RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Latest News, and Views, on the Brown/Coakley Contest

First things first: NoQuarter will provide full coverage and live blogging on Tuesday night’s Massachusetts results, and Larry Johnson will be a commentator on John Batchelor’s election coverage radio show.

(1) “Brown Has 9.6% Lead in New Poll,” insidemedford.com.

(2) “Sources: Obama advisers believe Coakley will lose,” CNN

(3) Fascinating: “Kirk Can’t Vote After Tuesday,” Fred Barnes, Weekly Standard

Appointed Senator Paul Kirk will lose his vote in the Senate after Tuesday’s election in Massachusetts of a new senator and cannot be the 60th vote for Democratic health care legislation, according to Republican attorneys. …

(4) From the most respected electoral pundit: “Charlie Cook: Brown now favored,” Politico

(5) “McConnell: Healthcare will be ‘toxic’ for Democrats in 2010, ’12,” The Hill

(6) We’ll believe it when we see it: “Sen. Kirk: New Mass. senator will be sworn in ‘as quickly as possible’,” The Hill

(7) The most telling headline of them all? Voters desert President Barack Obama in Ted Kennedy seat,” Times of London

[...]

This Tuesday, in the election to fill Kennedy’s Senate seat, Feeney and fellow lobstermen will vote Republican. It is a pattern being repeated throughout the state of Massachusetts in what is threatening to become the biggest upset of President Barack Obama’s first year in office.

“Kennedy was a good friend of the lobstermen,” explained Feeney. “He would help whenever we had a problem. I just think the Democrats have forgotten the working man.”

The lobstermen are not the only ones jumping ship. The latest polls show the Republicans ahead in America’s most liberal state. The party has not won a Senate seat here for 37 years. The Democrats are so worried about losing the seat that Obama is flying in tomorrow, despite the crisis in Haiti.

To lose Kennedy’s seat would be a humiliating end to Obama’s first year in power, particularly as Kennedy was one of the first senior Democrats to endorse him for president. Not only would it be an ominous sign for the mid-term elections later this year but it would lose the Democrats their supermajority in the Senate, robbing them of their ability to sidestep Republican filibusters, and derail healthcare reform.

Bill Clinton, the former president, flew in for a rally last Friday even though, as a United Nations special envoy for Haiti, he had not slept for three days. “I came here to tell the people of Massachusetts that this country’s revolution was born in Massachusetts against those who abused power … do you now want to put Massachusetts on the side of the power abusers?” Clinton said.

[...]

On Friday he did a walk-about in Boston’s Little Italy, a Democrat stronghold. Asked how he felt about possibly winning the seat, he replied to loud cheers: “It’s not the Kennedys’ seat. It’s not the Democrats’ seat. It’s the people’s seat.”

A number of women had brought along their dogs. Donna, a dentist, had brought her fox terrier Razzie. “I always voted for Kennedy but this guy is refreshing,” she said. “Washington has forgotten the middle class and he’s the way we can stop it.”

Most alarmingly for the Democrats, the main plank on which Brown has campaigned is Obama’s healthcare plan, which he says will mean Massachusetts subsidising states such as Nebraska. He has kept quiet on issues such as his opposition to same-sex marriage.

“People who I never in a million years thought would have voted Republican are going to him,” said Rhonda Serre, a mother of two who has lost her job but still supports the Democrats. On Friday Brown was joined by Rudy Giuliani, the former mayor of New York. “This election will send a signal and a very dramatic one,” Giuliani said. “Believe me, the Democrats are frightened.”

Most analysts still believe the Democrats can win. But even a narrow defeat will be portrayed as a victory by the Republicans. Brown’s Senate campaign is already being studied by party strategists as a model. “He’s making healthcare a front-and-centre issue in the most liberal state in the country and it’s working for him,” said Whit Ayres, co-founder of Resurgent Republic, a group of conservative strategists.

It’s the albatross around the Democrats’ necks.

