RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Last Days of the Republicans: Part 27 (“Mike Huckabee’s End Times”)

img-author-photo-john-batchelor_120021930309Editor’s Note: Reprinted from The Daily Beast with the express permission of John Batchelor.

——————————————

Commuting the sentence of a cop-killer may be the least of Huckabee’s problems. John Batchelor on the former Arkansas governor’s mindless evangelism—and why the GOP should just skip the 2012 election.

After the tragedy of the sadistic cop-killer Maurice Clemmons, whom Mike Huckabee pardoned while he served as Arkansas governor, the self-effacing Huckabee is back on the keynote circuit, telling boastful jokes on himself—”It’s great to be in Tennessee. It’s one of the states I carried”—and slipping around questions about running for president again.

Huckabee is also voluble these days as a TV, radio, and publishing personality, dispensing folksy clichés that are forgotten before he chortles at himself and offending no one at all, not even the Democrats.

Mike Huckabee has completed his conversion from Republican dark horse in the 2008 presidential campaign to what appears to be a harmless, aimless novelty who will perk up like a favorite son of Mayberry to confess, “The Fox gig I’ve got right now is really, really wonderful.”

The lone partisan significance of the cop-killer episode is that Huckabee’s largest donors in Israel now regard him as extremely unlikely as a candidate who can be trusted to make choices between the Devil and common sense.

Then again, there is no reason to believe much of Huckabee’s palaver when he claims he is “less likely to run” because “I would have to see the Republicans unite behind me.”

Mike Huckabee is an ambitious and craven Republican politician who will do exactly what he must to exploit his effectiveness in the weakest parts of the GOP—the bullying evangelicals, the cloying faux-Confederate vote, and the cynical elitists like Newt Gingrich, Dick Cheney, and Rush Limbaugh, whom I think of as Republican zombies.

Mike Huckabee, 54, is no one’s idea of a well-educated citizen.

As a youth, Huckabee was a Baptist pastor in Arkansas—mostly as a platform to exhibit his hambone one-liners on cable channels—and he wears this fleeting experience like a Harry Potter invisibility cloak to cover up his incuriosity of the world, the flesh, and the Devil.

That he performed notably at all in 2008 is not a credit to Huckabee but rather a verdict on the mortification of a party that was left without more than John McCain’s worn stubbornness and Mitt Romney’s deaf arrogance, and that today enjoys no stronger field, staring at the exuberant glamour of Sarah Palin and the leaden Sam’s Club marketing of Tim Pawlenty to add to Romney warmed over like cold liver.

Huckabee will loiter in Republican circles until the party confronts its addiction to the cunningly insufferable over the last 40 years, such as Pat Robertson, Pat Buchanan, Gary Bauer, and the new winking scold, Palin.

Huckabee’s ambition includes two hand-holds that he believes will keep him viable as a presidential candidate. First, Huckabee believes that creationism provides a sturdy constituency. He is a not just a grinning creationist, he is also willing to disdain Darwinism with a sinister pugnacity.

In a 2007 New Hampshire Republican debate, Huckabee pontificated when asked if he believed the world was created by God in six days’ time and is now 6,000 years old, “I don’t know, I wasn’t there, whether God did it in six days or whether he did it in six days that represent periods of time…”

It is challenging to say what is worse for the GOP in the 21st century: that Huckabee is sincere and doesn’t know that our planet is a product of 4 billion years of collisions and blessed chance and that our flora and fauna (including us) are the product of half a billion years of evolution since the Cambrian explosion, or that Huckabee does know that the creationism is spam by a tiny cult that he counts on in beauty-contest polling to attract the superstitious and the unloved.

What makes Huckabee’s useful idiocy most damaging to the GOP was contained in a remark to CNN’s Wolf Blitzer in the New Hampshire debate. “If anybody wants to believe he is descendant of a primate, they are certainly welcome to it—I don’t know how far they will march that back….” This is naked Scopes Trial exploitation and a clumsy rejection of Darwin’s genius Origin of the Species.

It is reckless of Huckabee to throw out on national TV a remark that is entirely mendacious; however that is his character as an itinerant hustler. The partisan problem is that Huckabee was standing on a stage with the other GOP candidates when he spoke, and nothing the party has done since has addressed Huckabee’s stupidity nor made clear to the public that a candidate who rejects 150 years of exploration, scholarship, disputation and education has no sense of decency.

What does the Republican Party represent if not support for passionate scientific inquiry in physics, chemistry, biology, geology, anthropology, and genetics?

