RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

ACORN – A Laugh A Minute – NOT

* Bumped Up *

And I am not talking about all of the acorns all over my yard (the raccoons and squirrels are having a field day!). Nope, I am talking about ACORN, Obama’s former employer. They never fail to disappoint in the level of hubris and entitlement they bring, which can be downright laughable (if not so serious). But this one is a doozy. It is so funny, it just has to be a joke.

Are you ready? Get this: they are suing Congress to get our money back! Isn’t that hysterical??? Wait – hold on a second – I am getting word that is NOT a joke, that this is, in fact, true, ACORN Sues Over ‘Unconstitutional’ Funding Cuts By Congress. Oh, sweet mother you have GOT to be kidding!

Yeah, no – this is what ACORN alleges:

In an attempt to regain the millions in funding it lost in the wake of a hidden-camera scandal, ACORN is suing the federal government over congressional legislation that cut off funding to the community organizing group.

Representatives for ACORN sued the federal government Thursday morning in an attempt to regain the millions of dollars in funding the community organizing group lost after filmmakers videotaped its workers offering advice on how to commit tax fraud and various other felonies.

The suit charges Congress with violating the Constitution when it passed legislation in September that specifically targeted ACORN to lose federal housing, education and transportation funds.

That qualifies the legislation as bills of attainder, according to the Center for Constitutional Rights, which filed the suit on behalf of ACORN. A bill of attainder punishes a person or group without the benefit of a trial, and is illegal under Article 1 of the Constitution.

Bills of attainder have traditionally been understood to have more serious legal consequences — including the seizure of private property and even capital punishment — than Congress’ decision to withhold funds that are at its discretion to disseminate. Though members of Congress have accused ACORN of corruption, it is not clear how the exercise of its own prerogative is outside the bounds of legislative power.

Critics of the group in Congress blasted the lawsuit as a last-ditch effort to save the foundering organization’s bottom line.

“ACORN’s baseless lawsuit is the first public acknowledgement we’ve seen from ACORN of just how desperate they are to use any mechanism available to subsidize an organization that is teetering on bankruptcy and financial insolvency,” said Kurt Bardella, spokesman for Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif.

I’ll say this is baseless. What the hell makes them think they, a partisan organization, are entitled to OUR money? I am pretty sure that taxpayers do NOT have to subsidize partisan groups or political parties with which they disagree. Never mind the activities in which ACORN has been involved, like voter registration fraud, voter fraud, or who could forget those videos:

Congress began cracking down on its funding to ACORN after its employees were secretly videotaped in a number of cities offering to help a man and woman posing as a pimp and prostitute to lie to the IRS and acquire illegal home loans.

Footage showed staffers advising the “pimp” and “prostitute” on how to falsify tax forms and seek illegal benefits for 13 “very young” girls from El Salvador that the pair said they wanted to bring to the country to work as child prostitutes. The videos set off a firestorm in Congress.

ACORN pledged an internal inquiry and fired the staffers who were caught on tape, but it was only the latest of many legal troubles for the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now.

State investigators raided ACORN offices in Louisiana last week, seizing computer hard drives and documents in a probe of alleged embezzlement and tax fraud. Staffers in multiple states have been accused of committing voter registration fraud.

Congress took the “prostitute” videos as clear evidence of systematic problems within ACORN and voted with bipartisan support in the House and Senate to freeze funding for the group in appropriations bills in September.

Yes, those funds are frozen now, though they could be reinstated in the coming year budget. Well, until ACORN decided to file this lawsuit. Not so smart on the timing, I’d say. But hey, whaddya I know? They’re claiming their “contstitutional rights” are being trampled:

Thursday’s lawsuit claims that Congress violated the right to due process enshrined in the Fifth Amendment — declaring the group guilty of a crime and punishing its members without completing an investigation within the Department of Justice or the IRS.

“It’s not the job of Congress to be the judge, jury, and executioner,” said Jules Lobel, an attorney representing the Center for Constitutional Rights.

“We have due process in this country, and our Constitution forbids lawmakers from singling out a person or group for punishment without a fair investigation and trial.”

The lawsuit itself singles out three defendants — Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner; Director of the Office of Management and the Budget Peter Orszag, and Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan.

