Do you or do you not believe that on August 13, 1961, the birth of Barack Obama was announced in the Honolulu Advertiser?

If you do believe it, then why are we having this conversation?

If you do not, then why haven’t you gone to Hawaii to check the microfilm? What, you’re not willing to bet the cost of a plane ticket that you’re right? Not even for the sake of the country? Hmm.

You’re twisting yourself into (hilarious) logical knots in an attempt to prove that this birth announcement isn’t real. Why don’t you actually prove it?

You have a publication and a date (which you claimed factcheck wasn’t providing… oops). It would be simple enough to prove that it’s all false. Wouldn’t it? Then you’d have some serious ammo in your PR battle, and maybe you could get serious people to do something other than laugh at you, for once.

Except the thing is (clearly) you don’t even care whether or not it’s true. You’re just enjoying making a fuss,* and feeling important. I honestly suspect that secretly, you do believe that Obama was born in Honolulu, and you’re just grasping at all the straws you can because you don’t like the results of the (legally valid) presidential election.

For the final time: ha. Seriously; I’m genuinely amused by the convoluted reasoning on display in your work. Bravo.

*How much of a “fuss” it truly is, is unclear… kind of reminds me of the tree falling in the woods with nobody around to hear it.

http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/12/10/tiger-woods-and-barack-obamas-birth-certificate-and-rezko-and-climategate-and-faith-based-science-and-hillary-clintons-victory-in-new-hampshire-part-ii/#comments

admin
December 12th, 2009 at 1:22 am

Is that a left-leaning audience? Because the applause when she came out was thunderous! I think I really like her personality. She’s a fighter, and funny to boot!

ahs, lacking intellectual rigor and authenticity, your continued defense of BO’s Constitutional eligibility for POTUS is now boring me.

The minority opinions that have resulted have been greatly magnified by their systematic broadcast across the internet and through the media. To me it seems as if corporate special interests are countering the majority opinion of climate scientists with a public opinion campaign.

In fact, the conspiracy would need to be even deeper than our colleagues realized. In late July, a researcher looking to dig up dirt on Obama instead found a birth announcement that had been published in the Honolulu Advertiser on Sunday, Aug. 13, 1961:

Obama’s birth announcement

The announcement was posted by a pro-Hillary Clinton blogger who grudgingly concluded that Obama “likely” was born Aug. 4, 1961 in Honolulu.

Now, do you get it? See, APFC found no actual newspaper announcement, or microfilm of a real newspaper announcement, or even an image of a real newspaper announcement that included the trademark name of the newspaper, indicating BO was born in HI. Instead, all they found was an image anonymously posted on another blog put there by someone who claimed this was an announcement of BO’s HI birth, which image s/he claimed to have found in a particular publication.

I imagine the reason you continue to subject yourself to the ridicule you incur for propagating this tripe is that you find grasping at these fanciful straws less painful than having to concede, BO/BB/NP/APFC are all charlatans and you have been ‘punk’d.’

It’s a sport to the likes of Barry Boy!