The Confederates mocked Abraham Lincoln as an “ape” in order to combine their rejection of Darwin’s then-contemporary theory and the Union.

Calling a brave man who believed slavery was wrong was an amusement to slave masters. Today, what health can there be for a national political party that welcomes a jackanape who repeats hooey about the origin of Homo sapiens?

Huckabee travelled to Jerusalem this past summer to secure another base for his political future; he was the guest of the Jewish Reclamation Project, which seeks to move Jews into the historical Arab quarter of the Old City.

Dubbed “Huckabee the Macabee” by his hosts, Huckabee spent two days snacking on a local favorite, shawarma (turkey and honey) and offering vaguely incoherent anachronisms, “…if you’ve studied the Bible you certainly understand this conflict didn’t start in the 1940s. It started with Isaac and Ishmael.” Huckabee was introduced to the significant players and generally treated as a VIP despite the discomfort of his hosts that he lacks curiosity about the conflict with Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Al-Aqsa Brigades.

“He doesn’t know anything,” was one close observer’s summary. What Huckabee does know is how to cash in on his pleasing vacuity; and he accepted what are reported to have been substantial checks.

The lone partisan significance of the cop-killer episode is that Huckabee’s largest donors in Israel now regard him as extremely unlikely as a candidate who can be trusted to make choices between the Devil and common sense.

Despite his bad luck recently, Huckabee’s future in the GOP is as rosy as the rouge on a corpse. Choosing among Huckabee, Romney, Pawlenty, Palin, and even the resident Swami Gingrich, the party could save itself some humiliation and a lot of money and skip the primaries and convention in order to offer a write-in line on the November 2012 ballot.

This could start to make amends for Huckabee’s intolerance and inertness and may even permit some of what is left of the decent GOP to write in a ticket of “Abraham Lincoln and Charles Darwin.”

John Batchelor is radio host of the John Batchelor Show in New York, Washington, D.C., San Francisco, and Los Angeles.

  • yooper

    Gov. Huckabee did the right judgement! If he is God, he won’t pardon him!

  • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com/ Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy

    I don’t care for Huckabee one way or the other, though I definitely do not care for his brand of religion. But it is inaccurate to say he PARDONED Clemmons.

    As I understand it, at the time Clemmons committed his crime, he was 16, and the sentence was extreme given the crime, 108 yrs, which Huckabee commuted to 47 yrs. The PAROLE BOARD was responsible for him. There was no way for Huckabee to know at the time that Clemmons was then going to go on and kill 4 police officers. The Parole Boards in BOTH states fell down on the job, especially when they did not incarcerating Clemmons after he violated parole in both states.

    Here’s a link:http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/12/08/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5939548.shtml

    Again, no love lost for Huckabee, but he cannot be blamed for Clemmons’ actions – if anyone is to blame, the two parole boards are.

  • andrew

    “What does the Republican Party represent if not support for passionate scientific inquiry in physics, chemistry, biology, geology, anthropology, and genetics?”

    I wouldn’t even know how to begin answering that one.

    Huckabee, however, shouldn’t be taking such a negative hit for having commuted Clemmons’ sentence in my opinion–and I’m no Huckabee fan. Huckabee didn’t have a crystal ball; what Clemmons would eventually turn into much later couldn’t have been known all those years before.

    There are people who dealt with Clemmons within the legal system far more recently who have no such excuse. They don’t seem to be taking much heat.

  • Bronwyn’s Harbor

    That is the fair thing to say, Amy. And Huckabee was on Fox last weekend explaining it. However, and this is a critical element in politics — sad to say — it is so easy to say that Huckabee pardoned the cop killer, and so much more difficult to explain the full facts.

    What is that saying? A lie has run around the world before truth gets its shoes on? I know I mangled it, but that’s what happens.

    And what i mean is that in the future, should Huckabee run for anything, any opponent will be able to toss that out and Huckabee will be mired in having to explain it but half the people will never hear his explanation.

    It happened to Hillary too. Even though Hillary and Bill were exonerated re Whitewater, to this day if someone mentions Whitewater, the auto-pilot implication is that she was embroiled in a land-deal scandal.

    Btw, when Hillary and Bill were exonerated, they were so thrilled and thought it was behind them. But NONE of the major newspapers or TV news outlets, save one, published or broadcast that news. They were stunned. It’s all in the great book by Sidney Blumenthal, The Clinton Wars.

