RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Notes on an “Extremist”

luanahills1-sCharles Krauthammer has no patience with Obama for calling Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab an “extremist” instead of a terrorist (see video below). I don’t know why Obama refuses to call Abdulmutallab a terrorist except that it may be too incendiary a term for the dainty leftist law professor we have as an erstwhile president-when-not-playing-golf.* [See more images of Obama's swanky Hawaii digs.]

By the way, Obama has been complaining that he is tired. Oh. Poor president Obama, all tuckered out. (Well, actually, I can see why he’s so tired. It requires a great deal of stamina and intense concentration to assume an identity and pretend to have experience that one does not possess. Obama also must feign an interest in the job, when in actuality he cares little for its endless and varied demands. He tries mightily to avoid the “buck stops here” aspect of the job. He just wants the title and inclusion in history books, and could care less about all that silly work that, sigh, is necessary at times.)

In the meantime, the ever-working Charles Krauthammer is his typical incisive self on The O’Reilly Factor (with guest host):

I was just listening to John Batchelor’s radio program — it’s on seven days a week — and Batchelor pointed listeners to reports from the UK that Abdulmutallab was no innocent, wide-eyed, hapless juvenile caught up in a web of Jihadism. Instead, Abdulmutallub was a leader in the spread of radical islam and jihadism, and was the fourth president of the islamic group at the exclusive University College London to be tied to terrorist activities. Curious, I went looking. The UK Times has this article that shows how steeped Abdulmutallab was in jihadism and was a LEADER in prosyletizing jihadism: “Al-Qaeda ‘groomed Abdulmutallab in London’“:

The Christmas Day airline bomb plot suspect organised a conference under the banner “War on Terror Week” as he immersed himself in radical politics while a student in London, The Times has learnt.

Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, 23, a former president of the Islamic Society at University College London, advertised speakers including political figures, human rights lawyers and former Guantánamo detainees.

One lecture, Jihad v Terrorism, was billed as “a lecture on the Islamic position with respect to jihad”.

Security sources are concerned that the picture emerging of his undergraduate years suggests that he was recruited by al-Qaeda in London. Security sources said that Islamist radicalisation was rife on university campuses, especially in London, and that college authorities had “a patchy record in facing up to the problem”. Previous anti-terrorist inquiries have uncovered evidence of extremists using political meetings and religious study circles to identify potential recruits. …

The Times UK has another backgrounder article worth your while, “Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab organised ‘War on Terror Week’ while studying at UCL [University College London].”

It’s obvious that Abdulmatallab was no innocent juvenile plucked for recruitment by manipulative jihadists. He was part of the apparatus spreading jihadism on the UK’s college campuses:

According to isocnews.com, an online magazine for Muslim students, War on Terror Week at University College London was one of the events of the year in 2007. There was a slick video advertisement for the event, an eye-catching poster and packed lecture theatres for five days of discussions about Guantánamo Bay, allegations of torture and the subject of “Jihad v Terrorism”.

The website reported the week of talks as “informative, relevant and always entertaining — the audience got involved with a good mixture of Muslim and non-Muslim attendees asking tough questions of the speakers”. In a corner of the poster, the event is declared to have been “approved by Umar Farook, president of UCLU Islamic Society”. The speakers advertised included George Galloway, the Respect MP; Geoffrey Bindman, the human rights lawyer; and former Guantánamo Bay detainees.

The Nigerian student who organised “War on Terror Week” in January 2007 is now better known as Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the would-be suicide bomber who tried to blow up a transatlantic airliner last week.

[...]

UCL has confirmed that Mr Abdulmutallab was a mechanical engineering student on its Central London campus in 2005-08 and in the academic year 2006-07 was president of the student union’s Islamic Society.

His role in organising War on Terror Week is the first indication that during his years in London he was heavily involved in radical political activity. Experts believe that this would have put him at risk of being groomed by al-Qaeda recruiters who routinely prey on such radical religious and political gatherings. “Before someone goes off for explosives training they have to be converted to the cause of al-Qaeda,” said Professor Anthony Glees, of the University of Buckingham.