The three were responsible for facilitating the defunding of ACORN by Congress, according to attorneys for the Center for Constitutional Rights.

ACORN claims it has been badly hurt by the congressional actions, and has had to fire workers and close some of its 1,200 branches around the country.

Though it remains unclear precisely how much money the national organization was receiving from federal sources and aid programs, a lawyer pressing the suit said ACORN has already lost an amount “in the millions” since the freeze took effect.

Why is it the amount of money they have received is unclear? Just wondering.

But if the voter fraud, the voter registration fraud, the mortgage crisis thanks in large part to ACORN and those who support it, and those VIDEOS aren’t enough, check out THIS LINK. In it, you will find an audio tape and transcript of an ACORN worker acknowledging that they are indeed partisan, and worked to get Obama into office, as well as how every vote they got went to Obama, none to McCain. Oh, yeah, I am not kidding. This is an astonishing admission.

Add to that the raid on the New Orleans office, and what that is bound to turn up, and I’d think ACORN would want to shut the hell up already before they end up behind bars. But that’s not their way. No doubt, they assume their “Friends in High Places” (i.e., Obama) will look out for them.

Obama’s new legal counsel, Bob Bauer, husband to Anita Dunn (she of “Fox News Is The Devil Spawn” fame), is expected to do just that, according to Rep. Steve King (R-NY). Rep. King is afraid Bauer’s deeply partisan ties will lead to letting ACORN off the hook. They might also allow this frivolous lawsuit (IMHO – I am not an attorney) to proceed.

We’ll see what happens. This would be hilarious – if it wasn’t true…

  • lorac

    I wish they would gather the evidence about ACORN’s role in the caucus fraud and pursue that, as well. With voter registration fraud, they can (and have) pointed out that it’s not the same as an actual fradulent vote. But caucus fraud is much more directly and demonstrably vote stealing. I really want these guys to go down before the next election, although it would be even better if we could just get rid of caucuses.

    And Ani, if you’re out there, I hope you write a book about the election – the REAL story.

    I didn’t anticipate their filing this lawsuit, but I’m not surprised. They do seem entitled, and while it may be emboldened with their friend in the WH, I suspect they’ve always been this way….

    • lorac

      PS – great post, Rev. Amy.

      • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com/ Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy

        Thanks, lorac – I guess I shouldn’t be surprised, either. ACORN has already demonstrated the lengths to which they will go…

        Hillary or Bust, have you seen the documentary, “We Will Not Be Silenced”? Here’s the link: http://wewillnotbesilenced2008.com/video/index.htm It’s also available on YouTube.

        Maybe we should do a live chat abt this sometime soon.

        The point is, we need to make this kind of blatant fraud clear to our representatives. Maybe send it to the Tea Party organizers so people will be on the lookout the next election? Whatever groups with which we are connected should see this, and make our voices heard.

        • http://www.hillaryorbust.com Hillary or Bust

          Yes, I’ve seen that, and the scary thing is, I’ve sent the video links to some of my Obamabot friends and they don’t blink an eyelash at it. It really shocks me how people selectively filter information to support their pre-conceived worldviews.

          At any rate, I met the creators of that film at the Palin rally last year. They told me that they tried to get the story out to the mainstream media but were ignored.

          However, it seems like they have not had the time/energy to push that documentary through and make it into a DVD or full length feature that could be bought/shared. This is a shame because if we had an actual film to promote that could make a difference.

          Obamastolemycountry is the director, I believe. She’s still posting here so perhaps she’ll see this thread.

          • Unabashed Galt

            It really shocks me how people selectively filter information to support their pre-conceived worldviews.

            Agreed and we (the loyal opposition) need to guard against this in our own minds as well, lest we become flaming bloody hypocrites. :(

            • tek

              UG: we have a ton of these people in this family (had a ton of Bush Neocons, now we have Kool Aid drinkers) they will argue that Obama WON enough PLEDGED delegates to get the Dem nomination. Obtuse and brainwashed.

              • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com/ Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy

                Excellent points, y’all.

                That is unfortunate abt the documentary – the half hour that is available is pretty staggering – one would think that would be sufficient to raise red flags. At the very least, it demonstrates the collusion between the DNC and the Obama camp to get the nomination no matter for whom the people voted. And the Clinton campaign made clear there was caucus fraud going on – the DNC took no steps to correct it or end it.