  • Smart-Jazz-Just Me

    “It is challenging to say what is worse for the GOP in the 21st century: that Huckabee is sincere and doesn’t know that our planet is a product of 4 billion years of collisions and blessed chance and that our flora and fauna (including us) are the product of half a billion years of evolution since the Cambrian explosion, or that Huckabee does know that the creationism is spam by a tiny cult that he counts on in beauty-contest polling to attract the superstitious and the unloved”..

    I take the tiny cult that Batchelor mentions here includes his wife who is a episcopal minister.

    Besides I never knew the Governor of Arkansas had the power to pardon anyone? I always though he/she had the power to recommend and the power actually belonged with the Parole Board…

    But then again its easy to be a Monday morning quarterback rather that a participant in the arena.

    Though I have my problems with Al Franken and his politics. I have to admire him for his US Senate run. Now he is in the arena making a difference. It might be the wrong difference but he is in the arena. To bad many of these talking heads rather put their wallets before public service…..

    Your better off listening to the Art Bell show rather than these self-serving duck talkers…

  • Docelder

    Both parties suck right now. I think it’s a terminal condition. But for Huckabee… at least they can’t call him a racist or say he executed an innocent man. He’s got that on some politicians. I don’t think he would try to force religion, he is after all a politician and smarter at the game than most right now.

  • Mandelay

    I agree, Rev. Amy. Also, I saw Huckabee explain this today on Cavuto’s show on Fox (4 pm) and I thought he did a very good job of it.

  • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com/ Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy

    Exactly. Again, as I understand it, the sentences for Clemmons were supposed to be concurrent, but ended up being consecutive. To serve a life sentence for his crime was extreme punishment, hence the commutation.

  • I’m a Linda too

    come on John. Surely you don’t mean that. As a life long Republican and slamming those for endorsing 3rd party candidate in NY23 by not following golden rule to toe party line, regardless of how liberal the candidate was, as you said?

  • I’m a Linda too

    what I found amusing was the political game Romney was playing rushing to Huckabee’s side when he thought Huckabee wouldn’t run and be an attack dog. After all, it was Romney that used Huckabee’s other pardon, DuMond, who after being released raped and killed a another woman, to hit him with nonstop in the 08 election.

    …but it is the other 700 that really makes a picture.

  • getfitnow

    I love Coast to Coast!

  • RecoveringDemoholic

    I don’t come here to read the Daily Beast, especially anything by John Batchelor.

    Mike Huckabee is not my cup of tea, but I have yet to see his explanation discredited.

    I am filled with sorrow and rage by murderous acts.

    However, the ‘bleeding heart’ part of me still tilts toward a special consideration for children who commit serious crimes. I can not adequately defend my position or recommend how they ought to be dealt with.

  • http://liberalrapture.com/ John (from Liberal Rapture)

    I would not write off the GOP in 2012 even in their current lame state. Obama was not even a U.S. Senator at this point 5 years ago. The GOP has played defense this year and still come out alright. Next year they’ll truly go on offense – and who knows who will emerge.

    In 2012 Obama will have to do something he’s never done before: run on his record. Until BHO gets back the independents – which is certainly possible – an attractive conservative will be able to make a strong case. If the economy is still limping along an unattractive conservative has a shot.

    I think we are in uncharted waters as a nation. The era of good feeling many thought Obama would usher in has been aborted. While Obama is smart politically I’ve seen no evidence that he’s resilient. Once the Clinton challenge was truly engaged he limped to the nomination with a lot of help from the DNC and the media. He won the general in a year that any of number major Dems would have. Many of the animating reasons to vote for Obama in 2008 will not be in play in 2012.

    Frankly, I would not vote for Romeny but if he runs a smart campaign he has a real shot. The tea party energies need to be corralled – but that’s the nature of our system. 3 more years of Obama and the right will get in line.

    That said Huckabee had no chance before the murders and he has less than none now.

  • Peggy Sue

    I heard a rather chilling comment Pat Caddell [former Demeocratic pollster and strategist for Carter as well as McGovern] made at the tail end of the Beck show this evening.

    He warned the DC crowd, both Democrats and Republicans: Be prepared. The Americans are coming. And they’re coming for you.

    As for Huckabee? I also heard him say his was a commutation, not a pardon. Clemmons was presumably set to serve over 100 years for a crime committed as a 16 or 17 year old–robbery, I think, without a weapon. This was long before the assault charges and child rape accusations.

    Fair or not, this will hang around Huckabee’s neck like an albatross. He seems likeable enough but I could never vote for the man. The last thing we need right now is a preacher turned politician. And anyone who is willing to bring up the Scope’s trial argument against evolution is out-of-step and simply not fit to sit in the WH.

