RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Ready to Receive

“.. It seems like we’re stepping on our dicks..”

If you want to blow up planes you should read the TSA airport security manual. If you lean politically left you should watch Fox News. If you are on the right go to the magazine rack and observe what, presumably liberal, young voters are skimming through. Learn your enemy. Open your mind. Either excuse is fine.

gq_eastwood200

Gentleman’s Quarterly used to be a dress fashion leader that urged men to get out of three-piece suits. But youth oriented mags and rags have to excite that market and kicking the crap out of the same power system that made their companies survive makes for great headlines. At first glance it seems that youth oriented publications are turning red and being read by millions of people who freely question authority without a thought given to the idea of questioning the writer or speaker suggesting the questioning.

Have you become the person you were thinking about when the expression “don’t trust anyone over 30” sounded reasonable? Perhaps reading the self-loving intellectually agnostic bibles of the 21st century may help you decide the answer to that question. That is, if you are Ready to Receive.

Some of the loyal lemmings on the right may hope that the kids who scrape news from the bile-laden floors of these dead-end slop troughs don’t get out and vote in 2010 or 2012. They would also be satisfied if only educated voters, who can count backwards from one, motivate themselves to the polls.

They may ask: If left wing talking heads can get away with suggesting that people who watch Glen Beck become violent is it fair to suggest that the fire-breathing liberal writers are leading young idealists into Jihad camps in Pakistan? There have been discussions about a literary leadership crisis on the right and, the other day, we observed a developing identity crisis brewing on the left that has even penetrated the Rolling Stone readers’ circle. Let’s flip a few pages in a boys-to-men rag and see how their cumberbund is hanging today.

GQ Magazine. 2009 Men of the Year issue. Of course Leader was Will Smith?, or, you know, the short haired guy in the Whitehouse. To punctuate how serious this award is the magazine catalogues the article under “entertainment.” The best award was Icon. That title was given to Mr. Badass himself, Clint Eastwood. Before you continue you should consider that Morgan Freeman probably would not work with Eastwood if he thought he was a racist. But it is obvious that Clint is not smoking the same pony poop that many of his Hollywood cohorts carry in their Guccis.

On page 265 Eastwood explains that he does not much care for the far right or the far left. He says he won’t go on any news talk shows because, and this is the best line said in a minute,

“there’s so much transmission and very little reception.”

But the most daring lines come in the preceding paragraph on page 264.

GQ: Do you hope people will look at this movie (Invictus) and learn anything?

Eastwood: “.. It seems like we’re stepping on our dicks all the time. Jimmy Carter accusing people who disagree with the president of being a racist. The president sides with a black professor rather than the policeman.”

He goes on to explain that he thinks Carter has a plantation guilt thing going on:

“Carter is just kind of a senile old guy, I guess, and it’s something about being an old guilty southerner that makes you want to be perceived as doing penance for all the years you probably cast a lot of aspersions on black people when you were younger..”

That was the November issue. In the new December issue to hit the stands the editor of GQ – a guy who looks like an Obama speech writing kid, ready to fondle a standup poster – totally missed the best and controversial points of the Clint interview. He actually says this in his letter from the editor:

Perhaps you saw the episode of Glenn Beck in which he finally went fully insane… In our interview with Clint Eastwood, he rails against the cable networks and the nastiness of the moment. He wants a simpler time, too, but we believe that Clint himself may be the solution. Do you remember Dirty Harry? Do you remember those old movies?

We’ve asked Clint to do us a favor and go kick Glenn Beck’s ass.

Spreading it on, the editor added this about the original Bush:

Even the first President Bush has had enough of the nastiness and division. “I don’t like it,” he recently said, urging people to give President Obama some respect. (Zing!) “I think the cables have a lot to do with it. I’ll take you back to when I was president; we got tons of criticism, but it didn’t seem day in and day out quite as personal as some of these talk-show people. And it’s not just the right. There are plenty of people on the left.” Then he started calling MSNBC’s nightly anchors “a couple of sick puppies,” and our Brief Moment of National Unity ended before it began.

