RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

True Grit: Two New U.S. Senators

13testerxlarge1Tomorrow morning on Meet the Press, Tim Russert, hobbling since he broke his ankle, will host two of the most unusual men ever elected to the U.S. Senate to “talk about Iraq and the new Democratic Senate.” Two rough diamonds who don’t want (or need) no shinin’ up thank you very much. One, Montanan Jon Tester, who knows how to “butcher a cow” and “grease a combine.” The other, Virginian Jim Webb, who defends “the dignity of his people — the gun-loving, country-music-singing, working-class whites of Scotch-Irish descent who fight in wars, staff the nation’s factories and shop its Wal-Marts.”

Jon Tester, senator-elect, Montana: It is fitting that a third-generation Westerner, Timothy Egan — who just won the non-fiction National Book Award for The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl — wrote a great character sketch of Tester for Monday’s New York Times.

For all the talk about the new Democrats swept into office on Tuesday, the senator-elect from Montana truly is your grandfather’s Democrat — a pro-gun, anti-big-business prairie pragmatist whose life is defined by the treeless patch of hard Montana dirt that has been in the family since 1916.

It is a place with 105-degree summer days and winter chills of 30 below zero, where his grandparents are buried, where his two children learned to grow crops in a dry land entirely dependent on rainfall, and where, he says, he earned barely $20,000 a year farming over the last decade.

Chouteau County, where Mr. Tester lives on a homestead of 1,800 acres, lost 8.5 percent of its population in the last five years — typical of much of rural America that has been in decline since the Dust Bowl.

To make extra money, Mr. Tester taught music to schoolchildren, and still plays a decent trumpet despite having only seven fingers (he lost the rest to a meat grinder as a child). He got into politics just eight years ago in a sustained rage over what utility deregulation had done to small farmers and businesses in Montana.

“You think of the Senate as a millionaire’s club — well, Jon is going to be the blue-collar guy who brings an old-fashioned, Jeffersonian ideal about being tied to the land,” said Steve Doherty, a friend of Mr. Tester’s for 20 years. “He’s a small farmer from the homestead. That’s absolutely who he is. That place defines him.” (Read all.)

Jim Webb, senator-elect, Virginia: I was surprised, when I checked in on the passionately angry lefty blog of Chris Floyd, a former columnist for The Moscow Times who currently writes for Truthout.org, to see his feature piece on Webb:

I don’t know that much about Jim Webb. I don’t know how he will actually vote when lobbyist push comes to corporate shove in the Senate. And I certainly don’t buy into the propensity of so many in the blogosphere (not to mention the mainstream media) to fall into swoons of hero worship over this or that politician.

But I will say this: Webb’s recent opinion column – in the Wall Street Journal, no less – put the facts about the elitist rapine of the American people about as squarely as you could hope for from an elected official writing in an Establishment paper. If Webb backs up these insights with political guts, he could serve as a formidable champion for economic justice – or at least (and more likely, given the near-total corporate-elite control of Congress) an outspoken gadfly, in the Proxmire mold, who by stating bald truth draws constant attention to the hypocrisy and servility of his colleagues.

What I found especially interesting was Webb’s insider exposé of the true attitudes of the corporate elite – their overwhelming sense of entitlement, their utterly callous dismissal of the rabble they squeeze their riches from. Let us have more of this, Senator Webb.

Some excerpts: The most important–and unfortunately the least debated–issue in politics today is our society’s steady drift toward a class-based system, the likes of which we have not seen since the 19th century. America’s top tier has grown infinitely richer and more removed over the past 25 years. It is not unfair to say that they are literally living in a different country. Few among them send their children to public schools; fewer still send their loved ones to fight our wars. They own most of our stocks, making the stock market an unreliable indicator of the economic health of working people. The top 1% now takes in an astounding 16% of national income, up from 8% in 1980. The tax codes protect them, just as they protect corporate America, through a vast system of loopholes.

Incestuous corporate boards regularly approve compensation packages for chief executives and others that are out of logic’s range. As this newspaper has reported, the average CEO of a sizeable corporation makes more than $10 million a year, while the minimum wage for workers amounts to about $10,000 a year, and has not been raised in nearly a decade…

Trickle-down economics didn’t happen. … (Read all.)

We could use more like these two in the Senate.

  • kim

    Private Social Security accounts would get ‘most of the stocks’ out of the hands of those doggone elites.
    =================

  • Eclaire

    Plus, Kim, private social security accounts would put hundreds of millions of dollars into the pockets of fund managers. I can’t wait!

