Comments on: Czars, Czars Everywhere, not a Czar to Vet

By: Katmoon

Katmoon — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:58:39 +0000

problem, not problems..sorry

By: Katmoon

Katmoon — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:54:29 +0000

No, I think sometimes there is maybe some assumption so a full read isn’t done and also believe there is some problems with people recruiting from this site. A couple days ago we had the issue of a previous member doing this.

By: donjo

donjo — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:50:23 +0000

Please don’t waste your arrogance on me. I’m sure you can find someone more deserving of your illustrious attention. Your comments remind me of that old quote, “A legend in his own mind.”

By: Ferd Berfle

Ferd Berfle — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:43:23 +0000

The spamminator has nabbed my comment. Can an administrator please return it to me?

By: Ferd Berfle

Ferd Berfle — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:40:38 +0000

I can’t even tell you who Barack Obama is, what his vision might be. And now, we have these shadowy advisors running around?

That is the most serious concern I have about That One. He is so secretive about his past. No real friends apparently (or at least none that will talk). He says he has done all sorts of things but no objective evidence is available to confirm or deny such statements. HE claims to be a scholar but has no records to prove it. And who can go through life and not make enough of an impression to at least merit some sort of memory from someone/anyone? There is something way out of whack here.

By: pm317

pm317 — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:33:54 +0000

We have written about those issues too. As the name of our blog suggests, we spare no one, we give no quarter.

By: susan h

susan h — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:22:55 +0000

The Obamas got by with NO EXPERIENCE, NO QUALIFICATIONS except their cries of “pick me anyway”, so they want to pick other unqualified people and try to get away with it as often as possible. It worked for them, so to speak. America was CONNED CONNED CONNED by the O’s, a bigger con than Bernie Madoff perpetrated on his victims.

By: pm317

pm317 — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:44:09 +0000

Thank you, Katmoon! You would think people would avail of some of the research that we writers put into writing these posts. You would think they would at least read the post before commenting.

By: pm317

pm317 — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:39:02 +0000

Your broad brush is my critical thinking. Don’t waste your time on my posts.

By: crk62

crk62 — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:06:27 +0000

are you an NQer who purports to have been a Democrat pre-Obama? if so, how exactly do you square that with giving Glenn Beck the time of day?

By: Katmoon

Katmoon — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:02:22 +0000

It’s a good spreadsheet pm, gives the titles and location and further information on whom they report to etc. Thanks for referring to it.

By: donjo

donjo — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:43:59 +0000

Typical. Call anyone who disagrees with you stupid or a kool aid drinker. What does that make you? A right-wing fascist prick? IF you bother to read something that disagrees with you, then you would find that some of these posts ARE confirmed by the Senate. Don’t blame me for starting them, I don’t like them, either. But, I’m just tired of people falling for the MSM and leftish use of the word “Czar” to diminish positions that may or may not be legitimate. I’m sure some of them are and some probably not. But I don’t work in D.C. so that’s not for me to decide.

I don’t like to see these “jobs” if their purpose is cronyism, nepotism, or just a way to give a buddy some work. However, what I see going on here is an attempt to paint everything with the same broad brush.

By: pm317

pm317 — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:34:34 +0000

Read the article I linked. It gives you more accurate info than Maddow would ever tell you. Whether we call them Czar or not (that is a shallow thing to talk about anyway), they are outside the confines of what constitution allows them. It is ok to have a few on pressing matters but this guy has turned it on its head to install a shadow government and back channel to K-street lobbyists.

But of course, if you want to listen to Maddow and feel comforted in your Koolaid stupor, be my guest. But don’t bring your idiocy here.

By: Katmoon

Katmoon — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:59:35 +0000

I’ve heard maddow and wouldn’t bother to ever let her face grace my television again. And for reference, the job description is what I believe Senator Byrd is objecting to-he is discussing the substance of the positions; which all should fall under Senate confirmation- not circumvention.

By: donjo

donjo — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:38:03 +0000

Works both ways. Apparently you haven’t heard Maddow, who bothered to look up the exact job title, rather than resort to the typical smears.
NONE of the above jobs is actually listed as a “CZAR,” which is a name bestowed by a lazy press – and people looking for something to bitch about.