                And given that, isn’t that fraud? That is, if we didn’t really have a choice, but continued to campaign for, and send money to, other candidates when the fix was in? Just wondering..

                • Unabashed Galt

                  What happened was just plain evil and will bite the perpetrators in the ass as Karmic or divine retribution is the law of this universe, I am most certain. We tried to warn them.

    • http://www.hillaryorbust.com Hillary or Bust

      Yes, THANK YOU for bringing this up. What can we PUMAs do to bring this caucus fraud back to light? We need some PUMA action on this.

      • http://firefox AnnieCarmel

        My experience has been much the same as yours HoB. But I plan to try again, sending the videos one part at a time to my family members with a note “Our ancestors fought for Independence. Please explain to me how you can support this.” Maybe planting seeds ahead of the electoral process will take root…they might even begin to see voter fraud right in front of them and resist. I have a Texas friend I’ll definitely send this too…she wasn’t in TX last year and is probably a clueless Dim.

        I watched it again RRRA…it’s still a shock.

    • Ani

      The caucus fraud info is out there and has been roundly ignored by the MSM and will continue to be. As with the recent ACORN scandal broken by these two young people with the help of Breitbart and aired on FOX, it was only extreme pressure and shaming that made any other news outlets cover this at all — albeit reluctantly.

      As with the situation of the media painting the terrorist Hasan as a PTSD case who cracked and killed 14 and injured another 26 people at an army base — for the media and the Obama Administration to admit this was a premeditated act of terrorism, which it was, this paints as false their meme that the election of Obama has “bridged the gap to the Muslim community” and stopped the spread of terrorism. Clearly that is not the case.

      The caucus fraud is similar, in that 90% of the MSM pushed for Obama to be elected with all their might, and when the race was tied between he and McCain in September (before the collapse of Lehman et al), the media then doubled down on the race card to play the guilt angle for all it was worth as an insurance policy to push Obama over the top. For them to now admit that caucus fraud was rampant would be tantamount to admitted all their other failures at vetting. This they will never do.

      Until his poll numbers drop into the thirties, I am very sad to say this may not be a fruitful endeavor. That does not mean it isn’t worth the attempt, however. We need to hold all our representatives feet to the fire. If enough people do it and express outrage and get it to go viral on the net, it is possible, once again, that the hand of the media may be forced. But that’s a huge “if.”

      • lorac

        Ahem [clearing throat] – maybe if somebody writes an expose book of the primary and general elections, and all the PUMAS buy it for themselves and for gifts, and for sending a copy to different investigative journalists – maybe we’ll get more traction then… :)

        • Ani

          Ahem! indeed!!! I’m working on it. :mrgreen:

          Lorac, you are adorable. By the way, that is a great marketing idea — buy the book and buy a case for your friends — they make great stocking stuffers! Thanks for the support.

          • lorac

            I’ll be first in line for a case!

            • Ani

              Bless you!

      • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com/ Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy

        Ani, thank you for your perspective. I appreciate it.

        And you are right abt the MSM and ACORN. There was an article not long ago abt how the NY Times completely missed the boat on Van Jones and that whole issue. Their excuse? Basically, that they just don’t have enough people to cover everything. (IOW, they are too busy regurgitating whatever the White House tells them to do.) Since they are planning on cutting a bunch of reporters, I don’t look for them to do more, but far, far less…

        You are right abt Fox shaming them into it, though. Gee, I wonder why Obama waged war on Fox?? And now, Anita Dunn, the Mao aficionado, has her husband, Bauer, an extreme partisan, in the White House to cover Obama’s tracks with ACORN. Greeaaaatttt…

        Say it ain’t so, Ani, say we’re not going to have to have this man in there for a total of 8 years…

        • Ani

          Brace yourself. If Pr. Bush got eight years, I am finding it hard to believe that Pr. Obama will not be afforded the same.

          Expect the same guilt card and wedge issue crap to be played again. And more ACORN. More media favoritism. Unless he’s polling in the low thirties by then — then we can expect another corporate sock puppet — from either party.

          Also depends on the economy’s rebound or lack thereof — and whether the GOP has a credible candidate — and Romney or Huckabee ain’t cutting it. I certainly wouldn’t want either one of them.