“I think that happened in London in the case of Abdulmutallab, as has happened to many others. He is one of a considerable number of people who have turned to al-Qaeda after being recruited in the UK. This recruitment often goes on where political events take place. Those who speak at such events are not terrorists, but they are being irresponsible if they do not realise that what they say could contribute to the radicalisation of people who could then be recruited into terror.”

The emerging picture of Mr Abdulmutallab is of a lonely young man who arrived in London as a devout, sometimes angry, figure and became increasingly radicalised while here.

He had previously joined discussions on an internet message board that revealed a confused and alienated personality. Writing in January 2005 under the name Farouk1986, he said: “I feel depressed and lonely. I do not know what to do. And then I think this loneliness leads me to other problems.” He talked of wrestling with liberalism and extremism and striving to live according to the Koran’s teaching.

And he confessed to having “jihad fantasies”, writing: “I imagine how the great jihad will take place, how the Muslims will win (Allah willing) and rule the whole world, and establish the greatest empire once again.” But many more of his posts were about football, suggesting that he was far from being the finished article as a mujahidin.

Within a year of arriving in London Mr Abdulmutallab started to adopt a more formal religious dress code, including a white robe and skullcap.

He is reported to have attended some of the radical meetings held at London colleges and mosques. He is understood to have attended talks given by the extremist US-born cleric Anwar al-Awlaki at East London Mosque. Awlaki, who was later banned from Britain and is believed to be in hiding with al-Qaeda in Yemen, where Mr Abdulmutallab spent months.

[...]

=================================

Obama-surfer2* Obama did turn in something of a performance today [December 29th], but only after his indifferent, read-off-the-teleprompter, bored and boring announcements of yesterday that left me astonished.

I say I was astonished because I was struck by the perfunctory, disengaged tone of Obama’s performance that suggests strongly that he doesn’t view this act of terrorism with any of the concern felt by most U.S. citizens.

Rather, Obama seemed vexed to have his golfing break interrupted by an inconvenient event of terrorism that he won’t call terrorism, and he seemed most interested in returning to his golf game, which is exactly what he did via limousine caravan.

I fully concur with Charles Krauthammer’s acerbic commentaries on Obama’s failures to communicate the gravity of the situation, as well as his devastating assessment of Janet Napolitano who, as K. says, is clearly in over her head and not qualified for her significant duties.

  • Peggy Sue

    I was astounded by the lame, dispassionate response from the President.  I was on the road all day so I didn’t hear the second statement but Obama seems to need three times to get it right.  But on that first round, he appeared “annoyed” more than anything else.  It did not inspire confidence anymore than the backtracking by Napolitino, who went from “the system worked” to “we had a systemic failure.”  And oh yes, this is the way Bush did it.

    Oy!  The “Great Communicator” is failing on many fronts.

  • kenoshamarge

    I guess if you voted for the “Rock Star” or for the “Cool Candidate” this will not bother you.

    Those of us that wanted competence, experience and someone that could manage to keep “all” the balls in the air are not surprised at this President’s lack of anything that isn’t all about him.

    This is what happens when the “American Idol” candidate sits in the Oval Office, albeit not very often.

  • Anonymous
  • Guest

    If anyone is surprised, does it mean they haven’t figured things out yet ?

    I think he believed he could just go into the White House and Play House with the nation..Have his way, live like a king, travel at taxpayer expense, have fancy parties and play play play…

    Well he is playing at being President and the country is suffering for it.

    That mode will be the style of Obama every time. Count on it.

  • Glennmcgahee

    Watchin Mornin Joe this am, gag me, I listened as they had commentary about the terrorism or “law breaker” by The Art Department Editor of The New York Times who declared “I love this president”.
    Yes, ladies and gentlemen, hard hitting news by one of our 3 major networks. Thank god for No Quarter and intelligent, informative information. I’d love to see their blank faces if you were to reveal all this information on that show. It would fry their brains.

  • elizabethrc

    Gotta love Charles.  He never minces words and he, by his training as a psychiatrist, knows how to analyze and gets to the heart of the matter in a refreshingly straightforward way.  I wish more politicians could be as succinct and on target.  I’m frankly tired of listening to pontificating politicians who use 20 words what could be said in 5 (like me, I guess).

