<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Won’t Pollsters Ask the Right Question On Race?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4113/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4113/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 09:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beowful</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4113/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-556061</link>
		<dc:creator>Beowful</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/11/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-556061</guid>
		<description>&quot;I feel I was way ahead of the ballgame when I was wise to Obama early on, he never fooled me. I welcome all late comers none the less.&quot;

NO.  You&#039;re just a racist tool.  Without question one of the 5%.  Nothing Obama said in the 2004 DNC keynote speech could be interpreted as machievellian or race-baiting.  He was only being a dutiful cheerleader for the party and John Kerry.

Now, if you had followed Obama&#039;s rise in Chicago and Illinois, which I didn&#039;t, then you&#039;d know him well and are justified in calling him a conman.  Otherwise, you&#039;re the paranoid guy who&#039;s full of crap.

But your comments in their totality suggests the former rather than the latter assertion.

Hint:  Try looking into hard data, sociological, economic, criminal, etc., rather than talk out of your ass.  Every other PUMA here is not saying what you are saying.  They only say that Obama and the black community have resorted to the worst race-baiting in this election cycle.  And that&#039;s all were saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I feel I was way ahead of the ballgame when I was wise to Obama early on, he never fooled me. I welcome all late comers none the less.&#8221;</p>
<p>NO.  You&#8217;re just a racist tool.  Without question one of the 5%.  Nothing Obama said in the 2004 DNC keynote speech could be interpreted as machievellian or race-baiting.  He was only being a dutiful cheerleader for the party and John Kerry.</p>
<p>Now, if you had followed Obama&#8217;s rise in Chicago and Illinois, which I didn&#8217;t, then you&#8217;d know him well and are justified in calling him a conman.  Otherwise, you&#8217;re the paranoid guy who&#8217;s full of crap.</p>
<p>But your comments in their totality suggests the former rather than the latter assertion.</p>
<p>Hint:  Try looking into hard data, sociological, economic, criminal, etc., rather than talk out of your ass.  Every other PUMA here is not saying what you are saying.  They only say that Obama and the black community have resorted to the worst race-baiting in this election cycle.  And that&#8217;s all were saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beowful</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4113/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-556049</link>
		<dc:creator>Beowful</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/11/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-556049</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;but is not quite the sought after ad guru.&lt;/b&gt;

Oops, meant to instead say: &quot;but is NOW quite the sought after ad guru.&quot;

If there are any other misplaced or missing negations, correct it yerself.  For once, use you&#039;re coconuts, man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>but is not quite the sought after ad guru.</b></p>
<p>Oops, meant to instead say: &#8220;but is NOW quite the sought after ad guru.&#8221;</p>
<p>If there are any other misplaced or missing negations, correct it yerself.  For once, use you&#8217;re coconuts, man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beowful</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4113/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-556043</link>
		<dc:creator>Beowful</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/11/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-556043</guid>
		<description>Look in the mirror my friend.

You make about as much sense as the bots.  You obviously are not connected to reality.  Everything I assert is based on either hard sociological, criminal, or economic data.  I&#039;m speaking based on reality.

I&#039;m also basing what I&#039;m saying on experiments done repeatedly replicated in social psychology.  Madison Avenue (corporate America) pays big bucks for this type of research, check out the name Clotaire Rapaille.  Practically every other company lines up and pays him $$$ MILLIONS $$$ for his research into archetypes and whatnot.  Rapaille is a French guy who started out as a psychoanalyst, but is not quite the sought after ad guru.

Ask yourself this question, douchebag:  &lt;b&gt;Why are they paying Rapaille the big bucks to do Freudian type marketing research &amp; analysis, if it doesn&#039;t work?&lt;/b&gt;

I believe it was American Airlines who actually paid him to design the interiors of their jetliners, using all manner of subconscious cues, to relax the passenger, to make them, more or less to fall in love with AA.  Many if not all, major auto makers hire him too for interior design.  He is HUGE.

Read this bitch:

&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Archetype Studies&lt;/b&gt; has been successfully guiding its clients&#039; interests in Marketing, Advertising, Research and Development, and Personnel since 1976. The reputation earned as the premier firm in breaking &lt;b&gt;the code of the Cultural Archetype&lt;/b&gt; has come as a direct result of our commitment to customer satisfaction in implementing this unique process.

