Obama arrived in Chicago in 1993 with a degree from Harvard Law School and was hired as a junior lawyer at the firm then known as Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Gallard. He helped represent clients in civil and voting rights matters and wrongful firings, argued a case before a federal appellate court, and took the lead in writing a suit to expand voter registration.

                      But the firm also handled routine legal matters and real estate. Obama spent about 70% of his time on voting rights, civil rights and employment, generally as a junior associate. The rest of his time was spent on matters related to real estate transactions, filing incorporation papers and defending clients against minor lawsuits.

                      In one instance, Obama defended a nonprofit corporation that owns low-income housing projects against a lawsuit in which a man alleged that he slipped and fell because of poor maintenance. Obama got the suit dismissed.

                      In another case, Obama appeared on behalf of a nonprofit corporation that provided healthcare for poor people. A woman who claimed income of less than $8,000 a year had sued Obama’s client to obtain a $336 payment for baby-sitting services; Obama’s client paid up, and the case was settled.

                      In 1994, Obama appeared in Cook County court on behalf of Woodlawn Preservation & Investment Corp., defending it against a suit by the city, which alleged that the company failed to provide heat for low-income tenants on the South Side during the winter.

                      By the way, even with the fact that he has litigated matters, your ergo is still completely absurd. But that’s a separate issue from you being wrong on the facts.

        • Slim Tyranny

          Hell, your article is filled with blatant lies. From the LA Times:

          Obama arrived in Chicago in 1993 with a degree from Harvard Law School and was hired as a junior lawyer at the firm then known as Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Gallard. He helped represent clients in civil and voting rights matters and wrongful firings, argued a case before a federal appellate court, and took the lead in writing a suit to expand voter registration.

          But the firm also handled routine legal matters and real estate. Obama spent about 70% of his time on voting rights, civil rights and employment, generally as a junior associate. The rest of his time was spent on matters related to real estate transactions, filing incorporation papers and defending clients against minor lawsuits.

          In one instance, Obama defended a nonprofit corporation that owns low-income housing projects against a lawsuit in which a man alleged that he slipped and fell because of poor maintenance. Obama got the suit dismissed.

          In another case, Obama appeared on behalf of a nonprofit corporation that provided healthcare for poor people. A woman who claimed income of less than $8,000 a year had sued Obama’s client to obtain a $336 payment for baby-sitting services; Obama’s client paid up, and the case was settled.

          In 1994, Obama appeared in Cook County court on behalf of Woodlawn Preservation & Investment Corp., defending it against a suit by the city, which alleged that the company failed to provide heat for low-income tenants on the South Side during the winter.

        • Mary

          Obama himself admits in his book that while working as a “community activist” in Chicago’s Southside, he knew he’d never have enough POWER without a law degree. His own words, from his own book.

          He went to law school so he could begin building his POWER BASE in Chicago politics.

        • Dead Ender1Does Not Bite AnyoneAnymore

          Beautiful West Palm.

          It’s sink or swim in small firms.

          You get bloodied a bit, get some experience, and develop a thick skin.

          Some can’t quite cut the mustard.

          I’m sure John Edwards or Gerry Spence would laugh like hell at the truth you just posted.

          Thanks.

      • ummm

        I guess Obama graduated Magna Cum Laude at Harvard because of Affirmative Action.

        He is black, after all.

        • WestPalm4Hillary

          Lazy comment from a supporter of a lazy candidate.

          When you have nothing else, fall back on race.

          Can you guys at least TRY to be original?

          The sad part is, so much of this veiled and blatant “you’re a racist” clap trap is perpetuated by petulant honkeys, and rarely African Americans themselves.

          I’m willing to bet, “ummm” (another highly appropriate SN for an Obama supporter) good money you’re whiter than a piece of paper.

          • Slim Tyranny

            Address the substance of the point — Obama graduated Magna Cum Laude from HLS — that is not the work of an “average student” or an undeserving legacy.

            • Hope Floats

              I agree that from all accounts Obama worked very hard at HLS and outperformed like many Affirmative Action beneficiaries. Hillary was the valedictorian of her graduating class from Wellesley and was featured in a Life Magazine article. I have heard many Obama supporters say that she would be nowhere without her husband.

              However, there is also political work that is part of the job for President. That Bush had none of this experience is exactly why we should not repeat the mistake of reelecting another learn-as-you-go President. Obama has throughout the primaries, despite winning the caucuses and running a good campaign, time and again revealed he has too little experience on the national stage to qualify him for POTUS.

