RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Quote of the Day

“Obama doesn’t lie. He merely eludes, gliding from one dubious assertion to another. This has been the story throughout his whole health-care crusade. Its original premise was that our current financial crisis was rooted in neglect of three things — energy, education and health care. That transparent attempt to exploit Emanuel’s Law — a crisis is a terrible thing to waste — failed for health care because no one is stupid enough to believe that the 2008 financial collapse was caused by a lack of universal health care.

“So on to the next gambit: selling health-care reform as a cure for the deficit. When that was exploded by the Congressional Budget Office’s demonstration of staggering Obamacare deficits, Obama tried a new tack: selling his plan as revenue-neutral insurance reform — until the revenue neutrality is exposed as phony future cuts and chimerical waste and fraud.

“Obama doesn’t lie. He implies, he misdirects, he misleads — so fluidly and incessantly that he risks transmuting eloquence into mere slickness. …”

Who wrote those three brilliant paragraphs? Can you guess who? Are you like me, able to appreciate perfectly described analyses even if they’re written by someone with whom you’ve historically disagreed? Well, just who might that be?

Dr. Charles Krauthammer. A psychiatrist who’s also the top conservative columnist in the United States. In his column titled “Does He Lie?” published in Friday’s Washington Post.

Back in my liberal, Democratic-party days — before the jarring and stunningly cruel attacks on Hillary Clinton and on me as well as many people I love — I used to disagree with almost everything that Dr. Krauthammer wrote. But those cruel attacks stripped away any illusions I had about liberals and diehard Democrats.

And here’s another great quote from Dr. Krauthammer (h/t to NQ reader, Anthony):

His quote about Maureen Dowd had me in stitches.

I remembered something about human beings that I’d somehow forgotten: That professed viewpoints and party ties in no way equate with the morality and decency of that human being in his/her treatment of others.

There was a time when I knew that. When I’d use the following as an example: “Just because someone demonstrably loves and treats dogs wonderfully does NOT mean that that person is a decent human being.”

And then I’d add the best example I could bring to nail my point: “After all, Hitler cherished and treated his dogs as much, if not more so, than almost any other dog owner on the planet.”

But, during my Daily Kos days, I’d somehow let slip that knowledge about human behavior. I overlooked imperfections in my fellow Daily Kossacks and in the politicians and pundits that they admired, and I joined the Kossacks in condemning every conservative and Republican for the slightest reason.

It’s better where I am these days. Even as I’m finding myself drawn more and more to conservative and Republican thinkers and doers, I’m not so besotted from imbibing their brand of KoolAid that I can’t also see their faults.

My reborn multiplicity vantage permits me to admire, and discuss, the pluck of Sarah Palin and to be deeply offended by the sexist attacks that she endured while, at the same time, not regarding her as an appropriate candidate for the presidency or as a serious conservative thinker. And be able to say so to friends and in my writings.

My reborn multiplicity vantage permits me to watch some of Glenn Beck’s shows, gleaning some invaluable information, while also cringing at his over-the-top, nutty mannerisms and often illogical reasoning. For example, when I first heard Beck use his newly-created phrase “the fringe media” to replace “the mainstream media,” I scratched my head but, in a day or so, I realized that “the fringe media” was the perfect description because those in this media group, while they dominate media, do not live in, fit in or desire to belong to any group of mainstream Americans. Beck nailed it, I realized, because that media not only exists on the fringe of mainstream American society, that media views itself as above the rest of Americans.

My reborn multiplicity vantage permits me to read Dr. Krauthammer’s writing with the utmost admiration for his rare talent in logically, precisely describing the attitudes and behaviors of other human beings, while also disagreeing on occasion with his conclusions. (I’ll be damned if I think of an example right now, but take my word that I do disagree with him often.)

