RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Harry’s Imaginary Friends & His Dangerously Flawed Health Care Plan

Have you ever seen a group of politicians as frenzied as majority leader Harry Reid and his minions in the U.S. Senate? Why, Harry Reid is so desperate that he is touting imagined unanimity among his brethren despite the actual serious reservations held by many wary Democrats.

Have you ever witnessed a cadre of Democrats so frantic to blow life into the embers of the once-stoked presidency of Barack Obama, who chose health care as his centerpiece? It is entirely Obama’s fault. He rolled the dice, sticking his neck out by guaranteeing this incautious bill’s passage. He requires that legislative win so much that he doesn’t care what is in the bill. That’s because his ego, and his very own precious vision of his presidency, are on the line.

Have you ever before observed the obsessive efforts expended on legislation whose passage, the president fantasizes, will make him rank as high as FDR in the history books?

And, bottom-line, have you ever seen a worse piece of legislation than the whatever-it-takes health care bill frantically being tossed together? This bill now expands Medicare to people over 55, “tens of millions more people,” while cutting Medicare’s budget by $500 billion. And (!) while Medicare currently has over $38 trillion in unfunded liabilities? Yes. I know, I know. Harry’s latest “spaghetti against the wall” is illogical financially, and to work it will require severe rationing of care for the elderly and disabled as well as dumping costs on every state. But there it is. As Charles Krauthammer said on Fox’s Special Report yesterday, “It is an IED” that can blow up our nation’s current health care system.

All of this reminds me of an assembled baked hash that tastes awful because of its core ingredients. The cook can try desperately to correct the flavor by tossing in spices and additional ingredients. But the real problems are that the meat is rotten, the potatoes moldy, and the sauce made on the cheap. And nothing can disguise those disgusting tastes and odors.

Obviously, no good cook would ever begin to make hash with bad ingredients. Instead, the cook would find the best ingredients, carefully preparing each to enhance the whole of the hash which, if each ingredient has received proper attention and preparation, will be as delicious as the most haute cuisine there is.

Of note, and it’s no small thing: The consumers of the hash will be pleased, and feel satiated and cared for by the cook.

Would that the American people would feel similarly cared for under Obama’s health care plan.

Then there’s that any recipe, if made with the best ingredients, always turns out well unless the cook really messes up. Medicare is one such good ingredient that works well for those who use it. The addition of tens of millions of new customers will put an impossible burden on Medicare if it has to slash costs by $500 billion at the same time.

Dick Morris explains the dangerous flaws of the current “hash” of a health care bill. And so what if it’s Dick Morris as long as he explains the bill’s economically illogical, slapdash provisions the most cogently?

I have selected a section of DickMorris.com’s blog column, “NEW HEALTH CARE DEAL: THEY’RE ON THE RUN!,” and I have bold-faced a couple points that are critical for you to share with your friends and family:

[...]

[T]he current proposal Reid is loudly trumpeting is horribly flawed. …

It has all of the old flaws (minus the public option) in that the government, through the Secretary of Health, will decide who gets what treatment at what cost and will force rationing through an artificial scarcity on all people, particularly the elderly. And it still has such high premiums for young uninsured people that it will compete with student loans for the honor of being their number one headache.

But the compromise itself is flawed. Here’s why:

1. By breeching the historic dividing line between private and public plans now at 65, it opens the door for an expansion of Medicare to become just the single payer we are trying to stop.

2. How can you expand Medicare, potentially to tens of millions more people while cutting it by $500 billion?

3. The cuts in doctor and hospital reimbursement rates written into this bill will force hundreds of thousands of medical providers to refuse to treat Medicare patients. By applying these low reimbursements to patients 55-64, now, you are driving doctors out of the profession and discouraging others from entering it. A permanent scarcity of doctors will be the inevitable result.

4. The expansion of Medicaid to 150% of the poverty level imposes huge new financial burdens on states. It will cost Texas $3 billion, Pennsylvania $2 billion, California $2 billion, and Florida $1.3 billion. It will cost Arkansas and Louisiana $500 million each. This is net of federal aid and only counts the 10% share of expanded Medicaid costs the states must pay.

It is simple. This bill is financially nonsensical, and therefore dangerous.

It must be stopped lest it destroy the quality of care that this country is famous for worldwide.

It is, as Krauthammer said, an “IED” that will blow up our current system that, despite its flaws, must stay “as is” until such time as we have a president and a Congress who are rational and deliberative in the health reforms that all of us acknowledge we need.