Obama has made a mistake so fundamental, it is shocking. The people are worried about our nation’s economy and about jobs. Yet Obama has given only passing attention — token attention, really — to the people’s most pressing worries.

Instead, Obama has focused all of his passion and his might on passing a bill that he envisions as legacy legislation, ignoring the obvious fact that the legislation itself is an obviously hopeless mish-mash mess that has required all kinds of arm-twisting to get as far as it has.

So we ask this question: How has Obama spent most of his time in the past few days, instead of keeping close watch over the fall-out from the underwear bomber’s nearly-successful act of terrorism and instead of focusing more time and energy on the overwhelming crisis in Haiti? Right. He’s spent most of his time pressuring lawmakers to pass his beloved health care bill because, for reasons that escape any but the most narcissistic, he sees the bill as his greatest achievement (while every sane person sees the bill as a pathetic joke that will muck up the quality of health care, harm Medicare, fail to address soaring medical costs, and increase every state’s as well as the federal deficit).

The people have watched all of the pressures being placed on their representatives, as well as their representatives’ abdication to such pressures, and are aghast.

How could their own senators and House members abandon the clear opposition of the people to this bill? How could members of Congress not insist that the foremost urgent matters — the economy and jobs — take precedence over all else?

Is it any wonder that voters, when given the rare opportunity to express themselves in the voting both, would rush to vote for a Scott Brown who — unlike his go-along-to-get-along opponent — clearly is his own man. When Scott Brown says he will be the 41st vote against Obamacare, I haven’t a single moment’s doubt that that is exactly what he means. He is believable. He is a man comfortable in his own skin who believes what he believes and lets the voters know, frankly, what he will and can do for them. How refreshing. And how drastically different than the drivel that Obama delivered on the campaign trails in 2007 and 2008.

  • Peggy Sue

    I really want to believe that Scott Brown, if elected, is “truly” his own man and won’t get sucked up in the partisan vacuum machine once in DC.  I mean how many times have we seen and heard this before?  A candidate represents himself/herself as one thing, only to do an about-face once elected?

    The “O” comes to mind immediately.

    On the other hand, Martha Coakley has projected the sense that she “will” be sucked into the partisan machine with her pivot on HCR shortly after the primary and her appearance at the fundraiser in DC last Tuesday, hosted by healthcare reps, Phama and lobbyists galore.

    What was she thinking???  That was such a poison pill.  I still don’t understand such a boneheaded move. 

    If Brown wins this thing [and the numbers now indicate he has an excellent chance], the President will become a lame duck in his first year.

    And this, from the Master of Political Strategy, the 11-dimension chess player!

    As a Hillary supporter, I find this a Karma moment beyond description.  As a Democrat, I find this scenario absolutely surreal.

    But then, as I’ve lamented before: This is not my mother’s Democratic Party! 

    Not even close. 

  • Freedom Fighter

    There are a handful of politicos that I can say are his or her own person. Joe Lieberman, John McCain, Sarah Palin, and Hilary Clinton. And as you can see, they are all unelectable to the highest office.

  • buzzlatte

    Interestingly, this isn’t about any of those politicians, FF.  

    However, if you would care to elaborate on who pulls Obama’s strings then perhaps it would be relevant to use as a comparison to Scott Brown. 

  • Peggy Sue

    Oh, so you’re willing to admit that the President misrepresented himself, FF?

    We’re making progress!

  • Freedom Fighter

    Peggy Sue, people who are his/her own person aren’t necessarily the best for the office. Why do you think people like Joe Lieberman, John McCain, Sarah Palin, and Hillary Clinton’s political careers have topped out?

  • Mark

    If Scott Brown can win this election this could be the impetus to save the country from becoming Obamatown. 

  • buzzlatte

    That was then, this is now.

    In case you missed it FF, the party system isn’t too popular right now, even in MA.

    Let’s re-set this thread.

