Comments on: Obama’s Campaign Chair Voted “No”, McCain Voted “No”, But Guess Who Gets the Pass?

By: jmk

jmk — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:10:59 +0000

I think NQ has been under sabotage. Strange things like comments being rejected or interupted and crashing midstream have been happening recently. I’m sure they are doing all they can about this.

Any good Attorneys around? With all that’s been going on online, I’m sure we have a good case for a CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT against the obama campaign.

Just need a good attorney. Let’s see one coming forward. We all have plenty of stored files on death threats, sabotage, crashed sites, ID theft, etc.

This is, at least, grounds for a MAJOR CLASS ACTION FCC COMPLAINT against the obama campaign. There is more than sufficient evidence that:

1. These complaints are legitimate, with plenty of documented evidence.

2. That obama campaign has both intigated these actions as well as condoned them. See Daily Kos and recent vicious death threat on Hillary, which is right on obama official campaign site.

QUICK SOMEONE TAKE A SCREEN SHOT OF THAT BEFORE IT IS SCRUBBED!

3. Violations of both the 1st and 4th ammendment are involved here – on a massive scale.

4. It is known and verified that aside from his volunteer bank of democracy haters, obama campaign hired people in paid positions to infringe on 1st and 4 ammendment rights – as their PAID POSITION.

WOULD ALL SANE LEGAL EXPERTS PLEASE CONTACT LARRY OR SUSAN with THE LEGAL PERSPECTIVE on filing a Class Action Lawsuit.

Whether or not this lawsuit makes it to court and succeeds, IT WILL BE COVERED by at least some major press and MAKE CLEAR to voters – who do not have computers or don’t go online – THEY WILL SEE through this lawsuit – what obama really is, does and represents.

By: Zeke

Zeke — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 09:51:17 +0000

The more of this crap that gets disclosed not only about BO but nearly all the rascals in Washington, the more I like the idea of voting against whoever the damned incumbent is just on general principle.
I live in the northwest where a baseball fan is a True masochist and everyone here has been saying to fire just about everybody with the Mariners.
Maybe we should just fire everyone in Washington.

By: Mary

Mary — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 05:58:11 +0000

Well, I DO hope the citizens of Missouri—especially the ones flooded in east St. Louis—now understand that Claire McCaskill helped reduce funds for fixing their levees.

I hope they hold her accountable in her next election.

By: Mary

Mary — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 05:55:05 +0000

How’s he gonna PAY for that Reinvestment Bank?

Borrow from China?

By: Mary

Mary — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 05:53:39 +0000

Obama voted for Cheney’s Energy Bill , which was FULL of subsidies and tax breaks for the big oil companies.

I consider that PORK and corporate paybacks.

John McCain voted AGAINST that Energy Bill.

Obama is a deceitful liar.

By: memyself&i

memyself&i — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 04:46:44 +0000

MODERATOR: I am not sure why my previous posts for this thread did not go through

By: Lou

Lou — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 04:37:43 +0000

And…
When we enter the voting booth remember how much we love this country by voting McCain.
If not Hillary Then McCain 2008.

Look at this video before you vote.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6ZT5aLeUmI&feature=related

By: Lou

Lou — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 04:28:24 +0000

This is a small glimpse into what an Obama presidency will be like..
Super Delegates: your country is in peril at the hands of Obama osama..
Listen up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXbCOEvQJRY&feature=related

By: Lou

Lou — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 04:25:46 +0000

chicago politics..what a joke..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBNxLgqIicc&feature=related

By: memyself&i

memyself&i — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 04:22:19 +0000

Obama is lying about McCain’s vote. McCain voted against the bill because it 1) contained billions of wasteful pork-barrel spending 2) it did not provide independent review of the design, cost and environmental consequences of all corps projects costing more than $40 million

McCain supports funding for levees and flood control, but he wants to do it in the most cost-effective way possible, thereby maximizing our safety and security.

Obama mis-characterized McCain’s vote.

Some experts think the reason for the extreme flooding in recent days is that we had TOO MANY levees. We need to wait for a more complete analysis.

Obama’s solution is to create a national investment bank to take care of our levees is a bad idea. A Countrywide-type solution to our levees? No thank you.

He will spend $60 billion. I wonder how much of that will end up funding pork barrel projects? I don’t know how much McCain would ask Congress to spend on levees and flood control, but I know under McCain, none of the money will be spent on earmarks.

By: Sam

Sam — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 04:20:35 +0000

Interesting article

http://www.obama-wire.com

By: DoroB

DoroB — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 04:08:37 +0000

She was against it when she was First Lady. The Kool-Aid is affecting your ability to be honest.
Unlike Obama, her words on NAFTA was not “just rhetoric.”

By: Jillie

Jillie — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 04:08:34 +0000

and you missed the other point of the post.

that mccain and feingold worked together to come out with a bill that was more directly related to the levees and the corps of engineers.

By: missE

missE — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 04:06:02 +0000

As a citizen of New Orleans, my heart aches for everyone affected by these floods.

As a citizen of New Orleans, it makes my blood boil to hear Obama trying to score political points while people’s lives and property are literally under water as he spouts his shit.

As a citizen of New Orleans, I find the following not only reasonable but urgent for many parts of this country. I’m sure many in Illinois and Iowa would agree.

Hopes for reform now lie with the Senate, where John McCain and Russell Feingold are still seeking, against heavy odds, to require two major and essential changes in the way the corps does business. One would require truly independent review of the design, cost and environmental consequences of all corps projects costing more than $40 million.

The second reform would require that projects be ranked by an interagency committee of experts in order of importance based on priorities like flood control and environmental restoration.

Thanks LisaB!

By: memyself&i

memyself&i — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 03:56:48 +0000

If any federal legislature wants federal funding for a project for his or her state, ask for that funding in a separate bill. This way, it can be properly scrutinized by Congress, the media, and the public.

Earmarks are legislatures’ sneaky way of getting federal funding for a pet project that would otherwise never get approval. Most of these projects do not even benefit the legislature’s general constituents, but only a small group, company, or individual. Many should be funded, if at all, by the state or local government. Earmarks only benefit the legislature. It helps him or her get donations and re-elected.

Citizens Against Government Waste documents pork barrel spending:

http://www.cagw.org/site/PageServer?pagename=reports_pigbook2008