Will Obama Surrender Afghanistan to the Mullahs?
By Larry Johnson on September 21, 2009 at 11:12 PM in Current Affairs
Yes. Short answer. The leak to the Washington Post of the assessment by General McChrystal, the officer in charge of the war in Afghanistan, is quintessential Washington power politics and a major “go screw yourself Barack” by the person or persons who passed the paper to Bob Woodward. You do not get leaks when there is a policy consensus on an issue. There are several reasons classified or sensitive information is leaked–a policy disagreement, a desire to embarrass a principle official or a whistleblower.
Here’s how Woodward started his story:
The top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan warns in an urgent, confidential assessment of the war that he needs more forces within the next year and bluntly states that without them, the eight-year conflict “will likely result in failure,” according to a copy of the 66-page document obtained by The Washington Post.
Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal says emphatically: “Failure to gain the initiative and reverse insurgent momentum in the near-term (next 12 months) — while Afghan security capacity matures — risks an outcome where defeating the insurgency is no longer possible.”
His assessment was sent to Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates on Aug. 30 and is now being reviewed by President Obama and his national security team.
McChrystal concludes the document’s five-page Commander’s Summary on a note of muted optimism: “While the situation is serious, success is still achievable.”
Did you catch the key sentence?
The assessment was sent to Gates almost three weeks ago. On an issue of such importance the delay in making a decision can only mean one thing–Obama does not want to do what McChrystal says he needs in order to succeed–i.e., deploy more troops.
Friends on the inside tell me that there was major foot dragging going on at the National Security Council. Once again the names of the political straphangers are at the top of the list for stalling a decision. This leak had one clear purpose–force Obama’s hand. General McChrystal replaced another General who had publicly challenged the Obama Administration and insisted he needed more troops. Obama and company promptly replaced him. Now this. While McChrystal has shied away from the public limelight and pressed his request through the proper chain of command, the Woodward piece opens a major fissure between the Obama White House and the military.
The delay in responding to McChrystal stands in stark contrast to the promises old Barky made during the campaign. Compare his foot dragging with the following “stirring” promise to take firm action in Afghanistan:
I guess Bob Woodward won’t be writing his beatific version glorifying the leadership of Obama in the same way he did in his first book on the Bush Presidency. The challenge now for Obama is to get up off of his lazy ass and make a decision. The time for waffling is over.


















Pingback: News Central » “General McChrystal Will Resign if Obama Does Not Provide Him What He Needs for Afghanistan” and related posts
Pingback: “General McChrystal Will Resign if Obama Does Not Provide Him What He Needs for Afghanistan” and related posts - KuASha Organization
Pingback: “General McChrystal Will Resign if Obama Does Not Provide Him What He Needs for Afghanistan” and related posts | One Syndicate: News That Matters
Pingback: Obama – Afganistan; He Just Can’t Deal with the Big Decisions; Instead, Forms Committee, will likely invite ACORN to help him decide « VotingFemale Speaks!
Pingback: “General McChrystal Will Resign if Obama Does Not Provide Him What He Needs for Afghanistan” and related posts « Twitter
Pingback: “General McChrystal Will Resign if Obama Does Not Provide Him What He Needs for Afghanistan” and related posts « Twitter