Comments on: WPost’s Ignatius Forgives the CIA Again and Again

By: Regina

Regina — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:58:57 +0000

Correct me if I am wrong….but isn’t Shabbaz Malcolm X’s wife’s name? Malik Shabbaz may be Malcolm X’s grandson…….does anyone know? That would explain the actions of Eric Holder and the unjust justice department.

By: Regina

Regina — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 00:30:30 +0000

Obama is shoring up his base at the expense of the safety of the American People. Can’t the investigation be done internally? Otherwise our enemies will see us as weak and use it against us?

By: Doc99

Doc99 — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 21:32:34 +0000

Dr. Evil released a new tape.
mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/198628.php

What war on terror? Miranda Rights for this guy?

By: tzada

tzada — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:09:29 +0000

per good article at the link

CIA Investigation insanity

Flashback to 9/11 and imagine the reaction if George Bush stood with the firemen amid the smoldering ruins and said the United States government will prosecute CIA interrogators for blowing cigar smoke in the face of the terrorist masterminds. The Bush administration would have been overthrown by the Honduran military. Seven years later and all common sense seems to be going up in smoke. Long gone are the images of Green Berets on horseback. Ranches, action heroes, and slap shots are out. Social media massages are in. The quitters can eat a hockey puck. The White House is white, not the American flag

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/08/cia_investigation_insanity.html

By: tzada

tzada — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:03:28 +0000

Lisa I am with you. Here is a very good article about that creature we call the speaker of the house.

I hope everyone takes the time to read the below article.

Are Pelosi’s lies impeachable?

Nancy Pelosi is a liar.

And not just the typical, sniveling, inside-the-Beltway-talking-head prevaricator, either.

Nancy Pelosi is a wide-eyed, stare-you-in-the-face, What-planet-are-you-from? liar.

Proof is provided in Thursday’s Wall Street Journal. Rather than just regurgitating Democrat talking points – -Why is it I always have the feeling that Rahm Emmanuel is barking questions into Chris Matthews IFB? — about recently released documents on the CIA’s use of enhanced interrogation techniques (EITs), the WSJ actually read the reports.

Their conclusion?

Whoever advised people to be skeptical of what they read in the papers must have had in mind this week’s coverage of the documents about CIA interrogations. Now that we’ve had a chance to read the reports, it’s clear the real story isn’t the few cases of abuse played up by the media. The news is that the program was thoughtfully developed, carefully circumscribed, briefed to Congress, and yielded information crucial to disrupting al Qaeda.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/08/are_pelosis_lies_impeachable.html

Is this what we can expect? Well I hope they go after squeeker in the house first. I asked pm to consider doing an article on it.

FOUR HINDU GIRLS ABDUCTED/CONVERTED TO ISLAM/RAPED AND MURDERED

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/08/four-hindu-girls-abductedconverted-to-islamraped-and-murdered.html

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/08/soros-shadow-potus-soros-behind-cia-witch-hunt.html

By: Lisa

Lisa — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:54:18 +0000

Mel- It bother me that you are so persistent to try to sway some of us in your direction. I would rather that the CIA uses techniques and get answers, rather than to have our people beheaded & tortured.

By: mark connette

mark connette — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:41:26 +0000

do you want to prosecute the trainers who waterboard our own service members? so they are prepared for being captured by islamic terrorists. by your definition they broke the “law’ too. your argument is shallow and weak

By: mark connette

mark connette — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:38:53 +0000

never been proven? thats a laugh ksm starting singing like a bird after some water was splashed in his face. next?

By: Jim S

Jim S — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:27:55 +0000

Since you brought up an ugly head, let’s take a look at what SanFran Nan had to say about her being briefed on Enhanced Interrogation Techniques. According to the documents just released although not mentioned by name, only title, she was there when, by law, they informed the congress about the EIT program. She said not complain about what was done or about what the CIA was preparing to do to detainees. SHE LIED! How about impeachment?

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/08/are_pelosis_lies_impeachable.html

By: Jim S

Jim S — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:16:58 +0000

Add Bill Richardson to the list, he just got a get out of jail card from Øbama and Holder.

By: Doc99

Doc99 — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:56:50 +0000

I again question the propriety of Holder’s DOJ investigation of CIA while members of his law firm, Covington & Burling’s represent those who would want to kill us. I’m hoping Larry is all over this one. I’m thinking this defines versimilitude.

By: Ferd Berfle

Ferd Berfle — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:39:30 +0000

Ignatius is wrong and so are you. I believe in the rule of law. When we twist it to meet some alleged need (which has never been proven) or outright break it, we open the door for all sorts of abuses. You’re always hammering away at the liberals and their misdeeds but turn a blind eye to those you feel a political connection with. I don’t like That One or his disdain for the law and didn’t like Bush/Cheney and theirs. This isn’t about Republicans or Democrats, liberals or conservatives. This is about the rule of law. The politicizing of the issue was started after 9/11 and has continued since. Both sides have used it and to object only to the use of it by people with whom you disagree is nothing short of hypocrisy. Change a couple of words here and there and you would be an obamabot–same old selective indignation rearing its ugly head.

By: mark connette

mark connette — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:28:24 +0000

Ignatius is right. And the dems bashing the people charged with protecting the united states will pay dearly for politicizing the issue

By: Ferd Berfle

Ferd Berfle — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:26:32 +0000

the Law is The Law

Indeed–it is the only constant in our society. People come and go but the law is always there.

By: Animal Control

Animal Control — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:05:09 +0000

why did they drop the charges against the New Black Panthers

I agree with you–no favoritisms, the Law is The Law and should be enforced/applied without fear or favor.