RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Big Apple GITMO Torture

 

Torture Debate.  

_46354721_composiite_ap_body.jpg

The Obama administration decision just announced to transfer 9-11 Devil KSM to New York to stand trial for mass murder in a Federal court looks to be laden with risks.  The Justice Department states that it will seek the death penalty.  Right away, how does KSM get a fair trial in NYC?

Also, in a court, KSM is presumed innocent,and he has already confessed several times to his conduct without representation:  Will this confession to a military tribunal authority remain in place, will KSM change his plea, will KSM be permitted to confess presumptively without counsel in the Federal system?

Then there is the torture debate.

POTUS and Attorney General Eric Holder have both on several occasions remarked that KSM was “tortured,” when he was subject to the so-called enhanced interrogations at GITMO.

I will wait on the full thinking of the massively shrewd lawyer pool in the nation, but as an amateur reader of US history, I am confounded to think of a model for trying in a Federal court a prisoner who has been tortured to confess his crimes.  It sounds like lynching.  It is lynching, until someone shows me how it is acceptable to torture a man to confess and then to sentence him to death upon his confession?

GITMO Politics

eh0611_foley-square.jpg

The fresh partisan news is that the GOP has immediately seized on the KSM decision to highlight the differences between the parties re national security. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell calls it a “Step backward.”

John Boehner asserts that the White House was “reverting to a dangerous pre-9/11 mentality.”  The major blast comes from Joe Liebermann, who uses WMD rhetoric: “It is inconceivable that we would bring these alleged terrorists back to New York for trial, to the scene of the carnage they created eight years ago, and give them a platform to mock the suffering of their victims and the victims’ families, and rally their followers to continue waging jihad against America.”

Lieberman’s point will be a rallying cry for his colleagues John McCain and Lindsey Graham. It is a fair guess that all New York lawmakers in Washington and Albany will contribute to the hissing and shrieking.

Why does the Obama administration want to pick this fight? Is it because there is no one of weight in the White House from New York City? Can POTUS and his political advisers, chiefly Rahm Emanuel, David Axelrod and Valerie Jarrett, be ignorant of New York and its pols? The 9/11 families live here and exercise overwhelming political moxie.

The trial will make NYC the center of the known universe for legal, moral, political, spiritual and historical firefights?   Everyone can imagine the security problem.  Foley Square (right) as target uno for the world’s do-I-feel-lucky jihadist cell.  Then there are the sicko Hasans of the planet, some of have been known to visit New York.  

NYC Risk.
There is the additional puzzle as to why the process of military tribunals, which was underway for KSM as recently as December 2008, did not answer the Obama administration’s concerns? KSM admitted to the court that he is guilty. He did so the last time he faced a military judge in GITMO. He was ready to be sentenced. So were his four conspirators. The Obama administration chose last January to set all that aside and proceed to this mysterious ten month review (after saying it would require six months), and the result is this confusion.

Eric Holder asserts that he is confident that the prosecution will be successful in obtaining a guilty verdict and the death penalty. But this is a Federal courtroom. Anything can happen, including especially treating the accused as not guilty and then risking a failure to convict.

Perhaps KSM will do us a favor and interpret his life as martydom, insisting he is guilt, shunning lawyers, and asking to be executed. I cannot now answer (because I am an amateur historian) if a court is permitted to permit a defendant to insist upon guilt and execution without examining how the evidence provided by the prosecution was obtained. That would be the torture defense.

Ed Hayes has told me repeatedly that he does nto see how you can get a conviction in Federal court based upon torture or even with torture as part of the process of detention since 2002.  I am eager to learn how the prosecutors maneuver through an obstacle course that is immediately crowded with three centuries of jurisprudence about the accused and with every civil libertarian alive and dead.

Then there is the death penalty part.  How can Uncle Sam execute a man who POTUS has declared a victim of torture by Uncle Sam?  This alone will be law school debate for the next several centuries.

Look at how the 1865 Federal court treated the Lincoln conspirators.  Who does not squirm at reading the abuse of the prisoners — the hanging of Mary Surratt?

GITMO Forever.

091113_craig_2_ap_297.jpg

There is still the lingering problem that there are cases at GITMO that will not be tried in Federal Court and that have yet to be adjudicated.  The question remains, what is to be done with a convicted terrorist who remains dangerous and cannot be jailed forever?

Also, closing GITMO is a partisan political chip for the Obama administration.  What of the detainees at Bagram airbase outside of Kabul, which the Obama administration has been using as a catch-all.  It is filling up with terror suspects, many of whom we do not know nor will likely ever learn of.

What is to be done with the New GITMO?  Leave it to the next Attorney General?  Is that what Greg Craig said before he was fired?  We will get the story, but for now it looks that the Obama team over promised and now under delivers — and Greg Craig was the fall guy.

gitmo-cell.jpg

………..

From the blog for my syndicated radio show.

On Sundays at 11:00 ET: Larry Johnson joins the “experts panel” weekly on my West Coast syndicated radio show. Listen via KFI-AM.

  • Mandelay

    Very thought-provoking article, thank you! Here’s one from the London Times —
    sounds like the U.K. could use a Gitmo of their own.

