Comments on: Mom, This Post Is For You http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/36339/mom-this-post-is-for-you/ Sun, 27 May 2012 09:27:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: tours http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/36339/mom-this-post-is-for-you/#comment-1455575 tours Tue, 08 Feb 2011 03:22:32 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=36339#comment-1455575 Mothers day is the best day for the celebrating the achievment and make them proud to be a women.Women sacrifies a life for the family so we appriciates them and we have to save the life of the girls.I am very proud to be apart of this wonderful goup. <a href=" http://www.visitshellisland.com/">tours</a> Mothers day is the best day for the celebrating the achievment and make them proud to be a women.Women sacrifies a life for the family so we appriciates them and we have to save the life of the girls.I am very proud to be apart of this wonderful goup.
<a href=” http://www.visitshellisland.com/“>tours</a>

]]> By: jasikajohnson http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/36339/mom-this-post-is-for-you/#comment-1438060 jasikajohnson Wed, 29 Dec 2010 07:10:14 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=36339#comment-1438060 Well I also think that cancer is really a seriour and some what dangerous, It's positive results generate a  lot of  tests and procedures, in the end that does not change the likelihood of death from breast cancer. <a href="http://www.fivesistersbusinesspark.com">Five Sisters Business Park</a> Well I also think that cancer is really a seriour and some what dangerous, It’s positive results generate a  lot of  tests and procedures, in the end that does not change the likelihood of death from breast cancer.

<a href=”http://www.fivesistersbusinesspark.com”>Five Sisters Business Park</a>

]]> By: jenny http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/36339/mom-this-post-is-for-you/#comment-1423744 jenny Tue, 09 Nov 2010 06:45:40 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=36339#comment-1423744 This was really a great post, given by you, well I think that I was glad to see the new recommendations, I also believe the new research, despite distrusting the government. <a href="http://www.promotionalpensrus.co.uk">printed pens</a> This was really a great post, given by you, well I think that I was glad to see the new recommendations, I also believe the new research, despite distrusting the government.

<a href=”http://www.promotionalpensrus.co.uk”>printed pens</a>

]]> By: grapeseed extract http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/36339/mom-this-post-is-for-you/#comment-1286402 grapeseed extract Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:47:43 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=36339#comment-1286402 Good post!I totally agree with you.I also heard this group's name for the first time here.So right that some countries kill baby girls before they born and here this is done after everything done.This will continue till no one will argue against them and try to protest.I will around for more.Thanks for sharing. Good post!I totally agree with you.I also heard this group’s name for the first time here.So right that some countries kill baby girls before they born and here this is done after everything done.This will continue till no one will argue against them and try to protest.I will around for more.Thanks for sharing.

]]> By: Tosk59 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/36339/mom-this-post-is-for-you/#comment-1279523 Tosk59 Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:47:02 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=36339#comment-1279523 They <strong>are</strong> sticking to primary care issues... exams, screening, etc. <strong>are </strong>primary care issues. If cancer is found, then yes the specialists are brough in (oncologists, etc.) Nothing in what changed was related to treatment... They are sticking to primary care issues… exams, screening, etc. are primary care issues. If cancer is found, then yes the specialists are brough in (oncologists, etc.)

Nothing in what changed was related to treatment…

]]> By: thetownecrier http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/36339/mom-this-post-is-for-you/#comment-1279180 thetownecrier Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:12:26 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=36339#comment-1279180 If anyone does not believe that health care dollars could not ultimately be rationed by recommendations by federal panels like this one, see what the LA Times had to say. <em>As much as we would like to believe that every life is worth endless amounts of money, there are limits on resources for healthcare. It makes sense to locate those resources where they do the most good.</em> http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-mammograms20-2009nov20,0,2635437.story If anyone does not believe that health care dollars could not ultimately be rationed by recommendations by federal panels like this one, see what the LA Times had to say.

As much as we would like to believe that every life is worth endless amounts of money, there are limits on resources for healthcare. It makes sense to locate those resources where they do the most good.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-mammograms20-2009nov20,0,2635437.story

]]> By: thetownecrier http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/36339/mom-this-post-is-for-you/#comment-1279179 thetownecrier Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:04:27 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=36339#comment-1279179 Then they should stick to primary care issues. Breast cancer is treated by specialists. Cancer is serious. They can talk about numbers on and on. Their study was about breast cancer mortality not being affected by the routine screening in those under 40. Their recommendations are partially derived from the number of false positive results that generate a lot of anxiety, and a lot of additional tests and procedures, that ultimately do not alter the chance of death from breast cancer. Try telling that to someone who is a survivor whose breast cancer was found incidentally on a routine mammogram. Then they should stick to primary care issues.

Breast cancer is treated by specialists.

Cancer is serious. They can talk about numbers on and on. Their study was about breast cancer mortality not being affected by the routine screening in those under 40. Their recommendations are partially derived from the number of false positive results that generate a lot of anxiety, and a lot of additional tests and procedures, that ultimately do not alter the chance of death from breast cancer.

Try telling that to someone who is a survivor whose breast cancer was found incidentally on a routine mammogram.

]]> By: thetownecrier http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/36339/mom-this-post-is-for-you/#comment-1279178 thetownecrier Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:54:08 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=36339#comment-1279178 From routine mammography. From routine mammography.

]]> By: thetownecrier http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/36339/mom-this-post-is-for-you/#comment-1279177 thetownecrier Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:52:49 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=36339#comment-1279177 A new report by the American Cancer Society (ACS) shows that in the US, the overall rate of deaths from breast cancer in women continues to fall by around 2 per cent a year, a trend that started in 1990. http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/83639.php A new report by the American Cancer Society (ACS) shows that in the US, the overall rate of deaths from breast cancer in women continues to fall by around 2 per cent a year, a trend that started in 1990.
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/83639.php

]]> By: thetownecrier http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/36339/mom-this-post-is-for-you/#comment-1279171 thetownecrier Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:21:07 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=36339#comment-1279171 The types of doctors in this group that came out with those recommendations are preventative medicine. Medical doctors, nurses, and Ph.D.'s but not one is a medical oncologist, surgical oncologist, or radiation oncologist. It is unclear if they are academicians, practitioners, or a mixture of both. Statistics give only so much of a picture. The following table should give a hint that breast cancer incidence is not something that just starts at 50. The incidence starts bumping notably at 40. Probability of Developing Breast Cancer Within the Next 10 years By age 20 = 1 out of 1,985 By age 30 = 1 out of 229 By age 40 = 1 out of 68 By age 50 = 1 out of 37 By age 60 = 1 out of 26 By age 70 = 1 out of 24 Lifetime = 1 out of 8 http://www.imaginis.com/breasthealth/statistics.asp Source: Among those cancer free at age interval. Based on cases diagnosed 2000-2002. "1 in" are approximates. Source: American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Facts & Figures, 2005-2006. The types of doctors in this group that came out with those recommendations are preventative medicine. Medical doctors, nurses, and Ph.D.’s but not one is a medical oncologist, surgical oncologist, or radiation oncologist. It is unclear if they are academicians, practitioners, or a mixture of both.

Statistics give only so much of a picture. The following table should give a hint that breast cancer incidence is not something that just starts at 50. The incidence starts bumping notably at 40.

Probability of Developing Breast Cancer Within the Next 10 years

By age 20 = 1 out of 1,985
By age 30 = 1 out of 229
By age 40 = 1 out of 68
By age 50 = 1 out of 37
By age 60 = 1 out of 26
By age 70 = 1 out of 24
Lifetime = 1 out of 8

http://www.imaginis.com/breasthealth/statistics.asp
Source: Among those cancer free at age interval. Based on cases diagnosed 2000-2002. “1 in” are approximates. Source: American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Facts & Figures, 2005-2006.

]]> By: Tosk59 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/36339/mom-this-post-is-for-you/#comment-1279170 Tosk59 Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:16:31 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=36339#comment-1279170 Re the "no oncologist" issue, a simple answer.. The Task Force is made up of <strong>primary care physicians</strong> and they are addressing primary care issues. Re the “no oncologist” issue, a simple answer.. The Task Force is made up of primary care physicians and they are addressing primary care issues.

