Comments on: Obama’s Deserving Peace Prize

By: TeakWoodKite

TeakWoodKite — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:32:43 +0000

It was a tough day for a kite with the storm that blew through today…

But even tougher for the homless man that went to bed down by the creek and woke up stranded in a flooded deluge, his tent and campstove washed away.

His dignity? Swept away long ago.

I hear you candymarl.

By: candymarl

candymarl — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:02:57 +0000

Yes, the mood of the entire world has changed. Too bad about those pesky wars and dead people.

Obama gave them the right to dream about peace? Give me a break.

MLK Jr. gave them that dream decades ago. But I guess that doesn’t count because he never ran for office.

Ghandi gave them that dream decades ago. But that doesn’t count either because he never ran for office.

Sojourner Truth, Harriet Tubman, Medgar Evars, the Quakers and countless unsung freedom fighters gave them that dream a long time ago.

They can now only recognize the truth of their words because of Obama? A man who is not a descendant of slaves and has had no dog in the fight for freedom? Heck, he couldn’t even rescue the tenants in his district from slumlord Rezko.

Obama has never condemned cousin Odinga in Kenya for inciting his followers to murder fellow Kenyans in horrible ways. But I guess those world leaders, Mandela included, don’t mind Obama’s fund raising and support of a man who incited mass murder.

Obama is the President of the United States of America. His job is to do something for his own people. But I guess all of those hungry, homeless, and jobless Americans will have to wait. Too bad for them.

By: b mathews

b mathews — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:13:08 +0000

can you say “ACORN”?

By: Onofre's arm

Onofre's arm — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:45:58 +0000

The Eddie Haskell Award, for outstanding yet nauseating duplicity. Those of us who see through the phony rat should win the Ward and June Cleaver Prize.

By: Onofre's arm

Onofre's arm — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:16:07 +0000

Judging from Goodman’s article, he is either attempting to be a Devil’s advocate, or he is suffering from acute Bush Derangement Syndrome.

Let’s hear your defense of Arafat winning the award, and explain why Ghandi, Churchill, FDR, Truman, Reagan, Thatcher, and Pope John Paul II didn’t.

By: Bella

Bella — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:58:57 +0000

Belly:
What are you all of two years old?
Stop I’m a stupid fest!

Try again please, that didn’t make much sense.

By: Donna Brazile

Donna Brazile — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:42:27 +0000

Belly:

What are you all of two years old?

Stop I’m a stupid fest!

By: silverfox

silverfox — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:36:18 +0000

looking into who nominated him, and when, should pretty much reveal the pr scam for what it is. but then, like the actual birth certificate, i doubt we’ll get to see the real names involved. the powerful global cabal raised him for this role, and will continue to steamroll him roughshod into the next piece of propaganda no matter the facts, or the outcry of those who speak truth to power. get it?

i know i do.

By: Sassy

Sassy — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:14:30 +0000

Is the White House seeking a new speech writer?
I think this author should apply!

By: Bella

Bella — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:05:22 +0000

Why are you even allowed to POST on this Site?

LOL
Ban, quash dissenting voices… I know it’s reflective for you righties.
“Oooohh, I don’t want to hear it, lalalalalala!!”

By: creeper

creeper — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:50:48 +0000

1,309 words and still not one logical reason for Obama’s receiving the NPP other than the usual hopey-changey drivel.

Larry, I commend you for giving Mr. Goodman the space here to argue his point and I look forward to his next paean to Barack Obama.

By: Regina

Regina — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:24:57 +0000

It’s good to hear the other point of view and try to understand their logic. However, I can’t get past the fact that Obama is a crook….remember Rezko? I am still trying to figure out who his ventriloquist is. It sure “ain’t” Ghandi.

By: Owllwoman

Owllwoman — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:59:34 +0000

Who or whom nominated him? Perhaps himself or his wife? Thats what I want to know.

By: elizabethrc

elizabethrc — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:47:52 +0000

“Ending the madness that has governed foreign policy for the last 8 years”? Perhaps…but he has replaced that ‘madness’ with something truly ominous, and that is the wholesale destruction of this country, this economy, citizens’ rights. He has now decided that he can brook no opposition whatsoever…none…nada. He’s chosen to attack FOX news as not a legitimate news organ, but accepts the rest of the main stream media as true reporters of the news.
This man is a joke. The number of stories FOX reveals are not even mentioned by the msm until their back is so to the wall that they have no choice, since the country, thanks to FOX, begins to talk about these stories and by not reporting, the msm look ridiculous and ineffectual.
No, the White House is completely transparent (probably the only time they are)in their favoritism of all stations which glorify Obama.
His administration is running dangerously close to pushing this country into something decidedly not a democracy. Perhaps he thinks he knows better than the framers of our Constitution, but somehow, I think those gentlemen earned their stripes. Obama has not, and I predict, will not.
Americans need to stand up (thank you, Beck), and let him know that we will not buy his change if it means losing our freedoms. We still have the most powerful word in the English vocabulary, and that word is NO. The coming midterm elections are possibly our only chance to cut this unworthy administration off at the knees. We must throw the Democratic majority out and neuter Obama by voting in a veto proof majority in both House and Senate. I’ll even settle for one of those.

By: Martha Washington Collier

Martha Washington Collier — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:05:06 +0000

Pardon me, Sir but anyone who truly deserves the prize, doesn’t need a justification or creds. They have already lived it. The Nobel was supposed to be the affirmation of what had already gone before it.

Sort of like marriage. The ceremony, ideally is an affirmation of the bonding that has already occurred between two people. The marriage of two souls, followed by a public ceremony celebrating that fact. They aren’t considered married by “thinking” about it or deciding it’s a good thing. Just ask the IRS. Yes, sometimes people don’t follow the prescribed path but the idea of a ceremony was a public announcement of a private fact.