    Republicans better dig deeper for a credible POTUS candidate. But 2010? That’s different matter.

  • http://www.rabblerouserruminations.blogspot.com/ Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy

    I hear you, BH – you are right, of course. This will haunt him from now on.

    The Clintons surely did get the bum’s rush when it came to Whitewater. And another glaring indictment of the MSM, isn’t it? Just like this story with Huckabee.

    I take your point, BH – it truly is easier for the lie to fly, and the truth takes its time…

  • obiewankenobie

    Any Democrat or RINO republican who underestimates Sarah Palin’s political abilities and instincts better watch out! She is going to win the 2012 R. nomination by 20 length going away! All others in the race will be distant also-rans. she has won the hearts of many. Going Rogue is an outline for a creditable platform for the party in 2012. She is no dummy. My question to Mr. Batchelor is; “Did you read her book? and if you did, Where is the critique?”

  • Peggy Sue

    I for one have never underestimated Sarah Palin. Yes, she has political instincts and personality to spare but IMHO lacks experience and qualifications for the WH.

    I haven’t read her book but do tell: what is this credible platform for 2012?

    I have yet to hear Sarah Palin say anything close to specific policy [her own spin, not a verbatim list from the Republican crib sheet]. Other than energy issues, something with which she did have hands-on experience in Alaska.

    Other than that? Nada. Btw, cliches and platitudes don’t count.

  • http://! stodgie

    john, you’d do better to write about writing off the democratic party. that’s more accurate.

  • foxy voter

    I like Sarah Palin but I am weary of exciting candidates. I would like to see Newt Gingrich become President. He is politically savvy and would be a credible President. Obama is a one termer because people are sick of his Amateuristic theatrics. He ran as a Messiah with no discernable governing experience and we’re are in a chit load of pain right now because of it.

    I would like to see Newt Gingrich become President. He is politically savvy and would be a credible President. We must stop giving this country away to telegenic but resume challenged candidates. We can’t afford it anymore.

  • BINKY

    “that Huckabee is sincere and doesn’t know that our planet is a product of 4 billion years of collisions and blessed chance and that our flora and fauna (including us) are the product of half a billion years of evolution since the Cambrian explosion” — I personally could care less about this kind of intellectual crap. What I do care about is getting a President who loves this country, has common sense, and understands fiscal responsibility — oh, and integrity is a nice attribute to have, these things that have been missing in Washington for a few decades. In areas where Huckabee might lacking, he can hire CZARS to help him out. LOL

    Whether Huckabee will run or not, I have no idea and I have no preference. What I am concerned about is getting the idiot Democrats out of Congress as quickly as possible and bring back some balance to our government. If we can do that in 2010, then by 2012 we might be able to work toward getting rid of some corrupt career Republicans. What I’m afraid of is that it will be too late to take our country back from the dictatorship course it’s on and the Republic may be lost to us forever.

    Here’s the type of Congressman I’m longing to see representing me (others may not agree):

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3n6F-ZeQj9Y&feature=player_embedded#

  • BINKY

    You should read her book. She had tons more executive experience than Obutt, plus integrity, and love of this country.

  • http://www.tomdegan.blogspot.com Tom Degan

    Dick Cheney’s most recent kvetch? Obama was “dithering” on Afghanistan. Dithering? Pray tell, do my ears deceive me? Barack Obama was “dithering” on whether or not to send an additional thirty-five thousand kids into harms way? He dithered???

    Oh! Dastardly Dick! Oh! Vile, deceitful Dickie! If thou had thus dithered, might not thy fellow countrymen and women have awaken this morn to a more content and peaceable homeland? Oh, vile and blundering Dick! Naughty Dick! Thou contemptible rascal!

    If you’ve ever read my blog, it’s no secret that it is my profound belief that Obama is committing a monumental mistake by escalating the war in Afghanistan. But let’s give the guy a tip of the hat, okay? At least he had the good sense to think long and hard about what he felt he needed to do – unlike the previous administration that dove head-first and smiling into this quagmire. In spite of my criticism, I believe (I hope) that Barack Obama is essentially a decent guy who means well. As stated previously, it is way too early to give an etched-in-stone assessment of this administration. We need to see where Election Day 2013 finds us. We shall see what we shall see.