Brief Moment of National Unity? You, dear editor, are not promoting unity.
At best you are trying to keep your circulation up by promoting and inviting America’s youth into the Zombie Zone of cult and identity politics. You should want them to wake up before they go to the polls, as opposed to sleepwalking and voting in their dreams. You should RESPECT the power of the written words you publish and learn to receive as much as you transmit.

When I was a kid my mother was receptive to the idea of trying to understand me. She took an album, randomly, from my collection and two months later I found out that she played Pink Floyd’s Echos on her record player every day, because she thought it was beautiful music. She, in turn, loaned me her Jim Reeves Christmas album and I discovered an unforgettable voice. I am going to try regularly visiting the Bot Barristers. I doubt my experience will be as enjoyable as my mother’s and I doubt that I will soon see the loonies on the left nodding in agreement with people like Gretta Van Susteren.

But discovering and accepting the idea that one may have been wrong in the past is usually a good first step to future enlightenment, even if what is learned is still close to the original thought.

You may start transmitting and receiving now.

  • candymarl

    I do understand why so many people supported Obama without looking into his background. Many people were so disillusioned with GWB and the Republican party they felt they had no choice.

    When you ask these same people what Obama has done before being elected many of them can’t tell you.

    Many African Americans and others supported Obama just to see him in the WH. Fine. Having lived through the Civil Rights era I do understand. Many of these same folks also forgot (or never knew) who stood up and didn’t. People of all faiths and colors. Even MLK Jr. didn’t give people a pass based on the color of skin. He said content of character.

    I just want a President who will work hard to solve the problems we have. I just don’t think we have one.

    • Eastan McNeal

      Sounds like you have been reading both sides of the pages. Good for you. I think you are right King would expect people to always keep an open mind, look and listen to good ideas, no matter who’s mouth delivers them.

  • TeakWoodKite

    Where are the antennae on “Fat Cat” POTUS?
    On one hand….

    Mr Eastwood has it on the money, as do you Eastan in my humble opinion.
    I try and listen to a both side of the dial and isle. It’s not easy to remain open minded, when the incoming telemetry is intructing me to “shutdown” my critical thinking and just use metrics.

    • Eastan McNeal

      Mandela used metrics and calculated what it would take to keep his country alive. He also could forgive. That is something not being demonstrated here in the U.S. Mandela forgave those who took his freedom and invited them to talk. Here we use the press to destroy anyone who does not worship our point of view.

    • Tricia

      Yeah–What Teakwood said!
      Great essay Eastan!

      • Eastan McNeal

        Thank you Tricia. I wrote it once with more of an edge. Then I went back and read some of what Clint Eastwood said and decided to chop out the Rush L and Kieth O quotes, and stick with GQ. It was a difficult practice, since I am sometimes guilty of seeing one-way signs pointing always in the direction I seek.

    • Eastan McNeal

      To directly answer your question. The ‘Rabbit Ears’ are on TOTUS.

      • TeakWoodKite

        Papa TOTUS was rollin stone,
        Where ever he left his hat ears was his home.

        …on the other hand. :)

  • yttik

    Nice post, Eastan McNeal.

  • I’m a Linda too

    Great post. And gee, thanks Editor for proving Clint’s point. Obiously you have nothing up stairs to receive the transmission.

    And I bet Clint is none to happy with you trying to infer something other than he said.

    One of Clint’s more recent (not a spaghetti Western)movies, I loved, “Heartbreak Ridge” comes to mind a lot these days. In particular when he breaks chain of command and calls it as he see’s it on an “exercise”, I’ve been wanting to say “Cluster F@ck” so bad. :)

    • Eastan McNeal

      Clu**F. Is that not what you call most major city beltways? Linda. You are right on. The editor, if he had a talk show, would jump on people for yelling by yelling louder. I think some people start composing responses before they finish reading or hearing another’s full delivery. What were you saying?