              • Slim Tyranny

                You have NO proof that he was an “Affirmative Action beneficiary.” Based on the available evidence, he performed at Harvard Law at a level above 90% of his classmates.

                Look, Hillary Clinton is also exceptionally intelligent. I have never said otherwise. I loved both our Democratic candidates.

                Stop denigrating Obama’s accomplishments with ugly insinuations. He is brilliant, and so is Clinton.

                • Hope Floats

                  Affirmative action simply says that his race was a consideration when his application was reviewed by the Harvard admissions board. Where did I say he did anything less than excel once he was admitted as a student? I mentioned Clinton, because women were also beneficiaries of affirmative action. But Obama can speak for himself on this, and his quote is in accordance with my comment.

                  “I have no way of knowing whether I was a beneficiary of affirmative action either in my admission to Harvard or my initial election to the Review. … If I was, then I certainly am not ashamed of the fact, for I would argue that affirmative action is important precisely because those who benefit typically rise to the challenge when given an opportunity.” [E.A.]

          • ummm

            When the words “Affirmative Action” and “Lazy” repeatedly infect a post about Magna Cum Laude Harvad Grad / Presidential Nominee Barack Obama or when the blogger titles his piece “SLACK Like me” you have to be willfully blind or stupid not to see the intent.

            But then again, I also remember posts here comparing Obama to OJ or calling his supporters Wild Savages.

            And no. I’m hispanic. You know the people you Republicans and Hillary dead-enders are counting on to hate blacks enough to vote for McCain.

            • Hope Floats

              No, I actually said I would vote for OJ before I’d vote for Obama. I also have a tee shirt with Ted Kennedy and OJ on it that reads, Vodka and OJ.

            • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com AmyinSC

              Ironically, the only ones who have used the phrase, “Affirmative Action” are the Obama supporters. As yet another attempt, I suppose, to paint anyone who does not support Obama as being a racist, like targeting the title of the post. It’s called SATIRE, get it?? Oh, no – obviously you did not.

              It is JUST as racist to vote for someone because of their skin color as it is to NOT vote for them because of their skin color. I am not ever going to vote for Obama because he is a charlatan who consistenetly stole his material from those around him, especially Hillary, who has exceedingly LIMITED experience, is arrogant as hell, is sexist as hell, is a flat out LIAR abt his accomplishments, his family’s history, and his own positions, and because he used race-baiting to denigrate the best president this country has had in DECADES, and to denigrate the more qualified candidate. I won’t vote for him – EVER – because I think he is unethical, and undemocratic. To expect to TAKE votes cast for someone else as his own after taking himself out of the running is at the LEAST hubris, and at most, immoral – it is voter fraud, and vote stealing. Those votes were not cast for him, not were they his to take. But he concluded that this was “FAIR” practice by the RBC. Again, like Bush, he lives in upside-down world in which stealing from someone else is considered FAIR. Wow. Never will he get my vote. And the continued ad hominem by you and others are doing NOTHING but ensuring many more of us will never vote for this poor excuse for a presidential candidate.

              • Slim Tyranny

                “Ironically, the only ones who have used the phrase, “Affirmative Action” are the Obama supporters.”

                Um, wrong. Just hit Control+F on this page, and you’ll find at least one explicit reference to Obama’s admittance to Harvard Law being based on affirmative action. The internet will provide thousands of other examples all over the place, a few of which (I’m sure) are from this blog.

                • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com AmyinSC

                  Well, gee, Slim – the first person to use it was Ummmm, an Obama supporter. It’s all well and good to use this handy little device, but you MIGHT want to look at the time stamp. Just a suggestion.

                  And seriously – the level of antagonism is not winning you or Obama any points whatsoever. Are you REALLY trying to ensure that those 25 – 30% of Hillary supporters cast their votes elsewhere? Because you are, every time you attack the PERSON and not address the FACTS. It is not a winning strategy, is what I’m saying to you, as kindly as I can.

                  • Slim Tyranny

                    Amy, I never said the FIRST person to use the phrase was an Obama supporter, I said that at least one person said Obama got into HLS based on affirmative action. Time stamps have nothing to do with the substantive point that an Obama detractor used the phrase to describe Obama’s admittance.

                    My comment was in response to your claim that “only” Obama supporters used the phrase.