          Gonna take enormous grass roots coming from both sides to get to a place where gov’t reps. are doing the people’s business instead of their own.

          Great article, btw.

    • tek

      lorac: Amen to that.

  • Ladydawnelle

    If they think by suing they will somehow regain their “good name” they’re smoking the HOPIUM again and will scream “WTF” when the reality bus hits them and they go slipping UNDER!

    Great more crooked Ostriches – and all these EGGS they’ve laid! YIKES! Bawaackkkkk!

  • lorac

    “Thursday’s lawsuit claims that Congress violated the right to due process enshrined in the Fifth Amendment — declaring the group guilty of a crime and punishing its members without completing an investigation within the Department of Justice or the IRS.”

    I don’t think this is true. I see it more like when an employee is suspected of something bad, and they are suspended until an investigation is completed.

    • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com/ Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy

      They have already been convicted in a number of states of voter registration fraud and voter fraud, so that seems to make their argument moot on the face of it. But having video evidence from a number of different cities of what they are willing to do seems like pretty good evidence.

      And it isn’t like the money they get from us is OWED them, for pete’s sake. They aren’t entitled to it, so I am still not sure how they could make a Fifth Amendment claim in the first place.

      FWIW, they are STILL under investigation in a number of states.

  • Obamastolemycountry

    ACORN, your constitutional rights are being trampled on? Well, so are most Americans! HA! We don’t like it either!

    If ACORN is successful in this lawsuit, I think all American citizens should sue for the same reason! Most of us haven’t engaged in illegal activities.

  • Unabashed Galt

    Checking my irony Bizarro Superman Universe meter:

    = = = = = = = = >

    The meter is pinned and off scale! :D

    • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com/ Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy

      LOL – good one, Galt!

  • ahs

    The bill of attainder challenge is closer than you’re allowing. IMHO it’s not going to win, but it’s by no means a groundless legal claim.

    Absent a conviction for fraud (which ACORN has never faced — check the facts), ACORN has a right to apply for gov’t grants on an equal footing with other groups. This law would take that away — imposing punishment for a crime that is only alleged, not proven in a court of law. That’s unconstitutional. That’s ACORN’s claim, and it’s not ridiculous.

    I don’t think it’ll win, as I said, because there’s a legitimate legislative purpose at work (deterring fraud in gov’t contractors), and that’s generally been enough to defeat bill of attainder claims.

    What will be most interesting is that if this isn’t a bill of attainder, it kinda-sorta might defund the entire military-industrial complex:

    http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/09/could-acorn-defunding-bill-strike-military-industrial-complex/

    • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com/ Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy

      They most certainly HAVE been convicted of fraud, most recently in the state of FL. A quick search brought this up immediately: http://thecapitalist.newsvine.com/_news/2009/09/09/3243165-acorn-turns-in-florida-workers-for-voter-fraud-charges-
      Not to mention Wisconsin and Colorado: http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009189

      And have been criminally charged in Nevada: http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2009/may/acorn-criminally-charged-nevada

      Their office in New Orleans was just raided, they are under investigation in that state by the state.

      Perhaps you should check your facts.

      I might add, they are NOT ENTITLED TO OUR MONEY. They are a partisan organization, and as such, should not be able to get taxpayer money PERIOD. Whether they have committed a crime or not(and they have).

      Thomas Jefferson was quite right when he wrote, “To compel a man (sic) to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.

      • ahs

        ACORN, the organization itself, has never been convicted of a crime. Many of its lowest-level workers have been, but that is entirely different. A Ford employee being convicted of fraud is not the same as Ford Motor Company committing fraud. Crimes by low-level employees, even if done in the course of their work, only very rarely result in the corporation itself being convicted. In ACORN’s case, that just hasn’t happened yet. Might well happen soon, but hasn’t yet.

        My facts are quite straight, thank you. If there were a conviction on the record, I’m sure you’d be able to cite it for me. But there isn’t, so you can’t.

        • lorac

          Maybe we should set Hasan free and give him some federal money. He hasn’t been convicted of anything.

          • ahs

            Brilliant analogy?

            Wait… no. No, it isn’t. In fact, if Congress passed a bill punishing Hasan, it would be unconstitutional. That’s beyond the powers of Congress.