_____________________________

For a sobering look at the monstrous problems facing Medicare, check out the Google results for “Medicare unfunded liabilities.”

Yes. $38 trillion. And that’s just what Medicare owes already, as of May 2009.

Then, as Dick Morris does above, we must factor in the budget crises facing every state and the new demands on every state’s budget that will come via this incautious federal legislation.

Last night, I watched the local news with my neighbors. We saw a report on the massive budget cuts being ordered by the state’s governor.

I looked over at my permanently disabled neighbor who depends on the state’s services to get dental care for her badly infected teeth and gums, and for all of her medical care.

She knew what those budget cuts will mean for her life. It was written all over her face.

She asked that we turn the news off, and talk about something fun. We did. How could we not? Her life of poverty and her painful disabilities are quite enough without now also learning that the services she counts on will likely go away.

That the federal government will add to the state rolls will mean too that my neighbor will have to stand in lines that are two- to three-times as long as she already does. Not to mention that the state, with its budget crisis, will have had to lay off many of the clerks who need to handle the new complex legislation.

Congress is, in truth, passing the financial buck to each state, with few or none of the states able to handle the burdens they already face.

It’s nuts.

  • sowsear

    It’s impossible to fathom why anyone would think they can take $500 billion from Medicare, which is now seeing a large surge of new seniors coming of age at 65, and then plan to expand the program further down to 55. This is either madness or some scheme to destroy the whole system so they can remake it for their own gain and/or the gain of their donors.
    I’m sick with worry about all of these shenanigans.

  • Peggy Sue

    It’s particularly nuts for the very reasons you mentioned, Brownyn. The medicare program is already in arrears, the Dems want to gut it by 500 million, and then add millions to the rolls. This isn’t a kindness to the uninsured; it’s a cruel joke, junk coverage.

    For people like my in-laws, now in their early 80s, it would be devastating. In fact, I’m not even going to mention this to them [they're always asking me to explain what's going on] because even though the Dems have shown themselves totally out of touch, I find it hard to believe that they could/would ultimately support such utter nonsense. And if they do, why get my worry wart mother-in-law in a tizzy at the start?

    As I reported last night, even the Progressives, though late to the party, realize how miserably bad and destructive this legislation would be, worse than the status quo. Which is going some.

    I simply do not know what’s happened to the Democratic Party. They seem to have lost their minds.

  • Obamastolemycounty

    The sad thing is that it is all an effort to make Dr. Utopia look good. That is all. Seriously flawed indeed! Just so they can say, “We did it!” When the country falls apart will they as readily admit, “We did it!”?

  • elaine

    When Bill Clinton told Congress just to pass ANY Health Care Reform Bill & then worry about amending it later I don’t recall any criticisms here at NQ. When Hillary demands mandatory 100% enrollment, again no criticisms at NQ, in fact a few posts of, “Everyone in no one out.” I’m opposed to all these gigantic sweeping programs: Health Care Reform, Cap & Trade, Comprehensive Immigration Reform, massive Keynesian bailouts & nation building, don’t give a damn who brings them forward.

  • http://firefox AnnieCarmel

    No Osmc. It will be “We did it!” followed by “What the F**k were we thinking?” when the crap of the unintended(?) consequences hit the fan. And that’s being kind. I’m not sure that it isn’t all part of the Soros/Obama plan to destroy America.

    Shallow minded bottom feeders.

  • Onofre’s arm

    This isn’t simply a symbolic gold leafing of the Obama idol at whose feet they worship, this is the most massive governmental power grab of a private enterprise in the history of the world. Let’s just call it “Slavery Light”.

  • Obama: Dubya 2 Electric Boogaloo

    When Bill Clinton told Congress just to pass ANY Health Care Reform Bill & then worry about amending it later I don’t recall any criticisms here at NQ.

    LOL! Yeah, I guess I missed that NQ post back in 1993! Goddamned dial-up!! Took forever to load!

  • Bronwyn’s Harbor

    We didnt exist until @ 2004, but nice try.

  • TeakWoodKite

    38 trillion in unfunded mandates. Times millions more people x 500 trillion in cuts.

    Bronwyn’s Harbor, nuts is being kind. It leaves me with a very sick feeling in the pit of my gut, mixed with more than the usual amount of Grinch dust.

    See ya in Whoville…

  • ~~JustMe~~

    LOL! Yeah, I guess I missed that NQ post back in 1993! Goddamned dial-up!! Took forever to load!