                    And you know, I’m not being antagonistic AT ALL. I said you were wrong on the facts. I haven’t name-called or used foul language. On this site I HAVE been called “dumb,” an “idiot,” a “FAT TROLL”, an “asshole” etc.

                    I attacked your facts. Mary thinks Obama got into HLS based on affirmative action, and she’s definitely not an Obama supporter.

                    • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com AmyinSC

                      Oh, my mistake, Slim. I should have said, MOST of the ones using this phrase are Obama supporters. In other words, Obama supporters are intentionally mis-reading, or misinterpreting, the point just to get on aa soapbox and argue ad nauseum on minutiae. It is tiresome, to say the least, as is your constant contention that EVERYONE else is wrong on the facts except you, even when you are presented with a whole bunch of cold, hard ones. So, clearly, you are here to be antagonistic. What joy you get out of this is beyond me. Some of us want to have real, substantive discussions, not to have to deal with the constant defensive, whiney, attacking, nit-picking, holier-than-thou attitudes being demonstrated here over and over and over. Oh, did I mention REPETITIOUS?!?! Just saying.

                    • Slim Tyranny

                      Heh, Amy, you were far more antagonistic in that one reply than I have been ever in this comment thread.

                      I laid out facts, not sure what “cold, hard” facts you are referring to, but needless to say, most of what’s being said about Obama here is false.

                      If you really do want a real, substantive discussion, then you won’t dismiss my fair, rational points as “whiney” and “attacking.”

                      Oh, and sometimes repetition is necessary, especially in the face of repeated lies. For every time someone says Obama didn’t do well in law school, someone else needs to point out the truth. I can’t help it that the lies keep getting repeated.

            • rjj

              Where did you get the term “dead enders,” sweetie?

    • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com AmyinSC

      Bang on. As I understand it, he was the ONLY editor to NEVER publish an article!

      Shano, WHERE is the proof of Obama’s “intelligent vigor?” Because he can read a teleprompter?!?! He cannot speak extemporaneously to save his life, unless you count, “uh, uh, uh” as speech!!! Clinton rang RINGS around him in interviews and debates!! If he couldn’t say, “DITTO” to what Clinton said, he would get pissy or stumble around for excruciating minute after minute of nonsensical blather. WHAT HAS HE DONE, WHAT that leads you to that description??? EVERYTHING he has has been HANDED to him by kingmakers. DO SOME FREAKIN’ RESEARCH already!

      BTW, since there is still a modicum of freedom in this country, NO ONE is making you come to this site. And Kevin, I swear – last time I’m feeding the trolls on this post!!

      • WestPalm4Hillary

        As I also understand it, he instituted “CHANGES” at the Harvard Law Review that didn’t go over very well, and which were reversed the year after he left!

        • Mary

          Yes. The year after he left, they changed the rules back to REQUIRING that the Editor of the Law Review publish articles.

        • Rob in Chicago

          And the editions of the Harvard Law Review that were published during his time as President are the least cited editions of that publication.

          • Slim Tyranny

            Heh, would love to see a source for that extraordinary claim.

  • http://www.obama-wire.com Sam

    Know Obama
    No Obama

    http://www.obama-wire.com

    Check It Out!

  • http://www.obama-wire.com Sam
  • LDW

    “Hmmm. See, here’s the thing. I have said for MONTHS that Obama is the MIRROR opposite of Bush”

    you meant to say, Obama mirrors Bush, I think, or that he is Bush’s twin.

    OK, so mirror oppostite could be used in a double negative sort of way, but it’s clumsy.

  • kevin

    FUN OBAMA FACTS:

    When he farts, it smells like roses

    When he takes a dump, nothing comes out, it just magically appears in the toilet, call it the immaculate defecation.

    he is the only male to experience multiple orgasms

    when he smiles, god smiles

    when he cries, god kicks a puppy

    HE liberated auschwitz, HE gave his uncle credit because his uncle was sad

    A lot of kids wear superman pajamas, superman wears Obama pajamas (from the chuck norris facts page)

    he can calm the hulk down with his melodious voice and a scratch behind the ears.

    • POdVet

      Sorry to disagree with you, but one of your points is blatantly false.

      “he is the only male to experience multiple orgasms”
      Tantric teachings and a good diet can help you too achieve this! :D

      Those you see following the Obamessiah are not Democrats, though the species may try to look similar. They are in fact nothing but JACKASSES!
      P.U.M.A.