    It looks like Brown has taken the lead in a race that has the whole nation holding it’s breath.  By all appearances, he is a man who holds to his convictions about being a representative of the people.  This makes him a very attractive candidate when the nation has just gone through a year of a new president who is more interested in meeting an ideologic agenda that appeases the far left wing of the democratic party. In turn, this makes Brown additionally attractive and more in touch with the heart of the American people.

  • Freedom Fighter

    The teabaggers and the bitter PUMAs may be making a lot of noise, but at the end of the day, MA will elect Marcia Coakley to fill the Kennedy seat.

  • buzzlatte

    MARCIA Coakley???  Um, try Martha.  Geez, did the talking points from the DNC bunker have a typo, FF?  

    ROFLMAO

  • Peggy Sue

    “Necessarily” is the key word there, FF.  And if you’re trying to convince me that Barack Obama’s misrepresention to the electorate is/was the true mark of leadership, I’ve got some ocean property to sell you in the heartland.

    Lying doesn’t recommend one to high office or much of anything else.  It might get you into office or favored position, but it won’t keep you there.  And it certainly won’t garner anything coming close to respect.

    If Brown wins on Tuesday night, this house of cards, flimsy as the lies it was built on, comes tumbling down.

    And rightly so. 

    That gives me no pleasure as a Democrat.  But rotten foundations do not hold for very long. Sometimes, you just need to gut the whole structure and start anew.

  • Peggy Sue

    We shall see, FF.  And you can drop the ugly names [teabaggers] and the predictable put downs of Hillary’s supporters. 

    It won’t win you one extra vote. 

  • TeakWoodKite

    That seat is set forth by THE CONSTUTION, FF, you twit. It belong to the PEOPLE Of MA. It is NOT nor has it EVAH been the proprety of any person.

    You are a wombat.

  • imustprotest

    Patrick Kennedy said the same thing, Marcia Coakley….hmmm….FF are you Patrick Kennedy?

  • Peggy Sue

    PS: It would be nice if you got the name right, FF.  That’s Martha Coakley.  She deserves to have her name printed correctly.

  • buzzlatte

    And isn’t Patrick Kennedy the son of the late Teddy?  Incredibly funny!  But on the other hand, it points out just how disconnected the dems really are on all levels.

    I’m beginning to think that Karma is having a grand time messing with the democrats.

  • Obamastolemycountry

    Well, now we know Freedom Fighter’s true identity.  It’s Jan Brady.

    “Marcia, Marcia, Marcia!” and Freedom fighter then stomps out of the room.

  • jbjd

    There is speculation from some R lawyers that current U.S. Senator Kirk from MA cannot legally cast votes in Congress after Tuesday’s special election to pick his successor. http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/barnes-massachusetts-senatorial-race-and-obamacare.  They based their conclusions primarily on the wording in the new law, which reads in part, an appointed senator remains in office “until election and qualification of the person duly elected to fill the vacancy.” 

    I read the new MA law differently from these R lawyers, with reference to the Definitions at the beginning of the chapters dealing with elections. In that section, there is no definition for “elected” or “duly elected.” However, there is a definition for the word “election.” Accordingly, using the word “election” in the new law means, the candidate who will now fill that US Senate seat will do so after the voting has ended. But there is an additional requirement in the new law that restricts this requirement “until election.” That is, the candidate must also be “duly elected.” The R attorneys above construe this as meaning, s/he satisfies the Constitutional requirements of eligibility. But this makes no sense. Because in MA, no law requires any state official to verify such eligibility either before the candidate’s name is printed on the ballot; or before the Governor certifies the results of the election.

    It makes more sense that “duly elected” in the new law means, elected according to provisions of law. And under this law, it looks like, the results cannot be certified before the 15th day after the election.
    http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/54-116.htm

    Because by law, a candidate has 5 (five) days to file a petition for recount. Here is the ballot certification procedure spelled out.
    http://www.sec.state.ma.us/ele/elerct/rctidx.htm

  • Anonymous

    Exactly! Only puppets get elected to the highest office.

  • Mark

    Not you again, the drone so drunk on Obama he cannot even find the Daily Kook site.