And, on this blog, my reborn multiplicity vantage permits me to admire — tremendously — Larry Johnson’s occasional praise for President Obama, as Larry did in a post earlier this week, because Larry is being HONEST with not only himself but also with all of you. Larry has that essential courage required to avoid the curse of every true believer: He not only thinks for himself but he also never has any apprehensions about what you and I may think of his opinions. Larry is completely aware that praising Obama will bring him heaps of criticism from most of you, but he has the guts to write what he thinks anyway. Sadly, Larry’s is a rare quality. And it’s one that I often fail to express because most of the time I’m too much of a people-pleaser and I don’t want the criticisms that come with daring to step outside the line that most of our readers expect to see in all of our writings.

Now, it’s up to me to take a big step and, next time, to post a “quote of the day” from a diehard liberal or Democrat. If I can find one! Ha!

Until then, I will leave you with this quote from Ralph Waldo Emerson:

A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.

P.S. TGIF to all of you! Let your hair down this weekend. Get outdoors if you can and enjoy the last sunny, warm days that we’ll have for many months.

  • Tricia Spiegel

    Great post. I love it, and relate! This life-long Democrat is changing to something else, and I apprecaited the “multiplicity” concept as I try to redefine where I am politically.

    • Tricia Spiegel

      P. S. Good comments about Larry also. An honest man!

      • http://sarainitalyblog.blogspot.com/ American Girl in Italy

        That makes two of us! :O)

        Great post.

        (although, depending on the dem quote, i might be one to jump on it too! i’m still very mad at them! hehe)

  • jwrjr

    Compared to Ozero, GWB is a reliable source of information and W. J. Clinton is the Patron Saint of Honesty (and good race-relations).

  • lemonv

    Found this on Wikipedia under Big Lie:

    Big Lie is a propaganda technique in which the lie is so complex that the public will either dismiss it as impossible or choose not to believe it out of willful ignorance. It was defined by Adolf Hitler in his 1925 autobiography Mein Kampf as a lie so “colossal” that no one would believe that someone “could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously”.
    Used in Hitler’s psychological profile

    The phrase was also used in a report prepared during the war by the United States Office of Strategic Services in describing Hitler’s psychological profile:[2]

    His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.[3]
    Wonder who has this psychological profile and has been mastering the technique of Big Lie(which is, by the way, the most potent tool of Nazi Germany then)? Your guess is as good as mine.

    • maryann

      I read an article Obama wrote from his Occidental days in a student newspaper and it afforded an insight into his overboard familiarity with Hitler’s tactics even then.

  • LisaB

    Great piece!

  • mountainaires

    Amen! Great blog post, BH. I relate so well to your thoughts on your own political evolution. Krauthammer has earned my respect; he’s a very smart man, after all, and whether or not I agree with him all the time is not the point. Do I learn things from him? Oh, indeed I do. And, his expertise in psychological profiles is invaluable. I suspect Krauthammer himself has considered historical political figures in his musings about that.

    “Obama doesn’t lie. He implies, he misdirects, he misleads — so fluidly and incessantly that he risks transmuting eloquence into mere slickness. …”

    • Lana

      I agree 100%, mountainaires, and I also appreciate BH’s story of rebirth. Because of the horrible treatment of Hillary during the primaries, I changed from a diehard Dem to someone who was willing to glance in the Republicans’ direction to someone who could see some sense in the “other party’s” truths. I have come to love Krauthammer’s precise prose and deliberate analyses. It’s been a journey, and I feel wiser. I only wish it hadn’t been Hillary who paid the price for my wisdom.

  • Linda Anselmi

    Spot on Bronwyn’s Harbor!!

    Multiplicity – should be everyones motto these days and stop looking for the easy button. It only works as a fun commercial. In real life you have to make tough choices and live with the consequences.

    And as to Larry – he calls them as he sees them and lets you know why. You can’t ask for better than that.

  • http://deleted BuzzisbackLatte

    Krauthammer uses the word “elides” rather than “eludes” in the first quote cited in this article. The correct version is available at the realclearpolitics website.

    It is a real word that means that he (Obama) omits!

    Krauthammer’s use of “elides” is masterful as it implies that Obama lies by omission, rather than just eluding the facts.