    LOL so funny hell I think I was on wind up in 1993… ya got to laugh right! LOL

  • creeper

    It doesn’t matter what’s in the bill. Obama will beg, borrow and steal to pass it, just as he did with the primaries. Then, as we continue our race to the bottom, he’ll brag about the mess he foisted off on us.

    This is insanity in its purest form.

  • getfitnow

    Kill the bill before it kills us!

  • ~~JustMe~~

    It’s scary how this has been handled they don’t care they get PAID Health CARE till the day they die!

  • http://www.BullShit.com Osellingbullshit

    Just as I was settling down to clear my mind from the incompetence and the amount of shit Bush left us to deal with, now I have to force my brain to yet again accept a new level of incompetence and more shit being display by Obama the fraud….

    Unbelievable. How much can a nation take from these two morons??

  • http://www.hillaryorbust.com Hillary or Bust

    There wasn’t even a World Wide Web in 1993. NoQuarter must have been delivered by Gopher.

  • Andy

    I wonder how does the AMA feels now? The interests groups that went into bed with PBO are no so happy now….

    http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2009/12/09/docs-hospitals-insurers-oppose-medicare-at-55/

  • elaine

    On Sat Dec 5 09 Sen. Debbie Stebanow D-Mich got an amendment passed that supposedly guarantees no cuts to any Medicare services. If you believe this then the only rational conclusion is massive tax increases.

  • sowsear

    Schuman also was “rewarded” for his vote. His “constituents” will not be penalized. How that will work, I do not know. I’m a used-to-be Dem, now indy, almost 80 yrs. old. Am I saved or what?

  • sowsear

    Meant Schumer. Cancel didn’t work.

  • jwrjr

    I am curious – how can you have a “compromise” “health care” bill while totally shutting out 40% of the Senators (and all of the constituents that they represent) – i.e. the Republicans?

  • candymarl

    This has got to be the most idiotic group of Dems in charge I’ve ever seen. Senator Reid doesn’t even seem to notice that the majority of Americans don’t want this bill.

    I understand party loyalty but please. I received a missive in the mail to help pay for the passage of this health care bill. I am not joking. Apparently having a super majority in Congress is not enough. Now Ms. Pelosi wants us to help pay to pass the bill. The Democrats claim they need to fund to fight the “special interests” (ie. the American people) that don’t want this bill.

    So pony it up everybody. Pay now and pay later! /snark

  • candymarl

    My comment disappeared. Help me spam savior!

  • Sassy

    Things are looking bleak, hey Bronwyn?
    The CBO may blow this monstrosity out of the water.
    Otherwise, we have a snow ball’s chance in Hades of stopping it!
    In watching the debate, it is evident that more than ideological differences are in play.
    The democrats are lying through their teeth. Need proof?
    Talk to a Medicare patient who cannot get a primary care physician now!

  • Ferd Berfle

    This “Healthcare” bill is wrong on so many levels but the worst part is that it will increase administrative costs on the regulator and regulated sides of the equation, which is one of the real problems with the current system. You don’t repair a broken system by adding more cogs to the part that caused it to break in the first place. Has ANYONE actually performed a process-flow diagram on the mess that is our healthcare system? Do the boneheads that put together this fustercluck have any concept of inputs and outputs to a system? Was there even an attempt made at requirements management? Do these m o r o n s think in anything other than soundbites? I tried parsing the stupid bill into one of my databases and came up with a number of requirements on both sides that are more numerous than those necessary to design, build, and operate a nuclear powerplant for 30 years. It is staggering–we’re speaking in terms of decades of thousands on an atomized level.

    But the Obamabots won’t discuss this one.

  • Ferd Berfle

    I hear you loud and clear and concur. When will the electorate stop being mesmerized by the shiny baubles that constitute most of those running for office and actually look into their empty shells, seing them for what they are–flim-flammers?

  • beachnan

    Thank you Ferd. Why can’t they start with the current system, and make effective changes? I don’t have health insurance. I am now 55 and worried that something catastrophic could wipe me out. I have been checking out many of the plans out there and they offer so little for $$$$$. The system needs to be changed, but not with the current monster they are creating. My Brother recently was getting chemo, and had a reaction. They called the paramedics to take him to a hospital approximately 3 miles away. The bill was over $3,000. Every chemo treatment is $10,000. My Mother, who is also getting chemo, wasn’t feeling well and instead of calling her children, she called 911. That trip to the hospital, approximately 2 miles away, was over $1,000. I recently had to go to a Doc in the Box. I hadn’t been to one in about 5 years, so I was shocked when the clerk said the bill is $180. I thought that included a lab test, but I later got a bill for an additional $60. Fix the current screwed up system, and drop this dud of a bill.