      • I’m a Linda too

        Yes. But would we then be saying that they give canned, prepared answers regardless of what is being said? Oh dear, the thought. It can’t be. Could they be so full of it? Yes. :)

        I have to also add, since I couldn’t take the all hObama promotion from all other stations and that they never covered anything worth my time, and even though I’d been warned by Dem’s not to go to Fox, and on the few times I was tuning in against their bitter advice and found it so much more enlightening, I have been only watching FOX now. I get so much more from them than anything I’ve ever been wasting my time with on the other networks. So often I feel like Punked by Dem’s was a natural occurence. Of course there are some over the top coverage, but on a whole, so much more.

        And…Clint, forgot to say kudos for being spot on.

        ok, done.:)

    • Obamastolemycountry

      Clint’s Gran Torino was an awesome movie! I’ll never forget that one.

      I would like to see an Eastwood vs Obama campaign! I could see Clint saying, “Go ahead! Make my day!” He may also say, “Show us the documents Obama! Where are your transcripts?”

      Clint would not fear CNN or MSNBC for questioning with boldness! As a matter of fact, again I think Clint would say, “Go ahead. Make my day!”

      • I’m a Linda too

        Yep. That would be sweet, wouldn’t it?

  • sowsear

    Great article Eastan. Thanks for the news on Clint. I would not have thunk it, that someone in Hollywood can “count backward from one”.

  • nickoury

    Thanks for the heads up. Great Eastwood interview.

  • http://firefox AnnieCarmel

    Locals reported that Clint gave a very big donation to McCain/Palin.

    I didn’t watch his early films but did like Grand Torino…excellent. I do like that he pushes his own cart at W. Foods from time to time rather than always farming it out. He’s low key and people leave him alone.

    • Eastan McNeal

      Annie. The GQ writer goes into fine detail about how modest Clint’s office is and how Eastwood made them a sandwich during the interview.

      And Linda, above. When I finally started watching Fox news I discovered that they really have a good non-political operation as well. Yes, there is the standard “let’s watch this building burn live” stuff, but they have a rounded coverage of general news that I would not have discovered without being “pushed” over there by election 08.

      • TeakWoodKite

        without being “pushed”
        As I kite I was blown over there. <:0==8

    • Pennsylvania Caucasian

      Not to mention the fact that the man is still HOT. How old is he – somewhere in his ’70s. You know Clint hasn’t had any work done a la Robert Redford.

      What a great cover for GQ – a magazine that has been irrelevant since gay men stopped reading it.

      And Clint’s comments on Jimmah Cahtah – LOL priceless.

      • I’m a Linda too

        He is now 80.

      • http://firefox AnnieCarmel

        Pretty sure he had some nips done around the time he married Dina and became a Daddy again…but he does look his age now.

        He used to come down to Big Sur with his gang of 4 or 5 of the same town guys and sit out on the terrace where I worked then. They, more than he, played the “look at us” game. There was a story circulating around town about 8 or 9 years ago that Dina caught him with a well-known jazz singer and that he was afraid she’d leave. Soon after, she had a new house in Hawaii. As messy as his personal life has been, it seems that he finally calmed down and at least he never denied and always supported his many children. It appears all the celebrity lessons he’s learned have had a sobering, maturing effect. He’s definitely gained respect and admiration during his expansion to directing…and his humane/patriotic themes don’t hurt either…

  • Peggy Sue

    Easton, I think many of us at NQ are nodding with your statment about being “pushed towards Fox News.” My husband and I are still stunned that Fox is a network we even tune in. Yes, there’s bloviating going on but I think the Bret Baier’s Special Report, for instance, is one of the better conversations out there and about as balanced as we’re likely to find these days.

    Clint Eastwood has turned into a remarkable director. He’s rough around the edges in all the right ways. It’s refreshing to hear someone speak his mind in public and not give a hoot about what other people think.

    One of the lines that stuck with me from his latest movie, Invictus, was spoken by Morgan Freeman. One of Mandela’s assistants query him about his insistence on supporting the rugby team [a throw back to the Apartheid days and well-loved by Afrikaners].

    “You’ll risk failure,” she says, “possibly losing support and your chance of reelection.”

    And Mandela replies, “If I’m not willing to risk that and more then I have no business serving as president.”

    Remarkable figure. And another movie Eastwood can be proud of. I want to read the book that the film was based on, “Playing the Enemy: Nelson Mandela and the Game That Made a Nation.”