            They don’t have to give him anything, just as they don’t have to give ACORN anything (which is, incidentally, why I think ACORN probably loses this suit).

            But what Congress can’t do is convert mere accusations, unproven by the formal legal process, into a punitive deprivation of rights. That’s unconstitutional. The legislative and judicial powers are separate for a reason. And if a judge decides that ACORN’s right to bid (not receive, just bid) for government contracts is being taken away here without proof of wrongdoing, and that there’s no other explanation for the bill, then ACORN will win.

            And if that’s what actually happened, then they’ll deserve to win, sleazy organization though they may be. I don’t want Congress to be allowed to act as judge and jury, and neither do you.

  • Diana L. C.

    This just really jerks my chain. My representative, a newbie whom I did vote for, made the comment that he didn’t for for the defunding of ACORN because that he thought the legislation defunding ACORN was a bill of attainder. That is the answer he gave when I wrote him a letter about how sorry I was that I had supported him after his decision not to vote fro defunding.

    I now wonder if they got this “brillian” idea from him. I really, really am worried that, in this upside down, black is white world, some judge may agree with them. (And I WILL vote differently next time around.)

    RRRA, thanks for the post, but I’ll laugh at ACORN when they no longer exist.

  • James Stellar

    The Puma site had reference to a set of videos during the election that showed minority voters talking about trucked in thugs intimidating them at various caucus sites. They were devastating!! If these could be found and forwarded to Breitbart at Big Government.com I think we might would see on fox.

    • http://firefox AnnieCarmel

      The videos were so major for me during the primaries I am surprised that so few people have seen them. Maybe it’s time, in the Winter of our discontent, for another push to have them go viral. They are damning.

      • Unabashed Galt

        Ostriches with buried in sand noggins won’t watch videos. :(

    • candymarl

      Agreed James. I was furious about elderly black women being targeted. Some of these women were around when black people either couldn’t vote or were taking their lives in their hands to do so.

      To have other black people threatening them is beyond wrong IMO.

  • http://www.dwarfhamster.com dst

    Great post on “A”corn, my only question is your reference to raccoons enjoying acorns. I will agree the local squirrels http://outdoors.webshots.com/photo/1108990899034166813xksIek

    are in heaven this year with the incredible wild acorn supply and seem to mostly be leaving my bird feeders alone. However my 5 regular raccoons still are beating the door down for their portions of Purina Cat Chow.
    http://www.youtube.com/user/comdst#p/a/u/1/2NAEnseyunE

    Me I’m most happy with all the “a”corns and have been gathering them by the bushel and tossing them in my wood stove.
    tossing them in my wood stove.

  • Docelder

    Groups like ACORN and their thuglings like Obama have manipulated the “system” to tie itself into knots for decades now. The Manchurian candidate has infiltrated and is awaiting his orders. All he needs to do now is read them off the teleprompter.

    • tek

      Docelder: What worries me is that the last two “occupants” of the WH have been Manchurian Candidates. It’s the New Politics in the U. S. How to break this system?

  • jwrjr

    The claim of “a bill of attainder” is absurd. What civil or Constitutional right was violated when Congress decided not to give them (our) money? They have no “right” to that money. If this lawsuit succeeds then your supermarket can sue you when you shop at a different store for “unConstitutionally” taking “their” money and giving it to somebody else.

  • Doc99

    Rev … fear not … Discovery will be verrrrry interesting.

    • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com/ Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy

      Sure hope you’re right, Doc99…

      Yes, Annie – maybe NOW some of the Kool Aide drinkers coming out of their haze will be able to see the videos and take in what they mean…

  • jbjd

    Lorac, HillaryorBust, R3A, and Everyone, I have been trying to figure out how to put together these several seemingly disparate facts: the LULAC lawsuit in TX alleging the over allocation of D delegates in black districts and the under allocation in Latino districts, which suit a 3-judge federal panel has approved to proceed; and the ACORN caucus fraud in TX, given HRC’s huge lead in Latino voting districts. If I am right then, all of this was done with the intention of stealing the D nomination for BO (and, of course, NP was chosen to Chair the Convention so that she could sign those bogus Certifications of Nomination submitted to state election officials to get BO’s name printed on the ballot in those states requiring only the names of qualified candidates will be printed on state ballots). Maybe if you can funnel to my blog a list of links to caucus fraud videos/statistics – I will use the link on NQ to get to Dr. Longs’s steallar work – I will funnel these to the LULAC attorneys, along with my TX complaint for election fraud against Boyd Richie, TX D state party Chair, who signed the Certifications of Nomination in TX. http://jbjd.wordpress.com

    • jbjd

      The LULAC lawsuit in TX is based on a violation of the federal Voting Rights Act through the unlawful (unequal) allocation of political party delegates as supported by the state of TX, and not for the actual voting ‘fraud.’