&lt;b&gt;Archetype Studies&lt;/b&gt; was founded by Dr. G. C. Rapaille to provide answers to the question: Why do people do what they do? Our goal is to provide you and your organization with the process and expertise necessary to discover the Archetype related to your product or service. We will continue to help implement this new found knowledge as necessary. At the conclusion of the study, the client retains Ownership of the study, and has a detailed Action Plan based upon the study.

&lt;b&gt;Archetype Studies&lt;/b&gt; is unique. We are not consultants and do not charge by the hour or day. We do not conduct market research, and do not write reports. Our commitment to the client is that at the end of the process, you will thoroughly understand the Archetype studied. The &lt;b&gt;Archetype Team&lt;/b&gt; will speak a common language, the unconscious Logic of Emotion of your customers.

&lt;b&gt;Archetype Studies&lt;/b&gt; is committed to increasing the client&#039;s competitive edge by providing you with a unique process, and by improving the skill and productivity of your staff people, they will perceive their customers in a completely new way.

The &lt;b&gt;Archetype Studies&lt;/b&gt; is a discovery and an education process. The &lt;b&gt;Archetype Team&lt;/b&gt; and &lt;b&gt;Archetype Manager&lt;/b&gt; become experts on the &lt;b&gt;Archetype&lt;/b&gt;. They will gain in-depth knowledge of the Logic of Emotions which has been discovered.

At the end of the process, the importance of the study will be self-evident. We spend most of our time helping the members of the &lt;b&gt;Archetype Team&lt;/b&gt; put the knowledge of the &lt;b&gt;Archetype&lt;/b&gt; into practical application.

&lt;b&gt;Archetype Studies&lt;/b&gt; is committed to your satisfaction. Our fee guarantees that a study does not stop at the end of the research. We remain available as long as you need us to implement the &lt;b&gt;Archetype Action Plan&lt;/b&gt; (and ask only that current expenses be reimbursed).

Once we have, together, discovered an &lt;b&gt;Archetype&lt;/b&gt;, it is YOURS. &lt;b&gt;Archetype Studies&lt;/b&gt; will not duplicate your study in the same culture, and will always give you priority to explore it in another culture.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Source:  http://www.rapailleinstitute.com/

Why are archetypes important?  Because we think in and process information, our surroundings, the world, EVERYTHING, in terms of archetypes.  It is both a strength and a weakness--as everything is in life.  If you know how the human mind works, you can mess with it.

Hint:  The archetype to human cognition is like  a subroutine, or even the algorithm, is to a computer scientist.

And just to let you know, the analysis here is my own, not Rapaille&#039;s or anyone else&#039;s.  And yeah, it&#039;s at least as good. :- ) 
 

PBS did a great documentary on advertising which included this guy:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/persuaders/interviews/rapaille.html

You can see the entire episode somewhere on their website.  It&#039;s called &quot;The Persuaders&quot;.  Watch it, you hopeless light-weight.

Note:  There was one line which I objected to in the documentary asserting that many if not most ad campaigns fail suggesting that the techniques used are not effective. BULLSHIT.  Ad campaigns fail because they are up against even more effective, better thought out ad campaigns. 

The media and political consultants like Frank Luntz, Rove, Carville, are all neck deep into this type of stuff in one form or another.
 