    Enjoyed the article!

  • WMCB

    Another thing that surprised me about Fox – they have more gender and race diversity than the other networks. That really surprised me. I had refused to watch them for so long that it was truly STRIKING and obvious, the difference, once I started watching.

    I was watching one afternoon, and there was an entire panel of 5 women discussing issues, not a male in sight. And they were not there to discuss “women’s” issues, either: they were delving into foreign policy and the economy, you name it. I have NEVER seen that on another network, ever. The best they do is one token woman on occasion, from whom they only want the “woman’s point of view”. Honestly, the liberal networks seem to very narrowly define women BY their gender, and want their input only on things related to that. Fox just flat does not do that. Their women are whole persons, if that makes sense.

    I still take all network or cable news with a grain of salt, and filter for their known biases. That’s just a given. But truthfully, despite their conservative slant, I see liberals sitting there treated more respectfully (despite vigorous disagreement) in a Fox discussion than I ever saw a conservative treated on an MSNBC panel.

    • thinker

      I switched to Fox News (and off of Air America) during the primaries when I could no longer stand the constant the constant dribbling over Obama, and I too was pleasantly surprised. For example, the morning show is informative and funny at the same time and their interviews are usually indepth and probing and they do manage to ask the hard questions, unlike the other channels that specialise in tossing softballs towards Obama and his mininions. I also love their Saturday shows.
      And they do present the left’s view — after all they have Geraldo both as a commentator and he also had his own show and he is the greatest koolaid drinking Obama butt kisser alive. Geraldo’s standard cop out line is “the president is wise, intelligent, etc., etc., etc., so I trust him to make the right decision.

  • creeper

    Not to hijack this thread but in keeping with the headline above, “Ready to Receive”, the Thomson Correctional facility in Illinois will become the new home for a hundred terrorists being moved out of Guantanamo.

    I live fifteen miles from Thomson. There is no way they can secure that location against an attack aimed at freeing the inmates. With roads, parks and residential areas surrounding it, it’s just not isolated enough.

    Those of us who live in the heartland have in recent years balanced our downscale existence with the security of knowing we were not prime targets. That security is now gone.

    I hope they save a cell in Thomson for Barack Obama and that he moves in soon.

    • Sassy

      creeper, the post title sure gave you a good lead-in.
      I heard that report first thing this morning, and I certainly understand your dismay!

  • creeper

    Atten admin: Would someone please rummage around in the spam filter and see if there’s one of my comments in there? Or let me know if it was removed as non-pertinent?

  • Sassy

    Nice work Eastan!
    Admittedly, everyone has a point of view.
    In separating the “wheat from the chaff”, the true measure of a person is their standing firm when challenged on core beliefs.
    Although Eastwood is known for being thorny, I have always loved his work, and think it reflects his personality well!

  • mountainaires

    Eastwood is a Libertarian. But the point is well taken, and well made. I think people should read books instead of watching cable news at all.

    Television: In his book Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television (1978), Jerry Mander (after reviewing totalitarian critics such as George Orwell, Aldous Huxley, Jacques Ellul, and Ivan Illich) compiled a list of the “Eight Ideal Conditions for the Flowering of Autocracy.”

    Mander claimed that television helps create all eight conditions for breaking a population. Television, he explained, (1) occupies people so that they don’t know themselves — and what a human being is; (2) separates people from one another; (3) creates sensory deprivation; (4) occupies the mind and fills the brain with prearranged experience and thought; (5) encourages drug use to dampen dissatisfaction (while TV itself produces a drug-like effect, this was compounded in 1997 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration relaxing the rules of prescription-drug advertising); (6) centralizes knowledge and information; (7) eliminates or “museumize” other cultures to eliminate comparisons; and (8) redefines happiness and the meaning of life.


    Are Americans a Broken People?

    Why We’ve Stopped Fighting Back Against the Forces of Oppression

    By Bruce E. Levine

    December 15, 2009 “AlterNet”

    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article24184.htm

  • Pingback: Curtain Call? : NO QUARTER