      • tek

        jbjd: If it turns out Obie got into the WH through fraud, would he be recalled?

        • jbjd

          Congress would introduce Articles of Impeachment, not because of the fraud per se – the Electors elected him and Congress ratified their vote – but because the ‘fraud’ could implicate him, inasmuch as he claimed to be a NBC – see AZ application for Presidential preference primary – and yet, no evidence exists in the public record, he is Constitutionally qualified for the job. Get the distinction?

        • jwrjr

          Only with an honest Congress. Yeah, right.

        • FrenchNail

          There is a legal procedure for the removal of individuals illegally occupying elected positions: it is call Quo Warranto.

          The impeachment procedure cannot be used because it refers to individuals who are legally elected but misbehave once in their official positions.

          The Quo Warranto is one of the core issues pursued by Taitz in her lawsuit before Judge Carter in California. It is also the core issue being currently pursued by Leo Donofrio. Naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com

    • lorac

      jbjd – it’s frustrating for all of us that there is plenty of evidence out there, and people with power turn a blind eye. It must be SO much more frustrating for you, out there on the front line. Thanks for continuing to fight.

    • http://www.hillaryorbust.com Hillary or Bust

      Thank you for the work you do. I think we also need a very slickly designed website with soundbites on it to grab people’s attention, and then direct them towards where they can get more data.

      Most of the websites on the caucus fraud are too text heavy and it’s hard to get the basic message without reading through a lot of stats.

  • jbjd

    Ha ha ha ha ha ha! I just realized, you also mentioned Bob Bauer! I am preparing a complaint to the bar against the license of that scoundrel for trying to bamboozle the DC Court into taking judicial notice of a phantom computer image! Hubris got the better of BO/BB when they submitted that request in a footnote in the Motion to Dismiss they submitted in the Hollister case brought by Phil Berg, last January 2009. ‘APFC noted a contemporaneous newspaper birth announcement…’ Conduct of a pompous ass. No name given for the publication that supposedly made that announcement? Hmmm… No hard copy to submit to the court, either? Hmmm…
    http://jbjd.wordpress.com/2009/10/27/bob-bauer-rumored-to-be-next-white-house-counsel-to-federal-court-f-you/

    • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com/ Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy

      Go get ‘em, jbjd!!! :-) You are truly doing the people’s work.

      Isn’t it amazing that the same people who screamed abt the attorneys Bush had are completely mum abt people like Bauer? Amazing…

  • tek

    Amy: Right about that!

    This is what’s wrong with our whole society. Here’s a group receiving billions in tax dollars, they help crooks (actors) set up a house of prostitution for kidnapped 13 yr olds, and there are tons of people who are willing to go to court and swear ACORN didn’t do anything wrong and millions should be restored to them!

    • lorac

      Among many other problems with that, it points to the misogyny in our culture, IMO. They were willing to help someone prostitute young, foreign, helpless girls – something is very wrong with anyone who glosses over that!

      • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com/ Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy

        Amen to that, sister. You said it.

    • IndianaDem

      BILLIONS? A billion is 1 million multiplied by 1 thousand. The high estimate for total federal funds received by ACORN since 1994 is $53 million, or around $3.5 million per year.

      • Unabashed Galt

        Apparently $3.5 million per year too much.

        • IndianaDem

          Some might find the fact that a few actual billion federal dollars have gone to politically conservative non-profit organizations through the “Faith Based Initiative” equally questionable–particularly when right-leaning partisan views and specific election opinions have been actively promoted by said organizations.

          The acceptability of federal funds for community activism apparently depends on what community you’re active in, and what your politics are.