  • jbjd

    This new poll is interesting, for this reason.  It failed to ask for “Unenrolled” voters BUT, the number of “Independents” approximated the percentage of registered voters in the state, who are Unenrolled.  And these went largely to SB.  But the biggest problem with this poll is, they didn’t ask respondents how likely they were to VOTE on Tuesday.  (And there’s a high margin of error.)

  • jbjd

    I have tried several times unsuccessfully to post a comment detailing how telling was MC’s inability to fill Cabot Hall at NU, with BO, given its close proximity to public transport and, the Roxbury neighborhoods of his strongest supporters, as gauged by the precinct vote totals in the 2008 general election.  But I keep getting a message that my comment contained too many characters.  Not so!

  • Mark

    The radicals are huddling right now to develop their strategy if ACORN and the their thugs fail to rig the election in favor of Coakley. 

    A close-up of a key radical, he speaks, “Let’s call everyone who votes for Brown a ‘racist!’”.  The radicals all applaud, “This will be an opportunity to guilt the entire state of Massachusetts then they will all run to us”, they opine. 

    These idiots are like a football team that only runs one play over and over again.  Eventually everyone catches on and the idiots get thrown for a loss and keep losing ground.

  • TiredOfSufferingFoolsGladly

    The most bitter person I believe I have ever seen in my lifetime is Michelle Obama, FF.

    And by the way, were you just having drinks with Patrick Kennedy?  He’s the only other idiot besides you I have heard call the soon-to-be-also-ran, ’Marcia.’

  • felizarte

    Acorn strategies require lots of groundwork which they failed to set-up because like Coakley, they thought the election was just going to be a formality.  After the primaries, Coakley was so far ahead and Brown was practically unknown.  No one could have predicted his progress in such a short period of time.  It is too late for ACORN. It is also too late for SEIU considering that two of their local affiliates have endorsed Brown.  This is an incredible alignment of so many little things.  It almost qualifies as a miracle.

  • Betty

    I found this on Hillaryis44, this is what Scott Brown was saying to everyone at the same time Obama was saying giving his speech.  What a difference.  When he claims all parties, suddenly one can see Obama and the other usurpers for what they are – outsiders.  Suddenly, democtat, republican and independant are all good again. 

    From44:
    Here’s an excerpt from Brown’s speech today. He nails the mood of the people. And just from a cynically political point of view, as far as strategy goes, he is on top of the wave and Coakley and the tone-deaf Dems are going to get hammered with it.
    When we started this campaign just a few months ago, the political machine wrote us off. A Senate seat in Massachusetts, we were told, was already spoken for – and this special election was just a minor detail that wouldn’t get in the way. The political machine already had a short-term placeholder in the Senate. Now all they needed was a long-term placeholder, and everything had been arranged.
    Well, there was just one little problem with that plan – the independent-thinking people of Massachusetts wanted a real choice, and they – and you — have made this a real contest.
    The voters are doing their own thinking, and the machine politicians don’t quite know how to react. So they put in a distress call to Washington, and the next thing you know, Air Force One is landing at Logan.
    At the beginning, it felt like me against the machine. But guess what? I was wrong. It’s us against the machine.
    I don’t need an establishment to prop me up. I stand before you as the proud candidate of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents across Massachusetts, north and south, east and west.
    The party machine is in high gear for my opponent. The establishment is afraid of losing their Senate seat. You can all remind them that this is not their seat, it is yours.
    Should I have the honor of representing our state in Washington, D.C., I will serve no faction but Massachusetts. I will pursue no agenda but what is right. I will be nobody’s senator but yours.
    One of the great advantages of being independent is that you meet voters of every kind. And you learn what people are really thinking about the big issues facing our state and our country. The political experts are still wondering how this little campaign of ours grew so fast and gathered so much strength and momentum. The reason is simple.
    We do not want a senator whose only question on health care is to ask Harry Reid, “How do you want me to vote?”

  • Mark

    felizarte–
    Go fuck yourself you have no fucking idea how dangerous ACORN is.  It’s like a fucking hydra with a pair of pliers bitch.

  • helenk

    I had this weird thought on why backtrack is so focused on health care. It is almost like he wanted to trash the thing that Hillary Clinton spend a lot of her lifetime working on. He is so vindictive that it would not suprise me. Also much dinero from healthcare companies.

    WOMEN WITH INTELLIGENCE AND EXPERIENCE,MEN WHO SUPPORT THEM AND COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY ALWAYS

    PUMAS,BUBBAS,EQUALISTS AND THOSE PEOPLE RULE

  • Freedom Fighter

    Who the fuck do you think you are wasting all that Internet real estate with shitty ranting?

  • Peggy Sue

    I’m suddenly realizing that reading this blog is really for psychopaths and shitmouths.
    Fuck you morons.

  • Mark

    You did have a weird thought–but here’s my thought:
    SHUT YOUR FUCKING MOUTH ASSHOLE!!

  • helenk

    I am sorry that backtrack did not give you  your paycheck and you only got gift certificates  for stores that went out of business instead. I guess that confused your thoughts. Next time get a better job couselor.

    WOMEN WITH INTELLIGENCE AND EXPERIENCE,MEN WHO SUPPORT THEM AND COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY ALWAYS

    PUMAS,BUBBAS,EQUALISTS AND THOSE PEOPLE RULE

  • felizarte

    Thanks for sharing.  I can see from his message why the people of Massachusetts are gravitating to him.

  • felizarte

    What’s your problem Mark?  I know Acorn/Seius/Andy Stern helped O to steal the election in 2008.  They’ll probably do it again for O.  But Coakley is not Obama and they probably did not expect this primary contest to turn out the way it has.  In the presidential elections, they basically had two years to set up their schemes:  busing people to the caucauses; registering seniors in nursing homes and those serviced in their homes by SEIU members, then collecting all their absentee ballots.  With the subprimes mess, the acorn video expose’s, and people awareness, they’ll have to come up with a more “refined” strategy in preparation for O’s re-election.  

  • felizarte

    What’s your problem Mark?  Ran out of meds?

  • stodghie

    and ff who in the heck do you think you are posting bs like you do on here. what you are is a fool and a bigot. hit the road and don’t slam the door. your sorry backside isn’t desired here when you write trash like that. now git!

  • stodghie

    ff, you are a fool!

  • Khan Krum

    Quite true, but I think he plans to call it Obamabad… maybe Obamastan?

  • Khan Krum

    Is there something on that Kennedy DNA strand that produces gaffes of this variety?

    1. Marcia Coakley:

    http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2010/01/after_obama_ral.php

    2. Osama bin Laden:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APx2YJ-_jos

    Nawh if ye vote Osamacare,
    We’ gonna vote yo’ happy ass outta thar!!!

  • Guest

    No kidding. Right on both counts. Coakley without doubt exceed the voters’ limits in Massachusetts: Just how many unforced errors can they make, and still win. It also makes no sense to me.

    And anyone whose major dyanamic in life is politics, instead of love, is f*cked already…

  • Ferd Berfle

    Free-dump, you come here day after day posting crap that is merely a stream of consciousness emanating from the dissonant voices in that space to let between your shoulders. Then you have the temerity to to call another’s comment “shitty ranting”. I’ll give you this: your disconnection from realty is now complete.

  • Mary cusack

    Massachuetts, Even though signs may look good for scott brown YOU STILL HAVE TO VOTE TO MAKE IT TRUE. the dems are counting on us feeling good and staying home. CARRY THROUGH YOUR INTENTIONS VOTE!!!!!!

  • Ferd Berfle

    “Obama has made a mistake so fundamental, it is shocking. The people are worried about our nation’s economy and about jobs. Yet Obama has given only passing attention — token attention, really — to the people’s most pressing worries. ”

    You hit the nail on the head. It’s the economy, stupid. Healthcare would be a contentioous issue even in the best of times but Mr. Dogmatic has to have it, the rest of the country be damned. That One is both tone deaf and invincibly ignorant. He simply doesn’t get it. So much for the “intellectual prowess” of That One. And as for his vaunted ability to communicate, it is a lie. Communication is a two-way street and he is incapable of listening, which makes communication impossible.