  • Ferd Berfle

    And thank you, beachnan. The problems with the current system aren’t addressed in any way, form, or fashion by any of these bills. Moreover, only those willing to suspend disbelief or are terminally gullible believe these cornucopias of manure will do anything at all to mitigate the numerous problems inherent in our current system, which has been cobbled together over the years through the VERY SAME process that has given us these NEW bills.

    Yeah, that’s what I want–another POS system to replace the POS system that they built in the first place.

  • RecoveringDemoholic

    Things my mother and father tried to teach me, and I believe they apply to everything about this administration and legislation.



    No matter how hungry or desperate you are:

    Don’t waste time picking oats out of h0rzesh1t.

    Pinching your nose won’t make it easier to eat h0rzesh1t.

    Don’t build an argument or foundation on h0rzesh1t.

    Don’t try to shine h0rzesh1t.

  • elaine

    Yeah LOL LOL LOL HA HA hee hee tee heeee, who in the hell was talking about 1993? Not me. I was referencing Bill Clinton’s RECENT advice to his fellow Dems this fall, 2009, & as for my comment about Hillary lobbying for mandatory participation, well hopefully you can recall all the way back to 2008. See this is so typical…selective memory? Hypocrisy? Denial? Bad policy is bad policy no matter who brings it forward & raggin’ on me won’t change that. But if you’d like some criticism from the oldies but goodies “dial-up” era, try the CRA & it’s quid pro quo, the repeal of Glass-Steagall, or do some of you still think giving mortgages to the uncredit worthy & turning the commercial banks into casinos was good policy?

  • elaine

    Yeah LOL LOL LOL HA HA hee hee tee heeee, who in the hell was talking about 1993? Not me. I was referencing Bill Clinton’s RECENT advice to his fellow Dems this fall, 2009, & as for my comment about Hillary lobbying for mandatory participation, well hopefully you can recall all the way back to 2008. See this is so typical…selective memory? Hypocrisy? Denial? Bad policy is bad policy no matter who brings it forward & raggin’ on me won’t change that. But if you’d like some criticism from the oldies but goodies “dial-up” era, try the CRA & it’s quid pro quo, the repeal of Glass-Steagall, or do some of you now think giving mortgages to the uncredit worthy & turning the commercial banks into casinos was good policy?

  • Sassy

    Each republican amendment is pre-empted by a vote on a watered-down version by the democrats.
    The democrats all vote yea, and cover their trail(and tail).
    Reid is counting on Vegas odds that many seniors will be dead by the time actual benefits are paid out in 2014!

  • b mathews

    as a registered dem (until 2012),i am hoping they call me for a campaign contribution as i have my answer all ready. “i will gladly make a contribution if obama uses it for a one way ticket back to africa”

  • b mathews

    harry reid (who is my senator) looks like he wont make it to 2014 either. too bad because then he wont get to see the havoc he has wrought.

  • http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/12/12/harry-reid-inserts-lifetime-limits-in-health-care-bill/ Harry Reid Inserts Lifetime Limits in Health Care Bill : NO QUARTER

    [...] If you missed it, check out my December 10th post on the Medicare provision: “ Harry’s Imaginary Friends & His Dangerously Flawed Health Care Plan.” [...]

  • morris1030

    Bronwyn thanks for a great post. You’ve hit it on the Medicare mess proposed by Reid and the absurdity of adding to Medicare while cutting benefits, and all the other dangerous inconsistencies you point out.

    This must be Reid’s swansong. He simply has to go and should be roundly defeated. His cancer language had to be removed by way of intervention from the American Cancer Society, as it was deceptive and prohibitive to cancer patients.

    What other goodies lurk in his garbage laden bill that we’re unaware of?

    This bill must be opposed. Harry must go.
    All of this is the result of no leadership from the White House, and a two-faced position from Obama.

  • morris1030

    It is the hugest power grab ala White House approval ever seen in my long life.

    It’s not Slavery Light. it’s Slavery Heavy.

  • http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/12/15/the-obamamania-is-but-a-dying-ember/ Obamamania Is But a Dying Ember : NO QUARTER

    [...] of FDR. He is fixated on history remembering him at the new FDR. As I wrote the other day in “Harry’s Imaginary Friends & His Dangerously Flawed Health Care Plan“: Have you ever before observed the obsessive efforts expended on legislation whose passage, [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus