Here’s more of her ‘brilliance’ from that linked piece:

“States don’t cease to be states overnight just because they get a great visionary as their new president.”

and later:

“Can we afford to do without a global figure, a global leader?”

These obamanites are stark raving dangerously crazy! Their bozo has never even fulfilled ONE single smaller job he’s had, says he voted Present in IL because he “pushed the wrong button”, can’t count the states, doesn’t know the capital of Israel, etc. etc. – and they think the job of President isn’t enough for him – he should rule the world!

By contrast to these idiots mesmerized in their own trances, a former student of bozo’s in IL U. wrote a long post about him, based on first hand experience- and, in sum, says even as a lecturer bozo was totally incompetent and not fully present.

Worth reading, it’s at jewsagainstobama

It should be noted that numerous different sources are picking up on this same theme- including the comment above. Frankly, I think it’s all an intuitive recognition of some kind- we’re just not clear of exactly what.

Meanwhile, Obama makes errors like “57 states” ior “8 to 10 years.” These errors are not telling. No one in their right mind (and I realize that doesn’t apply to everyone around here, so apologies for the infusion of common sense that follows) believes that Obama actually doesn’t know how many states there are in the Union, or the length of the Presidential term. These are, quite simply, slips of the tongue, and any effort to make them into something more than that is dishonest. Anyone in public life who spends 14 hours a day campaigning or talking to the media is going to have a certain number of errors creep in.

The question is whether those gaffes reveal anything about the candidates or not. Some of McCain’s errors do reveal weaknesses in his candidacy, and are legitimate topics for discussion. Others, e.g. “veto every beer” or mixing up the Green Bay Packers and the Pittsburgh Steelers, do not reveal anything particularly useful, and are at best fodder for late night comedy. Very few, if any, of Obama gaffes fall into the “reveal some material weakness” category, meaning it’s difficult to build a coherent critique based on them.