P.S. If you want to understand the &quot;liberal medi&quot;a, go to the FBI/DOJ websites and study the shit outta the current picture and past trends of crime in America.  Then compare to crime coverage on the media.  &lt;b&gt;There is no connection between the two.&lt;/b&gt;  That WILL tell you everything--about the &quot;liberal media&quot; &lt;b&gt;and about yourself&lt;/b&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look in the mirror my friend.</p>
<p>You make about as much sense as the bots.  You obviously are not connected to reality.  Everything I assert is based on either hard sociological, criminal, or economic data.  I&#8217;m speaking based on reality.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also basing what I&#8217;m saying on experiments done repeatedly replicated in social psychology.  Madison Avenue (corporate America) pays big bucks for this type of research, check out the name Clotaire Rapaille.  Practically every other company lines up and pays him $$$ MILLIONS $$$ for his research into archetypes and whatnot.  Rapaille is a French guy who started out as a psychoanalyst, but is not quite the sought after ad guru.</p>
<p>Ask yourself this question, douchebag:  <b>Why are they paying Rapaille the big bucks to do Freudian type marketing research &amp; analysis, if it doesn&#8217;t work?</b></p>
<p>I believe it was American Airlines who actually paid him to design the interiors of their jetliners, using all manner of subconscious cues, to relax the passenger, to make them, more or less to fall in love with AA.  Many if not all, major auto makers hire him too for interior design.  He is HUGE.</p>
<p>Read this bitch:</p>
<p><i><b>Archetype Studies</b> has been successfully guiding its clients&#8217; interests in Marketing, Advertising, Research and Development, and Personnel since 1976. The reputation earned as the premier firm in breaking <b>the code of the Cultural Archetype</b> has come as a direct result of our commitment to customer satisfaction in implementing this unique process.</p>
<p><b>Archetype Studies</b> was founded by Dr. G. C. Rapaille to provide answers to the question: Why do people do what they do? Our goal is to provide you and your organization with the process and expertise necessary to discover the Archetype related to your product or service. We will continue to help implement this new found knowledge as necessary. At the conclusion of the study, the client retains Ownership of the study, and has a detailed Action Plan based upon the study.</p>
<p><b>Archetype Studies</b> is unique. We are not consultants and do not charge by the hour or day. We do not conduct market research, and do not write reports. Our commitment to the client is that at the end of the process, you will thoroughly understand the Archetype studied. The <b>Archetype Team</b> will speak a common language, the unconscious Logic of Emotion of your customers.</p>
<p><b>Archetype Studies</b> is committed to increasing the client&#8217;s competitive edge by providing you with a unique process, and by improving the skill and productivity of your staff people, they will perceive their customers in a completely new way.</p>
<p>The <b>Archetype Studies</b> is a discovery and an education process. The <b>Archetype Team</b> and <b>Archetype Manager</b> become experts on the <b>Archetype</b>. They will gain in-depth knowledge of the Logic of Emotions which has been discovered.</p>
<p>At the end of the process, the importance of the study will be self-evident. We spend most of our time helping the members of the <b>Archetype Team</b> put the knowledge of the <b>Archetype</b> into practical application.</p>
<p><b>Archetype Studies</b> is committed to your satisfaction. Our fee guarantees that a study does not stop at the end of the research. We remain available as long as you need us to implement the <b>Archetype Action Plan</b> (and ask only that current expenses be reimbursed).</p>
<p>Once we have, together, discovered an <b>Archetype</b>, it is YOURS. <b>Archetype Studies</b> will not duplicate your study in the same culture, and will always give you priority to explore it in another culture.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Source:  <a href="http://www.rapailleinstitute.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.rapailleinstitute.com/</a></p>
<p>Why are archetypes important?  Because we think in and process information, our surroundings, the world, EVERYTHING, in terms of archetypes.  It is both a strength and a weakness&#8211;as everything is in life.  If you know how the human mind works, you can mess with it.</p>
<p>Hint:  The archetype to human cognition is like  a subroutine, or even the algorithm, is to a computer scientist.</p>
<p>And just to let you know, the analysis here is my own, not Rapaille&#8217;s or anyone else&#8217;s.  And yeah, it&#8217;s at least as good. :- ) </p>
<p>PBS did a great documentary on advertising which included this guy:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/persuaders/interviews/rapaille.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/persuaders/interviews/rapaille.html</a></p>
<p>You can see the entire episode somewhere on their website.  It&#8217;s called &#8220;The Persuaders&#8221;.  Watch it, you hopeless light-weight.</p>
<p>Note:  There was one line which I objected to in the documentary asserting that many if not most ad campaigns fail suggesting that the techniques used are not effective. BULLSHIT.  Ad campaigns fail because they are up against even more effective, better thought out ad campaigns. </p>
<p>The media and political consultants like Frank Luntz, Rove, Carville, are all neck deep into this type of stuff in one form or another.</p>
<p>P.S. If you want to understand the &#8220;liberal medi&#8221;a, go to the FBI/DOJ websites and study the shit outta the current picture and past trends of crime in America.  Then compare to crime coverage on the media.  <b>There is no connection between the two.</b>  That WILL tell you everything&#8211;about the &#8220;liberal media&#8221; <b>and about yourself</b>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jh4hill</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4113/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-555118</link>
		<dc:creator>jh4hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/11/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-555118</guid>
		<description>Obama winning is a fantasy scenario.  He has truly lost any hope of that.  He always overpolls.  Half these media outlets doing this polling have shown their bias towards him in the past.