  • Yttik

    We should have anti terror education programs like we do with smoking. I know it sounds silly, but we invest all this time an energy into diversity training, into environmental education, into all these social issues we want to raise awareness about. Governments should be running anti terror campaigns warning people about the dangers of getting involved in radical cults that will eventually demand that you set your junk on fire.

    Canada, the US, Britain should all be running public service announcements condemning terror and reminding people that religion is about peace and anybody that asks you to comit acts of violence in the name of religion is a false prophet and evil. It may not prevent any radicals from joining up, but it would humiliate terrorists, begin to take the romance or machismo or whatever the hell it is, out of their sails. Al Qaeda launces a big PR program full of propaganda to recruit people. We should be counter-acting that. Terrorists should be ridiculed. You will not be admired the world over as a martyr, you will simply set your junk on fire, go to jail, and become a laughing stock.

  • John

    “”Rather, Obama seemed vexed to have his golfing break interrupted by an inconvenient event of terrorism that he won’t call terrorism, and he seemed most interested in returning to his golf game, which is exactly what he did via limousine caravan.”"

    Excellent…

  • twistedfister13f

    This just in: Because of a previous attempt on an airliner that was averted, William Shatner has been hired as a first-line defender for passenger safety. his heroism in that event, which Janet Napolitono has cited as one of her favorite episodes of “The Twilight Zone” more than qualifies him to protect us from man-made acts of solitary extremism and cloud monsters.

  • tango

    Well it’s hard work having your vacation interupted by something like a terrorist trying to blow up a plane. Come on! The Obama Administration showed more concern and timely response to the little boy who got hurt at his Hawaii vacation home.

    Cool is one thing, bored, uninterested, uncaring is another.  Children, employees, citizens, countries, etc,  all want their authority figures to guide them and reassure them during troubled times. We appreciate someone who is cool under pressure but we want to feel that they care – that if push comes to shove, they’ll protect, stand up for or comfort us as necessary depending on the relationship and situation. We want to know that if someone does wrong, our leader/parent/boss/coach/so on will do their best to make sure it doesn’t happen again. I just don’t think Obama is capable of that – he doesn’t seem emotionally engaged so whatever he says comes off like he’s bored.  It’s neither reassuring nor comforting nor inspiring. That’s why when it takes him so long to respond to something and when he does, he acts like he’s discussing what’s for dinner, it just comes off flat and we are doubly disapointed.

    I think the bloom is off the Presidential rose and Obama is realizing he could care less about 95% of the job.  And as time goes on, it seems he could care less about faking that he cares.  I figure at a press conference, Obama would be more animated and engaged answering a question on his picks for the NCAA basketball champion then he would be discussing terrorists blowing up airplanes or shooting soldiers at Army bases. 

  • Bronwyn

    Excellent analysis.

  • Bronwyn

    There are a couple other issues in the quoted material that I didn’t get into in my essay:

    1) the “patchy” record of the colleges at squelching these jihadist movements on campus; and

    2) the involvement of peaceniks and humanitarians in the programming, set up by Umar on his campus, that was designed, really, to recruit jihadists.

    Generally, those concerned about human rights are a fine bunch of people.  A bit idealistic, but good souls.  But they need to be extremely careful that they do not abet the growth of a violent movement.

  • Bronwyn

    Re the college campuses:  Almost all of them suffer from being overly P.C. and of course being opposed to any harsh measures with going after extremists.

    I guess they think that if our governments were just nicer to the jihadists, that their violent aims would be tamped down, and we’d all get in a big circle of love, singing songs and toasting marshmallows.  

    The campus lefties are always focuses on criticizing their own democratic governments, rather than vocalizing equal amounts of anger towards the extremely violent aspirations of the jihadists.

    The campus lefties also always blame the economic greed of the first-world countries for economic woes that compel people to join jihadist causes.  Of course, a cursory examination of the backgrounds of the most rabid terrorists proves that most of them came from privileged, educated backgrounds.

    Of note:  All of this was true of the extremist activists in the U.S. during the Vietnam War.  Bill Ayers, the son of a Commonwealth Edison president, is a prime example of a violent extremist.

    Why did Umar and Bill Ayers get involved in violent groups?  I wish someone would ask Charles Krauthammer to analyze that.  My sense is that there is something missing in their psychological makeup that renders them incapable of seeing that their own violence is no better than that of the “oppressors” they so violently oppose.

