RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

The Intelligence Red Herring

First I’ll give President Obama credit for a solid speech that is certain to staunch the bleeding in his public support caused by his heretofore ham-handed handling of this incident. He provided a measured, stern declaration and, regardless of whether he meant it, did say those magic words, “the buck stops with me.” That’s what Americans expect of their President.

Now the bad news. The speech and the review of the incident are emphasizing the wrong issue–the failed Christmas day underpants bombing was not an intelligence failure or a failure to connect the dots. The folks making this charge know nothing of intelligence and, no matter how well intentioned, are going to gum up the intelligence community.

The real problem is the absence of a universal, standard system for detecting explosives at passenger security screening checkpoints. We do not have such a system in place and there is no magic, silver bullet solution on the horizon. It appears that Obama tacitly acknowledged this problem and is prodding the TSA and the National Labs to do something. But to come up with a genuine solution will require a Manhattan style project.

Over the short run the Feds should require all airports to install and use a combination of trace detector and bulk explosive detector systems at passenger screening checkpoints. This should be accompanied with a CAPPS-style program of passenger profiling This is an interim fix but is better than the non-system currently in place.

Here’s the danger with the President’s recommendations today. From here on out every tidbit of possible intel will be thrown into the hopper. There is no incentive now for an analyst to exercise any judgment. Every threat will be treated as a red alert. That’s not a problem if you are only dealing with a hundred threats a month but that’s not the case. The intelligence community is going to be flooded with threats. The system will be overwhelmed and instead of creating a more responsive, more collaborative process, we are going to wind up with the intel community equivalent of the “Boys Crying Wolf.” There will be people running in a thousand different directions and, not surprisingly, the real threats will once again slip between the cracks.

The expectation for perfect, timely intelligence is like the quest for the Ark of the Covenant or the Holy Grail. It exists in theory but it is not a reality. Even in the case of Umar Abdulmuttalab the intel community was in the process of compiling the information. There is no indicator when this information first comes in that puts the analysts and their managers on alert. In fact, let’s recall that the responsibility for compiling this information was taken from the CIA and a new layer of bureaucracy created with the creation of the National Counter Terrorism Center aka NCTC. That “shrewd” move made intelligence less agile not more.

It would be nice to have timely, accurate intelligence. But I would not bet our nation’s security on that fantasy. The best defense is a good defense. In other words, an integrated, over lapping system that incorporates mulitple technologies, profiling and the ability to ping key databases. I can’t tell based on today’s opaque presentation whether that is the course of action to be pursued.

  • Mr.Murder

    The tactic change(lone operators) is of prime importance. This new model of operation is much more likely to slip through.

  • Mr.Murder

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100107/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_yemen_al_qaida

    By LEE KEATH, Associated Press Writer Lee Keath, Associated Press Writer – 2 hrs 2 mins ago<!– end .byline –>

    SAN’A, Yemen – Yemen on Thursday provided the most comprehensive account yet of contacts between al-Qaida and the Nigerian accused of trying to blow up a U.S. airliner, saying he may have met with a radical U.S.-born cleric who previously had contact with the alleged Fort Hood shooter.
    In the weeks before the attempted airliner attack, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab met with al-Qaida operatives in a remote mountainous region that was later hit in an airstrike that targeted a gathering of the group’s top leaders, Yemen’s deputy prime minister said.
    The account by Rashad al-Alimi, who oversees security issues in the government, filled in some of the blanks in Abdulmutallab’s movements before his failed attempt to detonate explosives on a Christmas Day flight to Detroit.

  • Mandelay

    Larry Johnson for Sec’y of Homeland Security!!!!!

  • Docelder

    Yep, we are now at war with a bunch of lone wolves. How dumbass is that? That doesn’t even make sense when you think about it.

  • oowawa

    “the buck stops with me.”

    David Frye impersonating Richard Nixon:

    “I accept the responsibility but not the blame. Let me explain the difference. Those who are to blame lose their jobs. Those who are responsible do not.”

  • The Jackal

    DUBLIN: SLOVAKIA has apologised to Ireland after authorities planted an explosive in the backpack of a 49-year-old Irish traveller to test airport security – then inadvertently let it travel all the way to Ireland.

    http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/slovaks-apologise-for-irish-bomb-fiasco/story-e6frg6so-1225817176335

  • Jazzman

    Time to pound the House Committe on Homeland Security………….Lary get on the witness schedule for the January 27th Hearing… The rest of the security and intel community need to get papers submitted…..

  • mountainaires

    WHY are we referring to this country as “THE HOMELAND?” Why do we refer to Presidential appointees as “CZARS?”

    When Brennan referred tonite to the threat against “THE HOMELAND,” I WENT OFF. 

    It isn’t a MINOR THING. IT IS A MAJOR ISSUE. Frames are created by language. Are we or are we not a country called AMERICA? Why then, do we not refer to threats against AMERICA, instead of threats against “THE HOMELAND?”

  • Tricia

    Good post Larry–I hadn’t thought about how any little thing will now be reported and will gum up the works.

    I was driving when I heard Obama actually take responsibility for something.  I was so stunned that I alomost ran into a tree!

  • Anonymous

    Homeland
    That the type of word that Joseph Goebbels would approve.

  • Animal Control

    Homeland
    That the type of word that Joseph Goebbels would approve.

  • ducksoup

    Obama mouthing the words that the buck stooped with him are about as sincere and believable as his promise to hold the healthcare negotiations on C-SPAN.

