One-World Unsaved
By John Batchelor on December 18, 2009 at 12:45 AM in Current Affairs
* Bumped up *
Bolton’s remarks describe a UN World that believes only in one-world governance, describe a posse of developing nations called the G-77-China as the same old genius Third World potentates (rare to find anything but a kleptocracy in the lot) that has seized global warming as a new wedge issue to separate billions from the developed states of the G-8/G-20.
Once it was World Revolution (See Lenin, Stalin, Mao, etc). Then it was Ban the Bomb (with a fab movie, Gregory Peck and Ava Gardner in Nevil Shute’s story, “On the Beach.”) Now it is Global Warming.
John Bolton argues that the utopian-minded leadership of the G-20, led by POTUS Obama, aim to present a best case scenario for applause to the NGOs and G-77-China present, but that very little else will come of the two-week confab. The participants will agree to agree at a later date and then agree to meet again, hailing the result of no treaty as a success because they will continue to talk about a one-world treaty.
POTUS Obama and PM Brown and other G-8 officials will enjoy the glow of no change.
The new turmoil is that the G-77-China states refuse any verification protocol. The idea of inspectors to verify that states are in compliance with emission targets and climate friendly practicies is regarded by China and its cronies as a threat to sovereignty. Correct. China is now talking about sovereignty.
John Bolton remarks that during the Cold War, the necessity of inspection was the first line of discussion. Without inspections and verification, there could be no START, no ABM, no Test-Ban treaties. There would be no Non-Proliferation Treaty supervised by the IAEA. To go forward with a treaty that does not permit inspections is to entertain farce.
Ed Milliband of the UK has stated that there is no transparency in China. Coral Davenport tells me that Milliband is not withdrawing his remark. The utopian minded world leaders will arrive into an arena of ill-feeling and manufactured contretemps.
Coral Davenport reports that the Al Gore remarks at the summit have no purchase and are ignored by the swarming disputers.
Also, Ban Ki-Moon’s anxious remarks that the “posturing” must be set aside that the members must “seal the deal” — any deal, even for a deal to agree that the next time there will be a deal. It seems safe to suppose that the North Pole is safe for at least another two years until the next one-world crisis management team meets to correct the planet’s temperature.
Puzzle for the future: what is the correct temperature? “There’s still time, brother!”
From the blog for my syndicated radio show.


















Pingback: One-World Unsaved : NO QUARTER One World China
Pingback: One-World Unsaved : NO QUARTER « Noya Khobor