We’ve got to be careful. You’re making exactly the same argument Orrin Hatch made for amending the Federal Constitution to ban gay marriage.

Our only defense against the federal version of Prop 8 was the Congress. Many of the Senators who voted against the Federal Marriage Amendment said either (1) it was unnecessary because of DOMA or (2) it’s a state issue, not a federal issue. But you want SCOTUS to make it a federal issue? SCOTUS can be over-ruled just like the California Supreme Court. Except that where it’s possible to reverse Prop 8, it would take 100 years to repeal the FMA.

Right now the unpopular Dems have supermajorities they didn’t earn. One terrorist attack, or deeper recession, and the Repubs could end up with large majorities, coupled with surviving, nervous Blue Dogs, to bring back the FMA. So the last thing we need is SCOTUS to get involved.

I’m very critical of our strategy. With all respect to Evan Wolfson, he led us into an ambush in 2004. When a general leads his troops into a slaughter, you don’t make him Supreme Allied Commander. But that’s exactly what we’ve done, pushing the Marriage Equality lobby to the forefront of the broader gay liberation struggle.

Amy, I wasn’t surprised by NY. At a press conference before the vote, the director of Empire State Pride looked like he needed to pass a cantaloupe. My guess is they were pressed to push up the vote for Patterson’s benefit. The spin was ‘just getting a floor vote was a victory.’

The NY state senate is a brothel that should be closed by the Health Dept. Everybody in the state knows it. Every dollar we waste on those skeezers would be better spent supporting gays in the Red States. They face the worst discrimination. The poster is right about one thing: “one conversation at a time.” Starting in the Bible Belt, not Greenwich Village.

I consider this phrase to be very dangerous.

Die endgültige Lösung begann mit den Worten “Leute wie”.

No taxation without representation. Period.

Gay Marriage is a vector that the Left is using as a wrecking ball to establish a moral framework whereby the youth will have absolutely no family model to aspire to.

This will lead to a demographic , cultural and economic collapse.

This Press Release from the Pacific Justice Institute (a group I know nothing about) serves as a good example of how the Left will use Gay Marriage to make the argument that anyone holding to traditional values is a threat to the Left’s Utopia of No Standards and Models. In this Utopia everything is Tolerated except those things to which it is opposed.

(I feel obligated to state clearly that I by no means have the opinion that all advocates of gay-marriage share in this radical aim, I realize many people legitimately view this issue as a natural evolution from the past civil rights movements….. I think those good-natured folks have not critically examined the unintended consequences of gay marriage)

Parents Take a Beating from School District, Court in Anti-Bullying Case
City:
Alameda, CA
Date:
12/01/2009

A judge today slammed parents as “bigots” for seeking to excuse their elementary-age children from controversial pro-homosexual curriculum. The parents are being represented in court by Pacific Justice Institute.

PJI Chief Counsel Kevin Snider argued in Alameda Superior Court today on behalf of parents seeking to enforce a provision of the California Education Code that gives parents the right to opt their kids out of health education. Alameda Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch lambasted the parents, repeatedly insinuating that they are bigots and insisting there can be no homosexual indoctrination because people are born that way. The judge equated a view contrary to his own with creationism and called both false.

The legal battle over Alameda’s anti-bullying curriculum has intensified in recent weeks. Leading up to today’s hearing, attorneys for the school district grilled parents in depositions about their religious beliefs. Parents were asked numerous questions about church attendance, sermons they had heard against homosexuality, and whether they were aware that the Bible had been used to defend racism and oppression

I express my opinion , putting value more in societal demographic security and growth.

I believe those principles supersede whatever emotional need an individual has to live a life where he could force everyone to not disagree with him.

The Left has done a great job in Europe turning critical , society-changing policy debates into a Thought Police where no one could say the obvious for fear of being called a “racist”

Now their entire survivability as a Civilization is threatened.

All because Leftists were able to cower people from speaking by using the “Oh you’re a hater” accusation they have mastered so well.

What’s been exposed in your small mind? That I dont adhere to absurd political correct mumbled thinking?

Guilty as charged and i’m not even black.

Why should they not for Heaven’s name!

Only SEXUAL UNIONS BETWEEN BOYS AND BISHOPS ARE PERMITTED!

Wonder how these penis heads who have no clue as to female anatomy ever get to have a voice from our First Covert Gay Prez!