    Aside of that, great article, Bronwyn!

  • tango

    Elides, eludes, omits, flat out lies! There was the story he told the Russian college students about how he met his wife in college. In fact, he met her at work. Then recently, his lie about Sasha having meningitis when she was 3 months old. No, she was tested for it but was never diagnosed with the disease. Then the Otto Raddatz story about how the guy died because the insurance company cancelled his coverage while he was being treated for cancer since they found gallstones. Yes, they did but reinstated it 3 weeks later, gave him a stem cell transplant and other treatment and the guy lived an additional 3 years.

    So why lie &/or change or omit facts? Probably because he thinks it strengthens his argument or makes others indentify with him someway. And if he’s willing to lie over something so minor like where he met his wife if he thinks it will garner favor from those he’s speaking too, then I figure he’ll lie about the big things too.

    • carolhaka

      …………….. when and why he was conceived, ……….. his uncle liberating Auschwitz, …………….. every word out of his mouth!!!!!!!!

      CAROL HAKA :evil:

      • Anon

        Don’t forget about his mother and father doing it after the march on Selma and ending up with him.

        • maryann

          ‘cept Selma was after him…

          he also said his mother was on food stamps while he went to a private school…
          ‘cept his mother was a graduate student at U.HI and that was part of her stipend, and he was off at Occidental by then

          he’s always eliding eluding conflating inflating confabulating with premeasured plausible deniability and retreatable misstatements

  • Sassy

    A great read Bronwyn!
    I think my political leanings have always been close to where you are now. I was always a democrat, but I never hesitated to follow my best judgement on issues or candidates!
    As to Larry, there is no doubt that he thinks for himself, as we all should.
    That creates real dialogue!
    I have moved to the conservative camp, and feel right at home.

  • babawankenobe

    Great post! I left the Kool aid bandwagon a while back and I now listen to many “right wing’ commentators now who are really American patriots and realists who understand the challenges from an American viewpoint. In my opinion most are centrists. Hillary was my Choice and she has been off the radar screen just as David Axelrod planned! What a shame! Our President Obama has been pulled so far to the left that he no longer knows what is right! (for U.S. of America)

  • http://in Elizabeth

    Kraut wrote: “Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. famously said of Franklin Roosevelt that he had a ‘second-class intellect, but a first-class temperament.. Obama has…got both a first-class intellect and a first-class temperament. That will likely be enough to make him president.” He called the Palin pick “suicidal” and repeatedly ridiculed her as unfit for high office. Over the last decade he has cheerleaded excessive militarism, war in the Middle East, Islamaphobia, anti-Europeanism, the surge in Iraq, right wing Zionism, etc.,

    But in the end endorsed the McCain/Palin ticket, the one he considers inferior to the Democratic ticket.
    I prefer the one today. That column WAS erratic, wandering and barely decipherable.

  • carolhaka

    URGENT!

    Mika’s Dad, you know – the dude that brought us what ultimately became Al-Qaida, Dr. Brezinski, has done an interview in which he says Obama should give the order to shoot down Israeli Jets if they attempt a flyover to strike Iran. The creep needs to be deported back to Poland – where hopefully an Iranian missile goes off course and up his stinking *ss.
    (Ya know, now that there won’t be any protection ……………….)

    http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/09/brezinski-calls-for-obama-to-shoot-down-israeli-jets-a-liberty-in-reverse.html

    CAROL HAKA :evil:

    • maryann

      Ya what is it with Bryzinski and Soros, these Eastern European interfering goons?

  • Tammy

    Nice observations, BH!
    Enjoying the writings of Krauthammer doesn’t make you a loony Republican anymore than my reading of Hitchens makes me a liberal.

    Maybe the election of Obama will lead to something good: Like a level of discourse between sensible people from both parties.
    I’m a conservative, but I hated Newt Gingrich and what he pulled under Clinton. I feel the same way about Nancy Pelosi. Both divisive and unproductive. Both dismissive of the country as a whole.