          • Unabashed Galt

            I belong to neither community. I was and still am against the “Faith Based Initiative” for Constitutional reasons as well as the separation doctrine and fiscal conservative reasons.

  • TeakWoodKite

    “We have due process in this country, and our Constitution forbids lawmakers from singling out a person or group for punishment without a fair investigation and trial.”

    Bring it on I say! The arrogant sense of entitlement is second only to BO’s. So if they are recieving public grants and they are 503(?) does not the law require their books to be public? How come ACORN can say explicitly how the publics money is being used?
    That is a lot of sound equipment unaccounted for.

    Rev. Amy on a slight Tangent to this , with the incoming OLC Bouer, can anyone explain to me how it is not a conflict of interest, that Bauer is BO’s personal attorney and the lawyer for the office of the president?

    Does anyone know what Bauer was doing in 1981 to 1983?
    How did Bauer and his wife meet BO?

    • Unabashed Galt

      If something negative is uncovered:

      “That’s not the Bauer I knew!” :D

  • Tim
  • Doc99

    If you want exposure, I offer two words – Glenn Beck. I Know … but sometimes fire IS needed to fight fire.

    • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com/ Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy

      You’re right, Doc99 – say what you will abt Glenn Beck, but he has single handedly exposed Van Jones, Anita Jones, AND done a lot on ACORN. I can see him running the Caucus Fraud videos.

      Could it really be as simple as sending them to him?

      • Ladydawnelle

        this acorn didn’t fall far from the tree

        http://www.infidelsparadise.com/?p=8251

        LOL it’s too funny this hat! seems to fit though!

      • http://www.hillaryorbust.com Hillary or Bust

        Glenn Beck is the perfect person to get these caucus videos out. Anyone know how to contact him? (Besides maybe sending him a message via Twitter, which I guess we can try?)

  • I’m a Linda too

    I just could not believe it when I heard this load of crap. And, the argument, “unconstitutional” is an absolute joke. And no Judge should even allow this to a court room.

  • Clara

    Two lovely strong women, friends of mine in different cities in Texas, also contributed to this caucus fraud video. Their description of what happened on primary night in Texas was appalling and it shook them to their core. Each was a precinct captain who took seriously her duties to run an honest event. Each faced chaos, intimidation and thuggery at the hands of BO’s goons. I’d love to see this picked by a national outlet and brought to the public’s attention now that the Kool Aid is wearing off for some.

  • mountainaires

    ACORN may have to file for bankruptcy protection before Christmas, ACORN insiders say.

    “They may have to file for bankruptcy if they don’t have several big pending grants approved or get emergency loans,” a highly placed ACORN source told me over the weekend. This information bolsters Rep. Darrell Issa’s (R-Calif.) claim last week that ACORN is in turmoil amidst internal power struggles and on the verge of bankruptcy.

    Given that ACORN is a network of hundreds of affiliated nonprofits, it’s not exactly clear how a bankruptcy filing would work, but the idea is under serious consideration by ACORN’s leadership. It was discussed at length at the group’s most recent national board meeting, which took place in the suburbs of Washington, D.C., during the Oct. 14-15 weekend, ACORN sources told me.

    But even if ACORN were to go bankrupt, that doesn’t mean it would disappear.

    ACORN may dissolve and then re-emerge as a new organization, the group’s lawyer Arthur Z. Schwartz says. Such a re-organization may involve “the creation of new nonprofit entities in each state where ACORN functions, as ACORN considers moving from a centralized corporate structure, to a decentralized federated structure,” Schwartz said. “ACORN will need help from people who have handled rebranding.”

    As of Nov. 11, ACORN and its affiliates owed at least $2,328,596 in long overdue back taxes to all levels of government. Many of the tax liens, which are only issued by creditor tax agencies after a tax debt has become seriously delinquent, do not appear in the Nexis database, so the actual total may be much higher. ACORN has been negotiating with tax collectors to have interest on its tax debts waived and to have some of the debts partially forgiven.

    The new tax lien data throw new light on why ACORN can’t sell its former headquarters at 1024 Elysian Fields Ave. in New Orleans. French Quarter Realty is asking $835,000 for the property, which is now weighed down by a whopping $1,278,862 in tax liens.

    Full article:
    http://spectator.org/archives/2009/11/16/acorn-goes-for-broke