  • http://reflections-in-tyme.blogspot.com/ timepassages

    I think the trolls should check his voting recond, he voted “presnet” 42% of the time. And also against his own party, then also voted no to confirm soem judges, thats really “unity” she his voting record here…

    http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/o000167/

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNWPHElA7oo

    It would be best to really vote, don’t you think?

    • memyself&i

      It would be good to vote because that’s what people elected him for. But if you are running for president, strategically, you want to have plausible denial which “present” votes gave him….or so he thought, LOL.

  • OnlyTheTruth

    Selective journalism, distorted truth and hate-filled comments abound on No Quarter. Citing Obama-Wire is like citing Swift Boat Veterans For Truth. You’re not going to get truth, fair and balanced journalism there, nor on No Quarter.

    Cowgirlblues, “Cacuses (actually spelled caucuses) mean squat” sounds a lot like Hillary’s “Michigan and Florida don’t count”! And

    It’s impossible to have a discussion on issues with power coast FL dave or kevin when the educated argument comeback is “Jackasses”, “cockroaches” or “trolls”.

    Timepassages, if you could spell “presnet” you would know what voting present means in Illinois state politics.

    Cowgirlblues, Who would want to “gain any ground” in your pathetic, never-ending Hillary pity party.

    You No Quarterites are as cultist, as guilty of drinking the Kool Aid on these disenfranchised, conspiracy theories as the Obama supporters you condemn. You deserve each other.

    • educatedwhitewoman

      You are deluded. All of the articles posted here critical of OB are backed up FACTS and by links to articles supporting those FACTS, as is much of the commentary. Conversly, most of the posts praising Obama come from propaganda spoon fed to his supporters, obamatrons who won’t take the time to do their own independent research and verify Obama’s claims.

      • OnlyTheTruth

        EducatedWhiteWoman – no THAT’S the very definition of oxymoron!

        The only delusion is your idea that comments posted here are backed up with facts. Facts are information posted on sites such as FactCheck, Politico, MSNBC, CNN or any major metropolitan newspaper.

        What you get HERE, as with any blog, are opinions. And THESE opinions are the biggest, most hateful “propaganda” I’ve ever read… ANYWHERE.

        • Mary

          Then go away.

          I’m sure the Obama website is more to your liking.

          Go over there.

          • OnlyTheTruth

            Mary,

            You’d like that, wouldn’t you? Then there would be one less voice of reason, truth or reality to interfere with the hallucinogenic NoBama fantasy world that exists here at No Quarter.

            Reading these comments is like going to a skinhead rally, I need a shower to wash off the lying, hate-filled propaganda.

            • Mary

              Sweeetie, I only had to read ONE of your posts to know you had nothing to say except whining.

              So….I won’t read anymore.

              I couldn’t care less about you, dear.

              • OnlyTheTruth

                Mary,

                That reply was like putting your hands over your ears and making loud noises in order to drown out the sounds around you.

                You might be able to ignore the message for a short period of time, but sooner or later you’ll have to listen.

                It’s not easy being a misguided minority, but I have confidence that an intelligent person can surrender their opinionatedly views and get on the Democratic bandwagon.

                What’s your alternative… McSame? Add four more years to the eight that WILL and IS going down in history as the worst presidency in modern history.

                • Slim Tyranny

                  You might have to give up on Mary. I presented her with a load of facts about Obama’s academic abilities, and it just went right past her. Doesn’t want to hear it, and it’s tough to overcome willful adherence to falsehoods.

                  • Kickass Old Lady

                    Slim, my friend, I am sure you are very intelligent and a very competent and sucessful, or will be a sucessful lawyer. I am not sure why you are practicing your chops here. What is your goal? To convince people here to vote for Obama? You may be taking the wrong approach. Or do you just like listening to yourself? Look, I graduated with mensa scores. I don’t find that particularly impressive. I am not particularly impressed that anyone graduates from harvard law magna cum laude, either. There are many ways to measure the worth of a man or woman. Again, I don’t know what your goal here is, but I fear that you are lowering the general respect that ordinary people have for lawyers.

    • http://nobho.blogspot.com/ Johnny at Work

      We would drink Kool Aid, but O’boy and the Obots have cornered the market….

      If your not pro O’boy, it’s harder to get Kool Aid than a Wii Fit.

