YOU MUST NOT MISS IT!!!
free shipping come
best quality guarantee!!

Would that training camp be under a bus?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091231/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_airliner_attack_tsa_supoenas

I’ve thought from the start they’d blame Hillary come hell or high water.

I’d be interested in you professional perspective on the whole post-9/11 restructuring of intelligence. As an outsider looking in, it seems like a whole lot of activity trying to masquerade as progress (much like the internal reorganizations of many corporations). The creation of the post of DNI, with essentially the same functions as those originally given to the DCI when the CIA was created, just seems like an additional layer of bureaucracy and buck-passing. My experience is that major reorganizations are almost always disruptive, particularly when they add a whole new level of management to organizations that are already top-heavy. I would think that both analysts and operational personnel would find this obstructive and frustrating.

And it seems the UK is more familiar than our media…as usual.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyharnden/100020934/barack-obama-gets-an-f-for-protecting-americans/

Now for some heresy:  at my local airport, the majority of the security employees are African Americans and Latinos and any special scrutiny I’ve seen has ALWAYS been of Caucasian Americans.  It never fails — middle-aged white men, little old white ladies and so on receive extra screening.  It’s an absolute joke.  Last night on the evening news there was film footage of airport screening and you guessed it — a little old white lady was receiving extra scrutiny. 

W-T-F???  It’s high time for the employment of routine profiling.  Screw political correctness.  And screw the racist airport employees who seem to delight in humiliating those least-likely to be terrorists.

The more that’s revealed about the Nigerian would-be bomber, the more ridiculous it seems that he passed security — ANYWHERE.

The money we save on expensive technology could then be spent on better educated, better paid screeners. Not only does profiling helps pinpoint a potential terrorist, but it has also been used to highlight other potential threats like drug violations, visa forgery, smuggling etc, It’s not rocket science we need; it’s the deployment of common sense.

And it works when properly applied and enforced by trained staff. Richard Reid, the “shoe-bomber,” was identified as a possible threat on 21st December 2001 and refused boarding; he returned the next day and managed to board.

I think it starts with the president not knowing how the intelligence community operates and continues with the messages sent by Obama that we are not to “profile” terrorists for fear of offending Muslims thus allowing Islamic terrorists to shoot our soldiers at Fort Hood and to attempt to blow up an aircraft full of Americans.