     That One is nothing more than a chrome-plated megaphone.

  • Ferd Berfle

    “Obama has made a mistake so fundamental, it is shocking. The people are worried about our nation’s economy and about jobs. Yet Obama has given only passing attention — token attention, really — to the people’s most pressing worries. ”  
     
    You hit the nail on the head. It’s the economy, stupid. Healthcare would be a contentious issue even in the best of times but Mr. Dogmatic has to have it, the rest of the country be damned. That One is both tone deaf and invincibly ignorant. He simply doesn’t get it. So much for his “intellectual prowess”. And as for his vaunted ability to communicate, it is a lie. Communication is a two-way street and he is incapable of listening, which makes communication impossible.  
     
     That One is nothing more than a chrome-plated megaphone.

  • Ferd Berfle

    This isn’t Peggy Sue. Another name-troll rears its ugly little head.

    Cleanup on aisle 00.

  • Mary cusack

    why are you wasting all this intertnet real estate ranting against people who have made up their minds…..oh I forgot…… two year old tantrum…ok FF TIME OUT

  • glennmcgahee

    If this election swings to Brown it will NOT be because the Dems are trying to pass HCR. It will be because the bill they are passing is NOT Healthcare Reform by any imagination. It is a bill for the insurance/pharma lobby. Liberals want to see real reform as in single-payer/medicare for all, not by being forced to invest in for profit companies that already have us by the balls. The Dems have decided not to listen to us and for that, they can get a new job if they can find one.

  • HARP

    If Brown wins, will Newsweek put out a headline saying……We are all PUMAS now?

  • Olivia1998

    I went on network web sites and for some reason they seem to have ignored Browns speech yesterday.

  • Sassy

    Aside from the bitter pill we will have to swallow if the democrats destroy our healthcare system, there should still be a lot of residual anger about the “super delegate” confiscation of votes in Massachusetts.
    The voters there have the opportunity to actually count this time, and I hope they come out in full force for Brown.

  • karen for Clinton

    Excellent point.  They were robbed of their votes and payback time has come.  I know it is something I will never forgive or forget.  2008 took its rightful place of shame right next to 2000.

    btw – until they clear up the poop stains made by the foul-mouthed cheetoes eating, mommy’s basement dweller – do not feed the troll or give it any attention. 

  • Peggy Sue

    This response above is not me, people.  The Obamatrons must be getting really, really desperate! 

  • Clara

    If the thinking among Democrats is that the loss of one seat, losing their supermajority, will derail Obama’s entire agenda and his presidency, then how strong was their agenda or his presidency?  LBJ had the support of 75% of the Senate when he passed a tough social bill.  BO cannot get one Republican on board because their bills stink and they’ve done such a poor job of selling it.

  • Sassy

    In surfing the channels, Fox covered Coakley’s speech as well as BO’s in that rally.
    What gives? Did they cover Brown at a later time?
    I can see coverage of the President(yuk), but the candidates should be equally positioned!

  • Peggy Sue

    Fair’s fair, FF.  We put up with your ranting. 

    Btw, Betty: thanks for the clip.  I sense “that” speech brought down the house.  It’s exactly what people hunger for right now. 

  • Olivia1998

    Absolutely! Fair and balanced my a….  I emailed Fox and asked them this morning.  I sent part of Browns speech for them.  Do you think it might have something to do with the visitor at Fox last week.  The Prince…..Neil C did an interview with him.  Things changed after his visit

  • popl
  • Blue Heron

    This is just like the two-step the Dems danced when Ted died. The law regarding filling an empty seat in MA was changed for the third time in five years by the state legislature to make itn easier for a Dem to keep Ted’s seat. (governor appoint to speacial election [for Kerry] back to speacial election this time round)

    I don’t like it when repubs manipulate like this, and I don’t like it any better when Dems do it. The Founding fathers did not create a dynastic system. This type of politics as usual falunts that principle.