  • Lana

    All I can think about is the response we got to the Fort Hood shootings. Many of us here called for restraint before jumping to the conclusion that the shootings were an act of terror by an Islamic terrorist. However, as the facts were revealed, we found out that this indeed was the case. Or most of us did. As I recall, President Obama still refused to call this a terrorist act. We found out that all the information was there to prevent this attack, but no one acted in the name of Political Correctness. Now we have another terrorist who would have killed a planeful of Americans if his explosive device had worked, and again, Obama is refusing to condem an act of Islamic terror. Again the information is there, but as Charles Krauthammer so aptly summarizes, Obama has sent a message that we are not to act on such information for that we don’t offend our Muslim neighbors. How many people have to die before Obama wakes up?

  • mcnorman

    “My sense is that there is something missing in their psychological makeup that renders them incapable of seeing that their own violence is no better than that of the “oppressors” they so violently oppose.”

    Well said.

  • Anonymous

    I promise I only clicked “post” once. I have no idea why that posted three times! I’m sorry!

  • FLFem

    When it comes to being “PC”, I don’t bother with political correctness. I remember what my grandmother taught me, that good manners are for everyone all the time and manners will get you through any situation. Racism is rude, so it is not an option for a polite person. Neither is terrorism. Screw political correctness, just go with good manners. Works for me. And it has the advantage of not putting you in a position where you must support something that is inimical to your beliefs, or the law.

    Jihad is a political movement, masked in a religion. It should be treated as such, and not given the same protection as churches which do not give political direction in their sermons. Especially when that political direction involves mass murder. Personally, I think we should start taxing the hell out of the mosques in the US. Many of them are obviously politically oriented, and that is a violation of the separation of church and state in this country. Removing their protection as a religious meeting place will also enable the police etc. to conduct searches and do overt surveillance on the attendees without violating their religious rights.

  • Docelder

    Or that the violence is justified by something higher. I don’t want to poke a hornet’s nest for no good reason here, just making a point for something we probably will never understand. I was practicing in a Dallas hood the day OJ got acquitted. People on the streets were ecstatic. I felt sickened that money had bought “justice” once again. But I asked one of the ecstatic people on the street that I knew well, or at least I thought I did… I asked why were people joyous that this guy got away with this? He replied it wasn’t that he got away with it so mych as that he “could”. I will never underatand that as long as I might live. But, I think the same sentiments is working for these jihadists. I have said this before, I won’t harp on it, but “by any means necessary” is just another form of totalitarianism which when you boil it down is really a form of terrorism. The point is, we can’t fix our own problems at home, and we will ever fix the problems of the rest of the world. The best we can do is as Larry said a couple of days back, pick at the crabgrass, or at least use roundup on it so that it withers.

  • imustprotest

    Lana….”how many people have to die?”  Thousand have already and Our Dear Reader still doesn’t care, he’s incapable.  

  • missmalevolent

    How in the world can Obama come out against, “Islamic” anything when he has spent the better part of the year cow-towing to Islamic worshippers as being nothing BUT peaceful, bowing to Saudi Royalty, playing apologist for Islamic female subjugation? If after making excuses for the “extremist” elements of the religion, he’s going to reverse himself and stop acting like he’s the President of “The World” and above looking out JUST for Americans?

    Not bloody likely. He’s going to continue to play both sides to the middle with an apologist media backing him all the way. (Wondering if all that golfing footage will end up in the next Michael Moore film? I won’t hold my breath.)

    I just hope people remember all his various acts come 2012…and don’t make another mistake like this country did in 2004.

  • b mathews

    i also thought he seemed bored and annoyed to have his vacation interrupted.  then he had to READ his comments from notes provided to him and even then..not well.  anyone think hillary would have needed ANY notes to make tht speech.?

  • raging

    excellent post, Bronwyn. “Of course, a cursory examination of the backgrounds of the most rabid terrorists proves that most of them came from privileged, educated backgrounds.” that also describes the terrorist empathizer who calls himself POTUS. he reveals in his book that he felt like an outsider and identified with similar types at college. he doesn’t seem to have outgrown old insecurities, judging from the range of his associations – gangsters, radicals, former-terrorists.  a quality I like about Palin is her ability to relate genuinely with all types of ppl. that quality always makes it a bit easier to lead and manage. Barry was a lousey community organizer by his own admission. no surprise he can’t manage ppl or policy on a larger scale.

