RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

The Home Stretch for Martha Coakley in the MA Senate Primary

As the most qualified in the field, Martha Coakley has a chance to make history tomorrow, December 8th. I for one hope she does it. Massachusetts has never sent a woman to the Senate. Knowing her record, I suppose I am somewhat partial. The fact that she endorsed the right candidate for President last year and voted for Hillary on the convention floor speaks for her. As usual, it will come down to who has the best Get Out The Vote effort. The New Bedford Standard Times is one of a number of prominent publications giving AG Martha Coakley a strong endorsement for tomorrow’s MA Senate Primary:

…Attorney General Martha Coakley best exemplifies the qualities that make an effective U.S. senator.

A senator must be tough yet polished, a shrewd negotiator who is willing to compromise. Coakley strikes that balance, giving her the edge in a race against opponents who hold similar political views.

As attorney general, Martha Coakley sought to protect homeowners from abusive lending practices long before anyone coined the term “Great Recession.”

In June 2007, she announced an emergency 90-day regulation banning sham rescue schemes that took advantage of homeowners facing foreclosure. Judging the problem too dire to wait for the standard regulatory process, she boldly pressed forward to defend faltering homeowners.

Two months later, she proposed a series of new rules to fight predatory lending.

In 2008, Coakley responded to skyrocketing coastal homeowner’s insurance rates by calling on the state to fund public storm models crafted by academic scientists. SouthCoast homeowners — even those without so much as a water view — say their rates have doubled or tripled in the last few years.

This summer, Coakley filed suit against the federal government for equal marriage benefits, such as Social Security and income tax credits, for same-sex couples.

And in August, responding to growing political support for casinos, Coakley took forward-looking steps to update Massachusetts law with regard to money laundering and other crimes associated with gambling.

Coakley is a leader. She knows the law and is willing to take risks to do the right thing.
…Coakley was the first among the candidates to point out that the abortion amendment in the House health-care reform bill could actually roll back women’s access to abortion.

It does not merely block federal Medicaid funding for abortion for poor women — already the law — but in most cases prevents any government-run health plan or subsidized private insurance from covering abortion, regardless of whose money actually pays for the procedure. States could not use their own matching funds as some do now.
The result would be second-class treatment of poor women.

[snip]

Though gender should not propel an unworthy candidate forward, the gender issue matters. In all of Massachusetts’ long history, it has never sent a woman to the Senate.
It’s time to change that, but not with just anyone. The candidate must be worthy of the Senate, and Coakley is.

She is sharp and at the top of her game, ready to grow into the kind of senator Massachusetts deserves.

Her chief opponent, Rep. Capuano, was recently endorsed by Speaker Pelosi. That in itself is enough to disqualify him in my view. Not to mention his voting for the disastrous Stupak amendment in the House health care bill.

Coakley has also been endorsed by these publications:

Berkshire Eagle, MetroWest Daily News, Waltham Daily News Tribune, Milford Daily News and Dedham Transcript, Patriot Ledger (Quincy), Brockton Enterprise, Providence Journal and Springfield Republican.

Here is a link to a complete list of her endorsements by organizations, elected officials, and business and community leaders follows:

Those wishing to assist in their GOTV effort can e-mail elise@votecoakley.com for an ID to make calls at your leisure.

Coakley has shown courage and knows how to step up to the plate. Here’s hoping the voters agree and step up to the plate for her on Tuesday.

  • Nellie

    Ani,

    I listened to NPR station WBUR about the candidates. Boy is NPR ever pushing Capuano.

    I listend to the presentations about all the candidates. One thing puzzled me. The reporter and Capuano people believe the polls show him close enough so that he will win if turnout is light. Do you have any concrete numbers on the latest polls for this Senate Race?

    • Ani

      She is still ahead in the polls but GOTV efforts are really crucial.

      It is typical that NPR would push the guy that Pelosi endorsed — the may as well be the Obama PR firm. Capuano abandoned women in the health care bill and then tried to backtrack when he got a backlash for it. He is not Senator material.

      Coakley is.

      Thanks for your comment.