    • http://nobho.blogspot.com/ Johnny at Work

      Yes we do deserve each other, united in the one goal… O’boy will lose in November.

  • http://nobho.blogspot.com/ Johnny at Work

    If an inexperienced and incompetent CEO runs a company into the ground, whos cares but the shareholders.

    If an inexperienced President runs it into the ground… We all ARE the shareholders, and we better care.

    We just had 8 years of inexperience. Care for seconds anyone?

    • Mary

      No thanks.:)

      But even THAT 8 years was from a guy who had at least been a governor twice.

      The Democratic candidate hasn’t even done that.

      So we may well see WORSE from him.

  • http://www.obama-wire.com Sam

    ****************************
    http://WWW.OBAMA-WIRE.COM
    ****************************

    Know Obama
    No Obama

  • TeakwoodKite

    Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy;

    I saw that article and commented on your last thread “sound familiar”? You make it even more crisp how these to yo-yo’s are a product of the same bi-polar body politic. There is not enough Lithium on the planet for a critical thinking human not to notice.

    Great read.

    • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com AmyinSC

      Thanks! I appreciate that. It really is remarkable the similarities between the two, beginning with the whole Uniter thing (holy cow, how these people have COMPLETELY rewritten the English language!). I just cannot get over the lack of real scrutiny by so many PEOPLE after the past 7 yrs; that all these people are willing to blindly put their faith into yet another superficial candidate who has WAY more talk than action, and even the talk changes with the way the wind blows, is just mind-boggling…

      Like you said, not enough lithium in the world!

  • http://nobho.blogspot.com/ Johnny at Work

    My point exactly. Wake up and smell the coffee.

    In the LA debates, Obama said he wants to be an Inspiring type CEO Manager, and just tell people to do stuff rather than getting involved in the nuts and bolts.

    That is exactly like George W Bush. We do not need another Dubya manager for President.

    JUST SAY NOBAMA

    Obama is not for change. He wants to be a limited involvement manager like Dubya. He pretends to inspire Like JFK, but he lacks the wisdom and knowledge about policy details.

    Been there done that. And that’s called change?

  • http://nobho.blogspot.com/ Johnny at Work

    Obama said, “You don’t want me as the chief operating officer. But that’s not my job. I’m not a systems guy. I’m not somebody who could make sure that, you know, everything is running on time.”

    Obama the debate sparker. He won’t even participate in Town Hall Debates with McCain, he justs wants to spark it. Obama the Laz-E-Boy.

    George W promised to be a CEO “vision” President. Been there, done that, it did not work.

    No to Four More Years, No to Been There Done That, no to Laz-E-Boy.

    http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2008/01/hillary_attacks_obamas_coo_com.html

  • http://nobho.blogspot.com/ Johnny at Work

    Obama will lose in November no doubt….

    Although high turnout in urban areas could win the popular vote for O’boy, he still easily loses the elector total.

    Winning the popular vote, but losing the electoral vote… that would be sweet justice….

    But, realistically, O’boy is destined to lose both.

    O’boy, the reincarnation of McGovern and Carter.

  • AF catfish

    Arrogance, irritability, “big picture” vision (translation – no grasp of details), quick to blame and slow to credit, illegitimate candidate, and endless articles about his athleticism as proof of his great discipline. Where have we heard this before?

    He is indeed George Bush’s mirror opposite. The movie we’re watching is

    SHRUB II: THE BIRACIAL DEMOCRAT.

  • AF catfish

    Who is Barky texting while laid back on the couch?

  • chad3337

    Sorry, it’s not just about candidates’ policy statements. It’s about having the fire in the belly to work HARD for the American people. It’s about good judgment. And it’s about fundamental character issues. The voters are trying to balance these three factors and make a decision about who, on balance, can best lead this country.

    Have you ever seen a Presidential candidate able to enact even a fraction of their proposals after the election? No, world events and crises intervene, the fact that this is a democracy and lots of voices get to influence legislation intervenes, and the need to pay for pie in the sky proposals limits what candidates can actually pass into law. So I don’t care whether HRC and Obama have similar legislative proposals. I care about the nominees’ judgment and leadership skills, and who can get the job done.

