Rove: Obama is the Democrats’ Nixon

takes one to know one – rove seems the most likely to understand obama.

believe is that you?

r u tellin me Susan is Allegre?

Oy, do you really think we’re letting Rove decide anything? Christ. You are an ass. He got the only other completly unqualified candidate elected POTUS…twice. I’m guessing he has a little insight into getting barky elected.

Pleeeze, David Axelrod makes Karl Rove look like John the Baptist.

With all the dishonesty, under-the-bus spin, lies, cheating, threatening, flip-flopping and manipulation from Backtrack himself, the puppet of Axelrod et al, Obama supporters have lost their rights to diss Karl Rove.

Susan, there’s another good post by Hanson today on NRO, entitled “Barack W. Bush”

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NWYwMWQzOTVhYTMyYTBjNmRlZWRmNjBmOGU4MzZlNTk=&w=MA==

Ummm…Karl is not defining B0, he’s ‘splaining him to ya. And he’s in a good position to know as he was there at the birth – see?
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D02E5DC123DF932A15751C0A9659C8B63
“”The Republicans are in charge,” she said. ”I don’t want African-Americans to wait four years or eight years for the Democrats to get back in the game before we make progress.” ” much, much more…..

Yes, she IS quite the Democrat…the truthful kind, who is able to analyze news from all sectors and make her own conclusions. She doesn’t suffer from Obama myopia, as most of his ‘followers’ do.
She seems to prefer viewing the candidates through a prism of intellectual and emotional honesty…something alien to Obama’s followers.
She’s able to see that Rove might, just might, have a tiny, tiny shred of astute political acumen.

Your party’s candidate isn’t your party’s candidate yet.

Yours is a typically childish liberal reaction. Karl Rove isn’t “defining” anything. Hes simply stating an obvious truth. Nixon’s strategy was always to run as far to the right as possible in the Republican primaries, then tack hard back towards the center for the general election. He was quite open when asked about it. This is precisely what Obama has done in 2007-2008, except he’s run as far to the left as possible in the primaries.

I think John Kerry has a previous engagement.

You forgot, because hes a lying coward.

LMAO. That’s pretty damned funny.

LOL

This is what I’ve been saying. Barack has a “Secret Plan” to overturn FISA, end the Iraq war and give us universal health care.

If that doesn’t work there’s always Roe v Wade. Boo!

I cannot agree to the orders, I’m sure the Obamacamp has the “winners” already fixed.

No, it is a sign of the degradation of your thought as a human being that you have convinced yourself to take Karl Rove seriously as anything other than a skilled but highly partisan political operative who will say anything that advances his party’s interests.

Now tell me again how great the Democrats are , because I have forgotten why I have been voting for/as a Democrat for 32 years. Both parties suck. The Democratic party , run by Howard Dean, is corrupt. Welcome back to the new culture of corruption.

Hope is the Hope We’ve Been Hoping For!

Another non-reader Obamabot.

Can you not read? I didn’t think sounding like Nixon was an endorsement.

You know, Roadburdened, you should go off in a corner and lick your crotch. It will calm your fevered brain.

Ain’t gonna happen. They’ll let him careen to disaster before they’d admit they screwed up and let Pelosi bully them into a bad call.

They all know exactly what happened. It’s all about Pelosi.

And today, Congressional approval ratings are in the 20′s. Unbelievable.

They let the most unpopular minority whip ever in the history of the country bully them into stupidity.

You better believe they are hoping we all don’t notice the truth.

You’re right hootnannie, it IS like the “Let me make this perfectly clear” speech!

Not if you take into account the margin of error in the major polls. Statistically he and McCain are tied.

Face it, people don’t trust Obama because he’s all over the map with his policies.

He’s done a 180 on the majority of his positions. He’s publicly admitted to trying to disavow the left of the Democratic Party.

But keep supporting someone who disavows or votes against the very policies he claims he was for.

He’ll suddenly change when he reaches the WH.

Obama’s “Secret Plan” to govern from the left once he reaches the WH. Until then the left can go screw itself.

Obama – Nixon redux.

It’s definitely going to be tight. Yesterday, Gallup had McCain within 2 points. That’s statistically a tie.

He’s edged ahead in MO. Obama has reacted by landing 150 paid staffers there. McCain has widened his lead this week in FL….up by 8 now. He’s close in Ohio….4 points. That’s a true battleground state. He’s very close in NM and CO….less than 5 points.

