Dick Cheney’s Chutzpah Moment [Update]
By Larry Johnson on September 5, 2009 at 6:45 PM in Current Affairs
Last week Dick Cheney was on Fox News bemoaning the declining morale at the CIA in the wake of Eric Holder’s appointment of a Special Prosecutor to investigate whether or not charges should be brought against people who were involved in the torture of suspected terrorists. Isn’t that special. Too bad Dick was not so concerned when Valerie Plame’s identity as a CIA intelligence officer was being spread around town by the likes of Scooter Libby and Karl Rove (and yes, I know Rich Armitage was shooting off his mouth as well).
Here’s a blast from the past when the Democrats used to like me:
So now we have the Democrats trying to use the CIA as a political football. I have no problem with a legitimate investigation of wrong doing during the Bush Administration. But such an investigation must ensure that wrong doing all the way up the chain of command is punished. Going after low-level intelligence officers alone would be an injustice. Those who designed the policies, implemented them and monitored the results should be the first ones in the dock.
I know the lie that torture worked continues to be spread by Cheney, his enablers, and some in the media. The issue is not whether torture (aka “enhanced interrogation”) worked. It is morally indefensible. Efficacy does not trump morality. Dick Cheney and his ilk are an embarrassment to the principles Americans died to defend during World War II and dishonors the memory of those who put the Nazis on trial for war crimes and crimes against humanity. The justifications–e.g., “I was just following orders” or “I was protecting the homeland against terrorists”–were rejected and the guilty punished.
True intelligence professionals understand and live by the moral codes upheld in the Nuremberg trials. They should have nothing to fear from Holder’s investigation as long as it is an honest investigation. The key is to ensure that the standards are uniform and consistent. Playing politics with intelligence officers is wrong. It is wrong when Republicans do it and it is wrong when Democrats do it. I’m reserving judgment for now on Holder’s actions.
Here’s what we know for sure–Barack Obama has staffed his National Security Council and the Leadership at the CIA with some of the very officers who were involved in the decisions being investigated by the Special Prosecutor. John Brennan, for example, is the senior adviser in the NSC on terrorism and homeland security matters. Johnny boy was a lowly GS-14 in 2001 (that’s the equivalent of a Lt. Col. in the Army) and, as a result of his butt snorkeling with George Tenet and his “stellar” briefings for Dick Cheney, he was rapidly promoted to SIS 2–the equivalent of a Major General. Remember, Brennan is the guy who screwed up the report on terrorist statistics back in 2004. (And Brennan was not an undercover operative.) So count me a sceptic when it comes to Holder’s Special Prosecutor actually holding intelligence officials accountable for genuine misdeeds.
I am not beholden to Democrats or Republicans. I am going to call it as I see it. That’s my guarantee at No Quarter.
UPDATE–Here’s a Point-Counter Point with me in this month’s issue of Atlanta Life Magazine.






