]]> By: T http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/36339/mom-this-post-is-for-you/#comment-1279107 T Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:20:52 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=36339#comment-1279107 If you haven't heard that, you haven't been reading. Actually prostate cancer has an even higher rate of over-diagnosis and over-treatment -- which can lead to serious urological problems. And they're no longer recommending screening for average risk men. http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/ped_2_3X_ACS_Cancer_Detection_Guidelines_36.asp This whole notion that these guidelines are a huge conspiracy is just crap. I've been reading the data for years, and mammogram increases diagnoses of "borderline cancer" like DCIS, but does not increase survivability of aggressive cancers. Is it possible that this was an over-hyped test? Is it possible that this test was over-sold, just as drugs are oversold? Answer, yes. I find it ironic that this article criticizes the 'cherry-picking' of data, without supplying any contradicting data of its own at all. Early detection, like many issues, is about the shades of grey. Is detecting cancer that would never go on to spread really a good thing? If you haven’t heard that, you haven’t been reading.

Actually prostate cancer has an even higher rate of over-diagnosis and over-treatment — which can lead to serious urological problems. And they’re no longer recommending screening for average risk men. http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/ped_2_3X_ACS_Cancer_Detection_Guidelines_36.asp

This whole notion that these guidelines are a huge conspiracy is just crap. I’ve been reading the data for years, and mammogram increases diagnoses of “borderline cancer” like DCIS, but does not increase survivability of aggressive cancers.

Is it possible that this was an over-hyped test? Is it possible that this test was over-sold, just as drugs are oversold? Answer, yes.

I find it ironic that this article criticizes the ‘cherry-picking’ of data, without supplying any contradicting data of its own at all.

Early detection, like many issues, is about the shades of grey. Is detecting cancer that would never go on to spread really a good thing?

]]> By: ~~JustMe~~ http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/36339/mom-this-post-is-for-you/#comment-1279105 ~~JustMe~~ Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:09:16 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=36339#comment-1279105 My husbands first wife died at 44 from breast cancer she had a lump in rather an odd place just below her breast they told her it was a sprained muscle when it was detected it had gone too far and was in her bones she broke her leg and thats how they found it!!!! Too late 12 months later she was gone. and a friend died form cervical cancer at 24. The Drs kept telling her there was no way she was at risk of cancer at 24 by the time they did the test after arguing for months it was too late she didn't last 12 months it was devastating!! My husbands first wife died at 44 from breast cancer she had a lump in rather an odd place just below her breast they told her it was a sprained muscle when it was detected it had gone too far and was in her bones she broke her leg and thats how they found it!!!! Too late 12 months later she was gone.

and a friend died form cervical cancer at 24. The Drs kept telling her there was no way she was at risk of cancer at 24 by the time they did the test after arguing for months it was too late she didn’t last 12 months it was devastating!!

]]> By: I'm a Linda too http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/36339/mom-this-post-is-for-you/#comment-1279096 I'm a Linda too Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:05:01 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=36339#comment-1279096 You posted on the wrong comment. But to answer....no, it's not too extreme. Extreme is this administration now saying you are not to perform self breast exams. So gee, if you find one when touching your breasts and you weren't supposed to, because clearly if you see medical help for what you found, but you weren't supposed to touch yourself to find anything, do you really think they will cover you? If there laws for coverage are based on that, won't that make it illegal, or just unlawful :) You posted on the wrong comment.

But to answer….no, it’s not too extreme. Extreme is this administration now saying you are not to perform self breast exams.

So gee, if you find one when touching your breasts and you weren’t supposed to, because clearly if you see medical help for what you found, but you weren’t supposed to touch yourself to find anything, do you really think they will cover you?

If there laws for coverage are based on that, won’t that make it illegal, or just unlawful :)

]]> By: I'm a Linda too http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/36339/mom-this-post-is-for-you/#comment-1279094 I'm a Linda too Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:01:16 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=36339#comment-1279094 I posted it on the other comment. I posted it on the other comment.

]]>