Oncologist Congressman Switches to GOP
By Bronwyn's Harbor on December 22, 2009 at 1:09 PM in Current Affairs
We owe special thanks to readers “SnarlingCur,” “Dems better as losers,” and “HARP” for posting the link to Politico’s “Exclusive: Rep. Parker Griffith switches to GOP.” The Democrats can thank Obamacare for the oncologist’s party switch. Of note too is that 11 — yes 11 — Democratic members of the House are retiring. Why? Well, one reason is that centrist Blue Dog Democrats, just like our writers and readers here at NoQuarter, cannot stand the Democratic party anymore. (Read all about this scoop below the fold, along with my very personal feelings of angst, written at the very end of the post.)
POLITICO has learned that Rep. Parker Griffith, a freshman Democrat from Alabama, will announce today that he’s switching parties to become a Republican. [...]
The switch represents a coup for the House Republican leadership, which had been courting Griffith since he publicly criticized the Democratic leadership in the wake of raucous town halls during the summer.
Griffith, who captured the seat in a close 2008 open seat contest, will become the first Republican to hold the historically Democratic, Huntsville-based district. A radiation oncologist who founded a cancer treatment center, Griffith plans to blast the Democratic health care bill as a prime reason for his decision to switch parties—and is expected to cite his medical background as his authority on the subject. …
Here’s the scoop on the large number of retiring Democratic members of Congress, via the New York Times’ blog, The Caucus:
[...]
While it is true that a seasoned and popular congressman like Mr. Gordon probably could have been returned to Washington, it is hardly certain that the Democratic candidate to succeed him in a wide-open midterm race will have the same success, particularly in a district that Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, easily won in the 2008 presidential election.
The situation is similar for the other seats being vacated by Blue Dogs — in Kansas, Louisiana and a second Tennessee district — not to mention for districts in New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington that are losing incumbents.
And that is a problem for Democrats as they confront a series of departures, with the possibility of more to come. Defending open seats is a much more difficult proposition than helping even embattled incumbents hold on. Open seats typically provide the best chance for a takeover since the power of incumbency is eliminated.
In addition, a run of retirements can create an atmosphere that spurs other retirements, as rattled lawmakers begin to think it might be time to get while the getting is good.
Republicans have certainly been trying to create that aura, celebrating every retirement as a sign that Democrats are on the run.
“It’s official: Democrats now have a retirement problem,” Ken Spain, a spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee, said in the wake of Mr. Gordon’s decision. “After being forced to toe the line for Nancy Pelosi’s reckless agenda too many times, Blue Dog Democrats would rather roll over and retire than face the political headwind that is barreling toward them.” …
And, just wait until 2010 and 2012. We’ll see how many voters, just like members of Congress, switch parties and vote out the Democrats who supported Obamacare.
TRUE CONFESSION: I pinch myself every time I contemplate the possibility that I might not vote for my beloved Democratic member of the House. He has ably served my district, and he has earned prominent positions in the House that directly benefit our less-affluent district full of military veterans, the disabled, and retirees.
Why do I pinch myself? Because I cannot believe I may not support him. Is this the Bronwyn I know? What became of the Bronwyn I know? What has driven me to consider voting against my Congressman?
Can I possibly bring myself to vote against him? My tendency, right now — because I am furious with him for voting for Obamacare — is that I will vote for the Republican candidate. But I don’t want to. There is so much good that my Congressman has done, and I have to factor that in. Still, how could he in good conscience support that travesty?
I’m very torn. Are any of you facing the same predicament?






