Not a realistic argument.  Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama winning is a fantasy scenario.  He has truly lost any hope of that.  He always overpolls.  Half these media outlets doing this polling have shown their bias towards him in the past.</p>
<p>Not a realistic argument.  Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jh4hill</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4113/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-555112</link>
		<dc:creator>jh4hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/11/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-555112</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I don’t vote based on color or gender — I prefer to use such odd criteria such as credentials, character, experience, issues, etc. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Agreed.  For me, that means Hillary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I don’t vote based on color or gender — I prefer to use such odd criteria such as credentials, character, experience, issues, etc. </p></blockquote>
<p>Agreed.  For me, that means Hillary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darryl</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4113/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-553998</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/11/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-553998</guid>
		<description>yes obama is winning in that poll + or - the 10,000 callers who didn&#039;t pick up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes obama is winning in that poll + or &#8211; the 10,000 callers who didn&#8217;t pick up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: partridge</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4113/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-553658</link>
		<dc:creator>partridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/11/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-553658</guid>
		<description>Many unBlack Americans are simply hiding what they really believe, that Blacks will be unfair to all other races if they are given power. Blacks will always favor other Blacks no matter what choice maybe. What many unBlacks believe and think in regards to Obama comes back to one event: The trial of OJ Simpson. Those Black jurors saw the power they had as a majority thanks to Johnny Cochran and that idiot Marcia What&#039;shername and they did what they do. They freed a murderer because they could and the motivation was retribution for past injustices. Black people have a one track mind when it comes to retribution, they want it, all of them want it. If they are given power they will get their retribution one way or another.  Remember the shock on unBlack faces when the verdict was announced, remember the cheers from the Blacks? Do you think that lesson learned has gone away? UnBlacks are waiting to vote in November and Obama is payback time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many unBlack Americans are simply hiding what they really believe, that Blacks will be unfair to all other races if they are given power. Blacks will always favor other Blacks no matter what choice maybe. What many unBlacks believe and think in regards to Obama comes back to one event: The trial of OJ Simpson. Those Black jurors saw the power they had as a majority thanks to Johnny Cochran and that idiot Marcia What&#8217;shername and they did what they do. They freed a murderer because they could and the motivation was retribution for past injustices. Black people have a one track mind when it comes to retribution, they want it, all of them want it. If they are given power they will get their retribution one way or another.  Remember the shock on unBlack faces when the verdict was announced, remember the cheers from the Blacks? Do you think that lesson learned has gone away? UnBlacks are waiting to vote in November and Obama is payback time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thinker</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4113/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-553317</link>
		<dc:creator>Thinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/11/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-553317</guid>
		<description>I agree Phishmelt,

The African-American community does need Hillary, but so much pride is getting in the way.

So many of the Black people I know support the issues that Hillary believes in, but it&#039;s like they feel like they have to support a brotha, even if his policies will bite them in the ass. 

I think that if the mainstream media were to actually do their job, report all of the facts about Obama, many African-Americans wouldn&#039;t have a problem with having Hillary as the official nominee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Phishmelt,</p>
<p>The African-American community does need Hillary, but so much pride is getting in the way.</p>
<p>So many of the Black people I know support the issues that Hillary believes in, but it&#8217;s like they feel like they have to support a brotha, even if his policies will bite them in the ass. </p>
<p>I think that if the mainstream media were to actually do their job, report all of the facts about Obama, many African-Americans wouldn&#8217;t have a problem with having Hillary as the official nominee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thinker</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4113/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-553301</link>
		<dc:creator>Thinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/11/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-553301</guid>
		<description>They knew damned well that his sorry crackhead self wasn&#039;t Presidential material, and I IMMEDIATELY knew that he was brought in to break up the relationship that the Clintons had with African-American voters.

Now we are finding out that Brazilla is friends with Rove? This campaign reeks of corruption.

I want Hillary to pull out a win at this convention, and win in the general election.

I&#039;m not considered about her being branded a racist.

The media has thrown so much sh!t at her, SHE&#039;S the one who will eventually brush her shoulders off. She&#039;s tough. They can call her any names that they want, but in January, I want them to call her:

President Hillary Clinton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They knew damned well that his sorry crackhead self wasn&#8217;t Presidential material, and I IMMEDIATELY knew that he was brought in to break up the relationship that the Clintons had with African-American voters.</p>
<p>Now we are finding out that Brazilla is friends with Rove? This campaign reeks of corruption.</p>
<p>I want Hillary to pull out a win at this convention, and win in the general election.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not considered about her being branded a racist.</p>
<p>The media has thrown so much sh!t at her, SHE&#8217;S the one who will eventually brush her shoulders off. She&#8217;s tough. They can call her any names that they want, but in January, I want them to call her:</p>
<p>President Hillary Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thinker</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4113/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-553268</link>
		<dc:creator>Thinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/11/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-553268</guid>
		<description>When Obarnum was initially in fear of losing the Black vote, Meshelle was on t.v telling us to &quot;wake up!&quot;, then when he started getting over 90% of the Black vote, MSM told us that fact over and over and over, but some don&#039;t see that as wrong. But on the flipside, the minute Hillary says that she is getting the White working-class vote, that means that she is racist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Obarnum was initially in fear of losing the Black vote, Meshelle was on t.v telling us to &#8220;wake up!&#8221;, then when he started getting over 90% of the Black vote, MSM told us that fact over and over and over, but some don&#8217;t see that as wrong. But on the flipside, the minute Hillary says that she is getting the White working-class vote, that means that she is racist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thinker</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4113/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-553229</link>
		<dc:creator>Thinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/11/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-553229</guid>
		<description>Halle had 3 hit and runs? She covered that up quite well. Marion Barry is a joke.

I knew that Hillary had the majority of our vote, and Obama destroyed that the dirtiest way he knew how, which was to say that Bill and Hill were racists. I mean seriously, Bill Clinton a racist? He went from being considered the first African-American President to that?

If I were Bill Clinton, I would tell The Lyin King to kiss my a**! Backtrack knows he was wrong, and probably can&#039;t even look Bill in the eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Halle had 3 hit and runs? She covered that up quite well. Marion Barry is a joke.</p>
<p>I knew that Hillary had the majority of our vote, and Obama destroyed that the dirtiest way he knew how, which was to say that Bill and Hill were racists. I mean seriously, Bill Clinton a racist? He went from being considered the first African-American President to that?</p>
<p>If I were Bill Clinton, I would tell The Lyin King to kiss my a**! Backtrack knows he was wrong, and probably can&#8217;t even look Bill in the eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie Britton</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4113/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-553117</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie Britton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/11/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-553117</guid>
		<description>I have posted these same comment at least a dozen times, but I think I need to do it again. Obama can not win the general election. He will lose all of the south and the border states (M leads in MO. by 7 points), all of the normal red states and he will lose one or all of the following, Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania and, New Jersey. Rasmussen polling has it 45 to 43 % Obama and in Iowa the lead tighens to 46 to 41, Wisconsin it is down to 4 (was 11 a week ago) and Michigan is 47 to 41. All of these state polls have 12% or more undecided. There are little or no AA in these numbers and they represent the Nader, Barr and undecided. When this vote breaks very little will go to Obama and he will lose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have posted these same comment at least a dozen times, but I think I need to do it again. Obama can not win the general election. He will lose all of the south and the border states (M leads in MO. by 7 points), all of the normal red states and he will lose one or all of the following, Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania and, New Jersey. Rasmussen polling has it 45 to 43 % Obama and in Iowa the lead tighens to 46 to 41, Wisconsin it is down to 4 (was 11 a week ago) and Michigan is 47 to 41. All of these state polls have 12% or more undecided. There are little or no AA in these numbers and they represent the Nader, Barr and undecided. When this vote breaks very little will go to Obama and he will lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jh4hill</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4113/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-552869</link>
		<dc:creator>jh4hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/11/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-552869</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;These pollsters act as if voters don’t have valid complaints about Obarnum.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Yep.  That&#039;s the most important point of all.  We&#039;re not talking about &lt;em&gt;any &lt;/em&gt;candidate.  We&#039;re talking about &lt;em&gt;this&lt;/em&gt; candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>These pollsters act as if voters don’t have valid complaints about Obarnum.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yep.  That&#8217;s the most important point of all.  We&#8217;re not talking about <em>any </em>candidate.  We&#8217;re talking about <em>this</em> candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jh4hill</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4113/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-552857</link>
		<dc:creator>jh4hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/11/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-552857</guid>
		<description>I think that sums it up quite nicely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that sums it up quite nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cingnut</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4113/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-552642</link>
		<dc:creator>cingnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/11/why-won%e2%80%99t-pollsters-ask-the-right-question-on-race/#comment-552642</guid>
		<description>Why dont they ask &quot;would you vote for Hillary if she were the nominee isntead of Obama?&quot;

My wife and I have voted Republican for our entire voting lives (since the first Bush)...  we both believe we would vote for Hillary this year if she were an option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why dont they ask &#8220;would you vote for Hillary if she were the nominee isntead of Obama?&#8221;</p>
<p>My wife and I have voted Republican for our entire voting lives (since the first Bush)&#8230;  we both believe we would vote for Hillary this year if she were an option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