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article6917296.ece

    • hokma

      If this is known by Obama and his people it is certainly not something they care about.

      There intent is to show that they are treating 9/11 as a single criminal act and not part of a war. And they want to denegrate the Bush administration and their handling of national security to try and make it a 2010 and 2012 campaign issue.

      The problem is that this will backfire on them and become a Waterloo for Obama and Democrats and at the expense of our country’s standing in the world and our safety.

    • TeakWoodKite

      the media frenzy will be second to none.

      I have been scratching my head for sometime as to why this clueless administration is dumb enought o have these feces of human waste tried in NYC. Therw will be a very strong sentiments about the security nightmare and “in your face” insults to NY.

      Great! Why the Circus? Has there been any legal opinions fromt the AG as to why this trash is not in a Military court? They are combatants. They have the lives and blood of Americans on their hands, As much as I detest torture of human beings, they wish to martyr themselves. I would do them one better, but I can’t say it would not be the equivalent of being held captive by the Baal.

      • maryann

        They weren’t read Miranda rights. The information gleaned about them will be tainted with rants about torture, therefore unusable. Conspiracies are incredibly difficult to prove in court.

        They will be acquitted and I hope that they are. The agenda of the Obama administration (the usurper’s administration) is to try Bush and America, not the terrorists.

        Heck he can’t even use the word “terrorist”, it’s taboo.

        His legacy will be freeing and funding terrorists and excoriating America which will harm only Obama, and trying Bush which will only satisfy those seeking revenge while making the rest scratch their heads and say, “But Bush isn’t president any longer.”

        • lorac

          I’m not a lawyer, but what you said in your first paragraph is stuff I’ve been wondering about. What IF nothing they have can be used, or can be used to throw the case out? Can’t the adminstration see ahead to potential problems? And can’t they recognize that if this happens (apart from the bad effects of loose terrorists) that the majority of people will turn against them and vote them out? (although, if, as they say, a civil trial will take years, they may assume they’ll already be re-elected by the time the trial is done).

          I AM really starting to wonder about their ability to look ahead and imagine different scenarios. Like with this Afganistan issue – how hard was it to know, even during the campaign, that there would need to be decisions about what to do? And how many possibilities are there, anyway? Withdraw, maintain status quo, increase troops – how can it take months (really, almost 2 years) to know what you want to do??? Maybe it’s the inability to make decisions, though.

  • Doc99

    Holder’s (and Obama’s) Hidden Agenda.

    • SamuelSaysIt

      Praise the Lord. Let it ALL come out. Finally!

      • http://! stodgie

        samuel, aren’t you on the wrong forum? and they are giving out meds now so begone.

      • TeakWoodKite

        It’s ok Stdgie, he is full of it. BO internalized is the mother of all constipation.

        The truth is hard to digest.

  • NomNomNom

    BHO is a neocon mole: his fascist warmongering policies in the service of oligarchies foreign and domestic are identical to his predecessor’s.
    the trials are nothing more than a charade to drum up support for the wars in Afghanistan; Pakistan.
    the trials will additionally provide a smokescreen for all his backers’ other doings (ie finishing off our economy from any hope of recovery via more looting) because the msm will cover nothing else for the interim.
    the outcomes of the trials are the least of the problem.

  • Hank

    Obama’s Blame CZAR needs to start defending himself, well maybe not let him make a fool of himself. I think they are only doing this to cover up the crap that Obama, Pelosi and Reid have brewing. This trial will only be used to cover up the socialist agenda.

  • http://! stodgie

    this is backfire on obama in to many ways to count right now. the american people are tired of him and his other tools screwing with our country.

  • yttik

    If this guy was actually a US civilian citizen we’d have to toss the case out because so many rules were already broken. We’re not going to do that (I hope) so I guess we’re going to go thru the motions and give the illusion of a trial? I mean the whole thing boggles my mind.

  • http://! stodgie

    i read that all of the gitmo detainees will be housed in ill. now isn’t that special? oldbummer could lose ill in the next election due to this. i can’t imagine that the majority of people there including the aa’s who voted for obama will appreciate this.

    • Hank

      Maybe since the Oylmpic bid didn’t turn out for Valerie Jarret. She will lease the property to the US Gov’t to build whatever is necessary to house the Gitmo terrorist.

    • Doc99

      They should house the Club Gitmo guests in the same Public Housing that Obama’s cronies let go to hell.

  • ziggy

    If we could only put them all in cryogenic suspension, no one would ever have to make a decision…

    • Unabashed Galt

      Prezidunce Waffles would love that! :D

    • TeakWoodKite

      Ziggy, after all this time I thought I would check how your journey is progressing. I mean, and correct me if I am wrong, you have been square in BO’s corner out of the gate?

      It appears, by your very funny recent comments, your views regarding BO are changing? Just curious.

      I do not know about you but, I can’t escape the visual image of people I grew up with jumping out of the towers to their death, at the hands of these creatures of Wahhabism’s creation, as they sit in federal court smirking. Double jeapordy is a possibility.

      • Unabashed Galt

        I noticed the change as well. Either ziggy:

        1.) Has had a change of heart maybe due to us?

        2.) Is schizo?

        3.) Has a clone or an evil twin from the antimatter universe?

        :D

        • TeakWoodKite

          I thought is was me. ;)

      • ziggy

        I’m relieved that we’re finally going to take some sort of definitive action with these people. I’m really not certain which sort of definitive action is best. Civil court holds risks, but trial by a military tribunal could be more easily portrayed by our enemies to their advantage. I’m hoping the more open process will clearly demonstrate to the world what we are, and what the people on trial are. We’re already clear on that point ourselves.

        I don’t think I’m as square in Obama’s corner as some might think. I tend to be issue-oriented, and take his side on those where I agree with him. On the other hand, I’m critical of both past and current administrations on matters of fiscal irresponsibility, refusal to deal with immigration issues and campaign and lobbying reform, etc. I’m also ticked that stimulus money hasn’t directly created more new jobs. I’d have gone for public works projects to put our infrastructure back together, and something more than demonstration projects in the area of alternative energy. The only rationalization for spending deficit dollars is to be spending them on things that will clearly have a larger future payoff.

  • I’m a Linda too

    And isn’t it funny, a recent poll conducted says 73 percent of voters fear wrong person may be executed for crimes they did not commit.

    And don’t you forget, when a “death penalty” is specifically being seeked, the jurors have that on their mind when deciding. So, it’s either all or none, and don’t you doubt that is not on the mind of Obama admin.

    OMG, what would happen if KSM was found not guilty, because jurors felt sorry to send him to death?

  • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

    Every time I see that guy’s photo I think of the Missing Link.

    • Unabashed Galt

      Apologies to the real Missing Link I assume? ;)

    • Nellie

      Uppity,

      Last picture I saw of the missing link makes him appear more human than KSM.

  • HARP

    I think they should have a really quick trial,get acquitted and then they can drop them off in Hell`s Kitchen. I`d give them all of twenty minutes to live.

  • Hank

    Broadcast pioneer NBC prepares for cable takeover
    AP

    FILE – In this Oct. 29, 1935 file photo, Walter Winchell, U.S. journalist and AP – FILE – In this Oct. 29, 1935 file photo, Walter Winchell, U.S. journalist and broadcaster, is seen during …

    By DAVID BAUDER David Bauder – Sat Nov 14, 11:24 am ET

    NEW YORK – Eight decades after pioneering the concept of broadcasting, NBC is on the verge of a startling move that illustrates broadcast television’s decline.

    Cable TV operator Comcast Corp. is expected to buy a controlling stake in NBC Universal, perhaps as early as this week, bringing the network of Johnny Carson, Jerry Seinfeld, Bob Hope, Milton Berle and Tom Brokaw under the corporate control of the company that owns the Golf Channel and E! Entertainment Television.

  • Docelder

    Nothing makes any sense but the truth. KSM isn’t really the one on trial… Bush-Cheney will be the ones on trial. Must keep the evil Bush-Cheney effigy going. Legs will stop tingling soon unless the effigy of Bush-Cheney is kept on life support. So long as Bush-Cheney is bad Obama can blame them for everything and even get re-elected. Obama people aren’t so smart. But you don’t need to pass any iq test to vote. Hold onto one-love Obots. It’s all there is… emptiness.

  • HEPT

    ROFLMAO they ain’t gonna try Terrorist, they are going to try G.W. Bush, the Bush administration and the Iraq war by proxie.
    Everyone knows this and no one gives a damn.
    Bush and company will be found guilty and the demos will let the killer’s walk away free men.
    demos hate America and beleive Americans are stupid and that’s another thing this trial will bring out, Americans are stupid.

  • Just_Saying

    This is one matter in which the Secretary of State should have clear input. Secretary Clinton’s reaction to this insane idea of charging KSM in a criminal court in NY is very telling: “….Asked by moderator David Gregory where she stood on the matter, her response was the ultra-tepid: “I’m not going to second-guess any decision the Attorney General made. …If the Attorney General and veteran prosecutors think this is the best way to achieve [the desired] outcome, then I think that they should be given the right to move forward as they see appropriate.” (http://www.weaselzippers.net/blog/2009/11/abandon-ship-hillary-punts-when-asked-to-defend-decision-to-try-ksm-in-nyc.html)

    Hillary is no longer the honest and well-thought out individual we knew. Our Hillary would have said, “Hell no, it’s wrong,” no matter what Obummer and his minions chirped.

    Where did you go, Hillary?
    .

  • fred1

    I am concerned about the danger of an acquittal, based on the waterboarding Khaled Sheik Muhammad received many times in Gitmo. As far as the death penalty is concerned, I would rather see him be sentenced the same way Sheik Abdul Rachman was for the first World Trade Center bombing: solitary confinement for life. To execute these extremists is to grant them what they most desire: to become a martyr.

  • Pingback: Take This, KSM: We Bless America : NO QUARTER

  • Alice Finny

    Well, it is very interesting article you shard with us, It is very amazing.
    Portable eye wash