      • Nellie

        Ani,

        I agree on Capuanao. He definitely is a self serving Obamaphile.

        Since I wrote the first comment I have been looking for solid numbers in polls. The most recent I found was by Rasmussen – no specific numbers, just a statement saying Coakley is ahead as of Dec 3rd.

        I am going to try Real Clear Politics and see if they have a poll. If you have something solid, please put it in the comments.

        Thanks.

        • Ani

          So far I have not found anymore specific info than you have. I’ve contacted someone in the know on the campaign and am waiting to hear back.

          • Nellie

            Ani,

            I am writing this here as an update. It appears as if the Mass Dems are screwing with the election – again!

            I went to vote. When I got to the polling station there were 2 people in front of me and 1 behind me, checking in.

            The first was a male independent. The ladies at check in asked IF he was going to vote Dem or Republican. He stated Republican and they marked a big RED “R” next to his name.

            The second in line was another man also registered Independent. The ladies at the chick in table also asked if he was going to vote Dem or Republican. He stated dem and they just simply checked his name to vote. They did NOT flag his name.

            I planned on voting for Coakley and am a registered independent. Again the ladies asked me how I was going to vote. I interjected and asked why they were putting large red “R”‘s next independents who choose to vote Republican. The answer I received was that the State government wanted to know which Independents voted Republican. I was angry so I deliberately took a Republican Ballot and wrote Coakley’s name in.

            This is disturbing on several Levels:

            1. There was also a ballot for Libertarians. The poll workers did not ask ANYONE in the time I was there if they wanted a Libertarian Ballot.

            2. The only people being targeted/flagged were Independents voting Republican. The Lady behind me was an independent who took a Libertarian Ballot and her Name was NOT flagged.

            3, Massachusetts is an Open Primary State that uses paper ballots and scanning machines. Previously they simply checked your name and told you to choose a ballot, which are laying in stacks on the table by party. They did not Flag your name for the type of ballot you took. I now have my doubts they even COUNT write – in votes.

            4. The manner in which this was done struck me as an attempt as Voter Intimidation, Harassment and Suppression.

            5. Will there be retribution? I will have to work a couple of days/wk as a sub teacher to pay for my Medicare starting in June 2010. Will I be blackballed? Also I am being operated on tomorrow and will need a few weeks of VNA care. Will I be able to get it?

            What laws are being violated? I believe there are laws stating we have voting booths so vote are confidential, as they always were until today.

            JBJD what do you say to this practice?

    • TeakWoodKite

      I heard on the AM right today, that the NPR senior management is attempting to can NPR reporter Mara Liasson appearances on Fox , alledgedly because FOX is ‘biased’.
      If NPR has it for Capuano, Nancy’s choice, it is no wonder that NPR is actively becoming a media arm of the WH and the NP’s media orifice. By contrast they, NPR, ARE biased as shown during the Bush years. In fact, ever since I was a kid…with Fox it can be expected, but as much as I might support NPR in general, the hypocrasy and unethical behavior is all to obvious.
      Martha Coakley go go go!!!. take what jbjd stated at face value, how ever it would be a thing of beauty to watch NP(R) eat political shit.

      http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/12/report-npr-reporter-pressured-over-fox-news-appearances.php

    • Dan

      yep. within 5% in pagliuca’s poll

      • Nellie

        Thanks Dan.

        This morning the gap was 8 points in Coakley’s favor according to a poll taken over the weekend.

  • Portia Elizabeth

    The Boston Globe had a report a few days ago saying Martha Coakley had been receiving donations from women all over the country.From women. All over the country.

    Imagine what women could do if we could only pull together on a national level.

    • TeakWoodKite

      Can Hillary and Bill make a donation to her?

      • Tuppence 411

        Bill Clinton is on my answering machine encouraging me to vote for COAKLEY. I also got a post card from Capuano with a picture of Nancy Pelosi on it, that went into the woodstove…………

        • Nellie

          Great place for Pelosi – going up in flames!

    • CentralMass

      She got a big goose egg for support from any of the upper echelon in the party. That is probably the best endorsement she could have gotten.

      My state senator and our senior state rep endorsed Coakley.