  • http://noquarter.typepad.com SusanUnPC

    FYI, BookTV.org airs a reprise of Tim Egan’s appearance on his Dust Bowl book tonight and tomorrow AM:

    11:30PM SAT Timothy Egan, National Book Award Winner The Worst Hard Time

    8:30AM SUN History on Book TV: Timothy Egan, The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl
    http://www.booktv.org/schedule/

  • http://colorado-bob.blogspot.com/ Colorado Bob
  • kim

    Right Eclaire, and trillions, literally, into the pockets of workers and their heirs.
    ========================

  • kim

    Extra! Extra! Krugman proposes private Social Security accounts. Next week’s headline.
    =====================

  • newtonusr

    Thanks Larry for highlighting Tester & Webb. Gonna make for some great floor debates!

  • Retired

    Sen. Webb is quoted as saying, “They own most of our stocks…”. Sorry, Senator, as much as I like and admire you, this simply isn’t true. There is plenty of inequity for real, you don’t have to make it up.

  • kim

    Thank you, Retired. Note also the locution ‘our stocks’ as if they weren’t ‘their’ stocks. Methinks Webb protesteth overly much about property.

    Forty acres and a mule. Yeah, that’s the tikkit.

    Nobody knows the trouble I’ve seen.
    ===================

  • guess who

    Let’s see if he’s any good at horsetrading.

  • http://profile.typekey.com/sjkremersbcglobal.net/ Mango

    Kim,

    The total capitalization of the stock market as of March 2006 was estimated at $46 trillion.
    The SS fund has less than $2 trillion in government bonds.

  • http://noquarter.typepad.com SusanUnPC

    Wow. If that wasn’t one of the best MTPs ever. The discussion with Ted Koppel and Robin Wright on Iran/Iraq/etc. was riveting.

    Btw, James Webb showed the depth of his understanding of the issues, including Iraq. Tester is greener, but he has the correct foci.

  • Thinker

    Mr Tester would have struggled if his musical talent had embraced the piano. Take it from me, sometimes I feel I could do with an extra hand or two.

    Disgruntled farmers tend not to make very balanced socially fair individuals. Having said that, to his testament, Jon appears to accept his ‘lot’ and gets on with it. If there are improvements available, he’ll run with them (going on what has been said). That is good, because the hardest thing in times where change is needed, where change is required, the hardest thing is to make changes. The easiest thing is to say everything is ok and it will all “blow over”.

    I also have high hopes for Mr Webb. He lead his victory lap with his boots in his hands. Lets hope he puts them to good use.

  • Thinker

    Reitired & Kim, I am not sure what your drive is.

    I think Senator Webb used the term ‘our stocks’ to emphasis what [in his opinion] should be, agrandising the divide between “rich” and “poor”. Yet the poor have actually become better off, as it were, by default. And at the moment the war is between the “middle classes” and the rich.

    Most of the poor will be able to clutter their lives with useless junk peddled to them by the rich. And they will become fulfilled in their determination to allow ignorance to prevail. Who does set value?

    Landmark property, key artworks, items of historical SIGNIFICANCE, rare coins, stamps in optimum [choice] condition only ever seem to accrue in value. These have become the real assets, the long term assets. How many great artworks are in the hands of the humble classes?

    Very few people don’t have TVs, fridges, washing machines, even microwave ovens. Their possessions may be of the lowest quality, but pound for pound, the poor are a million miles better off than their counterpart 50 years ago. Those that bail society choose to because society is unfair. The increasing numbers of “noticably homeless” people in large cities are a direct result of institutions such as mental facilities being emptied of their prozac dependent zombies [society's compassion - sic]. No wonder these people become drug addicts!

    Stocks are just another way of gambling for the ignorant. For ‘our stocks’ to work then finance mechanisms need to be removed. No dividends, no speculation, just honest hard work. But if you had a world without stocks, without finance, for things to be fair, you would also have to have a world without profits because it is because of profits that the rich are rich and the poor are poor, but Senator Webb is not really addressing the poor. He is addressing the middle classes, who feel they should be given an equal oportunity in accumulating assets, some of those prized assets – maybe.

    There Senator Webb has a point; free trade agreements, the tender process, insider trading, preferencial government funding. Those are a couple of areas the rich have an absolute advantage over the emerging middle classes [who used to be poor]. He is supporting Churchill’s capitalist ideology, may the best man win. But we must be clear this is not about “the poor” persay.

  • kim

    Oh God, our society is unjust because the poor don’t have ‘art’?
    ==========================

  • kim

    Sorry for the cheap shot.
    ==============

  • Thinker

    I wasn’t talking about justice, Kim. That’s a whole different debate.

    Cultural empowerment can only be measured in ascetics.

    P.S. I missed out the “administration of taxes” in my listing of “rich advantages” (these can include taxes that are removed – land, inheritance, gains, etc).

  • kim

    Taxes are a mess. No argument here.
    ======================

  • Thinker

    This link says things in a different way:

    http://www.ratical.org/corporations/demoBrief.html

  • kim

    Walmart is gonna gitcha, gitcha, gitcha.
    ====================

blog comments powered by Disqus