    At the moment it would seem that Dick Cheney and his disgusting daughter Liz are fast becoming Number One the extreme right’s nitwit Parade. The darling girl is now promoting a movement ( and, PUH-LEEZ, I hope this is true) that would make dear old dad the GOP nominee in 2012. This can’t possibly be, can it? Optimist though I may be, my luck has never gotten this good! Could this merely be a dream from which I am yet to awake? Pinch me, please.

    http://www.tomdegan.blogspot.com

    Tom Degan
    Goshen NY

  • Sassy

    I like Huckabee on a personal level, but cannot regard him as a serious candidate.
    In fairness to him though, the shorter sentence for Clemmons was recommended by several people at the time, and seems to be reasonable for a non-violent offense.
    As to the GOP, hold the tolling bells of mourning. No candidate could bring less to the table than the “Chicago Kid”!
    My eye is on Gen. Petraeus for 2012, but he recently negated the notion. Bah humbug!

  • Peggy Sue

    Comparing Sarah Palin to Barack Obama does not work to her advantage. It was a better argument when she was running for Vice President. But where I come from 1 unqualified candidate + 1 unqualified candidate = 2 unqualified candidates. They don’t cancel one another out. Neither candidate gains by being added nor compared to the other.

    One thing we should have all learned from the 2008 primary and general election season is that the cult of personality is a poison pill. Doesn’t matter whether it’s a Dem or a Republican.

  • Peggy Sue

    Had another comment swallowed by the spammy monster [or caught in a hiccup]. Please retrieve, if you can.

    Thanx.

  • I’m a Linda too

    i do agree that a one incident of providing clemency for a child criminal that didn’t commit a violent crime would warrant that act. Huckabee would still be responsible for his clemency, but I wouldn’t say at the time it was wrong. It ended up a bad decision, but at the time, given circumstances, it would have been warranted, imo.

    But it’s Huckabee’s extreme commutation/pardon/clemency policy that shows real poor decision making. 700 including Dumond, who after release raped and killed again…after lvg AR to MO. What reasons did he do such extreme release of prisoners. Political, religious, what he viewed as a “real” crime, like rape…considering his past views of women.

    So, while one incident may not be directly his fault, there is so much more to it/him.

  • Peggy Sue

    I share your misgivings about this new escalation in Afghanistan, Tom. But I wouldn’t give Obama much credit for “thinking it out,” since what he said at Westpoint [loaded with contradictions] was basically what he said in March. And saying the President is basically a “decent guy” doesn’t fly for me either. I thought and still believe the same about Jimmy Carter. And he was a disaster in the WH.

    And yes, I’ve heard the suggestion about running Cheney in 2012. Are these people insane? Didn’t Cheney do enough damage in 8 years? The Republicans are truly bankrupt if that’s the best they can do. And we, the American public, are being screwed from both sides of the aisle.

  • I’m a Linda too

    Oh and then that other little thing, that when he left office, Huckabee ordered all computers destroyed wasting and costing the taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars, plus destroying public records.

    There is that matter of scrubbing his hard drives if he truly wanted to hide his communications and actions, instead of destroying all the computers.

  • Doc99

    In the latest Rasmussen poll, more voters would vote for a “Tea Party,” than for the Republicans. Further, among Independents, The “Tea Party” would garner more votes than either Dems or Gop.

  • Docelder

    Well, this is how pathetic congress has become.

    H.R. 390: College Football Playoff Act of 2009 – To prohibit, as an unfair and deceptive act or practice, the promotion, marketing, and advertising of any post-season NCAA Division I football game as a national championship game unless such game is the culmination of a fair and equitable playoff system.

    http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-390

  • Ferd Berfle

    And we, the American public, are being screwed from both sides of the aisle.

    Dickless and That One are alike in two ways: they’re both arrogant and ignorant to a fault. Moreover, they should both stop weakening the nation by opening their gaping pieholes and just shut up.

  • Ferd Berfle

    Sheesh. Those boneheads who ostensibly work for US apparently don’t have enough to do in all those extra hours in the year that they spend not working. If the public wants a playoff, they’ll get one.

  • Bob

    Based on a quick reading it appears the writer is mocking the Christian belief. This shows a real arrogance. The non believers and the far left are bringing down the democratic party.Elitist bull shit want sell either (News flash)The democrats have already lost the 2012 election. The more I listen to democrats the sicker I get and I hate phony ass Republicans– The truth this country has gone to self center hell- A former democrat now a distressed
    citizen who is watching time slip by with nothing or nobody to respect– Religion or beliefs don’t sound that bad asshole

  • Bob

    I pray this country actually elects a man or woman for President that has actually had a non government job. America you got it wrong with Bush and now Obama

blog comments powered by Disqus