    We hire these people in office to represent us, and they should do their damn jobs instead of turning everything into which party “wins”.
    Hey, what about THE COUNTRY, you boneheads?

    I learn a lot at this site, and the people who write here are not only smart, but they don’t take any crap. I like that.

    Thanks for that post, BH. It’s nice to come here and have discussions, disagreements and maintain some level of respect.
    (Well, most of the time, anyway).
    Have a great weekend as well!

  • carolhaka

    Urgent!

    Iranians have delcared BO is going to sell them Jets and parts.

    Hillary, either file Treason charges against him or step aside while you still have a future.

    http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/09/iran-venezuela-russia-obama-is-the-enemy.html

    CAROL HAKA :evil:

  • Diana L. C.

    Bronwyn,

    Yes, a post I can really relate to, though I never got so far to become a daily viewer of Daily Koz. I will have to admit that I would sometimes read Krauthammer and grudgingly admit to myself, but never to anyone I knew, that I admired his ability to state his opinion clearly and logically. I would add convincingly, but when a person is not willing to be convinced, as I was at the time, even Socrates couldn’t convince.

    And to comment on the use of the word “elide,” I am just going to guess you haven’t done much in the way of literary criticism. That word is standard in that field. I guessed that’s what you meant.

  • yttik

    “Obama doesn’t lie. He merely eludes, gliding from one dubious assertion to another.”

    Well, us bitter small town folks refer to that as trying to baffle you with bull$hit. Some of that is to be expected from politicians, it’s in their job description. Problem with Obama is that he’s all bull$hit and still has no track record of ever delivering on anything.

  • Lana

    A must read from the Washington Times:

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/sep/19/obamas-overhaul-backers-targeting-enemies/?source=newsletter_must-read-stories-today_photo_feature&

    and the new (phony) quote of the day:

    Mrs. Pelosi, California Democrat, became emotional at a news conference Thursday when she expressed fear that the harsh rhetoric of the debate would lead to violence.

    Oh really????? After she incited crowds by calling them Anti-American, astroturfers, domestic terrorists, etc., etc., etc. Give me a break!

  • snowhite

    I am another Lana—living in MI was bad enough but to watch and listen to the name calling and insinuations of Obamas preachers,Overmann,Schuster,Matthews,Schultz enraged me.I left the Democratic party and have never looked back.I still cannot believe people still believe in Obama and defend him regardless of his past or present.The people he has always surrounded himself with seem to be as crooked as he and Meeeshell.I thought nobody could be as bad as Bush for this country but I am fast learning I will probably be wrong.

  • Jenny

    Well said!

    Being independent, I’ve always enjoyed the benefits of multiplicity. Didn’t think Bush was such a bad guy (no giggles), and wanted Hillary to be the next president (I’ll accept the cheers).

    Comment by carolhaka | 2009-09-19 19:41:46

    No disrespect to Pamela Geller, I used to live in Israel and I have family and friends there and I appreciate her fight against jihadists, but you should take anything she writes with a grain of salt.

  • HARP

    This should make your day.

    America: Police and Military Train To Intern Swine Flu Vaccine “Refusniks”

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15272

  • eriezindian

    BH
    You must have been in my head! Great article. I have felt the same way…..watching Glen Beck(altho he does go off the rails sometimes), now an Independent and everything else. Well-phrased and thoughtful also.

  • Eastan

    I enjoyed this collection of words you just created. On top of your opinions you added a reminder to all of us to think about what we are thinking about. Wonderful work.

    You Lie is a great starting point for a discussion. I think, at that point in the Obama yak of the day, Obama was saying people who said that illegals would get coverage LIE. The You Lie outburst may have been warranted. Obama may have broken protocol by being the first president to call out a party at a joint sit down on the hill.

    Oh, well. I will end my comment by sharing this. My wife is ordering a bumper sticker that says: Don’t blame me. I voted for the chicks.