    Furthermore, should Brown win, and if Dems delay his swearing in till after healthcare vote, not only would it be despicable, it would fly in the face of what MA did just a scant four years ago with another open seat.

     
    Rep. Niki Tsongas (D-Lowell) was sworn in at the U.S. House of Representatives on Oct. 18, 2007, just two days after winning a special election to replace Martin Meehan. In that case, Tsongas made it to Capitol Hill in time to override a presidential veto of the expansion of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program.
     
    Evidently rules in MA are changed with impunity to benefit Democrats and not the people’s vote.
     
     

     

     

  • poplicola

    Robert Gibbs on Scott Brown winning the Massachusetts Senate race:

  • HARP

    They sure are busy over at Martha`s calling HQ.

  • Blue Heron

    Sorry for all the typos in above post. I was a little excited while typing at the hypocrasy of dems. That and I am just a bad speller, and even worse typist.

  • Olivia1998

    good one Harp. One ringy dingy, one….

  • karen for Clinton

    lol

  • tek

    How can anyone destroy a healthcare system when we don’t have a healthcare system?  Every man for himself is the U. S. healthcare system.  Obama’s bill shows the need for universal healthcare.  Under his bill select targeted populations will pay big taxes so everyone else can have healthcare and those people will also pay for their own healthcare.  Under universal healthcare, everyone pays taxes and everyone gets equal coverage.

  • TiredOfSufferingFoolsGladly

    FF, I hear your mother calling you.  It’s time for your diaper change. Overdue, if you ask me, from the stench you’ve left here……. 

  • jbjd

    Some D’s in the MA legislature opposed the bill that would allow the Governor to appoint a U.S. Senator to fill the seat vacated by Mr. Kennedy, seeing it as political and not consistent with democracy. Before this bill, there would have been a special election to fill the vacant seat.
    http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/09/23/senate_oks_kennedy_successor_bill/?page=2

  • arabella trefoil

    “a fucking hydra with a pair of pliers”

    You should consider rewriting that. It doesn’t make sense. A hydra has numerous heads, but no hands. How can a hydra share one pair of pliers, much less use them effectively. Unless they use their mouths to operate the one pair of pliers they share amongst themselves.

  • arabella trefoil

    Heck, yeah. Name stealing is one of the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse:

    Using the race card
    Name stealing
    Spamming
    Attacking the Clintons

    Yeah, I know attacking the Clintons makes no sense in many cases (because it’s irrelevant) but its the fourth horseman.

  • arabella trefoil

    Even worse, MA has had real life experiences with what life will be like with Obama style health care. And wasn’t their governor’s election campaign run by the same folks who gave us Obama?

    If Obama had any smarts at all, he’d realize the numerous implications of a Brown win. And he and his people would have been more prepared to plan for any eventuality.

    A Brown win is much worse for Obama than anybody has begun to realize.

    Brown may “beat the Obama machine.” Actually, let me give credit where credit is due, the people of the MA may beat the Obama machine. Hurray for the Bay State!

  • arabella trefoil

    You pre-destroy a healthcare system, and set it into law.

  • arabella trefoil

    LBJ knew how to work the Senate. Obama is no LBJ.

  • creeper

    Some perverse part of me would like to see Dems delay seating Brown if he won.  Talk about screwing the pooch!  Could there be any clearer proof of the crookedness of the current Dem leadership? 

    Well, yeah, there was Florida and Minnesota…

  • getfitnow

    The TALIBAN  is calling collect from…wait…. AFGANISTAN!

  • creeper

    “It is a bill for the insurance/pharma lobby.”

    Exactly like Medicare Part D…which requires seniors to buy coverage from private companies and allows for no negotiation of lower prescription costs.  It was a total sellout to medical lobbies. 

    Republican or Democrat…politicians sell out to big business every time.

