http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100019301/climategate-another-smoking-gun/

According to the IPCC, the Himalayan glaciers could be gone by 2035.

Or should that be 2350? Yep it seems those scientific experts who make the IPCC’s reports so famously reliable and trustworthy have a bad case of numerical dyslexia.

none of the 10 authors of the 2007 IPCC report could spot the error and “misread 2350 as 2035″.

President Obama’s spokesman said last week that the president supported a short-term fund to aid developing nations and that the United States would pay “its fair share.” In many multilateral efforts, the United States picks up a quarter to a third of the tab.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/09/science/earth/09cost.html

In energy infrastructure alone, the transformational ambitions that delegates to the United Nations climate change conference are expected to set in the coming days will cost more than $10 trillion

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/09/science/earth/09cost.html

Gray is the renowned hurricane forecaster and Emeritus Professor of Atmospheric Science at Colorado State University (CSU).

Hurricane Expert Rips Climate Fears: ‘There has been an unrelenting quarter century of one-sided indoctrination’

http://www.climatedepot.com/a/4369/Hurricane-Expert-Rips-Climate-Fears-There-has-been-an-unrelenting-quarter-century-of-onesided-indoctrination

If O’Bambi was geared up for audacious conspicuous consumption in London, why should he
drop anchor in Copenhagen without the trappings of all-American meritocracy? Zeesh! Why run for political office if you can’t strut your
stuff?

http://www.forbes.com/2009/12/03/climate-science-gore-intelligent-technology-sutton.html

Just in case the warming doesn’t work out the new one in the pipe is acid oceans.

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/07/the-acid-ocean-the-other-problem-with-cosub2sub-emission/

Science now loves a good crisis. Rather, crises fund the research and researchers love them a good crisis. There is more where these come from, I am sure of it.

Having received White House backing, the Environmental Protection Agency declared Friday that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are a significant threat to human health and thus will be listed as pollutants under the Clean Air Act

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30264214/?ref=fpbrk

It’s all about control. Obama can’t leave something as profitable as a carbon tax up to congress. His EPA is on it.

As of March 2009[update], carbon dioxide in the Earth’s atmosphere is at a concentration of 387 ppm by volume.[1] Atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide fluctuate slightly with the change of the seasons, driven primarily by seasonal plant growth in the Northern Hemisphere. Concentrations of carbon dioxide fall during the northern spring and summer as plants consume the gas, and rise during the northern autumn and winter as plants go dormant, die and decay. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas as it transmits visible light but absorbs strongly in the infrared and near-infrared.

And….Carbon dioxide is used by plants during photosynthesis to make sugars, which may either be consumed in respiration or used as the raw material to produce other organic compounds needed for plant growth and development. It is produced during respiration by plants, and by all animals, fungi and microorganisms that depend either directly or indirectly on plants for food.

And the EPA has determined this is a TOXIC substance, who is buying this crap?