    The man is incapable of saying an honest or sincere word.

  • ducksoup

    I meant to write “stopped” . . .

  • hokma

    After a year it was nice to final hear Obama call this a war after initially calling it an “overseas contingency operation.”

    If this is a war, why are we arresting this enemy combatent and giving him our rights and not treating him like a POW?

    If this is a war, what is Obama’s strategy to win?

    The only answer I have seen from Obama is that his solution to beating Al Qaeda is that we stay on the defensive with security measures to prevent bombs and strip away our own civil liberties.

    Al Qaeda is comprised of some very smart people who will find some way around our operations and machines. The answer has to be better intel operations to prevent the possibility of bombers from ever getting into an airport.

    Jim Jones had it right. They just had “Strike 2″ and they cannot afford Strike 3.

  • lark

    I think Larry is right in that the consequences of the President putting himself on the line as such will create a state of paranoia in the intelligence services that will keep the system crammed constantly. Oh well, the call will go to IBM to make more super duper luper mega ultra computers to take care of the volume and to MIT and Rand to build the programs to sort all that up. More millions of millions. Here let me send a few dollars extra in my income tax return to help pay IBM. :)

    Why don’t we offer the Muslims to build them a super duper ultra big mosque somewhere in Afghanistan where they can congregate on Fridays in exchange for them helping out and engaging Al Qaeda to stop their stupid war? I mean, why is it that the Muslims can’t get Al Qaeda under control? I mean what is with these people? Can’t they say – STOP IT – ENOUGH – LETS LIVE IN PEACE. Or instead of a mosque lets build them a great big university in Afghanistan where they can send their young people to study everything under the sun. I am getting tired of this war.

  • Anonymous

    Larry,

    Finally, a more interesting comment from you. More than just your normal political BS blame game. This is an issue that must not be politized. This is also a problem that took years to develop and can hardly be blamed on Obama. Blaming Obama is just political cheap shots.

    However, the real problem is not coming up with some kind of great passenger screening. That is easy to do. Anyone can say we need to do endless body searches and endless background checks. However, what is realistic for the given risk. I see at least three problems.

    1) How much of our civil liberties do we want to give up? This is not black and white and needs a full and thoughtful discussion. And some hard decisions need to be made by Americans.

    2) What will it cost to build or to put in place a super duper passenger screening system? It has to be in reason for the given risk. You cannot bankrupt the country and the airlines to do this. It has to be realistic.

    3) And most importantly, we can come up with all the screen procedures we want, but given that these threats generally come from international airports, how are you going to convince all the thousands of airports and governments around the world that it is in their interest to do exactly what the U.S. wants? Many countries have a different take on the risks, on how to judge civil liberities and many frankly think this is a U.S. problem.

  • Doc99

    I’m voting Present on the President’s speech. So far, he ‘s shown an ability to talk but actions speak louder than words. How long must we endure Ms Incompetano as Secy of DHS? While acknowledging a war, he still intends to mirandize unlawful combatants. I am prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt but, as he’s so fond of saying, the time for talk is over.

  • Anonymous

    It is coming out now that they mispelled the Detroit flight bombers name by one letter. So when they check the list he was not on it.

    IT WAS HUMAN ERROR!

    It will be hard to always be 100% correct, especially with these complicated names and that we are often reliant on foreign airline personal.

  • Anonymous

    Where did you read about the misspelling?

  • Jazzman

    The summary of the security review (PDF)

    Amazing….. just amazing…..

  • Clara

    Words.  Just words.  Same kind of words he used to okey-doke and bamboozle the masses, especially those S.C. voters.  No follow through after speaking the words.

  • candymarl

    They have people that do this for a living. If this guy’s father tried to  turn him in he misspelled his name? Where is the man in the suit that vouched for him? The man, wrong name or not, didnt have a passport according to reports. Keep digging.

  • Anonymous

    Yes, indeedy!

  • Jazzman

    No passport? He must have had his visa stamped on his forehead….

  • Yttik

    I didn’t believe a word the president said. His “the buck stops here” was one of the most insincere things I’ve ever heard someone say. I think “Iam not a crook” and “I did not have sex with that woman” don’t even compare on the insincerity chart. Obama just blew those two phrases out of the water.

  • lark

    Regarding Intelligence, in the year 2200 this war will be know as ‘The Stupid War’ started by the most stupid president we ever had ‘George Bush’ and continued by a stupidier so called president ‘Barack Hussein Obama.’ Lucky for America in 2013, President Palin put an end to all that stupidity.

  • TeakWoodKite

    Lark, you getting tired of it, is what both BO and Al q want.

    even if one wishes to be PC regarding the future of radical Islam whatever. But if you think Islam will exist in a “moderate” form or is a religion of peace, I do not see why then the majority of conflicts on the planet in Muslims.

  • Anonymous

    What matters is when they enter his name in the computer. If you do not spell the name right when entering it with a ticket purchase all else is meaningless. It is also in the report that a mispelling of his name led officials to not believe he had a visa.

  • Anonymous

    Just amazing that this adminstration put this out. A complete change for the secrecy of the Bush adminstration.

  • jangles

    That speech sucked.  It was everybody at fault and oh I guess since they ultimately report to me, I’m responsible.  Nice sound bite for the future.  Not convincing.  And the statements of Brennan and Napolitano—give me a break–they were surprised that Al Qaeda was ready to launch people in the US—that Aq was dedicated?

    No S##t Sherlock.

blog comments powered by Disqus