  • snosandy

    Maybe the dems who refuse to cross party lines will write-in their choice……Marcia Coakley.

  • Docelder

    Does nobody pulling for Coakley even know what her name is? This is becoming funny. I guess all they need to know is that Barry and Harry will be helping her vote.

  • Anonymous

    The lobsterman has it right, ” I just think the Democrats have forgotten the working man.”

    Remember, Brazile said they didn’t need us and threw us and our votes for Hillary under the bus.  Well, surprise, yes they did need us as apparently there are not enough latte liberal voters to go around in order to comfortably still win elections.

    Well, we will see what happens tomorrow.  Who knows if the party will learn their lesson, but what a mess they created throwing principles out the window to promote The One.  How’s that workin’ out for you Donna?

  • stodghie

    tek thanks for your utopian comments that is not the reality with this bill. it is a nightmare fu to the american people.

    i am for health care reform but not this debacle.

  • stodghie

    i can’t help but think about animal farm when i look at obummer and the dimorats. the process from being one of the group to be more equal than others in their view.

  • PortiaElizabeth

    Did anyone else hear Martha Coakley’s comment that BO was “irritated” because he had to come to Massachusetts yesterday? My husband said he heard it on one of the Boston stations. I can’t imagine how that comment could be construed as helpful.

  • Newyorkie

    I think Americans have buyers remorse about that cool guy who listens to rap music attacking women and attacks those who work hard and play by the rules. They are finding that as President this guy is cold and looks at this country as a social experiment.

    There is something about Scott Brown and his easy charm, his ability to connect with the average person that we have been starving for.  Martha Coakley is a potential Pelosi–cold and cruel who will not represent her constituants but instead will pay homage to any fat cat lobbiests.

    The Democrats and Obama better worry because this country doesn’t cotton to arrogance. 

  • arabella trefoil

    It was Michelle’s birthday, I think.

  • Newyorkie

    Clara whatever people say about LBJ he was a great legislator.  He knew how to count the votes.  Obama could have co-opted the Republican Healthcare agenda and incorporated it in a bill which would have gotten bi-partisan support but he cannot give an inch.  With him its my way or the highway. 

    Maybe Obama will write another book but after he is out of office in 2013.  I WAS GREAT BUT THE PEOPLE WOULD NOT ACCEPT MY COLOR.

  • Mark

    How original, a lib punk using my name to comment.  Are your lib feelings hurt since you don’t like to be called out on the race card?  Poor baby. 

  • jbjd

    Yes; upon assuming the Presidency after the assassination of JFK, LBJ, having spent many years in Congress, called into his office the leaders of both the House and the Senate and said, ‘I want a civil rights bill on my desk, yesterday.’  And, less than a year later, he got it.

  • FLDemFem

    We do not want a senator whose only question on health care is to ask Harry Reid, “How do you want me to vote?”

    That should be hammered in gold and set up over the campaign headquarters of everyone running for the Senate in the next election.

  • FLDemFem

    We are VOX POPULI and we are mad as hell. You should change your screen name to Freedom Fucker, given your attitude and language choices.

  • FLDemFem

    Rep. Kennedy, is that you??? :-D

  • FLDemFem

    LBJ also had the advantage over Obama of knowing the people he had served in Congress for thirty years, which Obama does not. LBJ knew where the “bodies were buried”, so to speak and he used that to get the bills he wanted passed through Congress. I remember when the Civil Rights bill and others were passed. We were living in McLean, Va then and although Dad worked at State, many of our neighbors were Congressional types, some in office, some on staff. I remember hearing the grown-ups talk about LBJ and how he got his bills through Congress, and even some of the details. The ones he thought he would have trouble with he threatened with making public various peccadilloes that would, in those days, have ended their careers. LBJ knew how to play hardball when he needed to, and he did it very well. He was a master politician. And he really cared about the American people, and wanted the best for them. The same cannot be said for the current American president.

  • FLDemFem

    That would be “served with in” not “served in”