  • Anonymous

    Didn’t Obama say in one of his books, something like-  if the political winds should shift, he would align himself with the Muslims?  Why aren’t any of the reporters asking him about this comment from his book?

  • Guest

    I can live with the 3 day delay. When the shoe-bomber struck on December 22, 2001 it was six days before President Bush, then on vacation, made any public remarks…

    But that’s not because he was sluggish or incapable or trying to project an image of calm reassurance on the golf course — more likely because he was in the process of invading Afghanistan to fight Al Qaeda on their home territory. There was no sense at that time that W was not doing enough to combat terrorism. The Shoe Bomber was a surprise, but still sort of a side show in those days.

    After Fort Hood all Obama did was avoid the issue and refuse to call it what it was, and his lack of response to the Detroit terrorism incident was a continuation of that non-policy. Obama had done nothing effective or reassuring since Fort Hood. That’s why he’s being justifiably flamed now, plus Napolitano is an idiot and an incompetent.

  • Anonymous

    You are right. They didn’t ask him during the campaign, and they aren’t asking him now as the comment becomes scarily prophetic.

  • surfered

    Yes, and Charles Krauthammer was his typical incisive self when he repeatedly wrote in his columns that Saddam Hussein would give nuclear weapons to the same terrorists who attacked us on 9/11.

    We could do with a little better insight.

  • stodghie

    when i think about poor o and his book, DREAMS OF MY FATHER. i have to shake my head. his father didnt want him and barely ever saw him. he could not have been legally married to o’s mother because he already had a wife. it would be more likely to be NIGHTMARES OF MY FATHER. his father was a wife beating drunk. so if that is his big dream, then michelle get your boxing gloves out. i actually he might worry about her.

    look, o is a dismal failure. and the sad thing is we don’t have a parliamentary sytem where we could kick him out office sooner rather than later.

  • I’m a Linda too

    Oh snap.  Didn’t catch that video of Charles. Thank you.

    ...Yo’ Barry, it’s 3AM and the f@ckin’ phone is ringing.  You forgot to “forward” calls to Hillary.  So pick up the damn phone!!!

    And…correctly...FOX news has designated Hillary Clinton Winner of the Decade!!! 

  • IndayHill

    Who is to blame for what our great America is in now ? The mesmerized voters lead by the incompetent media. FOX was all over Obama’s “red flags” but totally ignored by the Obots. Their rock star stole the election ala Chicago dirty politics.  
    Will there be a repeat performance come 2012? God forbids !

  • Anonymous

    I finaly ventured over to CNN.com today after boycotting them since the middle of the primaries. Back then, those of us who weren’t hypnotized by the great and powerful O couldn’t even get our comments posted. Now, I am happy to report, comments about That One’s ineptitude are everywhere. Why, oh why, didn’t these people see the light BEFORE the election?

  • NMGRL

    You’re so brave to even look at what passes for the news here!!

  • blogforce one

    Hey, he called him an extremist, not a terrorist. but in his heart he thinks abdul farouk mutallab is just a mis-understood “ACTIVIST”!

  • connie

    Fox news has declared Hillary the winner of what??

  • Anonymous

    We do have a system in place to rid ourselves of incompetents and fools. It’s called “impeachment”. And if he is impeached and convicted in the Senate, then he gets no more perks, no pension, no Secret Service, no funds for libraries, staff, etc. Nada. And as the cherry on top, he can never hold any public office again in the US. Now that’s a plan I could get behind!!

  • FLDemFem

    Well, the administration is finally coming around to the conclusion that Al Queda was involved in the Detroit incident. I guess the perp’s statement, and Al Queda’s claim of responsibility showed them the way through the murk of indecision. Now if only they will make it a rule that no one can get on a plane for the US without a passport, no matter who they are, or where they are from. And we should also coordinate with other countries regarding their terror watch lists, especially since he was denied entry into Britain due to terrorist activities. That is such a no-brainer it’s a wonder Obummer didn’t think of it.