      My state rep endorsed Capuano and had endorsed Obama. I find increasingly, he does not represent our town. I will not vote for him again.

      Wednesday morning should be interesting.

      • Ani

        She got a big goose egg for support from any of the upper echelon in the party. That is probably the best endorsement she could have gotten.

        Spot on. After what these hypocrites did to Hillary, this makes perfect sense. Hill still beat Obama by 15 pts in MA despite Kennedy, Kerry and Patrick endorsing Obama.

    • Ani

      Amen, Portia Elizabeth. If women stood up for qualified women, instead of turning their backs on a qualified woman in favor of a brand, we’d be on to something.

    • jbjd

      Unbelievable. Do you presume she is competent because she is a woman? I have already experienced firsthand that she is corrupted by personal interests. Too bad I have not completed the book I am writing that details how the state stole this child from his family first, by ‘misplacing’ him in the wrong home and then, when I discovered he was being abused and neglected in the wrong home, intentionally leaving him there, forever, to cover up the crime.

      You know I am not prone to hyperbole; this case I have mentioned before is as bad as I have portrayed. Indeed, this case taught me, there is no crime so horrific that public officials lacking moral and ethical self-restraint will not commit worse so as to conceal their initial misconduct.

    • FranSC

      And Nancy Pelosi endorses the man! So what else is new? And the beat goes on!

  • Peggy Sue

    I’ve been doing a little digging on Coakley. She looks very impressive on paper. She was a diehard Hillary Clinton supporter, and I read that Bill Clinton endorsed her and has done a taping that will be used in 500,000 robo-calls. The police chiefs of the state came out and endorsed her as well.

    I wish her luck. And since Pelosi supports Capuano, he’d be the last one I’d support. I did read that Caroline Kennedy made a public appearance for Alan Khazei.

    Also picked up that in the bellwether community polls Coakley is winning within a 14 pt. range.

    So, she’s looking pretty good.

  • Dan

    Capuano voted against the Stupak Amendment, but if you are voting for Coakley you are voting for Coakley. More papers, more unions, and more elected officials went for Capuano, so good luck tomorrow, but don’t distort his record.

    • Ani

      No he did not. He voted for it. Then he backtracked after the vote and said he would change his mind on amendment because he got into trouble when there was a backlash.

    • fif

      More papers, more unions and more elected officials went for Obama too–what’s your point? Those endorsements don’t have anything to do with quality.

  • jbjd

    Yes, Martha Coakley is loyal, to a fault. That trait explains why she refused to investigate charges of child abuse and neglect I filed with her office, against her friend, a Republican attorney appointed DA by one Republican Governor and then, when he lost election to office, appointed by another Republican Governor to become the Commissioner of the state’s child protection agency. Because the baby he abused and neglected was black and poor; and besides, Ms. Coakley had touted her friend’s ability to turn the “troubled agency around” in a press interview just months before I caught him trying to cover up what he had done to this poor infant.

    She is married to a cop; evidently, they believe she is tough on crime. But I swear on the life of my beloved son, she looked the other way when the accused was her powerful friend; and the victim was a powerless baby.

  • RalphfromBoston

    I am voting for Scott Brown. He’s not a Dem who’s lost his way like the rest of them. Can’t imagine
    supporting any Dem that wants to go play in the Senate with those idiots.
    Scott Brown is against the Public Option. He gets my vote for that alone.
    Do you really want Nancy Pelosi in charge of health care ?
    Martha will probably win,but I’m ready for revolutionary leaders that will take back the country, not shuffle along with the killing of the middle class, business as usual that has been going on too long.

  • RalphfromBoston

    I’m voting for Scott Brown. He’s not a Dem that’s lost their way like the rest of them.
    He’s against the Public Option,and gets my vote for that alone.
    Do you really want Nancy Pelosi in charge of the country’s heathcare ?
    I think Martha will win, but I’m ready for revolutionary leaders, that can save our country form the business as usual senators that are killing off the middle class.
    Martha is more of the same.
    I have awakened.

  • fif

    Boston news just called the race for Martha!

    Another strong woman’s voice in the Senate.