RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Two More Obstacles To Intelligence Reform

The appointment of former Central Intelligence Agency director Michael Hayden to the Public Interest Declassification Board (PIDB) and former senator Warren Rudman to the CIA’s External Advisory Board (EAB) will ensure less openness in the intelligence community and more obduracy in the CIA.

The late senator Daniel P. Moynihan created the PIDB in the 1990s to reduce the “torment of secrecy,” which denied important information on national security to the American people. The EAB was designed to deal with the complexities of managing the CIA and to improve the access of intelligence information to the Congress and the American people. Hayden and Rudman have a cold war preoccupation with secrecy and have never been known for improving access. Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-KY, is responsible for the Hayden appointment; CIA director Leon Panetta appointed Rudman.

As Steven Aftergood, the editor of Secrecy News noted, Hayden is “not well known as a classification critic or a proponent of declassification.” As director of the National Security Agency (NSA), Hayden instituted the warrantless eavesdropping program that violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 and the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution that prohibits unlawful seizures and searches.

In defending warrantless eavesdropping at the National Press Club in January 2006, he argued that the Fourth Amendment did not stipulate the importance of “probable cause,” which of course it does. Hayden also conceded that he relied on advice for the program from White House lawyers and never considered consulting the legal staff of NSA.

Soon after arriving at the CIA as director, Hayden began an unprecedented investigationof the Office of the Inspector General, which had been critical of the CIA’s renditions and interrogations programs. Hayden even targeted the statutory inspector general of the CIA, John Helgerson, who had recommended the creation of “accountability boards” for CIA officers, including former director George Tenet, involved in 9/11 intelligence failures.

The failure of the chairmen of the congressional oversight committees to come to Helgerson’s defense made it extremely difficult for the IG to do his job and he announced his retirement seven months ago. The White House and the CIA have still not named a replacement for Helgerson, which is particularly damaging in view of the high-level investigations of CIA detentions and interrogations programs as well as the numerous secret prisons or “black sites” established after 9/11, which would benefit from an aggressive Office of the Inspector General.

In addition to naming Rudman to the EAB, Panetta has made the former senator the director’s special advisor on the Senate Select Intelligence Committee’s (SSCI) special inquiry of past practices in detentions and interrogations.

Panetta has his own review group within the CIA on these practices, but has prominently placed current members of the National Clandestine Service (NCS) in the group. The Rudman appointment and the use of NCS officers does not augur will for genuine openness with the Senate inquiry. The NCS has been a major player in the culture of cover-up at the CIA, including the destruction of the 92 torture tapes that has been investigated by the FBI for nearly two years.

By placing Rudman as an intermediary between the SSCI and the CIA’s review group, Panetta has ensured himself that the most damaging information on detentions and interrogations will never see the light of day. Rudman was the most active member of the SSCI in trying to block CIA officials from testifying against the nomination of Robert Gates as CIA director in 1991.

Rudman actually branded those few individuals willing to come forward as “McCarthyites” in an effort to marginalize their testimony and to make sure additional witnesses would not testify or submit written affidavits against Bob Gates. There is ample evidence, moreover, of Rudman’s strong, even bellicose, partisan politicking over the years.

One of the greatest unknown scandals within the intelligence community is the over-classification of government documents in order to keep important information out of the hands of the American people. It costs billions of dollars for government and industry to classify documents, with several million individuals in the government and private industry having the right to classify information.

Government vaults hold over 1.5 billion pages of classified information that are more than twenty-five years old and, thus, unavailable to scholars and researchers, let along the general public. Documents are typically classified to hide embarrassing political information, not secrets. Greater respect for openness might have prevented the policies that led to the torture and abuse at Abu Ghraib prison, the CIA’s network of secret prisons, and the CIA’s detentions and interrogations programs.

Melvin A. Goodman, a senior fellow at the Center for International Policy and adjunct professor of government at Johns Hopkins University, is The Public Record’s National Security and Intelligence columnist. He spent 42 years with the CIA, the National War College, and the U.S. Army. His latest book is Failure of Intelligence: The Decline and Fall of the CIA.

This op-ed was first published Sep. 10th at The Public Record and is reprinted with the express permission of Mel Goodman.

  • Animal Control

    Mr Goodman,
    But for people such as you, we would have no inklinkg of what actually happens in our government.
    Thanks and I liked your “letters to the editor” response in the Washington Post a week or so ago.

    • Ferd Berfle

      I agree, AC. An increasingly secretive government is an anathema to an open society. Whether the potentially-damaging information is being abusively classified by the right or by the left is immaterial and not the point. That it is being done at all is the real problem. I wish the public would come to this fundamental understanding. An abusive process one side uses is available for the other side to use, as well.

  • Ladydawnelle

    “intelligence reform” oxymoron? hehe!

    I mean you forgot to mention FIRST we need intelligent PEOPLE to deliver SAID reform! right? j/k

    ok

  • Sassy

    I read an editorial this morning regarding the “leaks”, which are deemed criminal disclosures.
    Panetta has asked for an investigation by the Justice Department.
    Will Holder pursue CIA agents or political operatives?

    • Ladydawnelle

      if they are worms for bambi they will surely never see the first warrant

      oh wait, there’s that dang BUS and all the people “supposedly” still under it? Although they do keep sneaking out from UNDER (like Wright).

      I”m waiting for the day one of the ONES most SPECIAL ONES gives him the old HEAVE HO! Thennnnnnn the house of Saud Cards will begin to fall!

      right?

  • Ferd Berfle

    Government vaults hold over 1.5 billion pages of classified information that are more than twenty-five years old and, thus, unavailable to scholars and researchers, let along the general public. Documents are typically classified to hide embarrassing political information, not secrets. Greater respect for openness might have prevented the policies that led to the torture and abuse at Abu Ghraib prison, the CIA’s network of secret prisons, and the CIA’s detentions and interrogations programs.

    This all ties into an end-run around the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), especially with non-intelligence agency sorts of classified materials. They seem to be able to maintain an iron-clad shroud of secrecy around everything but personally-identifiable information (PII), which is often compromised due to sloppy, careless, or malicious handling.

    Documents are typically classified to hide embarrassing political information, not secrets.

    That is certainly true and is an abuse of the classification system.

  • yttik

    “Intelligence reform” sounds like what happened to people who cast a vote last November.

    • Ferd Berfle

      Nah, they were just ACORNed.

  • Tricia Spiegel

    It seems as if this government is going in the opposite direction of what was promised during the campaign. I used to take campaign promises with a grain of salt, but now I realize they are not even worth that much–in fact it is dangerous to even imagine that politicians may mean what they say.

    From now on, best to go on the resume of experience and what action has been taken in the past. Of course, in Obama’s case there was no record.

  • Lily

    When you consider that the person we elected as our 44th President, Barack H Obama, has refused to release a long, long list of personal information that anyone of us would be required to provide for any number of public or private sector positions, then it would be inconsistent for “his” administration to be open in the slightest. Mr Obama simply is not in a position to advocate for such policies. To paraphrase Mr Goodman….greater respect for openness might have prevented the election of the sham and charade that is Barack Obama.

  • TeakWoodKite

    Mr. Goodman, it seems like some horse trading is going on.

  • TeakWoodKite

    Mr Goodman, was Warren Rudman’s influence on the Hart Rudman report of a similar obstructive nature?

  • http://www.bloglifetime.com/ Bloglifetime

    The White House and the CIA have still not named a replacement for Helgerson, which is particularly damaging in view of the high-level investigations of CIA detentions and interrogations programs as well as the numerous secret prisons or “black sites” established after 9/11, which would benefit from an aggressive Office of the Inspector General.