    If anyone can’t figure out that that is a PUMA (Hillary / Palin) statement, then they can just scratch their balls and spit in the outfield.

    • Diana L. C.

      Eastan,

      I keep forgetting to get out the T-shirt I had during the Bush administration. It has that circle with a diagnonal slant line over the word “BLAME” on the front. (“No blame) On the back it has the sentence “I didn’t vote for him.”

      It’s a little worn, but it will still do for this president.

  • CentralMass

    Great article and discussion…..

    I think the deal is we aren’t supposed to be paying attention. The election and this administration is a grand application of Chicago community organization techniques. Funnel money to the peeps to keep’em on your side and try to mesmerize the masses with rhetoric. If that doesn’t work, call the doubters racist’s.

  • Portia Elizabeth

    Bronwyn — I really enjoyed this excellent post. It speaks to me in ways that I thought had been buried after last year. Thank you so much!

    I was such a political naif that I barely knew who Charles Krauthammer was before last year. Now I listen when he speaks. Until last year I thought I was a Democrat. Then I learned that I don’t know what a Dem is anymore. Maybe the whole concept of a “party” is outdated and needs to be given a decent burial. I don’t know how to categorize myself politically now, but I am learning who makes sense when they opine and who lies. From now on that’s how I’ll be selecting a candidate to get my vote.

  • http://www.sonicninjakitty.wordpress.com Sonic Ninja Kitty

    Bronwyn, This is a wonderfully written piece about your recent political thought process. I would like to share something I read on another blog and wonder about your reaction to it.

    It’s basically the idea that although we tend to look at politics as a one axis phenomenon, a horizontal “x” axis–left, center, and right–there is actually another axis to consider: an up and down “y” axis if you will.

    The “y” axis has to do with government level of involvement in people’s lives. High on the “y” axis and to the far left is full out communism. High on the “y” and to the far right is fascism/oligarchy. If you stay low on the “y” and to the left, that is pure socialism, and to the right is libertarianism.

    It may not be enough to think in one dimension–maybe we should be thinking in two. (It was also suggested that there is a third dimension, a “z” axis of corruption, but that may be too much for the purposes of discussion here.)

    The thing that sometimes makes it confusing when discussing our representatives, IMO, is that we are all arguing about where they are on the “x” axis when we really should be looking at both their “x” and “y” points simultaneously. The right wingers who cry “Obama’s a socialist” confound the supporters of socialism who see Obama as a corporate pawn (high on “y” and to the right). People on the left who cry “Corporations should not be making so much money” confound the people who support free markets and but see the corporate/government partnership as very harmful.

    Obama has done a real snow job here. He has managed to get the left and right fighting with each other instead of fighting together against the same old government system we all wanted to get rid of. I’m really curious what you think about this.

  • candymarl

    Apparently Obama and his minions don’t learn from their mistakes.

    While accusing others of racism they refer to “you people”.

    While accusing others of racism they refer to people as “teabaggers, terrorists (shades of GWB), and un- American (GWB deja vu all over again).

    The same folks/MSM protesting the wars have become silent or are actively advocating these same wars.

    This is the new and improved type of politics which looks a hell of a lot like the same-old-same-old.

  • Peggy Sue

    Excellemt commentary, Bronwyn. You expressed the situation many of us find ourselves in–nowhere and everywhere when it comes to political affiliation. I’m still refer to myself as a Dem, and yet I’ve been abandoned by and have myself abandoned the party I thought I knew. But maybe that was a fiction in and of itself. I know when I hear the Republicans gearing up on the “values strategy,” I cringe. I’m not interested in the damn culture wars. That is “not” what will save us from the mess we’re in.

    But I share your respect for Krauthammer, his intelligence and ability to frame an argument [though I often find myself on the opposing side].

    I guess at this point in time, I’m an Independent by default. I will not allow party affiliation to jerk me around again, ever. I’m an American first. I think that’s where we all need to be now. So, I will read everything and listen to anyone who’s willing to tell the truth, a rare commodity these days. And then make up my own mind and vote for the best candidate.