It’s going to be a fight.

One thing for sure. There’s been enough stability now in the polls to safely say that Obamabot’s dream of stampeding into the White House is a fairytale.

And I’m not intentionally bringing up the rumors of him being on the down-low.

Ed Schultz was saying at one point he didn’t know where Obama stood. What’s funny is, I was listening to “liberal” radio. Hardly any hosts mentioned the FISA vote. In fact, those that brought it up tried to excuse it.

Imagine the furor if Hillary had voted for FISA. The howls would be endless.

In fact many of these same “liberal” hosts predicted Hillary would vote for the bill and Obama against it.

Now they don’t seem to want to speak about it all.

-=chuckle=-

a. hillary
b. mccain

america first!

Tis the nature of his campaign. He evokes disdainful remarks, sexism, ageism, and disunity.

This meme will be just like the Where are Hillary’s Tax Returns meme. They will not be the least bit embarassed by how they talked when her bill was paid off by HER supporters. They will ignore yet again the sexist nature of how they are behaving. All other campaigns receive help from the winner. But not Hillary.

They will ignore it. And they won’t know why we are firm in our decision to Just Say No Deal to Obama.

They will never get it.

Greta responds:

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/fnc/greta_van_susteren_on_fnc_vs_cnn_missingperson_cases_and_missing_wisconsin_88603.asp

1. TVNewser: Critics often lambaste cable’s emphasis on the big missing persons/murder cases (e.g., Scott Peterson, Natalee Holloway).

Van Susteren: First, as noted, the question says ‘the critics.’ At Fox we don’t program for the ‘critics.’ Whether the critics like it or not, missing people is a serious topic, and if you don’t believe me, ask a family member.

This is not about pontificating from the sidelines — this is about real problems for people. And second, if you look at it, everyone in the business covers these murder cases cited in the question (including the high-and-mighty, who do it by the underhanded way of talking about how the others are doing it and how horrible it is that they do — that is what the critics do when they talk about it…hmmm…the oldest trick in the book and one we used often in the courtroom: “I am not calling this police officer a liar…” Just what are you doing?).

Yes, we at Fox — and especially at 10pmET — get criticized often for these stories as though we are the only ones covering these topics, but I suspect we get all the attention and much of the criticism for one reason: we don’t just sit on the set and yakety-yak and let others do the heavy lifting. We actually go out and investigate (an old-fashioned journalism concept: investigation!).

Of course, my years as a trial lawyer with an emphasis on fact investigation helps make our work better. I am the ‘real deal’ when it comes to fact investigation. In other words, we do our jobs…and we may be the lightening rod for criticism simply because we are doing our jobs well. I don’t mind getting criticism for doing my job well.

No, but he should. Since he said that about a 27 year old adult with her own mind, what would be his thoughts for Obama using his children under the age of 10 as partisan props?

and on the little ones birthday too

sad sad sad

Well, I’m a very strong Obama supporter and I don’t go to his site as much as before.

The hits on the site are an absolutely meaningless indicator of a trend.

You know what BJ that is absolutely true. Sad, but true.

This is now an Obama site. Leave.

Kerry’s campaign sadly had a lot of flaws but aside from his support of Obambi, I liked the guy.

Long after the election was won, there was a documentary on HBO following him on the campaign trail. I can’t recall who made it. (It might have been Pelosi’s daughter but not sure).

Anyway, it showed the guy in a light that we NEVER saw thru the actual campaign tactics. He was smart, compassionate and quite human with the ‘little people’ who came around him and wanted to converse with him. It wasn’t at all the same guy who couldn’t connect on the campaign trail.

If only America, and Americans could have seen the real Kerry during the campaign instead of the one put forward by the powers that be.

It’s just like the sad/scary (imo) campaign of Obama. They recently made a statement about being on a path to “a strict message and not straying from that path”.

That should scare the crap outta everyone.

48 + 40 = 88. So 12% is not yet accounted for. The most interesting trend I’m following is that Barack Obama’s support has seemed to top out – and never reach 50%.

That’s the real story. How will the undecideds break? In the primaries, almost every time they broke hard for Hillary Clinton. Why? Because people who just aren’t sure sure the hell aren’t going to take a risk on such an unknown quantity.

We won’t know til November, but I have hope that Obama has maxed out.

His issue positions are virtually the same as Clinton’s. I bet you never did support her, did you?