    Voting present doesn’t make you a leader. Sitting in a racist, separatist church for 20 years while the preachers demagoguge doesn’t make you a leader. Voting a straight party line time and again doesn’t make you a leader. Inability to compromise or see the others’ view doesn’t make you a leader. Labeling your Grandmother who has sacrificed greatly for you as a racist and throwing her under the bus doesn’t make you a leader (or a very good grandson). Dirty deals with corrupt businessmen don’t make you a leader. Sorry, but there’s no “there, there” with Obama. While I wish I could vote for HRC for President, I’ll take McCain’s tenacity, grit, and proven ability to reach across the aisle any day over Nobama’s empty suit.

    • Mary

      Well said, Chad!

  • http://deleted AnninCa

    And today…..tada…..he’s losing ground in one of his many more states he won. *heh*

    http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2008/06/mn_poll_obama_1.html

    • Northwest rain

      I love this sort of good news.

      He peaked early and now he’s going down down down the drain. Next stop — da jail! When will Rezko start singing????

      Oh give him a home where the Rezkos roam — and a couple of ex-Governors of Illinois — and they’ll sing all day. Where the skies are not cloudy all day. . .

      Sung to home home on the range.

      McCain (or Cinton) 08
      Clinton 2012

      PUMA

  • Pingback: Obama’s Plane Is Stocked With MAXIMum Sexist Magazines : NO QUARTER

  • Annagain

    Empty suit. Proven.

    That’s it.

    Didn’t work out so good with Bush, either.

    Would you ever see Hillary acting like this — for two seconds. She is not perfect a perfect being — then again, who is. But she’s got a pretty good idea about the serious problems we’ve got in this country and will never put her feet up til she’s done everything in her power to get the job done.

    Who did those boobs at the DNC push the SDs to nominate again?

  • Kickass Old Lady

    Slim, my friend, I am sure you are very intelligent and a very competent and sucessful, or will be a sucessful lawyer. I am not sure why you are practicing your chops here. What is your goal? To convince people here to vote for Obama? You may be taking the wrong approach. Or do you just like listening to yourself? Look, I graduated with mensa scores. I don’t find that particularly impressive. I am not particularly impressed that anyone graduates from harvard law magna cum laude, either. There are many ways to measure the worth of a man or woman. Again, I don’t know what your goal here is, but I fear that you are lowering the general respect that ordinary people have for lawyers.

  • GB George W

    Negroes are notoriously lazy.

    • Northwest rain

      No that is a racist lie — and you know it.

      An INDIVIDUAL can be lazy like Obama obviously is — because he is too lazy to do the work required. His name was put on bills that he DID NOT WRITE — in the IL Senate — to pad his resume. That takes a very lazy person to take other’s work.

      Obama was too lazy to put out HIS own position papers on issues — he just stole other candidates.

      Hillary Clinton is a hard worker — she understands the issues and the problems and has come up with SOLUTIONS. Obama has not come up with an ORIGINAL solution on any of the issues.

      Obama can read a teleprompter reasonably well and he’s learned to mimic Preacher’s rhythm. But he doesn’t write his own speeches and when not chained to a teleprompter — he is clueless just like bushie

      Do not come here and spout of racist crap. That sort of behavior is so 17th Century.

      It is also racist to AVOID criticizing an Individual because of his or her race. As in — oh we can’t say anything negative about Mr. X — because he is ORANGE.

      Now go away you stupid sexist troll — back to the Orange Stain.

    • Perry Logan
  • http://ascrivenerslament.blogspot.com/ Delilah

    John Kerry advised Obama to make sure his rapid-response team didn’t let a single attack go unanswered?

    What a crock!

    I was one of the original Kerry rapid-responders in 2003-04 (in the Stanton Park DC HQ), and we were not allowed to address the swiftboaters head on.

    We had to use our own personal blogs and discussion forums we joined as private citizens… on our own time, by the way… in order to fight back against the military service smears.

    One more thing about that article: If you replace “Obama” with “Bush,” several of those descriptive paragraphs look scarily familiar.

  • DJ

    One thing I will say for Bush, he doe not associate with people who are linked to terrorism. Obama sure seems to have alot of ties connected to the middle east.

  • Pingback: Punish Everyone, an Open Thread « The Confluence

  • sophie

    I used to read this blog for hard-biting reporting and opinion on current intelligence policy and operations…alas, it’s turned into the “Grudge Report”.

    Sadly, this is my last visit. I was hoping that after the election, youall would get back to what you do best. Guess not.

  • Pingback: butalbital

  • http://south-carolina-mountains.greher.345.pl/map.html HeathUF