    Party be damned!

  • http://www.lesstalkmoreactivism.blogspot.com whoframedrudy

    Krauthammer’s too generous. Obama does lie–big time! I’m hard pressed to find anything to redeem this President because he’s defaulted on the fundamental premise of his candidacy:

    “There are no blue states. There are no red states. There is only the United States … We have to leave behind the old divisions rooted in the outdated ’60s … it’s not her fault, but Hillary is too polarizing.”

    I don’t recall any fear that Hillary’s battle with the VRWC would turn violent. The Klan will ride again? That sounds pretty outdated. And Team Obama’s campaign to dehumanize heartland Americans shows the ‘blue state-red state’ speech was a galactic whopper. As for ‘The Obama Movement’ — Obama has turned the progressive movement into a schizophrenic mess that defends his ban on abortion funding.

    Bush gave us ‘uniter not divider’ b.s. soundbite, but that wasn’t his basic message. He ran as an Evangelical identity candidate, and that’s how he governed. Nixon ran as the Cold Warrior who’d negotiate from strength — that’s just what he did. Reagan governed just as he campaigned — like John Wayne. Bill said ‘we can do better.’ We did. Whatever you think of any of these Presidents, none of them ran on a fundamental lie — except Obama. His entire campaign was a Big Lie.

  • TeakWoodKite

    h Multiplicity (philosophy)

    Instead of referring to “the Multiple in general,” Bergson’s theory of multiplicities distinguishes between two types of multiplicity: continuous multiplicities and discrete multiplicities (a distinction that he developed from Riemann).[5] The features of this distinction may be tabulated as follows:

    Continuous multiplicities Discrete multiplicities
    differences in kind differences in degree
    divides only by changing in kind divides without changing in kind
    non-numerical – qualitative numerical – quantitative
    differences are virtual differences are actual
    continuous discontinuous
    qualitative discrimination quantitative differentiation
    simultaneity succession
    fusion juxtaposition
    organization order
    subjective – subject objective – object
    duration space

  • Karen from California

    OUTSTANDING ARTICLE!!

    When obama won? the primary, I switched from democrat to “decline to state” and ended up voting for ralph nader. When obama won the presidency, I found myself sneakily reading conservative opinions and analysis although in my heart I’m a liberal. However, I now feel free to take in all points of view rather than the party line. What a liberating experience and I’m no longer a sneak. I’M FREE!!!

    • maryann

      With Obamacorn proven criminality, we don’t in any way know that Obama “won”, and he certainly violated campaign finance laws by hundreds of millions in foreign donations.

  • Five Thirty

    Krauthammer was just too wrong about Iraq for me to consider his opinion seriously – plus he is unabashedly a propagandist for the GOP. He was not just wrong about Iraq and about the oil revenues we were going to get from there to pay for the war, but he would go on tv to state this as a fact. Plus he would bash Democrats whenever he could in his essays in the back of Time (Newsweek)?

    • candymarl

      Yet Obama is continuing these same wars. Obama, or his surrogates, bash Americans that dare to protest or disagree with anything. At least Krauthammer is consistent. He still thinks, wrongly I agree, that the Iraq war was a good thing.

      Obama has backed off his anti-war rhetoric and is following many of GWB’s policies. Obama has gone along with GWB’s policies on FISA, and the banker bailout.

      If the Iraq war is so wrong, and I agree that it is, where are the protesters now? You have liberal columnists cheering on the war in Afghanistan and it’s expansion into Pakistan.

      Krauthammer is correct in this instance that any disagreement with this administration is met with cries of racism. How does that further debate or solve any problems? It doesn’t. But it sure helps to demonize any opposition.

  • Surfered

    OMG! A President implies, misdirects and misleads. How about this one? “The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.”

    And remember boys & girls, it was Mr. Krauthammer that kept writing in column after column that Saddam was going to give nuclear weapons to the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11. So, he should know something about misleading.

  • http://pchizri.com vritrir

    lama1234